Yield potency assessment and characters association of promising lines of mustard (Brassica rapa L.) in southern region of Bangladesh

Mahmudul Hasan Khan, B. C. Kundu, M. Shalim Uddin, M. Rafiqul Islam, M. Aktar-Uz-Zaman, M. Ahmed, Razi Uddin, M. Rashedul Islam, A. K. Das, M. G. Rahman

Article ID: 2216
Vol 4, Issue 2, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ama.v4i2.2216
VIEWS - 91 (Abstract)

Abstract

Mustard (Brassica spp.) is a major oilseed crop and the world’s third largest source of vegetable oil. During the rabi season of 2022–2023, the experiment was carried out at the Regional Agricultural Research Station, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Barishal to evaluate the performance of 12 genotypes of Brassica rapa L., including the check variety BARI Sarisha-14. The experiment was conducted under randomized complete block design (RCBD) design with three replications. Analysis of variance demonstrated that a highly significant (p ≤ 0.01) differences for the traits viz., plant height, no. of primary branches, no. of secondary branches, and no. of seeds per siliqua whereas no. of siliqua per plant, 1000 seeds weight, yield kg per hectare had significant difference at p ≤ 0.05. Among the examined accessions, the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) cluster analysis identified four different clusters. Cluster II (28.91%) with only one accession had the highest average yield, followed by Cluster I (26.25%) and Cluster IV (22.68%) with the best agronomic features. Furthermore, we observed 1.6% and 11.93% greater (+) mean yield compared to the grand mean yield (1502.33 kg ha−1) for cluster I and cluster II, respectively. Correlation analysis examine the positive and highly significant association among the yield with its related traits. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed the total proportion of variation 54.86% for PC1 and 16.89% for PC2. The genotypes BC-100614(8)-7 gave 7.20% higher yield over the check variety. Considering the statistical results, maturity period, yield and yield contributing characters of Brassica rapa L. genotypes BC-100614(8)-7 (1681 kg ha−1), BC-100614(8)-1 (1594 kg ha−1) and BC-100614(7)-3 (1565 kg ha−1) were noted as promising lines among the evaluated genotypes and suggested for future breeding program.

Keywords

Brassica rapa L.; yield potency; phenotypic association; PCA analysis; promising breeding lines; trait selection

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Ahmed Z, Kashem MA. Performance of mustard varieties in haor area of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Agronomy Journal 2017; 20(1): 1–5. doi: 10.3329/baj.v20i1.34875

2. USDA. Bangladesh: Oilseeds and products annual. Available online: https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/bangladesh-oilseeds-and-products-annual-3 (accessed on 30 March 2022).

3. Aziz MA, Rahman AKMM, Chakma R, et al. 2011. Performance of mustard varieties in the hilly areas of Bangladesh. Journal of Experimental Biosciences 2011; 2(2): 7–10.

4. Das S, Tejani DN, Patel JC, et al. Effect of weather parameters on population dynamics of mustard aphid. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science 2019; 8(4): 1648–1653. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2019.804.192

5. Sehgal A, Reddy KR, Walne CH, et al. Climate stressors on growth, yield, and functional biochemistry of two Brassica species, Kale and Mustard. Life 2022; 12(10): 1546.doi: 10.3390/life12101546

6. Uddin MS, Talukdar MMR, Khan MSI, et al. Evaluation of mustard genotypes under late sowing condition in the southern region of Bangladesh. Journal of Scientific Research 2009; 1(3): 667–672. doi: 10.3329/jsr.v1i3.2576

7. Agriculture Information Service (AIS). (2023). Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. Available online: http://www.ais.gov.bd/site/ekrishi/da8c8a9e-683a-4f3e-ab89-ac9c65fddf64 (accessed on 7 April 2023).

8. Tridge. Export & import trends in food & agriculture. Available online: https://www.tridge.com/ (accessed on 31 October 2023).

9. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute. BARI Annual Report (2021–2022). Oilseed Research Centre; 2022.

10. Khaliqi A, Rafii MY, Mazlan N, et al. Genetic analysis and selection criteria in Bambara groundnut accessions based yield performance. Agronomy 2021; 11(8): 1634. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11081634

11. Khan MH, Rafii MY, Ramlee SI, et al. Genetic analysis and selection of Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea [L.] Verdc.) landraces for high yield revealed by qualitative and quantitative traits. Scientific Reports 2021; 11(1): 7597. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87039-8

12. Fayyaz L, Amin NU. Genetic variability among advanced lines of Brassica. Pakistan Journal of Botany 2015; 47(2): 623–628

13. Bazzaz MM, Hossain A, Farooq M, et al. Phenology, growth and yield are strongly influenced by heat stress in late sown mustard (Brassica spp.) varieties. Pakistan Journal of Botany 2020; 52(4): 1189–1195. doi: 10.30848/PJB2020-4(44)

14. Sharif MAR, Haque MZ, Howlader MHK, Hossain MJ. Effect of sowing time on growth and yield attributes of three mustard cultivars grown in Tidal Floodplain of Bangladesh. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University 2016; 14(2): 155–160. doi: 10.3329/jbau.v14i2.32689

15. Helal MU, Islam N, Kadir M, Miah NH. Performance of rapeseed and mustard (Brassica sp.) varieties/lines in north-east region (sylhet) of Bangladesh. Advances in Plants & Agriculture Research 2016; 5(1): 457–462. doi: 10.15406/apar.2016.05.00168

16. Mojena R. Hierarchical grouping methods and stopping rules: An evaluation. The Computer Journal 1977; 20(4): 359–363. doi: 10.1093/comjnl/20.4.359

17. Khan MH, Rafii MY, Ramlee SI, et al. (2022). Unveiling genetic diversity, characterization, and selection of Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc) genotypes reflecting yield and yield components in tropical Malaysia. BioMed Research International 2022; 2022: 6794475. doi: 10.1155/2022/6794475

18. Khan MH, Rafii MY, Ramlee SI, et al. Genetic variability, heritability, and clustering pattern exploration of Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc) accessions for the perfection of yield and yield-related traits. BioMed Research International 2020; 2020: 2195797. doi: 10.1155/2020/2195797oducts-annual-3 (accessed on 30 March 2022).

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.