Open Journal Systems

Publication Frequency

Bi-annual

Journal Content

Search scope

Volume Arrangement

2024

2023

2022

Featured Articles

Classification of cotton water stress using convolutional neural networks and UAV-based RGB imagery

Embracing smart irrigation management techniques empowers growers to irrigate with greater efficiency, thereby promoting sustainable agricultural production. In this context, growers often rely on crop evapotranspiration (ETc) as a key factor in making informed irrigation decisions, underscoring the significance of accurately determining and spatially mapping crop water status. Technological progress, exemplified by the emergence of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), has brought about a revolutionary shift in agricultural monitoring. UAV platforms can capture high-resolution images with centimeter-level spatial accuracy and offer higher temporal coverage compared to satellite imagery. Considering these advancements, this study introduces a robust method for classifying water stress in cotton using a compact UAV platform and convolutional neural networks (CNN). The experiment was conducted at the USDA-ARS Cropping Systems Research Laboratory (CSRL) in Lubbock, Texas, where the cotton field was divided into 12 drip zones. The study included three replications to evaluate four irrigation treatments: “rainfed”, “full irrigation”, “percent deficit of full irrigation”, and “time delay of full irrigation”. The results demonstrated that the CNN model successfully classified the cotton water stress using the UAV-based RGB image, achieving an overall best prediction accuracy of approximately 91%. By segmenting the original cotton images into separate canopy and soil areas using morphological image processing methods, the authors also isolated and analyzed the individual contributions of these components to cotton water stress. Additionally, a random forest classifier revealed the relative importance of different image features in the classification process through feature importance analysis. These findings highlighted the state-of-the-art performance of the proposed system in cotton water stress classification and provided valuable insights into the key image features contributing to accurate classification. The authors concluded that integrating UAV-based RGB imagery and CNN models had great potential for assessing water stress in cotton.

A new approach to measure spatial variability of soil parameters and field technique to test-value specific fertilizer

Information on the distribution of soil properties is important to know the status of nutrients in the soils based on which fertilizer nutrients are recommended. Given the variability of nutrients in the soils, making a site-specific fertilizer recommendation seems to be a compelling work. To determine the spatial variability of soil nutrients and to make judicious and precise fertilizer recommendations, new measures are designed with this study. These measures are tested against the soil samples (n = 43) for total nitrogen (N), organic matter (OM), phosphorus (P2O5), and potassium (K2O) in the study area. The descriptive statistical analysis indicated an average of low nitrogen and organic matter, while phosphorus was found to be very high and the level of potassium was high. The spread of nutrients across the data sets, however, included low, medium, high, and very high levels of ratings. The Deviation Square Index was developed and applied for the variability measurement and found that the largest variation was with phosphorus distribution, followed by potassium, nitrogen, and organic matter. The coefficient of variation (CV%) analysis also exhibited similar trends in nutrient distributions. Nitrogen was the main determinant explaining the variations in rice yield, while phosphorus and potash were negatively related to the yield. An index of fertilizer nutrient recommendation called Test-Value Specific Dose (TVSD) was developed and used to calculate the nutrient recommendation for each sampled location. This new method gave easy and more accurate doses of fertilizer over the blanket recommendation to fit the variations across the soil samples.

Understanding factors intercepting response of rice farmers to climate change in Ebonyi State, Nigeria

E. E. Osuji, A. C. Tim-Ashama, U. T. Agunanne, R. A. Iheanacho, S. C. Onyirioha, J. Nze

Article ID: 2285
Vol 4, Issue 2, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ama.v4i2.2285
VIEWS - 108 (Abstract)

Abstract

Understanding factors intercepting response of rice farmers to climate change in Ebonyi State, Nigeria was investigated. A total of 70 rice farmers was sampled using multi-stage sampling technique and were administered with a questionnaire. Primary data was collected and were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean, frequency, percentage, chart), and ordinary least square multiple regression model. Results shows that the rice farmers cultivated on small land holdings, relatively educated, sourced their land via inheritance and had 16 years of farming experience. Results reveals that 72% of the rice farmers are highly aware of climate change, while 17% and 11% are relatively aware and not aware respectively. Temperatures, rainfall, and number of rainy days have positive effects on rice production while sunshine hours and relative humidity had negative effects on rice production. Age, gender, education, farm size, extension contacts and participation in workshop were significant variables influencing rice production in the state. Capital, crude implements, pests and diseases, poor soil, lack of incentives and cultivation systems were the non-climatic factors that influenced rice cultivation in the state. Farmers were recommended to embrace climate smart cropping systems and seek for early climate change information to mitigate adverse effects of climate change on rice cultivation.

Keywords

rice farmers; climate change; multi-stage sampling; logit model; Ebonyi State

Full Text:

PDF

References

1. Saud S, Wang D, Fahad S, et al. Comprehensive impacts of climate change on rice production and adaptive strategies in China. Frontiers in Microbiology 2022; 13: 926059. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.926059

2. Climate Change Is an Increasing Threat to Africa. Available online: https://unfccc.int/news/climate-change-is-an- increasing-threat-to-africa (accessed on 27 October 2020).

3. Cai C, Li G, Yang HL, et al. Do all leaf photosynthesis parameters of rice acclimate to elevated CO2, elevated temperature, and their combination, in face environments? Global Change Biology 2018; 24(4): 1685–1707. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13961

4. Chandio AA, Jiang Y, Rehman A, Rauf A. Short and long-run impacts of climate change on agriculture: An empirical evidence from China. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management 2020; 12(2): 201–221. doi: 10.1108/IJCCSM-05-2019-0026

5. Chen C, van-Groenigen KJ, Yang H, et al. Global warming and shifts in cropping systems together reduce China’s rice production. Global Food Security 2020; 24: 100359. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100359

6. FAO. Nigeria agriculture at a glance. Available online: https://www.fao.org/nigeria/fao-in-nigeria/nigeria-at-a-glance/en/ (accessed on 14 September 2023).

7. Deng A, Chen C, Feng J, et al. Cropping system innovation for coping with climatic warming in China. The Crop Journal 2017; 5(2): 136–150. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2016.06.015

8. Nwali NI, Okoro FN. Analysis of climate change effects on rice output in Ebonyi State, Nigeria: 1990–2015. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Annual NAAE Conference; 16–19 October 2017; Abeokuta, Nigeria. pp. 591–596.

9. FAO. The state of food and agriculture 2019. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/ca6030en/ca6030en.pdf (accessed on 14 September 2023).

10. Chen K, Horton RM, Bader DA, et al. Impact of climate change on heat-related mortality in Jiangsu Province, China. Environmental Pollution 2017; 224: 317–325. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.011

11. Ding Y, Wang W, Zhuang Q, Luo Y. Adaptation of paddy rice in China to climate change: The effects of shifting sowing date on yield and irrigation water requirement. Agricultural Water Management 2020; 228: 105890. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105890

12. Adeagbo OA, Ojo TO, Adetoro AA. Understanding the determinants of climate change adaptation strategies among smallholder maize farmers in South-west, Nigeria. Heliyon 2021; 7(2): e06231. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06231

13. Agovino M, Casaccia M, Ciommi M, et al. Agriculture, climate change and sustainability: The case of EU-28. Ecological Indicators 2019; 105: 525–543. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04. 064

14. Ahmad M, Jiang P, Majeed A, Raza MY. Does financial development and foreign direct investment improve environmental quality? Evidence from belt and road countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2020; 27: 23586–23601. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08748-7

15. Ahsan F, Chandio AA, Fang W. Climate change impacts on cereal crops production in Pakistan. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management 2020; 12(2): 257–269. doi: 10.1108/IJCCSM-04-2019-0020

16. FAO. Crop prospects and food situation. Available online: https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cc0868en (accessed on 14 September 2023).

17. Igberi CO, Osuji EE, Anuli RO, et al. Climate smart adaptive measure of yellow cassava, linkages and implications in Southeast Nigeria. Agrociencia 2022; 56(3): 1–32. doi: 10.47163/1646.Ag.

18. Ikuemonisan ES, MafimisebiTE, Ajibefun I, Adenegan IK. Cassava production in Nigeria: Trends, instability and decomposition analysis (1970–2018). Heliyon 2020; 6(10): e05089. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05089

19. Kumar P, Chandra NS, Kumar S, Ansari MA. Impact of climate change on cereal production: Evidence from lower-middle-income countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2021; 28: 51597–51611. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14373

20. Dou Z, Tang S, Chen WZ, et al. Effects of open-field warming during grain-filling stage on grain quality of two japonica rice cultivars in lower reaches of Yangtze River delta. Journal of Cereal Science 2018; 81: 118–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2018.04.004

21. Espe MB, Hill JE, Hijmans RJ, et al. Point stresses during reproductive stage rather than warming seasonal temperature determine yield in temperate rice. Global Change Biology 2017; 23(10): 4386–4395. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13719

22. Guo Y, Wu W, Liu Y, et al. Impacts of climate and phenology on the yields of early mature rice in China. Sustainability 2020; 12(23): 10133. doi: 10.3390/su122310133

23. Tajudeen TT, Omotayo A, Ogundele FO, Rathbun LC. The effect of climate change on food crop production in Lagos State. Foods 2022; 11(24): 3987. doi: 10.3390/foods11243987

24. Arora NK. Impact of climate change on agriculture production and its sustainable solutions. Environmental Sustainability 2019; 2: 95–96. doi: 10.1007/s42398-019-00078-w

25. Onyeneke RU, Amadi MU, Njoku CL, Osuji EE. Climate change perception and uptake of climate smart agriculture in rice production in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Atmosphere 2021; 12(11): 1503. doi: 10.3390/atmos12111503

26. Osuji EE, Okwara MO, Essien UA, et al. Sustainability of climate change adaptation measures in South-South, Nigeria. Agriculture and Food Sciences Research 2019; 6(1): 120–126.

27. Diagi BE, Nwagbara MO. Perceived impact of climate change on swamp rice cultivation by farmers in Ebonyi State, Southeastern Nigeria. Archives of Current Research International 2018; 14(2): 1–10. doi: 10.9734/ACRI/2018/41176

28. Onyeneke RU. Determinants of adoption of improved technologies in rice production in Imo State, Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2017; 12(11): 888–896. doi: 10.5897/AJAR2016.11737

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

Editor-in-Chief

Dr. Joan Estrany

University of the Balearic Islands Spain

News & Announcements

2023-08-22

New version of Author Guidelines are update

Please follow the journal's author guideline and the required article template to prepare your manuscript

2022-09-10

The 2022 World Food Forum will be held in Italy

The 2022 World Food Forum (WFF) flagship event will take place from 17 to 21 October at the Headquarters of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) in Rome, Italy and virtually.

2022-06-07

Italian researchers are protesting a law that may equate “biodynamic” methods with organic agriculture

One line in the draft law concerns scientists above all. Article I states that “for the purposes of this law, the biodynamic agriculture method […], when applied in compliance with the European Union’s dispositions on organic farming, is equated with organic farming”. A few articles later, the law requires one representative of biodynamic farmers to sit in a technical committee that will oversee the application of the law, including allocations of public funds.

More Announcements...

Section Collections

Proposal a Section Collection

Deadline: 2024-12-31

Food Science

Keywords: food science; functional foods; food ingredients; nutrient fortification; crop biomass; sustainable food; processing technologies; cross-disciplinary approach

Special Issue

Proposal a Special Issue

Deadline: 2023-08-24

Sustainability of modern agriculture

Keywords: sustainable agriculture, objectives of sustainable farming, involving devices, involving technology, pros and cons, etc.

Deadline: 2023-08-24

Technology in modern agriculture

Keywords: the agricultural device, the technology used in farming different plants, the impact of technology on agriculture, the evolution of agricultural technology, robotic systems, etc.