Open Journal Systems

Embracing smart irrigation management techniques empowers growers to irrigate with greater efficiency, thereby promoting sustainable agricultural production. In this context, growers often rely on crop evapotranspiration (ETc) as a key factor in making informed irrigation decisions, underscoring the significance of accurately determining and spatially mapping crop water status. Technological progress, exemplified by the emergence of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), has brought about a revolutionary shift in agricultural monitoring. UAV platforms can capture high-resolution images with centimeter-level spatial accuracy and offer higher temporal coverage compared to satellite imagery. Considering these advancements, this study introduces a robust method for classifying water stress in cotton using a compact UAV platform and convolutional neural networks (CNN). The experiment was conducted at the USDA-ARS Cropping Systems Research Laboratory (CSRL) in Lubbock, Texas, where the cotton field was divided into 12 drip zones. The study included three replications to evaluate four irrigation treatments: “rainfed”, “full irrigation”, “percent deficit of full irrigation”, and “time delay of full irrigation”. The results demonstrated that the CNN model successfully classified the cotton water stress using the UAV-based RGB image, achieving an overall best prediction accuracy of approximately 91%. By segmenting the original cotton images into separate canopy and soil areas using morphological image processing methods, the authors also isolated and analyzed the individual contributions of these components to cotton water stress. Additionally, a random forest classifier revealed the relative importance of different image features in the classification process through feature importance analysis. These findings highlighted the state-of-the-art performance of the proposed system in cotton water stress classification and provided valuable insights into the key image features contributing to accurate classification. The authors concluded that integrating UAV-based RGB imagery and CNN models had great potential for assessing water stress in cotton.

A new approach to measure spatial variability of soil parameters and field technique to test-value specific fertilizer

Information on the distribution of soil properties is important to know the status of nutrients in the soils based on which fertilizer nutrients are recommended. Given the variability of nutrients in the soils, making a site-specific fertilizer recommendation seems to be a compelling work. To determine the spatial variability of soil nutrients and to make judicious and precise fertilizer recommendations, new measures are designed with this study. These measures are tested against the soil samples (n = 43) for total nitrogen (N), organic matter (OM), phosphorus (P2O5), and potassium (K2O) in the study area. The descriptive statistical analysis indicated an average of low nitrogen and organic matter, while phosphorus was found to be very high and the level of potassium was high. The spread of nutrients across the data sets, however, included low, medium, high, and very high levels of ratings. The Deviation Square Index was developed and applied for the variability measurement and found that the largest variation was with phosphorus distribution, followed by potassium, nitrogen, and organic matter. The coefficient of variation (CV%) analysis also exhibited similar trends in nutrient distributions. Nitrogen was the main determinant explaining the variations in rice yield, while phosphorus and potash were negatively related to the yield. An index of fertilizer nutrient recommendation called Test-Value Specific Dose (TVSD) was developed and used to calculate the nutrient recommendation for each sampled location. This new method gave easy and more accurate doses of fertilizer over the blanket recommendation to fit the variations across the soil samples.

The influence of slope exposure on the yield characteristics of winter wheat and spring barley in the Oka River basin, Russia

P. A. Shary, L. S. Sharaya, O. V. Rukhovich

Article ID: 2435
Vol 5, Issue 1, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ama.v5i1.2435
VIEWS - 7355 (Abstract)

Download PDF

Abstract

We studied the relationship of the yield of winter wheat and spring barley with slope exposure components in the west of the Oka River basin. The size of the study area was 250 km by 360 km. The yield characteristics included the maximal yield obtained when applying the optimal dose of fertilizers, the yield without applying fertilizers (control), and the maximal addition to yield, that is, their difference. The addition is shown to be most sensitive to climatic factors. For wheat, the addition increased on the warmer southwestern slopes, and for barley—on the wetter north-eastern slopes. The high sensitivity of the addition of barley to moisture is shown using its comparison with climatic water deficit. To compare slopes by the energy of incident solar radiation, we used the slope insolation in energy units. Although the difference in energy between the southwest and northeast slopes was only 2.2%, wheat addition on these slopes varied by more than a factor of two. The reasons for this are discussed. The results obtained show that when choosing locations for crop areas, it is advisable to take into account the exposure of the slopes.

Keywords

slope exposure; solar irradiation; winter wheat; spring barley; water deficit; incident solar energy

References

1. Alvarez R, Grigera S. Analysis of Soil Fertility and Management Effects on Yields of Wheat and Corn in the Rolling Pampa of Argentina. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 2005, 191(5): 321-329. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037x.2005.00143.x

2. Lobell DB, Field CB. Global scale climate–crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environmental Research Letters. 2007, 2(1): 014002. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/2/1/014002

3. Ferrara RM, Trevisiol P, Acutis M, et al. Topographic impacts on wheat yields under climate change: two contrasted case studies in Europe. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 2010, 99: 53–65.

4. Lobell DB, Burke MB. Why are agricultural impacts of climate change so uncertain? The importance of temperature relative to precipitation. Environmental Research Letters. 2008, 3(3): 034007. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/3/3/034007

5. Shary PA, Rukhovich OV, Sharaya LS. Analytical and Cartographic Predictive Modeling of Arable Land Productivity. Novel Methods for Monitoring and Managing Land and Water Resources in Siberia. Published online November 15, 2015: 489-502. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24409-9_21

6. Shary PA, Sharaya LS, Rukhovich OV. Model-Based Forecasting Winter Wheat Yields Using Landscape and Climate Data. Landscape Modelling and Decision Support. Published online 2020: 383-396. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-37421-1_20

7. Schlenker W, Roberts MJ. Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009, 106(37): 15594-15598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906865106

8. Lobell DB, Schlenker W, Costa-Roberts J. Climate Trends and Global Crop Production Since 1980. Science. 2011, 333(6042): 616-620. doi: 10.1126/science.1204531

9. Walley F, Pennock D, Solohub M, et al. Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) yield and grain protein responses to N fertilizer in topographically defined landscape positions. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 2001, 81(4): 505-514. doi: 10.4141/s00-036

10. Basso B, Cammarano D, Chen D, et al. Landscape position and precipitation effects on spatial variability of wheat yield and grain protein in Southern Italy. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 2009, 195: 301–312.

11. Yang C, Peterson CL, Shropshire GJ, Otawa T. Spatial variability of field topography and wheat yield in the Palouse region of the Pacific northwest. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 1998, 41: 17–27.

12. Si BC, Farrell RE. Scale‐Dependent Relationship between Wheat Yield and Topographic Indices. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2004, 68(2): 577-587. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2004.5770

13. Xu Y, Yang B, Liu G, et al. Topographic differentiation simulation of crop yield and soil and water loss on the Loess Plateau. Journal of Geographical Sciences. 2009, 19(3): 331-339. doi: 10.1007/s11442-009-0331-6

14. Persson A, Pilesjö P, Eklundh L. Spatial Influence of Topographical Factors on Yield of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Central Sweden. Precision Agriculture. 2005, 6(4): 341-357. doi: 10.1007/s11119-005-2323-6

15. Jankauskas B, Jankauskienė G, Fullen MA. Relationships between soil organic matter content and soil erosion severity in Albeluvisols of the Žemaičiai Uplands. Ecologija. 2007, 53: 21–28.

16. Wilkens P, Singh U. A code-level analysis for temperature effects in the CERES models. In: White JW (editor). Modeling Temperature Response in Wheat and Maize. Proceedings of a workshop, CIMMYT, El Batán, Mexico, 23–25 April 2001. pp. 1–7.

17. Basso B, Liu L, Ritchie JT. A comprehensive review of the CERES-Wheat, -Maize and -Rice models’ performance. Advances in Agronomy. 2016, 136: 27–132.

18. Wang Z, Ye L, Jiang J, et al. Review of application of EPIC crop growth model. Ecological Modelling. 2022, 467: 109952. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109952

19. Shary PA, Smirnov NS. Mechanisms of the effects of solar radiation and terrain anisotropy on the vegetation of dark conifer forests in the Pechora-Ilych state biosphere reserve. Russian Journal of Ecology. 2013, 44(1): 9-17. doi: 10.1134/s1067413613010116

20. Shary PA. Environmental Variables in Predictive Soil Mapping: A Review. Eurasian Soil Science. 2023, 56(3): 247-259. doi: 10.1134/s1064229322602384

21. Lobell DB, Burke MB. On the use of statistical models to predict crop yield responses to climate change. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2010, 150(11): 1443-1452. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.07.008

22. Pasquel D, Roux S, Richetti J, et al. A review of methods to evaluate crop model performance at multiple and changing spatial scales. Precision Agriculture. 2022, 23(4): 1489-1513. doi: 10.1007/s11119-022-09885-4

23. Lobell DB, Ortiz‐Monasterio JI. Impacts of Day Versus Night Temperatures on Spring Wheat Yields: A Comparison of Empirical and CERES Model Predictions in Three Locations. Agronomy Journal. 2007, 99(2): 469-477. doi: 10.2134/agronj2006.0209

24. Shary PA, Sharaya LS, Mitusov AV. Fundamental quantitative methods of land surface analysis. Geoderma. 2002, 107(1-2): 1-32. doi: 10.1016/s0016-7061(01)00136-7

25. Sychev VG, Rukhovich OV, Romanenkov VA, et al. Case studies on developing a single systematized data base of field experiments of Agrochimsluzhba and geonetwork “Agrogeos” (Russian). Problems of Agrochemistry and Ecology. 2008, 3: 35–38.

26. Rodriguez E, Morris CS, Belz JE, et al. An assessment of the SRTM topographic products. Technical Report JPL D-31639. Pasadena, California: Jet Propulsion Laboratory. 2005, 143.

27. Beers TW, Dress PE, Wensel LC. Aspect transformation in site productivity research. Journal of Forestry. 1966, 64: 691–692.

28. Lutz JA, van Wagtendonk JW, Franklin JF. Climatic water deficit, tree species ranges, and climate change in Yosemite National Park. Journal of Biogeography. 2010, 37(5): 936-950. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02268.x

29. Thornthwaite CW. An Approach toward a Rational Classification of Climate. Geographical Review. 1948, 38(1): 55. doi: 10.2307/210739

30. Budyko MI. Thermal Balance of Land Surface (Russian). Leningrad: Hydrometeoizdat. 1956.

31. Brutsaert W. Evaporation into the Atmosphere. Theory, History and Applications. London: D. Reidel Publishing Company. 1982.

32. Hwang T, Song C, Vose JM, et al. Topography-mediated controls on local vegetation phenology estimated from MODIS vegetation index. Landscape Ecology. 2011, 26(4): 541-556. doi: 10.1007/s10980-011-9580-8

33. Beckage B, Osborne B, Pucko C, et al. A rapid upward shift of a forest ecotone during 40 years of warming in the Green Mountains of Vermont. Proc. Nation. Acad. Sci. 2008, 105: 4197–4202.

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2024 P. A. Shary, L. S. Sharaya, O. V. Rukhovich

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Zhengjun Qiu

Zhejiang University, China

Honorary Editor-in-Chief

Cheng Sun

Academician of World Academy of Productivity Science; Executive Chairman, World Confederation of Productivity Science China Chapter, China

Processing Speed

- - - ＜5 days from submission to initial review decision;
  - 64% acceptance rate

News & Announcements

2024-09-11

Smart agriculture is becoming a reality!

Modern agricultural technology is evolving rapidly, with scientists collaborating with leading agricultural enterprises to develop intelligent management practices. These practices utilize advanced systems that provide tailored fertilization and treatment options for large-scale land management.

2024-05-01

Notice on the prohibition of using AI techniques to generate papers!

This journal values human initiative and intelligence, and the employment of AI technologies to write papers that replace the human mind is expressly prohibited. When there is a suspicious submission that uses AI tools to quickly piece together and generate research results, the editorial board of the journal will reject the article, and all journals under the publisher's umbrella will prohibit all authors from submitting their articles.

Readers and authors are asked to exercise caution and strictly adhere to the journal's policy regarding the usage of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) tools.

2024-01-14

We are recruiting Editorial Team Members

Advances in Modern Agriculture (AMA) is looking for members of the Editorial Board.

2023-12-28

Notice on the change of publication frequency

The publication frequency of Advances in Modern Agriculture is Quarterly since 2024, that means the journal will publish 4 issues per year from 2024 onwards.

More Announcements...

Journal Center

Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.

more

Article Tools

Indexing metadata

How to cite item

Review policy