Performance of Cambodia’s made vegetable transplanter for two-wheel tractors under tillage conditions

Lyhour Hin, Lytour Lor, Sokleng Mang, Sokunthea San, Buntheang Oem, Sopheabunnarith Thy, Sokong Houth, Rei Loeurn, Sreytoch Sinh, Manuel R. Reyes

Article ID: 2839
Vol 5, Issue 3, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ama.v5i3.2839
VIEWS - 2525 (Abstract)

Download PDF

Abstract

In Cambodia, vegetable crops are planted by hand, making it hard to meet local market demands. However, this production can be boosted by using a mechanical transplanter with two-wheel tractors to cut input costs, when introduced to farmers, while production and productivity can be accelerated. Thus, this research aimed to (1) evaluate the working performance of a locally made vegetable transplanter against manual planting and (2) compare plant survival rates. The study included fabrication, testing, modification, and experiments with farmers, starting from January 2023 to July 2024. The transplanter was fabricated, tested, and improved by the Royal University of Agriculture. Then, two experiments were carried out with a vegetable farming community in Tram Kak District, Takeo Province, Cambodia. Tomato was selected for the testing, choosing seedlings aged four weeks. The randomized complete block design (RCBD) was applied for both experiments with two treatments, manual planting and transplanter use, replicated four times. The results show that the working performance of the transplanter was six times faster than manual planting. Its speed, total field capacity, and planting rate were 1.03 km/h, 0.052 ha/h, and 27 plants/min, respectively, but missed planting was about 4%. Within-row spacing was similar (0.58 m), while using the transplanter made the plants incline at a steeper angle (63°), but could save 81.9% of time, when compared to manual planting. Both treatments had 100% plant survival rates evaluated one week after the transplanting. In short, using the transplanter can save both time and labor, but further assessment should be made with more kinds of fruit vegetable based on different seedling ages, so that the specifications can be confirmed, which is good for actual adoption for farmers.


Keywords

cutting disk; plant survival rate; total field capacity; plant angle; working speed


References

1. Asian Development Bank. Cambodia Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Rural Development Sector Road Map. Available online: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/718806/cambodia-agriculture-rural-development-road-map.pdf (accessed on 12 May 2024).

2. Ministry of Industry, Science, Technology & Innovation. Strategic Framework and Programs for Science, Technology and Innovation 2030. Available online: https://misti.gov.kh/public/file/202206301656578708.pdf (accessed on 13 May 2024).

3. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries. Annual MAFF Report 2021 and Direction in 2022. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries; 2022.

4. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries. Annual MAFF Report 2023 and Direction in 2024. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries; 2024.

5. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Simple solutions: Ergonomics for farm workers. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2001.

6. OECD. OECD Health Statistics 2020: Definitions, Sources and Methods: Consumption of Vegetables and Fruits, Daily Survey Data. Available online: http://stats.oecd.org/wbos/fileview2.aspx?IDFile=5b61fb4c-1d39-42ef-93c2-b126609edd23 (accessed on 13 May 2024).

7. Lyhour H, Borarin B, Manuel RR, et al. Performance of a No-Till Vegetable Transplanter for Transplanting Thai Round Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) in Conservation Agriculture. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering B. 2020; 9(6). doi: 10.17265/2162-5263/2020.06.002

8. Ritchie H, Rosado P, Roser M. Vegetable consumption per capita. Our World in Data. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/vegetable-consumption-per-capita (accessed on 19 May 2024).

9. AVRDC—The World Vegetable Center. Strengthening Capacities in Cambodia to Increase Off-Season Vegetable Production. Available online: https://avrdc.org/strengthening-capacities-in-cambodia-to-increase-off-season-vegetable-production/ (accessed on 19 June 2024).

10. College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Davis. Agricultural Innovations Help Cambodian Farmers Thrive. Available online: https://caes.ucdavis.edu/news/agricultural-innovations-help-cambodian-farmers-thrive (accessed on 15 June 2024).

11. Du X, Ma G, Mao H. Development of simplified seedling transplanting device for supporting efficient production of vegetable raw materials. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(18): 10022. doi: 10.3390/app131810022

12. Michalska-Klimczak B, Wyszyński Z, Pačuta V, et al. Within-field variability of plant and canopy traits of sugar beet and their relation to individual root mass during harvest. Plant, Soil and Environment. 2020; 66(9): 437-445. doi: 10.17221/325/2020-pse

13. Kumar GVP, Raheman H. Development of a walk-behind type hand tractor powered vegetable transplanter for paper pot seedlings. Biosystems Engineering. 2011; 110(2): 189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.08.001

14. Dihingia PC, Kumar GVP, Sarma PK, et al. Hand-Fed Vegetable Transplanter for Use with a Walk-Behind-Type Hand Tractor. International Journal of Vegetable Science. 2017; 24(3): 254-273. doi: 10.1080/19315260.2017.1413477

15. Bhambota S, Dixit AK, Manes GS, et al. Field evaluation of a semi-automatic vegetable transplanter for major vegetable crops. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2018; 88(11): 1755-1752. doi: 10.56093/ijas.v88i11.84922

16. Javidan SM, Mohammadzamani D. Design, construction and evaluation of semi-automatic vegetable transplanter with conical distributor cup. SN Applied Sciences. 2019; 1(9). doi: 10.1007/s42452-019-1034-y

17. Durga ML, Rao AS, Kumar AA. Performance Evaluation of Single Row-Low Horse Power Tractor Operated Vegetable Transplanter. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 2020; 37-44. doi: 10.9734/cjast/2020/v39i4431149

18. Abhijit Khadatkar SM, Mathur BB, Gaikwad A, et al. Shrinivas. Biometric Properties of Plug Vegetable Seedlings Relevant to the Design of Vegetable Transplanter. Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India). 2020; 57(1): 16-24. doi: 10.52151/jae2020571.1700

19. Ray A, Moses SC. Design and Development of Automatic Universal Chain Type Vegetable Transplanter. Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2024; 10(2): 311-319. doi: 10.9734/ajsspn/2024/v10i2288

20. Narang MK, Dhaliwal IS, Manes GS. Development and Evaluation of a Two-Row Revolving Magazine Type Vegetable Transplanter. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 2011; 48(3).

21. Saruth C, Lytour L, Sinh C. Status and Prospect of Agricultural Mechanization in Cambodia. Director Vice Dean Deputy Chief of Office, ESCAP-CSAM. 2014.

22. National Institute of Statistics. Cambodia Agriculture Survey 2021 Report 2: Crop Production. Ministry of Planning. 2023.

23. Kornecki TS, Kichler CM. Transplanter for Walk behind tractors. U.S. Patent 10,004,174 B2, 29 September 2016.

24. Hancock JN, Swetnam LD, Benson FJ. Calculating farm machinery field capacities. Agricultural Engineering Extension Publ., University of Kentucky. 1991.

25. Edwards W. Farm machinery selection. Iowa State University Extension and Outreach. Available online: https://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/crops/html/a3-28.html (accessed on 10 June 2024).

26. Amare G, Gebremedhin H. Effect of Plant Spacing on Yield and Yield Components of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in Shewarobit, Central Ethiopia. Scientifica. 2020; 2020: 1-6. doi: 10.1155/2020/8357237

27. Wang Y, He Z, Wang J, et al. Experiment on transplanting performance of automatic vegetable pot seedling transplanter for dry land. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. 2018; 34(3):19-25. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2018.03.003.

28. Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency. Part 158 Nontarget Plant Protection Data Requirements: Guidance for Calculating Percent Survival in Seedling Emergence Studies. Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency. 2018.

29. FAO. Testing and evaluation of agricultural machinery and equipment: Principles and practices. Rome, Italy: United Nations FAO; 1994.

30. Kassambara A. Rstatix: Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests. CRAN: Contributed Packages. 2019. doi: 10.32614/cran.package.rstatix

31. Wickham H. Ggplot2. Springer International Publishing; 2016.

32. Sharma A, Khar S. Conceptualization and development of a semi-automatic vegetable transplanter prototype for small landholdings. Heliyon. 2024; 10(11): e31540. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31540

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Lyhour Hin, Lytour Lor, Sokleng Mang, Sokunthea San, Buntheang Oem, Sopheabunnarith Thy, Sokong Houth, Rei Loeurn, Sreytoch Sinh, Manuel R. Reyes

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).