crop cultivation; animal husbandry; 3D phenotyping; computer vision; trait measurement; optical sensors

Poutanen KS, Kårlund AO, Gómez-Gallego C, et al. Grains—A major source of sustainable protein for health. Nutrition Reviews. 2022; 80(6): 1648-1663. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab084 Godfray HCJ, Aveyard P, Garnett T, et al. Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science. 2018; 361(6399). doi: 10.1126/science.aam5324 Huang J, Yang G. Understanding recent challenges and new food policy in China. Global Food Security. 2017; 12: 119-126. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2016.10.002 Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature. 2011; 478(7369): 337-342. doi: 10.1038/nature10452 Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, et al. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011; 108(50): 20260-20264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116437108 FAO. The State of Food and Agriculture 2023. In FAO eBooks; 2023. Elijah O, Rahman TA, Orikumhi I, et al. An Overview of Internet of Things (IoT) and Data Analytics in Agriculture: Benefits and Challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 2018; 5(5): 3758-3773. doi: 10.1109/jiot.2018.2844296 Saiz-Rubio V, Rovira-Más F. From Smart Farming towards Agriculture 5.0: A Review on Crop Data Management. Agronomy. 2020; 10(2): 207. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10020207 Nie J, Wang Y, Li Y, et al. Artificial intelligence and digital twins in sustainable agriculture and forestry: a survey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2022; 46(5): 642-661. doi: 10.55730/1300-011x.3033 Karunathilake EMBM, Le AT, Heo S, et al. The Path to Smart Farming: Innovations and Opportunities in Precision Agriculture. Agriculture. 2023; 13(8): 1593. doi: 10.3390/agriculture13081593 Fanzo J, Davis C, McLaren R, et al. The effect of climate change across food systems: Implications for nutrition outcomes. Global Food Security. 2018; 18: 12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2018.06.001 Wang T, Chen B, Zhang Z, et al. Applications of machine vision in agricultural robot navigation: A review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2022; 198: 107085. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.107085 Rehman TU, Mahmud MdS, Chang YK, et al. Current and future applications of statistical machine learning algorithms for agricultural machine vision systems. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2019; 156: 585-605. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.12.006 Yu F, Wang M, Xiao J, et al. Advancements in Utilizing Image-Analysis Technology for Crop-Yield Estimation. Remote Sensing. 2024; 16(6): 1003. doi: 10.3390/rs16061003 Niu H, Landivar J, Duffield N. Classification of cotton water stress using convolutional neural networks and UAV-based RGB imagery. Advances in Modern Agriculture. 2024; 5(1). doi: 10.54517/ama.v5i1.2457 Xiao L, Ding K, Gao Y, et al. Behavior-induced health condition monitoring of caged chickens using binocular vision. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2019; 156: 254-262. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.11.022 Jin X, Zarco-Tejada PJ, Schmidhalter U, et al. High-Throughput Estimation of Crop Traits: A Review of Ground and Aerial Phenotyping Platforms. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine. 2021; 9(1): 200-231. doi: 10.1109/mgrs.2020.2998816 Verdouw C, Tekinerdogan B, Beulens A, et al. Digital twins in smart farming. Agricultural Systems. 2021; 189: 103046. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103046 Pylianidis C, Osinga S, Athanasiadis IN. Introducing digital twins to agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2021; 184: 105942. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105942 Lei L, Yang Q, Yang L, et al. Deep learning implementation of image segmentation in agricultural applications: a comprehensive review. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2024; 57(6). doi: 10.1007/s10462-024-10775-6 Zheng Y, Jiang W. Evaluation of Vision Transformers for Traffic Sign Classification. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. 2022; 2022: 1-14. doi: 10.1155/2022/3041117 Yang B, Wang X, Xing Y, et al. Modality Fusion Vision Transformer for Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data Collaborative Classification. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing. 2024; 17: 17052-17065. doi: 10.1109/jstars.2024.3415729 Tummala S, Kadry S, Bukhari SAC, et al. Classification of Brain Tumor from Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Vision Transformers Ensembling. Current Oncology. 2022; 29(10): 7498-7511. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29100590 He M, Jiang W, Gu W. TriChronoNet: Advancing electricity price prediction with Multi-module fusion. Applied Energy. 2024; 371: 123626. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123626 Lu Y, Wang W, Bai R, et al. Hyper-relational interaction modeling in multi-modal trajectory prediction for intelligent connected vehicles in smart cites. Information Fusion. 2025; 114: 102682. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102682 Han XF, Laga H, Bennamoun M. Image-Based 3D Object Reconstruction: State-of-the-Art and Trends in the Deep Learning Era. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 2021; 43(5): 1578-1604. doi: 10.1109/tpami.2019.2954885 Akhtar MS, Zafar Z, Nawaz R, et al. Unlocking plant secrets: A systematic review of 3D imaging in plant phenotyping techniques. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2024; 222: 109033. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.109033 Wang J, Xie Z, Mao P, et al. Fruit modeling and application based on 3D imaging technology: a review. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization. 2024; 18(6): 4120-4136. doi: 10.1007/s11694-024-02480-3 Ma W, Qi X, Sun Y, et al. Computer Vision-Based Measurement Techniques for Livestock Body Dimension and Weight: A Review. Agriculture. 2024; 14(2): 306. doi: 10.3390/agriculture14020306 Lee Y. Three-Dimensional Dense Reconstruction: A Review of Algorithms and Datasets. Sensors. 2024; 24(18): 5861. doi: 10.3390/s24185861 Sutherland IE. Sketchpad—a man-machine graphical communication system. Seminal graphics. 1998. Edl M, Mizerák M, Trojan J. 3D Laser Scanners: History and Applications. Acta Simulatio. 2018; 4(4): 1-5. doi: 10.22306/asim.v4i4.54 Van As H, van Duynhoven J. MRI of plants and foods. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 2013; 229: 25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2012.12.019 Ghosh T, Maity PP, Rabbi SMF, et al. Application of X-ray computed tomography in soil and plant -a review. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2023; 11. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1216630 Mildenhall B, Srinivasan PP, Tancik M, et al. NeRF. Communications of the ACM. 2021; 65(1): 99-106. doi: 10.1145/3503250 Müller T, Evans A, Schied C, et al. Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding. ACM Transactions on Graphics. 2022; 41(4): 1-15. doi: 10.1145/3528223.3530127 Kerbl B, Kopanas G, Leimkuehler T, et al. 3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics. 2023; 42(4): 1-14. doi: 10.1145/3592433 de Villiers HAC, Otten G, Chauhan A, et al. Autoencoder-based 3D representation learning for industrial seedling abnormality detection. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2023; 206: 107619. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.107619 Shi Z, Meng Z, Xing Y, Ma Y, Wattenhofer R. 3D-RETR: End-to-end single and multi-view 3d reconstruction with transformers. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2021. Paproki A, Sirault X, Berry S, et al. A novel mesh processing based technique for 3D plant analysis. BMC Plant Biology. 2012; 12(1): 63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-63 Heinemann M, Herzfeld J, Sliwinski M, et al. A metrological and application-related comparison of six consumer grade stereo depth cameras for the use in robotics. In: Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Robotic and Sensors Environments (ROSE); 2022. Xu X, Zhang L, Yang J, et al. A Review of Multi-Sensor Fusion SLAM Systems Based on 3D LIDAR. Remote Sensing. 2022; 14(12): 2835. doi: 10.3390/rs14122835 Lowe DG. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision. 2004. Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, et al. Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF). Computer Vision and Image Understanding. 2008; 110(3): 346-359. doi: 10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014 Fischler MA, Bolles RC. Random sample consensus. Communications of the ACM. 1981; 24(6): 381-395. doi: 10.1145/358669.358692 Maćkiewicz A, Ratajczak W. Principal components analysis (PCA). Computers & Geosciences; 1993. Rusinkiewicz S, Levoy M. Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling; 2001. Ester M, Kriegel HP, Sander J, Xu X. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; 1996. Qi CR, Yi L, Su H, Guibas LJ. PointNet++: deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2017. Hanocka R, Hertz A, Fish N, et al. MeshCNN. ACM Transactions on Graphics. 2019; 38(4): 1-12. doi: 10.1145/3306346.3322959 Liu Z, Tang H, Lin Y, Han S. Point-voxel CNN for efficient 3D deep learning. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2019. Wu X, Jiang L, Wang PS, et al. Point Transformer V3: Simpler, Faster, Stronger. In: Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR); 2024. Cao J, Tagliasacchi A, Olson M, et al. Point Cloud Skeletons via Laplacian Based Contraction. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Shape Modeling International Conference; 2010. Huang H, Wu S, Cohen-Or D, et al. L 1 -medial skeleton of point cloud. ACM Transactions on Graphics. 2013; 32(4): 1-8. doi: 10.1145/2461912.2461913 Guo Y, Wang H, Hu Q, et al. Deep Learning for 3D Point Clouds: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 2021; 43(12): 4338-4364. doi: 10.1109/tpami.2020.3005434 Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H. Universal approximation of an unknown mapping and its derivatives using multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Networks; 1990. Park JJ, Florence P, Straub J, et al. DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representation. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR); 2019. Wang P, Liu L, Liu Y, et al. NeuS: Learning Neural Implicit Surfaces by Volume Rendering for Multi-view Reconstruction. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems; 2021. Xiao S, Fei S, Li Q, et al. The Importance of Using Realistic 3D Canopy Models to Calculate Light Interception in the Field. Plant Phenomics. 2023; 5. doi: 10.34133/plantphenomics.0082 Chaudhury A, Godin C. Skeletonization of Plant Point Cloud Data Using Stochastic Optimization Framework. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020; 11. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00773 Li W, Wu S, Wen W, et al. Using high-throughput phenotype platform MVS-Pheno to reconstruct the 3D morphological structure of wheat. AoB PLANTS. 2024; 16(2). doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plae019 Fernandez R, Le Cunff L, Mérigeaud S, et al. End-to-end multimodal 3D imaging and machine learning workflow for non-destructive phenotyping of grapevine trunk internal structure. Scientific Reports. 2024; 14(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55186-3 Zhu W, Sun Z, Peng J, et al. Estimating Maize Above-Ground Biomass Using 3D Point Clouds of Multi-Source Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Data at Multi-Spatial Scales. Remote Sensing. 2019; 11(22): 2678. doi: 10.3390/rs11222678 Liu H, Xin C, Lai M, et al. RepC-MVSNet: A Reparameterized Self-Supervised 3D Reconstruction Algorithm for Wheat 3D Reconstruction. Agronomy. 2023; 13(8): 1975. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13081975 Wu S, Wen W, Xiao B, et al. An Accurate Skeleton Extraction Approach From 3D Point Clouds of Maize Plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019; 10. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00248 Arshad MA, Jubery T, Afful J, et al. Evaluating Neural Radiance Fields for 3D Plant Geometry Reconstruction in Field Conditions. Plant Phenomics. 2024; 6. doi: 10.34133/plantphenomics.0235 Mccormick RF, Truong SK, Mullet JE. 3D sorghum reconstructions from depth images identify QTL regulating shoot architecture. Plant Physiology; 2016. Gong L, Du X, Zhu K, et al. Panicle-3D: Efficient Phenotyping Tool for Precise Semantic Segmentation of Rice Panicle Point Cloud. Plant Phenomics. 2021; 2021. doi: 10.34133/2021/9838929 Wu D, Yu L, Ye J, et al. Panicle-3D: A low-cost 3D-modeling method for rice panicles based on deep learning, shape from silhouette, and supervoxel clustering. The Crop Journal. 2022; 10(5): 1386-1398. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2022.02.007 Chang A, Jung J, Yeom J, et al. 3D Characterization of Sorghum Panicles Using a 3D Point Cloud Derived from UAV Imagery. Remote Sensing. 2021; 13(2): 282. doi: 10.3390/rs13020282 Li Y, Wen W, Miao T, et al. Automatic organ-level point cloud segmentation of maize shoots by integrating high-throughput data acquisition and deep learning. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2022; 193: 106702. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.106702 Su Y, Wu F, Ao Z, et al. Evaluating maize phenotype dynamics under drought stress using terrestrial lidar. Plant Methods. 2019; 15(1). doi: 10.1186/s13007-019-0396-x Qiu R, Miao Y, Zhang M, et al. Detection of the 3D temperature characteristics of maize under water stress using thermal and RGB-D cameras. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2021; 191: 106551. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106551 Gilliot JM, Michelin J, Hadjard D, et al. An accurate method for predicting spatial variability of maize yield from UAV-based plant height estimation: a tool for monitoring agronomic field experiments. Precision Agriculture. 2020; 22(3): 897-921. doi: 10.1007/s11119-020-09764-w Okamoto T, Kimura A, Shimono H, et al. 3D reconstruction of rice plant community using spectral images with a goal of making rice breeding efficient. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Advanced Imaging Technology (IWAIT) 2023; 2023. Gu Y, Wang Y, Wu Y, et al. Novel 3D photosynthetic traits derived from the fusion of UAV LiDAR point cloud and multispectral imagery in wheat. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2024; 311: 114244. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2024.114244 Sun Z, Li Q, Jin S, et al. Simultaneous Prediction of Wheat Yield and Grain Protein Content Using Multitask Deep Learning from Time-Series Proximal Sensing. Plant Phenomics. 2022; 2022. doi: 10.34133/2022/9757948 Kurdyś-Kujawska A, Strzelecka A, Zawadzka D. The Impact of Crop Diversification on the Economic Efficiency of Small Farms in Poland. Agriculture. 2021; 11(3): 250. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11030250 Marks E, Magistri F, Stachniss C. Precise 3D Reconstruction of Plants from UAV Imagery Combining Bundle Adjustment and Template Matching. In: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2022. Zhang J, Wang X, Ni X, et al. Neural radiance fields for multi-scale constraint-free 3D reconstruction and rendering in orchard scenes. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2024; 217: 108629. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.108629 Smitt C, Halstead M, Zimmer P, et al. PAg-NeRF: Towards Fast and Efficient End-to-End Panoptic 3D Representations for Agricultural Robotics. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 2024; 9(1): 907-914. doi: 10.1109/lra.2023.3338515 Kelly S, Riccardi A, Marks E, et al. Target-Aware Implicit Mapping for Agricultural Crop Inspection. In: Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2023. Xie P, Ma Z, Du R, et al. An unmanned ground vehicle phenotyping-based method to generate three-dimensional multispectral point clouds for deciphering spatial heterogeneity in plant traits. Molecular Plant. 2024; 17(10): 1624-1638. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2024.09.004 Xu Y, Hu C, Xie Y. An improved space colonization algorithm with DBSCAN clustering for a single tree skeleton extraction. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2022; 43(10): 3692-3713. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2022.2102950 Kim CH, Kantor G. Occlusion Reasoning for Skeleton Extraction of Self-Occluded Tree Canopies. In: Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2023. Chebrolu N, Labe T, Stachniss C. Spatio-Temporal Non-Rigid Registration of 3D Point Clouds of Plants. In: Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2020. Sun S, Li C, Chee PW, et al. High resolution 3D terrestrial LiDAR for cotton plant main stalk and node detection. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2021; 187: 106276. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106276 Ma B, Du J, Wang L, et al. Automatic branch detection of jujube trees based on 3D reconstruction for dormant pruning using the deep learning-based method. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2021; 190: 106484. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106484 Du R, Ma Z, Xie P, et al. PST: Plant segmentation transformer for 3D point clouds of rapeseed plants at the podding stage. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 2023; 195: 380-392. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.11.022 Tsoulias N, Paraforos DS, Xanthopoulos G, et al. Apple Shape Detection Based on Geometric and Radiometric Features Using a LiDAR Laser Scanner. Remote Sensing. 2020; 12(15): 2481. doi: 10.3390/rs12152481 Yuan Q, Wang P, Luo W, et al. Simultaneous Localization and Mapping System for Agricultural Yield Estimation Based on Improved VINS-RGBD: A Case Study of a Strawberry Field. Agriculture. 2024; 14(5): 784. doi: 10.3390/agriculture14050784 Xiao S, Fei S, Ye Y, et al. 3D reconstruction and characterization of cotton bolls in situ based on UAV technology. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 2024; 209: 101-116. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.01.027 Saeed F, Sun J, Ozias-Akins P, et al. PeanutNeRF: 3D Radiance Field for Peanuts. In: Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW); 2023. Moualeu-Ngangué D, Bötzl M, Stützel H. First Form, Then Function: 3D Reconstruction of Cucumber Plants (Cucumis sativus L.) Allows Early Detection of Stress Effects through Leaf Dimensions. Remote Sensing. 2022; 14(5): 1094. doi: 10.3390/rs14051094 Hao H, Wu S, Li Y, et al. Automatic acquisition, analysis and wilting measurement of cotton 3D phenotype based on point cloud. Biosystems Engineering. 2024; 239: 173-189. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2024.02.010 Feng L, Chen S, Wu B, et al. Detection of oilseed rape clubroot based on low-field nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2024; 218: 108687. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.108687 Wang Y, Mücher S, Wang W, et al. A review of three-dimensional computer vision used in precision livestock farming for cattle growth management. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2023; 206: 107687. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.107687 Zhou H, Li Q, Xie Q. Individual Pig Identification Using Back Surface Point Clouds in 3D Vision. Sensors. 2023; 23(11): 5156. doi: 10.3390/s23115156 Lei K, Tang X, Li X, et al. Research and Preliminary Evaluation of Key Technologies for 3D Reconstruction of Pig Bodies Based on 3D Point Clouds. Agriculture. 2024; 14(6): 793. doi: 10.3390/agriculture14060793 Hao H, Jincheng Y, Ling Y, et al. An improved PointNet++ point cloud segmentation model applied to automatic measurement method of pig body size. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2023; 205: 107560. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.107560 Le Cozler Y, Allain C, Caillot A, et al. High-precision scanning system for complete 3D cow body shape imaging and analysis of morphological traits. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2019; 157: 447-453. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.01.019 Pezzuolo A, Guarino M, Sartori L, et al. A Feasibility Study on the Use of a Structured Light Depth-Camera for Three-Dimensional Body Measurements of Dairy Cows in Free-Stall Barns. Sensors. 2018; 18(2): 673. doi: 10.3390/s18020673 Tun SC, Onizuka T, Tin P, et al. Revolutionizing Cow Welfare Monitoring: A Novel Top-View Perspective with Depth Camera-Based Lameness Classification. Journal of Imaging. 2024; 10(3): 67. doi: 10.3390/jimaging10030067 Zhang X, Zhang Y, Geng J, et al. Feather Damage Monitoring System Using RGB-Depth-Thermal Model for Chickens. Animals. 2022; 13(1): 126. doi: 10.3390/ani13010126 Veinidis C, Arnaoutoglou F, Syvridis D. 3D Reconstruction of Fishes Using Coded Structured Light. Journal of Imaging. 2023; 9(9): 189. doi: 10.3390/jimaging9090189 Feng G, Pan B, Chen M. Non-Contact Tilapia Mass Estimation Method Based on Underwater Binocular Vision. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(10): 4009. doi: 10.3390/app14104009 Audira G, Sampurna B, Juniardi S, et al. A Simple Setup to Perform 3D Locomotion Tracking in Zebrafish by Using a Single Camera. Inventions. 2018; 3(1): 11. doi: 10.3390/inventions3010011 Yin J, Zhu D, Shi M, et al. MoFiM: A morphable fish modeling method for underwater binocular vision system. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds. 2022; 33(5). doi: 10.1002/cav.2104 Wu R, Deussen O, Li L. DeepShapeKit: accurate 4D shape reconstruction of swimming fish. In: Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2022. Muñoz-Benavent P, Andreu-García G, Valiente-González JM, et al. Enhanced fish bending model for automatic tuna sizing using computer vision. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2018; 150: 52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.04.005 Deng Y, Tan H, Zhou D, et al. An automatic body length estimating method for Micropterus salmoides using local water surface stereo vision. Biosystems Engineering. 2023; 235: 166-179. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2023.09.013 Huang K, Li Y, Suo F, et al. Stereo Vison and Mask-RCNN Segmentation Based 3D Points Cloud Matching for Fish Dimension Measurement. In: Proceedings of the 2020 39th Chinese Control Conference (CCC); 2020. Gao T, Xiong Z, Li Z, et al. Precise underwater fish measurement: A geometric approach leveraging medium regression. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2024; 221: 108932. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.108932 Shi C, Zhao R, Liu C, et al. Underwater fish mass estimation using pattern matching based on binocular system. Aquacultural Engineering. 2022; 99: 102285. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2022.102285 Nygård TA, Jahren JH, Schellewald C, et al. Motion trajectory estimation of salmon using stereo vision. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2022; 55(31): 363-368. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.455 Aya S, Stian J, Morten B, Mats M, Eleni K. StereoYolo + DeepSORT: A framework to track fish from underwater stereo camera in situ. In Proc.SPIE; 2024. Atienza-Vanacloig V, Andreu-García G, López-García F, et al. Vision-based discrimination of tuna individuals in grow-out cages through a fish bending model. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2016; 130: 142-150. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2016.10.009 Pérez-Escudero A, Vicente-Page J, Hinz RC, et al. idTracker: tracking individuals in a group by automatic identification of unmarked animals. Nature Methods. 2014; 11(7): 743-748. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2994 Wang Y, Chen Y. Fruit Morphological Measurement Based on Three-Dimensional Reconstruction. Agronomy. 2020; 10(4): 455. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10040455 Zheng HY, Li Y, Wang N, et al. A novel framework for three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography reconstruction of maize ear via feature reconfiguration and residual networks. PeerJ Computer Science. 2024; 10: e1944. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1944 Li G, Li H, Li X, et al. Establishment and Calibration of Discrete Element Model for Buckwheat Seed Based on Static and Dynamic Verification Test. Agriculture. 2023; 13(5): 1024. doi: 10.3390/agriculture13051024 Xie W, Wei S, Yang D. Morphological measurement for carrot based on three-dimensional reconstruction with a ToF sensor. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 2023; 197: 112216. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.112216 Ma H, Zhu X, et al. Rapid estimation of apple phenotypic parameters based on 3D reconstruction. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. 2021; 14(5): 180-188. doi: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20211405.6258 Yu S, Yan X, Jia T, et al. Binocular structured light-based 3D reconstruction for morphological measurements of apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 2024; 213: 112952. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2024.112952 Gao Y, Wang Q, Rao X, et al. OrangeStereo: A navel orange stereo matching network for 3D surface reconstruction. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2024; 217: 108626. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.108626 Huang T, Bian Y, Niu Z, et al. Fast neural distance field-based three-dimensional reconstruction method for geometrical parameter extraction of walnut shell from multiview images. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2024; 224: 109189. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.109189 Mollazade K, Lucht J van der, Jörissen S, et al. 3D laser imaging for measuring volumetric shrinkage of horticultural products during drying process. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2023; 207: 107749. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.107749 Ni X, Li C, Jiang H, et al. Three-dimensional photogrammetry with deep learning instance segmentation to extract berry fruit harvestability traits. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 2021; 171: 297-309. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.11.010 Bernard A, Hamdy S, Le Corre L, et al. 3D characterization of walnut morphological traits using X-ray computed tomography. Plant Methods. 2020; 16(1). doi: 10.1186/s13007-020-00657-7 Zhang Y, Hui Y, Zhou Y, et al. Characterization and Detection Classification of Moldy Corn Kernels Based on X-CT and Deep Learning. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(5): 2166. doi: 10.3390/app14052166 Zhao H, Wang J, Liao S, et al. Study on the micro-phenotype of different types of maize kernels based on Micro-CT. Smart Agriculture; 2021. Yan H. 3D Scanner-Based Corn Seed Modeling. Applied Engineering in Agriculture; 2016. Mi G, Liu Y, Wang T, et al. Measurement of Physical Properties of Sorghum Seeds and Calibration of Discrete Element Modeling Parameters. Agriculture. 2022; 12(5): 681. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12050681 Huang H, Tian G, Chen C. Evaluating the Point Cloud of Individual Trees Generated from Images Based on Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) Method. Remote Sensing. 2024; 16(6): 967. doi: 10.3390/rs16060967