


Land use effects on soil properties and carbon stocks of agricultural and agroforestry landscapes in a rainforest zone of Nigeria
Vol 6, Issue 2, 2025
VIEWS - 565 (Abstract)
Download PDF
Abstract
This study examined the impacts of land use on the physical and chemical properties of soils of land use types along agroforestry and agricultural landscapes in a rainforest zone of Nigeria. The land use systems are forest, agroforestry, fallow, and ornamental plant fields in addition to permanent crop fields (cocoa, oil palm, and citrus) and annual crop fields (maize). Profile pits were dug on the land use types and samples were collected 0–20 cm and 20–50 cm for laboratory analysis. Soil samples were collected from undisturbed soil and profile pits for bulk density and moisture content determination following standard analytical procedures. Among the land use types, physical properties (sand, clay, soil bulk density) and chemical properties (soil pH, SOC, total N, P, K, Ca, Mg, and CEC) differed significantly. Bulk density, pH, SOC, total, and stocks of SOC and N differed statistically for 0–20 and 20–50 cm soil depths with downward increases in N and SOC stocks along sampling depth. Permanent croplands (forest and agroforestry fields) had higher soil pH, SOC, total N, and CEC, while arable crop fields had relatively lower pH, SOC, TN, P, K, Ca, Mg, and CEC. Arable fields had significantly lower C and N stocks within 50 cm compared with permanent crop fields, which may be attributed to continuous tillage by the smallholder farmers and soil erosion-enhanced SOC and N removal from top soil. For both permanent and annual crop fields, SOC and total N stocks ranged from 5.75 to 3.12 kg/m2 for 0–20 cm depths and 2.44 to 1.93 kg/m2 for deeper (20–50 cm) layers. Relative to forest soil, stocks of SOC in the surface soils (0–20 cm) decreased in the order: agroforestry > ornamental plant field > cocoa > fallow land > citrus > oil palm > annual cropping system. Following this decreasing order, soil deterioration indices are equivalent to 27% > 28% > 30% > 31% > 32% > 34% > 38% compared with forest soil, respectively. Strong significant correlations (p < 0.05) were observed between SOC and TN stocks and some soil properties (bulk density, clay contents, pH, and CEC) with R2 values ranging from 1.0 to 0.85. It is concluded that the soil's physical and chemical properties and carbon storage potential differed among the land uses of the study site.
Keywords
References
1. Enisan G, Adeyemi AG. Effect of Agricultural Practices on Residential Land Use in Ipinsa Town, Akure, Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Research. 2013; 1(7).
2. FAO. World Food and Agriculture—Statistical Yearbook 2020. FAO; 2020.
3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Climate-Smart Agriculture Sourcebook. Available online: https://www.fao.org/climate-smart-agriculture-sourcebook (accessed on 12 September 2024)
4. FAO, ITPS. Recarbonizing Global Soils—A Technical Manual of Recommended Management Practices. Volume 2: Hotspots and Bright Spots of Soil Organic Carbon. FAO; 2021.
5. Abera Y, Belachew T. Effect of Land Use on Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen in Soil of Bale, Southeastern Ethiopia. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystem. 2011; 14: 229–235.
6. Getahun HA, Abbadiko H, Mulige G. Sustainable Agriculture: Agroforestry for Soil Fertility and Food Security. Journal of Equity in Sciences and Sustainable Development. 2018; 2(1): 44–53.
7. Ketema H, Yimer F. Soil property Variation under Agroforestry Based Conservation Tillage and Maize Based Conventional Tillage in Southern Ethiopia. Soil and Tillage Research. 2014; 141: 25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2014.03.011
8. Negasa T, Ketema H, Legesse A, et al. Variation in soil properties under different land use types managed by smallholder farmers along the toposequence in southern Ethiopia. Geoderma. 2017; 290: 40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.11.021
9. Young FJ, Hammer RD. Soil–Landform Relationships on a Loess‐Mantled Upland Landscape in Missouri. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2000; 64(4): 1443–1454. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2000.6441443x
10. Brumer AC, Park SJ, Ruecker GR, et al. Catenary Soil Development Influencing Erosion Susceptibility along a Hillslope in Uganda. CATENA. 2004; 58(1): 1–22.
11. Babur E, Süha Uslu Ö, Leonardo Battaglia M, et al. Studying soil erosion by evaluating changes in physico-chemical properties of soils under different land-use types. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 2021; 20(3): 190–197.
12. Romkens PFAM, Van der Pflicht J, Hassink J. Soil Organic Matter Dynamics after the Conversion of Arable Land to Pasture. Biology and Fertility of Soil. 1999; 28(3): 227–284.
13. Six J, Conant RT, Paul EA, Paustian K. Stabilization mechanism of Soil Organic Matter; Implication for C-Saturation of Soils. Plant and Soil. 2002; 241: 155–176.
14. Byrnes RC, Eastburn DJ, Tate KW, Roche LM. A Global Meta‐Analysis of Grazing Impacts on Soil Health Indicators. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2018; 47(4): 758–765.
15. Yimer F, Messing I, Ledin S, Abdelkadir A. Effects of Different Land Use Types on Infiltration Capacity in a Catchment in the Highland of Ethiopia. Soil Use and Management. 2008; 24(4): 344–349. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1475-2743.2008.00182.x
16. Ekero D, Haile W, Lelago A, Bibiso M. Effects of different land use types on soil physico-chemical properties in Wolaita zone, Ethiopia. Polish journal of Soil Science. 2022; 55(1). doi: 10.17951/pjss/2022.55.1.19-35
17. Samuel A, Kayode A, Friday C, et al. Impacts and Feedbacks of Land Use and Land Cover Patterns in Landscape on Ecosystem Processes and Microclimate: Case of a Cacao-Based Agroforestry System. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 2017; 22(3): 1–11.
18. Ito A, Hajima T. Biogeophysical and biogeochemical impacts of land-use change simulated by MIROC-ES2L. Prog Earth Planet Science.202; 7: 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-020-00372-w
19. Tellen VA, Yerima BPK. Effects of land use change on soil physicochemical properties in selected areas in the North West region of Cameroon. Environmental Systems Research. 2018; 7(1). doi: 10.1186/s40068-018-0106-0
20. Manuel Naranjo Gómez J, Carlos Loures L, Alexandre Castanho R, et al. Assessing Land Use Changes in European Territories: A Retrospective Study from 1990 to 2012. In: Land Use-Assessing the Past, Envisioning the Future. IntechOpen; 2018.
21. Lousada S, Manuel Naranjo Gómez J. Analyzing the Evolution of Land-Use Changes Related to Vegetation, in the Galicia Region, Spain: From 1990 to 2018. In: Vegetation Dynamics, Changing Ecosystems and Human Responsibility. IntechOpen; 2022.
22. Maes J, Jacobs S. Nature-based solutions for Europe’s sustainable development. Conservation Letters. 2017; 10(1): 121–124. doi: 10.1111/conl.12216
23. Lousada S, Cabezas J, Castanho RA, Manuel Naranjo Gómez J. Land-Use Changes in Insular Urban Territories: A Retrospective Analysis from 1990 to 2018. The Case of Madeira Island—Ribeira Brava. Sustainability. 2022; 14(24): 16839. doi: 10.3390/su142416839
24. Castanho RA, Lousada S, Manuel Naranjo Gómez J, et al. Dynamics of the land use changes and the associated barriers and opportunities for sustainable development on peripheral and insular territories: The madeira Island (Portugal). In: Land Use-Assessing the Past, Envisioning the Future. IntechOpen; 2018.
25. Albert C, Aronson J, Fürst C, Opdam P. Integrating ecosystem services in landscape planning: Requirements, approaches, and impacts. Landscape Ecology. 2014; 29(8): 1277–1285. doi: 10.1007/s10980-014-0085-0
26. Fentie SF, Jembere K, Fekadu E, Wasie D. Land Use and Land Cover Dynamics and Properties of Soil under Different Land Uses in the Tejibara Watershop, Ethiopia. The Scientific World Journal. 2020; 2020: 1–12. doi: 10.1155/2020/1479460
27. Botezan CS, Radovici A, Ajtai I. The challenge of social vulnerability assessment in the context of land use changes for sustainable urban planning—case studies: Developing cities in Romania. Landscape. 2022; 11(1): 17. doi: 10.3390/land11010017
28. Tesfaw AT, Pfaff A, Golden Kroner RE, et al. Land-use and land-cover change shape the sustainability and impacts of protected areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018; 115(9): 2084–2089. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716462115
29. Jackson ML. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall INC; 1958. p. 498.
30. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. Estimation of Available Phosphorous in Soil by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. U.S. Department of Agriculture; 1954.
31. Walkley AJ, Black IA. Estimation of Soil Organic Carbon by the Chromic Acid Titration Method. Soil Science. 1934; 37(1): 29–38.
32. Saxton KE, Rawls WJ, Romberger JS, Papendick RI. Estimating generalized soil water characteristics from texture. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 1986; 50(4): 1031–1036. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000040039x
33. Saxton KE, Rawls WJ. Soil Water Characteristic Estimates by Texture and Organic Matter for Hydrologic Solutions. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2006; 70(5): 1569–1578. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0117
34. Wairiu M, Lal R. Soil organic carbon in relation to cultivation and topsoil removal on sloping lands of Kolombangara, Solomon Islands. Soil and Tillage Research. 2003; 70(1): 19–27.
35. Kahsay A, Haile M, Gebresamuel G, Mohammed M. Developing soil quality indices to investigate degradation impacts of different land use types in Northern Ethiopia. Heliyon. 2025; 11(1): e41185. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41185
36. Omotade IF, Alatise MO. Spatial Variability of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties in Akure, South Western Nigeria. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: Agriculture and Veterinary. 2017; 17(5).
37. Horel Á, Tóth E, Gelybó G, et al. Effects of Land Use and Management on SoilHydraulic Properties. Open Geosciences. 2015; 7(1). doi: 10.1515/geo-2015-0053
38. Wubie MA, Assen M. Effects of land cover changes and slope gradient on soil quality in the Gumara watershed, Lake Tana basin of North–West Ethiopia. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment. 2020; 6: 85–97. doi: 10.1007/s40808-019-00660-5
39. Venter ZS, Hawkins HJ, Cramer MD, Mills AJ. Mapping soil organic carbon stocks and trends with satellite-driven high resolution maps over South Africa. Science of The Total Environment. 2021; 771: 145384. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145384
40. Nnaji GU, Asadu CLA, Mbagwu JSC. Evaluation of Physico-chemical Properties of Soil under Selected Agricultural Land Use Types. Agro-Science. 2002; 3(1): 27–33.
41. Oguike PC, Onwuka BM. Moisture Characteristics of Soils of Different Land Use Systems in Ubakala Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP). 2018; 8(4).
42. Ramesh T, Bolan NS, Kirkham MB, et al. Soil organic carbon dynamics: Impact of land use changes and management practices: A review. Advances in Agronomy. 2019; 156: 1–107. doi: 10.1016/bs.agron.2019.02.001
43. Davari M, Saeidpoor B, Khaleghpanah N. et al. Impacts of land use/cover change on soil hydrological properties, runoff, and erosion: results from micro-plots in Western Iran. Environment and Earth Science.2024; 83: 508.). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11813-w
44. Mulatu K, Hundera K, Senbeta F. Analysis of land use/ land cover changes and landscape fragmentation in the Baro-Akobo Basin, Southwestern Ethiopia. Heliyon. 2024;10 (7): e28378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28378.
45. Lousada S, Iyer-Raniga U. Land-Use Management–Recent Advances, New Perspectives, and Applications. IntechOpen; 2024. p. 232.
46. Nwite JN. Effect of Different Urine Sources on Soil Chemical Properties and Maize Yield in Abakaliki, Southeastern Nigeria. International Journal of Advance Agricultural Research (IJAAR). 2015; 3(3): 31–36.
47. Amanze CT, Oguike PC, Eneje RC. Land Use Effects on Some Physico-Chemical Properties of Utisol at Ndume-Ibeku, Southeastern Nigeria. International journal of scientific and research publications. 2017; 7(9).
48. Patiño S, Hernández Y, Plata C, Domínguez I,. Dazan M, Oviedo-Ocaña R, Buytaert W, Ochoa-Tocachi BF.. Influence of land use on hydro-physical soil properties of Andean páramos and its effect on streamflow buffering. CATENA. 2021; 202: 105227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105227.
49. Kakare J, George LM, Majalina M, et al. Effect of Mulching on Soil Hydro-Physical Properties in Kibaale Sub-catchment, South Central Uganda. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2015; 3(5): 127–135.
50. Lousada S, Manuel Naranjo Gómez J, Loures L. The Evolution of Land-Use Changes in the Alto Tâmega Region, Portugal: From 1990 to 2018—A Vision of Sustainable Planning. In: Sustainable Regional Planning. IntechOpen; 2023.
51. Bizuhoraho T, Kayiranga A, Manirakiza N, Mourad AK. The Effect of Land Use Systems on Soil Properties; A case Study from Rwanda. Sustainable Agriculture Research. 2018; 7(2): 30. doi: 10.5539/sar.v7n2p30
52. Puget P, Drinkwater LE. Short-Terms Dynamics of Root- and Short-Derived Carbon from a Leguminous Green Manure. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2001; 65(3): 771–779.
53. Bununu YA, Bello A, Ahmed A. Land cover, land use, climate change and food security. Sustainable Earth Reviews. 2023; 6(1). doi: 10.1186/s42055-023-00065-4
54. Bailey KM, McCleery RA, Binford MW, Zweig C. Land-cover change within and around protected areas in a biodiversity hotspot. Journal of Land Use Science. 2015; 11(2): 154-176. doi: 10.1080/1747423x.2015.1086905
55. Sainju UM, Stevens WB, Caesar-Tonthat T, Jabro JD. Land Use and Management Practices Impact on Plant Biomass Carbon and Soil Carbon Dioxide Emission. Soil Science Society America Journal. 2010; 74(5): 1613–1622.
56. Wang Q, Lu C, Li H, et al. The Effect of No-tillage with Subsoiling on Soil Properties and Maize Yield: 12-Year Experiment on Alkaline Soils of Northeast China. Soil and Tillage Research. 2014; 137: 43–49. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2013.11.006
57. Olubanjo OO, Ayoola SO. Assessment of Spatial Variability of Physico-chemical Properties of Soil at Crop, Soil and Pest Management Research Farm, FUTA. Applied Research Journal of Environmental Engineering. 2020; 3(1): 1–20. doi: 10.47721/ARJEE20200301020
58. Hassan MK, Sanchez B, Yu JS. Financial Development and Economic Growth: New Evidence from Panel Data. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 2011; 51(1): 88–104. doi: 10.1016/j.gref.2010.09.001
59. Biernbaun J. Organic Matters: Feeding the Soil and Building Soil Quality. Organic Matters. 2012; 1–7.
60. Kizilkaya R, Dengiz O. Variation of Land Use and Land Cover Effects on Some Soil Physico-chemical Characteristics and Soil Enzyme Activity. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture. 2010; 97(2): 15–24.
61. Samuel A, Peter A, Babadele F, Olufunke O. Effects of Tractor Wheel Passes-induced Compaction and Organic Amendments on Soil Properties and Yield of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Warp) in an Alfisol of the Rainforest Zone of Nigeria. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science. 2016; 13(4): 1–16.
62. Akintokun PO, Owoeye OO. Effect of Land-Use Pattern on Phosphorus and Potassium Fixation and Maize Performance. Journal of Agricultural Science and Environment. 2011; 11(1). doi: 10.51406/jagse.v11i1.1309
63. White JG, Lindbo DL, Hardy D, et al. Mineralization, Plant Availability, and Water Quality Consequences of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Land-Applied Municipal Biosolids. WRRI; 2017.
64. Haddaway NR, Hedlund K, Jackson LE, et al. How does Tillage Intensity Affect Soil Organic Carbon? A System Review. Environmental Evidence. 2017; 6(1).
65. Funk JM, Aguilar-Amuchastegui N, Baldwin-Cantello W, et al. Securing the climate benefits of stable forests. Climate Policy. 2019; 19(7): 845–860. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1598838
66. Velastegui-Montoya A, Montalvan-Burbano N, Peña-Villacreses G, et al. Gricelda Herrera-Franco Land Use and Land Cover in Tropical Forest: Global Research. Forests. 2022; 13(10): 1709. doi: 10.3390/f13101709
67. de Andrade Carvalho Pereira G, Primo AA, Meneses AJG, et al. Soil Fertility and Nutritional Status of Elephant Grass Fertilized with Organic Compost from Small Ruminant Production and Slaughter Systems. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. 2020; 44: e0200031.
68. Ogbona PC, Nzegbule EC, Okorie PE. Seasonal Variation of Soil Chemical Characteristics at Akwuke Long Wall Underground Mined Site, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management. 2018; 22(8): 1303–1310.
69. Neina D, Nii G, Dowuona N. Short-term effects of human urine fertiliser and wood ash on soil pH and electrical conductivity. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics.2013; 114 (2:, 89–100
70. Ufot UO, Iren OB, Chikere Njoku CU. Effect of Land Use on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties in Akokwa Area of Imo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Life-Sciences Scientific Research. 2016; 2(3): 273–278.
71. Senjobi BA, Ogunkunle AO. Effect of Different Land Use Types and their Implications on Land Degradation and Productivity in Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development. 2011; 3(1): 7–18.
72. Geisen V, Sánchez-Hernández R, Kampichler C, Hernández-Daumás S. Effects of land-use change on some properties of tropical soils — An example from Southeast Mexico Geoderma. 2009;151: 3-4 DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.03.011
73. Oladoye AO, Adedire MO, Amoo AO. Carbon Stock Estimate under different Land-Use in the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria. Ife Journal of Science. 2013; 15(2).
74. Nyawira SS, Hartman MD, Nguyen TH, et al. Simulating Soil Organic Carbon in Maize-based Systems under Improved Agronomic Management in Western Kenya. Soil and Tillage Research. 2021; 211: 105000. doi: 10.1787/22260935
75. Lal R. Climate Change and Soil Degradation Mitigation by Sustainable Management of Soils and other Natural Resources. Agricultural Research. 2012; 1: 199–212.
76. Zeng R, Wei Y, Huang J, et al. Soil Organic Carbon Stock and Fractional Distribution across Central-South China. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. 2021; 9(4): 620–630.
77. Chaudhuri S, Pena-Yewtukhiw EM, McDonald LM, et al. Land Use Effects on Sample Size Requirements for Soil Organic Carbon Stocks Estimations. Soil Science. 2011; 176(2): 110–114.
78. S Sharma R, Rimal B, Baral H, et al. Impact of Land Cover Change on Ecosystem Services in a Tropical Forested Landscape. Resources. 2019; 8(1): 18. doi: 10.3390/resources8010018
79. Chidowe OA, Blessing AD, Olaleken OJ, et al. Tillage, Desmodium Intortum, Fertilizer Rates for Carbon Stock, Soil Quality and Grain Yield in Northern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria. America Journal of Climate Change. 2019; 8(2): 325–341.
80. Bationo A, Kihara J, Vanlauwe B, et al. Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics, Functions and Management in West African Agro-Ecosystems. Agricultural Systems. 2007; 94(1): 13–25. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2005.08.011
81. Girmay G, Singh BR, Mitiku H, et al. Carbon Stocks in Ethiopian Soils in Relation to Land Use and Soil Management. Land Degradation and Development. 2008; 19(4): 351–367. doi: 10.1002/ldr.844
82. Delelegn YT, Purahong W, Blazevic A, et al. Changes in land use alter soil quality and aggregate stability in the highlands of northern Ethiopia. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14128-y
83. Samson ME, Chantigny MH. Vanasse A, et al. Response of subsurface C and N stocks dominates the whole-soil profile response to agricultural management practices in a cool, humid climate. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2021; 320: 107590.
84. Lal R, Negassa W, Lorenz K. Carbon Sequestration in Soil. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2015; 15: 79–86. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.09.002
85. Vos C, Don A, Hobley EU, et al. Factors controlling the variation in organic carbon stocks in agricultural soils of Germany. European Journal of Soil Science. 2019; 70(3): 550–564.
86. Tsui CC, Tsai CC, Chen ZS. Soil organic carbon stocks in relation to elevation gradients in volcanic ash soils of Taiwan. Geoderma. 2013; 209–210: 119–127. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.013
87. Awoonor JK, Adiyah F, Dogbey BF. Land-Use Change on Soil C and N Stocks in the Humid Savannah Agro-Ecological Zone of Ghana. Journal of Environmental Protection. 2022; 13(1). doi: 10.4236/jep.2022.13100
88. Tsozué D, Nghonda JP, Tematio P, Djakba Basga S. Changes in soil properties and soil organic carbon stocks along an elevation gradient at Mount Bambouto, Central Africa. CATENA. 2019; 175: 251–262. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.028
89. Yu P, Li Q, Jia H, et al. Effect of Cultivation on Dynamics of Organic and Inorganic Carbon Stocks in Songnen Plain. Agronomy Journal. 2014; 106(5): 1574–1582.
90. Seifu W, Elias E, Gebresamuel G, Khanal S. Impact of land use type and altitudinal gradient on topsoil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks in the semi-arid watershed of northern Ethiopia. Heliyon. 2021; 7(4): e06770.
91. Bekunda M, Sanginga N, Woomer PL. Chapter Four—Restoring Soil Fertility in Sub-Sahara Africa. Advances in Agronomy. 2010; 108: 183–236. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(10)08004-1
92. Bhattacharyya R, Pandey SC, Bisht JK, et al. Tillage and irrigation effects on soil aggregation and carbon pools in the Indian sub-Himalayas. Agronomy Journal. 2013; 105(1): 101–112. doi:10.2134/agronj2012.0223
93. Toru T, Kibret K. Carbon Stock under Major Land Use/Land Cover Types of Hades Sub-Watershed, Eastern Ethiopia. Carbon Balance and Management. 2019; 14(1). doi: 10.1186/s13021-019-0122-z
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Prof. Zhengjun Qiu
Zhejiang University, China

Cheng Sun
Academician of World Academy of Productivity Science; Executive Chairman, World Confederation of Productivity Science China Chapter, China
Indexing & Archiving
In the realm of modern agriculture, the integration of cutting-edge technologies is revolutionizing the way we approach sustainable farming practices. A recent study published in Advances in Modern Agriculture titled "Classification of cotton water stress using convolutional neural networks and UAV-based RGB imagery" has garnered significant attention for its innovative approach to precision irrigation management. Conducted by researchers from Institute of Data Science and the AgriLife Research and Extension Center of Texas A&M University (authors's information is below). This study introduces a novel method for classifying cotton water stress using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs), offering a powerful solution for optimizing water use in agriculture.
Modern agricultural technology is evolving rapidly, with scientists collaborating with leading agricultural enterprises to develop intelligent management practices. These practices utilize advanced systems that provide tailored fertilization and treatment options for large-scale land management.
This journal values human initiative and intelligence, and the employment of AI technologies to write papers that replace the human mind is expressly prohibited. When there is a suspicious submission that uses AI tools to quickly piece together and generate research results, the editorial board of the journal will reject the article, and all journals under the publisher's umbrella will prohibit all authors from submitting their articles.
Readers and authors are asked to exercise caution and strictly adhere to the journal's policy regarding the usage of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) tools.
Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.