Open Access
Article
Article ID: 3102
PDF
by Nataliia Kravchenko, Oksana Chaika, Oleksandr Yudenko, Oleksandr Muntian
Metaverse 2025, 6(1);   
Received: 26 November 2024; Accepted: 8 January 2025; Available online: 5 February 2025;
Issue release: 31 March 2025
Abstract

The article explores the impact of liminality in immersive games on players’ identity from two perspectives: overcoming liminal phases associated with the initiation of a character in games with a narrative-plot architecture that reflects the universal stages of the hero’s “journey”; and overcoming liminality in survival horror games, where players use the virtual world to experiment with their psyche. It introduces and substantiates the terms of mytho-liminal and mystical-liminal games, assessing their positive and negative effects based on data from semi-structured interviews with student groups, totaling 120 informants. After processing the interview data and deriving quantitative indicators, the findings were refined and justified through the lens of research on liminal states, game psychology, and psychological studies on out-of-body experiences in virtual reality. It has been found that the positive effects of mystical-liminal games include the experience of emotions unattainable in the real world, development of coping potentials, working through unconscious conflicts and psychological traumas, and strengthening the moral imperative with a clear distinction between good and evil. The negative impact of mystical liminality manifests in feelings of fear, tension, and discomfort during gameplay, feelings of helplessness and frustration in cutscenes, and cognitive stress due to disidentification with the projective identity when the player’s “positive” avatar is transformed into an immoral character. The positive effects of mytho-liminal games include: enhancement of the sense of subjectivity, awareness of an ideal to emulate, strengthening of the value component of personality, development of creativity and problem-solving skills, unleashing positive potential of latent, unrealized possibilities, development of communication skills, and liberation from social conventions. Negative effects include self-dissociation and depersonalization in both psychological and physical terms, realization of latent destructive needs and deviant behavior, and the substitution of real initiation–finding one’s “self”–with pseudo-initiation through gameplay. This research provides insights into the intersection of liminal and virtual realities, shedding light on the psychological dimension of liminality in video games and enhancing the overall understanding of the liminality role in the virtual context.

show more
Open Access
Perspective
Article ID: 3129
PDF
by Nitzan Kenig, Aina Muntaner Vives
Metaverse 2025, 6(1);   
Received: 4 December 2024; Accepted: 6 January 2025; Available online: 15 January 2025;
Issue release: 31 March 2025
Abstract

The progression of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has reshaped our understanding of intelligence, consciousness, and the human condition, challenging long-held assumptions about the mind and its relationship with machines. Starting with Alan Turing’s Imitation Game, the narrative of assessment of AI has continually evolved. This historical context underlines the importance of moving beyond mere facts to confront philosophical questions about AI’s role and limitations, especially in its capacity for consciousness and emotional resonance. In healthcare, the evolution of AI reflects a transformative cycle. Historically, medicine began as an empathic endeavor, where caregivers provided comfort amid limited knowledge. Over centuries, advancements in science elevated physicians to authoritative figures, creating a paternalistic doctor-patient dynamic. Today, with the advent of AI and technologies like the metaverse, healthcare knowledge is becoming democratized. Patients can increasingly access AI-driven diagnostics and interactions, creating a potential era of “algorithmic paternalism” where machines dominate the knowledge hierarchy. Looking to the future, as AI assumes cognitive and diagnostic responsibilities, the human aspect of medicine will gain renewed importance. Physicians will return to their foundational role as empathic caregivers, focusing on human connection and emotional support—qualities that AI, despite its advances, cannot fully replicate today. This shift completes a historical cycle, reaffirming the enduring value of humanity in medicine and positioning the physician as a central figure in the emotionally nuanced landscape of healthcare.

show more