Current status, performance characteristics and future perspective of electric tractor

Danish Gul, Rizwan Ul Zama Banday, Mohd. Muzamil

Article ID: 3078
Vol 5, Issue 4, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ama3078
Received: 18 November 2024; Accepted: 13 December 2024; Available online: 23 December 2024;
Issue release: 30 December 2024

VIEWS - 227 (Abstract) 66 (PDF)

Download PDF

Abstract

Electric tractors with its cutting-edge technological improvements represent a transformative shift in agricultural technology for achieving the broad objectives of sustainable and environment friendly farming practices. This review examines the current status, performance characteristics, and future perspectives of electric tractors, focusing on their potential to replace traditional diesel models. The analysis highlights the advantages of electric tractors, including lower operational costs, reduced maintenance, and zero emissions, which contribute to quieter and cleaner agricultural operations. This transformation is witnessing several challenges in terms of high initial costs, limited battery life and the need for extensive charging infrastructure. The performance of electric tractors, particularly in extreme climates, is also a significant concern, with battery efficiency and power output varying under different environmental conditions. Despite these challenges, advancements in battery technology and propulsion systems, along with supportive government policies, are paving the way for greater adoption of electric tractors. The review also discusses the variability in regional adoption rates, with Europe leading due to strong regulatory support, while other regions like North America and Asia-Pacific are witnessing sluggish growth. The integration of electric tractors into precision agriculture and smart farming systems presents exciting opportunities for the future, boosting both productivity and sustainability. The investment in innovations and infrastructure related to electric tractor and renewed supportive policies from the governmental sector can usher a revolution in agricultural production system with lower environmental impact.


Keywords

electric tractors; farming; policies; battery; propulsion; productivity

Full Text

1. Introduction The prime mover serves as the foundation to propel and power the agricultural machinery for agricultural development [1]. Conventionally, the internal combustion engine, both petrol and diesel engine are used in tractors and power tillers to operate the agricultural machinery at field conditions. Tractors have revolutionized agriculture since their inception, fundamentally transforming farming practices and boosting productivity. The tractor is a slow-moving high torque generating self-propelled vehicle with an ability to propel and power the agricultural machinery. The tractor has revolutionized the agricultural production system with its involvement in seed bed preparation (tillage), sowing, weeding, spraying, harvesting and threshing, Figure 1. Originally conceived to replace animal labour, modern tractors represent the pinnacle of agricultural mechanization, incorporating advanced technologies to enhance efficiency and capabilities across various farming operations. The evolution of the tractor dates back to the late 19th and early 20th centuries when pioneers like John Froelich and Benjamin Holt laid the groundwork for the contemporary agricultural tractor [2]. Froelich’s 1892 gasoline-powered tractor was among the first to replace horses and steam engines, setting the stage for future developments. Holt’s development of the caterpillar track in 1904 revolutionized tractor design by improving traction and stability on uneven terrain [3]. Figure 1. Applications of tractor in agricultural production system. However, the fossil fuel powered tractor results in excessive consumption of diesel fuel, release of pollutants and low efficiency. Several attempts were made to shift from fossil fuel powered tractors to semi-autonomous robots for specific tasks to autonomous unmanned ground vehicles (UGV) for agricultural system. These vehicles utilize fuel cells (which act as energy sources similar to batteries, such as lithium-ion cells) or electric motors (which convert electrical energy into mechanical energy to drive the power train). These technologies are at various stages of development across the globe. The transition from traditional diesel tractors to electric tractors represents a significant shift in agricultural machinery technology [4]. This comparison examines the key aspects of power, efficiency, and performance between electric and diesel tractors, highlighting their respective strengths and limitations. The comparative analysis between diesel tractor and electric tractor highlights the need for the shift for sustainability, Table 1. Modern tractors are sophisticated machines that integrate various technologies to enhance performance and functionality. Advanced features such as GPS navigation, automated steering systems, and precision agriculture tools have become commonplace. These technologies allow for precise field mapping, optimized planting, and efficient resource management [4]. GPS technology, for instance, enables farmers to achieve high levels of accuracy in planting and fertilization, leading to significant improvements in crop yields. Tractors have had a profound economic impact on agriculture by greatly boosting productivity and efficiency. They have significantly reduced the time and labour needed for various farming tasks. The adoption of modern tractors increased the crop yield by 20% and resulted in labour requirement by 30% [5]. Tractors have also enabled the cultivation of larger areas of land, contributing to the expansion of commercial farming and agribusinesses [6]. However, over the last years, the thrust on the environment and arrival of global climate change has forced to search alternate sources to power agricultural tractor [7,8]. It has been observed that internal combustion (IC) engine powered tractors and power tillers possess low efficiency and are responsible for release of toxic gases and emissions. All the factors have converged to a single point i.e., utilizing electric motors in place of petrol/diesel engines to reduce pollution and increase the efficiency of operations. However, advancements in tractor technology with hybrid models have shown the potential to mitigate these impacts [9]. These innovations aim to reduce emissions and promote sustainable farming practices, aligning with global efforts to combat climate change [10]. The experts believe that the replacement of the IC engine with electric motor necessitates to develop innovative transmission system to fulfil the requirements of agricultural production system. Dhand and Pullen [11] suggested a hybrid system incorporating internal combustion engine and electric motor to power the system. Wang et al. [12] propounded a concept of planetary gear system as the power coupling device and internal combustion engine/electric motor as power source as the viable alternative. Table 1. Comparison of electric tractor with traditional diesel tractors. Feature Electric Tractors Diesel Tractors Initial Purchase Cost Higher Lower Fuel Cost Lower Higher Maintenance Cost Lower (less moving parts) Higher (engine, oil, filters, etc.) Operational Lifespan Comparable but depends on battery Comparable Charging/Refueling Time Longer (up to several hours) Quick (5–15 minutes) Environmental Impact Low (zero emissions on-site) High (emissions, air pollution) Power Output Can be limited by battery capacity Higher, sustained for longer durations Availability Limited, emerging market Widely available Infrastructure Needs Charging stations Fuel stations readily available Noise Level Lower Higher 2. Agricultural tractor The arrival of electric tractors in agriculture machinery industry presents an opportunity to shift towards sustainable and environment friendly solution [13]. The provision of sustainable power source is imperative for long term adoption of the technology. The electric tractors are usually powered by battery configured electric motors. The combination of fuel cell and electric motor can ensure the shift towards electrification and automation of agricultural machinery. The electric motors can be mechanical shunt with single motor and electric shunt with dual motor [14]. Fuel cells convert the chemical energy directly into electrical energy with attributes of maintaining low operating temperature at high power density without the release of gases harmful for environment [15]. The involvement of fuel cells can help to achieve long cherished dream of deviation from the release of particulates and pollutants from fossil fuel-based tractors. 3. Current trends, challenges and opportunities The electric tractor market has experienced notable growth, driven by advancements in battery technology and rising environmental awareness. Companies are making substantial investments in research and development to improve battery life, charging infrastructure and overall tractor performance, Figure 2. The integration of electric drivetrains with advanced precision farming technologies is a notable trend, enabling greater efficiency and accuracy in farming operations [16]. Figure 2. Advantages of electric tractors. The governments around the world are enacting policies and offering incentives to encourage the adoption of electric tractors. These measures include subsidies, tax breaks, and grants designed to lower the initial cost of electric tractors [17]. The stringent environmental regulations and carbon reduction targets are pushing farmers and manufacturers towards cleaner and electric alternatives [18]. The electric tractor market is becoming increasingly competitive, with both established agricultural machinery companies and new startups entering the field. This competition is driving innovation and bringing more options to the market [19]. Major players are focusing on improving the efficiency and affordability of electric tractors to capture a larger share of growing market. One of the main challenges for the electric tractor market is the high initial cost of electric tractors compared to traditional diesel models. Although battery prices are decreasing, the overall cost of electric tractors remains a substantial barrier for many farmers, particularly in developing regions [20]. The economic feasibility of switching to electric tractors is a key concern that needs to be addressed through continued innovation and cost reduction. Current battery technologies pose limitations in terms of energy density, charging time, and lifespan. Although advancements are being made, the performance of electric tractors can still be affected by battery constraints, such as limited operational hours and long charging times [21]. These issues can impact the efficiency and attractiveness of electric tractors for practical farming applications. The establishment of sufficient charging infrastructure is essential for the widespread adoption of electric tractors. In rural areas, where many farms are situated, the scarcity of charging stations can impede the use of electric tractors [22]. Investment in infrastructure is important to support the growth of the electric tractor market. There is significant potential for innovation in the electric tractor market, particularly in integrating new technologies such as autonomous driving and advanced data analytics, Figure 3 [23]. These technologies can enhance the efficiency and productivity of electric tractors, making them more appealing to farmers. Electric tractors offer substantial environmental benefits, including reduced greenhouse gas emissions and lower noise pollution compared to diesel tractors [24]. As sustainability becomes increasingly important in agricultural practices, electric tractors present a valuable opportunity for farmers to reduce their environmental footprint. Emerging markets, particularly in developing countries, represent a significant opportunity for growth in the electric tractor market. As these regions adopt more sustainable practices and invest in renewable energy infrastructure, the demand for electric tractors is likely to increase [25]. Tailoring electric tractor solutions to the needs of these markets can unlock new growth opportunities. Figure 3. Technological improvements in transmission system of tractor. 4. Technological advancements in electric tractors Electric propulsion systems represent a significant technological advancement in various transportation sectors, including agriculture, automotive, and aerospace. Unlike traditional internal combustion engines, which rely on fossil fuels, electric propulsion systems use electric motors powered by batteries or other energy storage devices, Figure 4. This transition brings several advantages, such as decreased emissions, reduced operating expenses, and enhanced efficiency. The main component of the electric propulsion systems is motor. They convert electrical energy into mechanical energy to drive the vehicle or machinery. The electric motor can be AC induction motor (robust and simple), permanent synchronous motors (high efficiency and torque density) and brushless DC motors (high efficiency and low maintenance). The electric energy is stored in batteries, either lithium-ion or solid-state batteries. Lithium-ion battery is widely used due to its high energy density, long cycle life, and relatively low self-discharge rates [26]. The solid-state battery is emerging as a promising alternative with higher energy densities and safety in comparison to traditional lithium-ion batteries. The flow of electrical energy between the battery and motor is controlled by power electronics. It can be either an invertor or convertors. The operation of the electric motor and optimization is controlled by control systems. It can be electric control unit with embedded systems that handle various functions such as motor control, energy management, and diagnostics. In battery management system, the monitoring of battery health, state of charge and health is maintained for efficient operation [21]. The electric propulsion system can ensure benefits in terms of protection of environment, higher operational efficiency and lower noise, Table 2. Figure 4. Power system configuration of electric tractor. Table 2. Characteristics of electric propulsion systems in electric tractor. Advantage Description Details/Impacts References Environmental Benefits No tailpipe emissions, contributing to reduced air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Essential for combating climate change and improving air quality [27] Operational Efficiency Higher energy conversion efficiency and lower energy consumption compared to internal combustion engines. Results in lower operational costs and reduced maintenance due to fewer moving parts [26] Reduced Noise Pollution Electric motors operate more quietly than traditional engines. Decreases noise pollution, making them ideal for urban and residential applications [28] A number of researchers have highlighted the major limitations and challenges of electric propulsion system. The challenges can be summarized to present a clear picture of the bottlenecks in improving the efficiency of electric tractor and adoption rate among the stakeholders, Table 3. Table 3. Challenges of electric propulsion systems. Challenge Description Details/Impacts References Battery Limitations Limited energy density, high cost, and long charging times. Current lithium-ion batteries are expensive and offer less energy density compared to fossil fuels. Solid-state batteries show promise but are not widely available and remain costly. [29] Charging Infrastructure Inadequate availability of charging stations, especially in rural areas. The lack of sufficient charging infrastructure can restrict the practicality and widespread use of electric propulsion systems in remote or less developed regions. [30] High Initial Costs Higher initial investment than traditional engines. Includes expenses related to batteries, electric motors, and power electronics. While long-term operational costs may be lower, high upfront costs can hinder adoption [20] 5. Future trends in technological advancements Future advancements in battery technology, including improvements in energy density, charging speed, and cost reduction, are anticipated to boost the viability and adoption of electric propulsion systems [26]. Integrating these systems with renewable energy sources, such as solar or wind power, can further minimize environmental impact and promote sustainability. The expansion of charging infrastructure and progress in rapid charging technologies will support the growth of electric propulsion systems by addressing current challenges in charging convenience [30]. Traditional diesel tractors have been preferred for their strong power output and capability to manage heavy-duty tasks. Diesel engines are recognized for their high torque and reliable power delivery, which are crucial for intensive agricultural activities like ploughing, tilling, and hauling [26]. Diesel engines typically offer higher horsepower ratings compared to electric tractors, which allows them to perform strenuous tasks effectively. Electric tractors, on the other hand, are making strides in power output. Modern electric tractors can provide substantial torque at lower speeds, which is beneficial for tasks requiring high torque, such as ploughing [31]. However, they may still lag behind diesel tractors in terms of overall horsepower and the ability to sustain high power outputs over extended periods. Diesel tractors excel in a variety of environmental conditions, including high temperatures and heavy loads, due to their robust engine design [23]. Electric tractors, while increasingly capable, may face challenges related to battery performance and thermal management, especially in extreme conditions. Ongoing advancements in electric tractor design are aimed at addressing these limitations, but diesel tractors currently have an edge in performance consistency under harsh conditions. Diesel tractors are known for their fuel efficiency, particularly when running at optimal loads. Diesel engines typically have a higher energy density compared to batteries, allowing them to operate longer before refueling. However, electric tractors are designed to be more energy-efficient in converting stored electrical energy into mechanical work, often leading to reduced energy consumption per unit of work [32]. Electric tractors offer several advantages in operational efficiency. They have fewer moving parts compared to diesel engines, leading to lower maintenance requirements and reduced downtime [31]. Additionally, electric motors provide high torque at low speeds, which can enhance the efficiency of certain agricultural tasks, However, the overall efficiency of electric tractors can be affected by battery life and charging infrastructure, which are still developing [20]. 6. Market adoption of electric tractors in different regions Electric tractors benefit from high energy conversion efficiency, with electric motors converting a larger proportion of electrical energy into mechanical energy compared to diesel engines [23]. This leads to lower energy losses and more efficient operation during use. Conversely, diesel engines experience energy losses in the form of heat and friction, reducing their overall efficiency, Figure 5. Electric tractors are known for their quick acceleration and smooth operation. Electric motors provide instant torque, which allows for rapid acceleration and smooth power delivery [33]. This can be particularly advantageous in tasks requiring precise control and quick adjustments. Diesel tractors, while powerful, may have slower acceleration due to the mechanical nature of their engines. Electric tractors offer significant advantages in terms of noise and vibration. They operate much more quietly than diesel tractors, which can enhance the working environment and reduce noise pollution in rural areas [34]. Diesel engines, while effective, produce more noise and vibration, which can be a drawback in terms of operator comfort and environmental impact [20]. Electric tractors typically require less maintenance compared to diesel tractors due to the absence of complex mechanical components and fluids [35]. This can result in increased reliability and lower maintenance costs over the lifespan of the tractor. Diesel tractors, with their numerous moving parts and reliance on fuel systems, often require more frequent maintenance and repairs [36]. European countries have implemented robust policies to encourage the use of electric tractors. Germany offers subsidies for electric machinery as part of its climate protection program, while the Netherlands has introduced tax incentives for sustainable farming practices. The EU also supports research and development projects focused on electric tractor technology and infrastructure. The Asia-Pacific region is experiencing a rapid increase in the adoption of electric tractors, particularly in countries like China and India. In 2023, the region accounted for approximately 20% of the global electric tractor market share [23]. The adoption is driven by both government initiatives and the need to address air pollution and improve energy efficiency in agriculture. China has launched several policies to support the adoption of electric agricultural machinery as part of its broader environmental and energy efficiency goals [37]. The Chinese government provides subsidies for electric tractors and supports the development of charging infrastructure. Similarly, India is exploring opportunities to introduce electric tractors through pilot programs and partnerships with manufacturers [38]. Figure 5. Promotional strategies of electrical machinery across the globe. 7. Environmental regulations related to electric tractors Environmental regulations play a pivotal role in shaping the adoption of electric tractors, influencing both market dynamics and technological advancements. These regulations are designed to mitigate environmental impact, improve air quality, and support sustainable agricultural practices. This section explores how various environmental regulations across different regions are driving the adoption of electric tractors. The European Union’s Green Deal and the Farm to Fork Strategy are central to promoting the adoption of electric tractors in Europe. The Green Deal aims to make Europe the world’s first climate-neutral continent by 2050, which includes transitioning to cleaner agricultural technologies [39]. The Farm to Fork Strategy aligns with this by aiming to create fair, healthy, and eco-friendly food systems, promoting the use of electric tractors to lower greenhouse gas emissions. EU member states provide various subsidies and financial incentives to encourage the adoption of electric tractors, such as through the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development. (EAFRD) provides grants for farmers adopting innovative and environmentally friendly technologies, including electric tractors. Additionally, the EU’s Horizon Europe program funds research and development projects aimed at advancing electric tractor technology and infrastructure. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has implemented various regulations aimed at reducing emissions from agricultural machinery. The EPA’s Tier 4 emission standards for diesel engines are among the strictest globally, which has spurred interest in cleaner alternatives, including electric tractors [40]. These regulations are designed to lower particulate matter and nitrogen oxide emissions, creating a more favorable environment for electric tractors. The U.S. government offers incentives such as tax credits and grants through programs like the Clean Air Act and the USDA’s Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) to support the adoption of electric [41]. These programs aim to reduce the environmental footprint of farming operations and encourage the transition to cleaner technologies. China has introduced several environmental policies to address air pollution and promote sustainable agriculture. The Chinese government’s policies include subsidies for electric agricultural machinery as part of its broader strategy to reduce emissions and improve energy efficiency. The 13th Five-Year Plan for Ecological and Environmental Protection emphasizes the adoption of clean energy technologies in agriculture. India is beginning to implement environmental regulations and incentives aimed at reducing emissions and promoting sustainable farming practices. The Indian government is exploring pilot programs and partnerships to introduce electric tractors and other clean technologies [42]. While not as advanced as in Europe or North America, these efforts represent a growing recognition of the benefits of electric tractors. 8. Cost comparison between electric and diesel tractors The cost comparison between electric and diesel tractors involves examining both the initial acquisition costs and the long-term operational expenses. Electric tractors generally have a higher initial purchase price compared to their diesel counterparts. This is primarily due to the cost of advanced battery technology and electric drivetrain components. As of 2023, electric tractors can cost between 20% and 50% more than comparable diesel tractors, depending on the model and specifications [43]. This higher upfront cost can be a significant barrier to adoption for many farmers. Government incentives and subsidies can help offset the higher initial costs of electric tractors. In regions like Europe and North America, various programs provide financial assistance to support the purchase of electric machinery [44]. The EU’s Horizon Europe program and the USDA’s Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) offer grants and subsidies that can reduce the effective purchase price of electric tractors [41]. Electric tractors incur lower operational costs associated with fuel and energy. Since electricity is typically less expensive than diesel on a per-unit basis, this can result in substantial long-term savings [45]. Moreover, electric tractors are more efficient at converting energy into mechanical work, further reducing operational costs [46]. Maintenance costs for electric tractors are typically lower than for diesel tractors. Electric motors have fewer moving parts compared to internal combustion engines, which reduces the frequency and cost of maintenance [47]. Diesel engines require regular maintenance for components such as fuel filters, exhaust systems, and oil changes, which can add to the overall operational costs [48]. One of the significant operational costs for electric tractors is battery replacement. Batteries typically need to be replaced every 5 to 10 years, depending on usage and battery technology [49]. While advancements in battery technology are improving lifespan and reducing costs, battery replacement remains a notable expense compared to the longer life of diesel engines [50]. When considering the total cost of ownership, which includes purchase price, operational costs, and maintenance over the lifespan of the tractor, electric tractors can become more economical in the long run. Despite higher initial costs, lower fuel and maintenance expenses contribute to a reduced total cost of ownership over time. Electric tractors are currently experiencing faster depreciation compared to diesel tractors due to their newer technology and evolving market conditions [49]. However, as electric tractors become more common and technology improves, their resale value is expected to stabilize and potentially increase, reducing depreciation concerns. 9. Challenges and barriers The performance of electric tractors is influenced by several factors, including battery life, charging time, and the ability to operate efficiently in various climatic conditions, Table 4. These issues are critical in determining the practicality and reliability of electric tractors for different agricultural settings. Battery life is a significant concern for electric tractors, as batteries degrade over time and with usage. The performance of electric tractors is directly linked to the health of the battery, and battery degradation can affect both range and operational efficiency [51]. Modern lithium-ion batteries typically last between 5 to 10 years, but their capacity diminishes over time, which can lead to reduced operating range and performance [40]. Recent advancements in battery technology, such as solid-state batteries and improved lithium-ion variants, aim to extend battery life and enhance performance [52]. These advancements promise longer-lasting batteries with higher energy densities, which can address some of the limitations associated with battery life in electric tractors. Charging time is also critical factor influencing the adoption of electric tractors. Unlike diesel tractors, which can refuel quickly, electric tractors require charging, which can take several hours depending on the battery capacity and the charging infrastructure available [53]. The availability and development of charging infrastructure are crucial for minimizing downtime and ensuring efficient operation in agricultural settings [54]. The development of fast-charging technologies is an ongoing area of research. Fast chargers can significantly reduce charging times, with some recent advancements promising to charge electric tractors to 80% capacity in under an hour [55]. However, the implementation of fast-charging infrastructure is still in the early stages and requires substantial investment. Electric tractors can face performance challenges in extreme temperatures. Cold weather can affect battery efficiency and reduce the operational range of electric tractors due to decreased battery capacity [56]. Similarly, high temperatures can lead to thermal management issues, impacting battery performance and overall tractor efficiency [57]. Manufacturers are working on solutions such as advanced thermal management systems to mitigate these issues, but they remain a concern for operators in extreme climates. In regions with high humidity and dust, electric tractors can experience issues related to battery and motor cooling. High humidity can lead to condensation and potential short-circuiting, while dust can affect cooling systems and reduce overall performance [58]. To address these challenges, electric tractor designs are incorporating better sealing and cooling solutions, but managing these environmental factors remains a key area of development. Manufacturers are developing adaptations to ensure electric tractors perform well in diverse climates. Some models are equipped with enhanced cooling systems and battery insulation to improve performance in extreme temperatures [59]. The high initial cost of electric tractors poses a significant barrier to adoption, particularly for small-scale farmers. The economic feasibility of transitioning from traditional diesel tractors to electric models involves assessing both the upfront investment and the long-term financial benefits. Electric tractors generally have a higher purchase price compared to their diesel counterparts. This price disparity is largely due to the cost of advanced battery technology, electric drivetrains, and other specialized components [60]. As of 2023, the cost of electric tractors can be 40%–50% higher than comparable diesel models, which can be a significant investment for small-scale farmers [61]. For small-scale farmers, the high initial cost of electric tractors can be prohibitive. Government incentives and subsidies play a crucial role in improving the economic feasibility of electric tractors for small-scale farmers. Despite the high initial cost, electric tractors offer potential long-term cost savings through reduced fuel and maintenance expenses. Over time, these savings can offset the higher purchase price, making electric tractors a more economically viable option in the long run. The return on investment (ROI) for electric tractors depends on various factors, including usage patterns, energy costs, and available incentives [62]. Financing options can also play a role in improving economic feasibility. Leasing programs, low-interest loans, and other financial products can help small-scale farmers manage the upfront costs of electric tractors [63,64]. Table 4. Impact of technological advancements on electric tractor. Factor Challenges Recent Advancements Economic/Operational Impacts References Battery Life Degradation over time; reduced capacity affects range and efficiency Solid-state and improved lithium-ion batteries promise higher energy densities and longer life Battery degradation impacts operating range and tractor efficiency; long-term solutions can enhance reliability. [51,52] Charging Time Prolonged charging compared to quick refuelling of diesel tractors Fast chargers capable of 80% capacity in under an hour. Downtime affects productivity; fast-charging infrastructure can reduce operational delays. [53,55] Charging Infrastructure Limited infrastructure availability Ongoing investments to expand fast-charging networks. Development of infrastructure essential to minimize downtime and enable widespread use. [54] Performance in Cold Weather Reduced battery efficiency and operational range due to low temperatures Advanced thermal management systems in development. Cold weather impacts range: solutions needed to maintain performance in varying climates. [56] Performance in High Temperatures Potential overheating and reduced battery life Enhanced cooling and insulation systems Thermal issues can decrease efficiency; improved systems mitigate overheating. [57,59] High Humidity and Dust Risk of condensation and short-circuiting; dust affects cooling Better sealing and cooling solutions integrated into newer models. Reduces risk of mechanical failure; enhanced designs improve durability. [58] Initial Cost Higher purchase price than diesel tractors; significant investment for small-scale farmers Government incentives and subsidies can offset costs High initial cost can be prohibitive; long-term fuel and maintenance savings can make investment more feasible. [60,61,63] Economic Feasibility for Small-scale Farmers Limited capital and tighter budgets make investment challenging Subsidies, low-interest loans, and leasing programs provide financial relief. ROI depends on usage, energy costs, and available support; potential long-term savings justify higher initial cost. [62] 10. Conclusion The shift to electric tractors represents a major advancement in agricultural technology, motivated by environmental, economic, and technological factors. With the agricultural sector under growing pressure to cut carbon emissions and implement sustainable practices, electric tractors are becoming a promising solution with the potential to revolutionize farming operations worldwide. In recent years, they have gained considerable momentum, especially in regions with strong regulatory frameworks and environmental policies, such as the European Union. These tractors represent a shift away from traditional diesel-powered models, offering a cleaner and more sustainable alternative. However, their adoption is still in its early stages, with several hurdles to overcome, particularly in terms of cost, infrastructure, and performance under various environmental conditions. The electric tractor market is still developing, with manufacturers actively working on improving battery technology, propulsion systems, and overall tractor design. These advancements aim to improve the efficiency, reliability, and affordability of electric tractors, making them a more practical option for a wider range of agricultural activities. Despite these developments, the market penetration of electric tractors remains limited compared to traditional diesel models, especially in areas with less supportive policies or where small-scale farmers, with limited financial resources, dominate the agricultural sector. Electric tractors offer several advantages over diesel counterparts, particularly in operational efficiency and environmental impact. Their electric propulsion systems are quieter, produce no tailpipe emissions, and require less maintenance due to having fewer moving parts. These features make electric tractors especially well-suited for tasks that demand precision and low noise levels, such as greenhouse operations or work near residential areas. However, the performance of electric tractors is closely tied to the capabilities of their batteries. Battery life, charging time, and efficiency in various climatic conditions are critical factors that influence the practicality of electric tractors. While advancements in battery technology, such as the development of solid-state batteries, have shown promise in extending range and reducing charging times, challenges remain. In cold climates, for example, battery efficiency can drop significantly, reducing the operational range of electric tractors and requiring more frequent charging. Similarly, in hot climates, battery overheating and reduced efficiency can be issues that need to be addressed through improved thermal management systems. Another important performance aspect is the power output of electric tractors relative to diesel models. Although electric tractors can provide comparable power for some applications, their performance may vary depending on the specific task. Although electric tractors excel in tasks that require consistent torque and power, such as tilling and ploughing, they may face limitations in heavy-duty applications that demand sustained high power over long periods. The development of higher-capacity batteries and more efficient electric drivetrains will be crucial in addressing these limitations and expanding the range of applications for electric tractors. The future of electric tractors appears promising, with substantial potential for growth as technological advancements continue to overcome current limitations. The global push for sustainability, coupled with the increasing cost of fossil fuels and tightening environmental regulations, will likely accelerate the adoption of electric tractors. Governments and policymakers play a critical role in this transition by providing financial incentives, investing in charging infrastructure, and implementing regulations that favour the adoption of clean technologies in agriculture. However, several challenges must be overcome to realize the full potential of electric tractors. The high initial cost remains a significant barrier, particularly for small-scale farmers who may lack the financial resources to invest in new technology. While government subsidies and incentives can help mitigate these costs, more work is needed to make electric tractors affordable and accessible to a wider range of farmers. Additionally, the development of a comprehensive charging infrastructure is essential to support the widespread use of electric tractors, especially in rural areas where access to charging stations may be limited. Another challenge is the variability in adoption rates across different regions. While regions like Europe are leading the way in electric tractor adoption due to strong regulatory support and financial incentives, other regions such as North America and Asia-Pacific are seeing slower growth. This disparity underscores the need for customized strategies that address the unique needs and challenges of various regions, ensuring that the advantages of electric tractors can be realized worldwide. The performance of electric tractors in diverse climatic conditions also remains a concern. Extreme temperatures, humidity, and dust can all impact battery efficiency and overall tractor performance. Manufacturers are working on solutions such as advanced thermal management systems and improved sealing and cooling mechanisms to address these issues. Continued research and development in this area will be crucial to ensure that electric tractors can perform reliably in a wide range of environmental conditions. Incorporating electric tractors into precision agriculture and smart farming systems offers an exciting opportunity for the future. Electric tractors are well-suited to be part of an integrated farm management system, where they can be combined with other technologies such as autonomous operation, IoT sensors, and data analytics to optimize agricultural productivity and efficiency. This integration could further enhance the appeal of electric tractors, offering farmers not only environmental and cost benefits but also the ability to manage their operations more effectively. While electric tractors are still in the early stages of adoption, their future looks bright. Continued advancements in technology, supportive policies, and a growing awareness of the need for sustainable agricultural practices are all driving the shift toward electric tractors. However, to fully realize their potential, it will be essential to address the challenges of cost, infrastructure, and performance in diverse conditions. By doing so, electric tractors can play a key role in transforming agriculture into a more sustainable and efficient industry, benefiting farmers, the environment, and society as a whole. Acknowledgments: The authors would like to acknowledge the help of technical staff of College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology for their valuable suggestions. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Ashan B, Muzamil M, Dixit J, et al. Assessment of soil compaction due to the motion of prime mover and tillage machinery in temperate region of Kashmir valley. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal. 2023; 25(2): 89–100.

2. Williams M. Farm tractors: A complete illustrated history. Fox Chapel Publishing; 2016.

3. Renius KT. Fundamentals of Tractor Design. Springer International Publishing; 2020.

4. Banday R, Muzamil M, Kumar A, et al. Internet of things based smart farming: A futuristic approach. Agricultural Engineering Today. 2022; 46(4): 41–44. doi: 10.52151/aet2022464.1607

5. Farmonaut. Revolutionizing Indian agriculture: top tractor trends and tech advancements for modern farming. Available online: https://farmonaut.com/asia/revolutionizing-indian-agriculture-top-tractor-trends-and-tech-advancements-for modernfarming/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CModern%20tractors%20can%20increase%20farm%20productivity%20by,aspect%20of%20improving%20agricultural%20productivity%20and%20sustainability (accessed on 2 November 2024).

6. Reshi I, Muzamil M, Banday R, et al. Development, feasibility testing and economic viability of solar powered over-the-top (OTT) sprayer for vegetable crops. In: Transactions of the Indian Academy of Engineering. Springer; 2024.

7. Eriksson EL, Gray EM. Optimization and integration of hybrid renewable energy hydrogen fuel cell energy systems—A critical review. Applied energy. 2017; 202: 348–364.

8. Siddik M, Islam M, Zaman AK, Hasan M. Current status and correlation of fossil fuels consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Int. J. Energy Environ. Econ. 2021; 28: 103–119.

9. Jones A, Begley J, Berkeley N, et al. Electric vehicles and rural business: Findings from the Warwickshire rural electric vehicle trial. Journal of Rural Studies. 2020; 79: 395–408.

10. Krisnaputra R, Aisyah N, El Hakim SU, et al. Revolutionizing Agriculture: Electric Tractors for Indonesian Sustainable Farming. Jurnal Engine: Energi, Manufaktur, dan Material. 2024; 8(1): 43–48.

11. Dhand A, Pullen K. Review of flywheel based internal combustion engine hybrid vehicles. International Journal of Automotive Technology. 2013; 14(5): 797–804. doi: 10.1007/s12239-013-0088-x

12. Wang L, Cui Y, Zhang F, Li G. Architectures of Planetary Hybrid Powertrain System: Review, Classification and Comparison. Energies. 2020; 13(2): 329. doi:10.3390/en13020329

13. Gorjian S, Ebadi H, Trommsdorff M, et al. The advent of modern solar-powered electric agricultural machinery: A solution for sustainable farm operations. Journal of cleaner production. 2021; 292: 126030.

14. Liu Y, Zhang Z, Zhang X. Design and optimization of hybrid excitation synchronous machines with magnetic shunting rotor for electric vehicle traction applications. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 2017; 53(6): 5252–5261.

15. Zhu Z, Yang Y, Wang D, et al. Energy Saving Performance of Agricultural Tractor Equipped with Mechanic-Electronic-Hydraulic Powertrain System. Agriculture. 2022; 12(3): 436. doi:10.3390/agriculture12030436

16. Cavallo E, Ferrari E, Coccia M. Likely technological trajectories in agricultural tractors by analysing innovative attitudes of farmers. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management. 2015; 15(2): 158–177.

17. Akram N, Akram M, Hongshu W. Study on the socioeconomic factors affecting adoption of agricultural Machinery. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development. 2020; 11(3): 68–80. doi: 10.7176/jesd/11-3-07K

18. Mocera F, Somà A, Martelli S, et al. Trends and future perspective of electrification in agricultural tractor-implement applications. Energies. 2023; 16(18): 6601.

19. Malla UM, Khan AR, Muzamil M, et al. Development and evaluation of four-row seeder for vegetable crops in the temperate region of Jammu and Kashmir. SKUAST Journal of Research. 2022; 24(1): 71–79. doi: 10.5958/2349-297X.2022.00016.2

20. Panday D, Bhusal N, Das S, et al. Rooted in nature: the rise, challenges, and potential of organic farming and fertilizers in agroecosystems. Sustainability. 2024; 16(4): 1530. doi:10.3390/su16041530

21. Majeed Y, Khan MU, Waseem M, et al. Renewable energy as an alternative source for energy management in agriculture. Energy Reports. 2023; 10: 344–359.

22. Deswal S. Challenges faced by electric tractors in rural north India. Available online: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/challenges-faced-electric-tractors-rural-north-india-sagar-deswal-luqbc (accessed on 2 November 2024).

23. Kumar V, Sharma KV, Kedam N, et al. A Comprehensive Review on Smart and Sustainable Agriculture Using IoT Technologies. Smart Agricultural Technology. 2024; 8: 100487. doi: 10.1016/j.atech.2024.100487

24. Mocera F, Somà A. Analysis of a parallel hybrid electric tractor for agricultural applications. Energies. 2020; 13(12): 3055. doi: 10.3390/en13123055

25. Sharma M, Kargwal R, Atheaya D, et al. Role of energy in the development of agriculture sector in South Asia. In: The South Asian Energy Corridor. Apple Academic Press; 2024. pp. 313–333.

26. Naresh R, Singh NK, Sachan P, et al. Enhancing Sustainable Crop Production through Innovations in Precision Agriculture Technologies. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports. 2024; 30(3): 89–113.

27. Bentouba S, Zioui N, Breuhaus P, et al. Overview of the Potential of Energy Harvesting Sources in Electric Vehicles. Energies. 2023; 16(13): 5193.

28. Mavlutova I, Atstaja D, Grasis J, et al. Urban transportation concept and sustainable urban mobility in smart cities: a review. Energies. 2023; 16(8): 3585.

29. Zhang H, Cheng J, Liu H, et al. Prelithiation: a critical strategy towards practical application of High‐Energy‐Density batteries. Advanced Energy Materials. 2023; 13(27). doi: 10.1002/aenm.202300466

30. Wang Y, Wright LA. A comparative review of alternative fuels for the maritime sector: Economic, technology, and policy challenges for clean energy implementation. World. 2021; 2(4): 456–481.

31. Olivari E, Gurrì S, Caballini C, et al. Ports Go Green: a cost-energy analysis applied to a case study on evaluating the electrification of yard tractors. The Open Transportation Journal. 2024; 18(1). doi: 10.2174/0126671212308027240430114324

32. Ragazou K, Garefalakis A, Zafeiriou E, et al. Agriculture 5.0: A new strategic management mode for a cut cost and an energy efficient agriculture sector. Energies. 2022; 15(9): 3113. doi: 10.3390/en15093113

33. Wang C, Pan W, Zou T, et al. A Review of Perception Technologies for Berry Fruit-Picking Robots: Advantages, Disadvantages, Challenges, and Prospects. Agriculture. 2024; 14(8): 1346.

34. Indurthi S, Sarma I, Vinod DV. Horticultural Innovations Elevating Crop Yields and Agricultural Sustainability for a Flourishing Future. Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology. 2024; 25(1–2): 22–44.

35. Mao S, Basma H, Ragon PL, et al. Total cost of ownership for heavy trucks in China: Battery-electric, fuel cell electric, and diesel trucks. Available online: https://theicct. org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/ze-hdvs-china-tco-FS-EN-nov21. Pdf. (accessed on 2 November 2024).

36. Shang L. Technology adoption and upscaling of detailed farm-level models [PhD thesis]. Universitäts-und Landesbibliothek Bonn; 2023

37. Yang S, Li W. The Impact of Socialized Agricultural Machinery Services on Land Productivity: Evidence from China. Agriculture. 2022; 12(12): 2072. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12122072

38. Bernard MR, Tankou A, Cui H, et al. Charging solutions for battery-electric trucks. ICCT; 2022.

39. Wrzaszcz W, Prandecki K. Agriculture and the European green deal. Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej/Problems of Agricultural Economics. 2020; 365(4): 156–179. doi: 10.30858/zer/131841

40. Slowik P, Isenstadt A, Pierce L, et al. Assessment of light-duty electric vehicle costs and consumer benefits in the United States in the 2022–2035 time frame. International Council on Clean Transportation; 2022.

41. National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition. Environmental Quality Incentives Program—National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition. Available online: https://sustainableagriculture.net/publications/grassrootsguide/conservation-environment/environmental-quality-incentives-program/ (accessed on 2 November 2024).

42. Naina G. Government promotes electric tractors for sustainable farming. Available online: https://www.outlookbusiness.com/news/government-promotes-electric-tractors-for-sustainable-farming-news-416291 (accessed on 2 November 2024).

43. Basma H, Beys Y, Rodríguez F. Battery electric tractor-trailers in the European Union: A vehicle technology analysis. International Council on Clean Transportation. 2021; 29.

44. Shao Z, Anup S. Incentives for electrifying agricultural tractors in India. International Council on Clean Transportation. 2022; 28.

45. Popovich ND, Rajagopal D, Tasar E, et al. Economic, environmental and grid-resilience benefits of converting diesel trains to battery-electric. Nature Energy. 2021; 6(11): 1017–1025. doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00915-5

46. Beligoj M, Scolaro E, Alberti L, et al. Feasibility evaluation of hybrid electric agricultural tractors based on life cycle cost analysis. IEEE Access. 2022; 10: 28853–28867.

47. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Alternative Fuels Data Center: Maintenance and safety of electric vehicles. Available online: https://afdc.energy.gov/vehicles/electric-maintenance (accessed on 2 November 2024).

48. Reif K. Diesel engine management. Berlin: Springer Vieweg; 2014.

49. Lagnelöv O, Dhillon S, Larsson G, et al. Cost analysis of autonomous battery electric field tractors in agriculture. Biosystems Engineering. 2021; 204: 358–376.

50. Cunanan C, Tran MK, Lee Y, et al. A review of heavy-duty vehicle powertrain technologies: Diesel engine vehicles, battery electric vehicles, and hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles. Clean Technologies. 2021; 3(2): 474–489.

51. Curiel-Olivares G, Johnson S, Escobar G, et al. Model Predictive Control-Based Energy Management System for a Hybrid Electric Agricultural Tractor. IEEE Access. 2023; 11: 118801–118811.

52. Shalaby, Alziyadi MO, Gamal H, et al. Solid-state lithium-ion battery: The key components enhance the performance and efficiency of anode, cathode, and solid electrolytes. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2023; 969: 172318. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.172318

53. Lagnelöv O, Larsson G, Nilsson D, et al. Performance comparison of charging systems for autonomous electric field tractors using dynamic simulation. Biosystems Engineering. 2020; 194: 121–137.

54. Corti F, Iacono SD, Astolfi D, et al. A comprehensive review of charging infrastructure for Electric Micromobility Vehicles: Technologies and challenges. Energy Reports. 2024; 12: 545–567.

55. Cyberswitching. Charging times: Reducing charging times could help make electric vehicles more practical for long trips. Available online: https://cyberswitching.com/charging-times-reducing-charging-times-could-help-make-electric-vehicles-more-practical-for-long-trips/#:~:text=Latest%20developments%20in%20fast%20charging%20technology,-Fast%20charging%20technology&text=High%2Dpower%20charging%3A%20High%2D,little%20as%2015%2D20%20minutes (accessed on 2 November 2024).

56. Anonymous. The impact of Cold Weather on an Electric Vehicle Efficiency, Range and Charging|Imperial Society of Innovative Engineers. Available online: https://imperialsociety.in/blog/2022/01/31/the-impact-of-cold-weather-on-an-electric-vehicle (accessed on 2 November 2024).

57. Sitompul J, Zhang H, Noguchi R, et al. Optimization study on the design of utility tractor powered by electric battery. InIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019; 355(1): 012058.

58. Baylakoğlu İ, Fortier A, Kyeong S, et al. The detrimental effects of water on electronic devices. E-Prime-Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy. 2021; 1: 100016.

59. Scolaro E. Feasibility study of electric drives for agricultural tractors and numerical techniques for electric machine design [PhD thesis]. University of Padova; 2023.

60. Clean mobility shift. India’s existing EV policies have the potential to make electric tractors financially viable for the agriculture sector. Available online: https://cleanmobilityshift.com/market-trends/indias-existing-ev-policies-have-the-potential-to-make-electric-tractors-financially-viable-for-the-agriculture-sector/ (accessed on 2 November 2024).

61. Markets and Markets. Electric Tractor Market Size, Share, Trends, Demand, Growth & Forecast 2030. Available online: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/electric-tractor-market-109801941.html (accessed on 2 November 2024).

62. Ojiako IA, Tarawali G, Okechukwu RU, et al. Profitability of Cassava Production: Comparing the actual and potential returns on investment among smallholders in Southern Nigeria. Journal of Biology Agriculture and Healthcare. 2018; 8(16): 51–65.

63. Malik A, Kohli S. Electric tractors: Survey of challenges and opportunities in India. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020; 28: 2318–2324.

64. Reshi I, Muzamil M, Banday R, et al. Development, feasibility testing and economic viability of solar powered over-the-top (OTT) sprayer for vegetable crops. Transactions of the Indian Academy of Engineering. 2024.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Danish Gul, Rizwan Ul Zama Banday, Mohd. Muzamil

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).