Regulation of modern "grass-sheep-field" agro-pastoral cycle system based on life cycle assessment

Yuan Shen, Haihou Wang, Yueyue Tao, Changying Lu, Linlin Dong, Linlin Shi, Meijuan Jin, Xinwei Zhou, Mingxing Shen

Article ID: 2093
Vol 4, Issue 1, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ama.v3i1.2093
VIEWS - 2356 (Abstract)

Download PDF

Abstract

Modern circular agriculture aims to minimize the number of external outputs for less impact on the environment in the complex ecosystem and the circular economy of the industry chains. Therefore, the green development of agriculture can be achieved to promote rural revitalization in China. However, accurate data support and parameter matching are still lacking in most operation of circular agriculture. Fortunately, the life cycle assessment can serve as an effective tool to evaluate the environmental impact of the entire chains in the product systems, further improving the circulating efficiency of the systems in recent years. In this study, an empirical investigation using the life cycle assessment was performed on the modern “straw-sheep-cropland” agro-pastoral system located in the northeast of Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China. Six types of potential environmental impacts were evaluated from the sufficient data collection and tracking survey using the data characterization, standardization, and weighted summation, including the acidification potential, global warming potential, terrestrial ecotoxicity, human toxicity, freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity, and eutrophication potential. And then the environmental service energy was compared for the emission degradation before and after the regulation. The energy was calculated to consume the pollution dilution for a safe concentration. The results showed that fertilization was an important factor in the environmental performance of the cereal cropping subsystem during the wheat- and rice-growing seasons. The types of potential environmental impacts from the feed producing and sheep raising subsystems were more than 85% of the total impacts, which were much higher than that of the cereal cropping and organic composting subsystems. The environmental impacts of human toxicity and freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity were greater in each subsystem, whereas, that of terrestrial ecotoxicity was the least. After life cycle assessment, the annual environmental service energies of air, water, and soil to realize the emission degradation were 7.42×1010, 6.03×1016, and 1.59×1012 J, respectively, according to the threshold concentration of index pollutants. Subsequently, the scales of feed producing and organic composting subsystems were adjusted in line with the matching output with the input of successive subsystems, particularly under the steady production scale of cereal cropping and sheep raising subsystems. A simulated regulation was also conducted to optimize the parameters and key technologies. It was estimated that the annual environmental service energies of air, water, and soil were reduced by 52%, 44%, and 21%, respectively, compared with the original. In conclusion, a new system was formed with excellent sustainability and replication to evaluate and regulate the modern agro-pastoral system using the life cycle assessment. The finding can provide a strong reference for the optimal regulation of modern agricultural systems in diverse regions. In the future research, the local life cycle inventory database can be constructed for the life cycle assessment.

Keywords

circular agriculture; life cycle assessment; potential environmental impact; emission degradation; environmental service energy


References

1. Li F J, Dong S C, Li F. A system dynamics model for analyzing the eco-agriculture system with policy recommendations[J]. Ecological Modeling, 2012, 227: 34-45.

2. Donner M, Verniquet A, Broeze J, et al. Critical success and risk factors for circular business models valorising agricultural waste and by-products[J]. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2021, 165: 105236.

3. Adegbeye M J, Ravi Kanth Reddy P, Obaisi A I, et al. Sustainable agriculture options for production, greenhouse gasses and pollution alleviation, and nutrient recycling in emerging and transitional nations-An overview[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 242: 118319.

4. Xu Xiangbo, Sun Mingxing, Zhang Linxiu. Research progress of life cycle assessment on agriculture[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(1): 422-433. (in Chinese with English abstract)

5. Altieri M A. Agroecology: The Science of Sustainable Agriculture[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2018.

6. Tricase C, Lamonaca E, Ingrao C, et al. A comparative life cycle assessment between organic and conventional barley cultivation for sustainable agriculture pathways[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 172: 3747-3759.

7. Christensen L O, Galt R E, Kendall A. Life-cycle greenhouse gas assessment of Community Supported Agriculture in California's Central Valley[J]. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 2018, 33(5): 393-405.

8. Masuda K. Measuring eco-efficiency of wheat production in Japan: A combined application of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 126: 373-381.

9. Taki M, Soheili-Fard F, Rohani A, et al. Life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impacts of different wheat production systems[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 197: 195-207.

10. Jimmy A N, Khan N A, Hossain M N, et al. Evaluation of the environmental impacts of rice paddy production using life cycle assessment: Case study in Bangladesh[J]. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2017, 3(4): 1691-1705.

11. Yang Xinglin, Liu Yanbing, Zhu Zongyuan, et al. Life cycle assessment of biodiesel from soybean oil and waste oil[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2020, 36(19): 233-241. (in Chinese with English abstract)

12. Bai Jinheng. Ecological Environment Impacts and Driving Mechanisms of Rice Production in Liaoning[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)

13. Chen Zhongdu, Li Fengbo, Feng Jinfei, et al. Study on carbon footprint for rice-wheat rotation system in the lower reaches of Yangtze River: Based on the life cycle assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019, 40(12): 81-90. (in Chinese with English abstract)

14. Liang Long, Chen Yuanquan, Gao Wangsheng. Integrated evaluation of circular agriculture system: A life cycle perspective[J]. Environmental Science, 2010, 31(11): 2795-2803. (in Chinese with English abstract)

15. Zhang X, Ma F, Wang L. Application of life cycle assessment in agricultural circular economy[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 260/261: 1086-1091.

16. Wang X L, Dadouma A, Chen Y, et al. Sustainability evaluation of the large-scale pig farming system in North China: An emergy analysis based on life cycle assessment[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 102: 144-164.

17. Fan W, Dong X, Wei H, et al. Is it true that the longer the extended industrial chain, the better the circular agriculture? A case study of circular agriculture industry company in Fuqing, Fujian[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 189: 718-728.

18. Dorr E, Koegler M, Gabrielle B, et al. Life cycle assessment of a circular, urban mushroom farm[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 288: 125668.

19. Bakshi B R. A thermodynamic framework for ecologically conscious process systems engineering[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2002, 26(2): 269-282.

20. Ulgiati S, Brown M T. Quantifying the environmental support for dilution and abatement of process emissions: the case of electricity production[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2002, 10(4): 335-348.

21. Jiangsu Taihu Institute of Agricultural Sciences. Modern "grass-sheep-field" agricultural and animal husbandry cycle production technology [J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Science, 2017, 45(24): 6.

22. Guinée J B. Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards[M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.

23. Moreno Ruiz E, FitzGerald D, Symeonidis A, et al. Technical report of changes implemented in the ecoinvent database between v3.7 & v3.7.1[R]. Zürich: Ecoinvent Association, 2020.

24. Ciroth A, Di Noi C, Lohse T, et al. OpenLCA 1. 10 comprehensive user manual[R]. Berlin: GreenDelta, 2020.

25. Van Oers L. CML-IA database, characterisation and normalisation factors for midpoint impact category indicators[EB/OL]. (2016-09-05)[2020-08-15]. http: //www. cml. leiden. edu/software/data-cmlia. html.

26. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects 2019[EB/OL]. (2020-05-01)[2020-09-14]. https: //population. un. org/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/.

27. Wang M, Wu W, Liu W, et al. Life cycle assessment of the winter wheat-summer maize production system on the North China Plain[J]. The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2007, 14(4): 400-407.

28. Liang Long. Environmental Impact Assessment of Circular Agriculture Based on Life Cycle Assessment: Methods and Case Studies[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2009. (in Chinese with English abstract)

29. Wang Xiaolong. An Integrated Framework Based on Life Cycle Assessment and Emergy Evaluation for Circular Agriculture: Theories, Methods and Cases[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract)

30. Mi Lan. Microbial Underpinning of the Differential Methane Emission Between Hu Sheep and New Zealand White rabbits[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)

31. Li Danyang, Ma Ruonan, Qi Chuanren, et al. Effects of moisture content on maturity and pollution gas emissions during sheep manure composting[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2020, 36(20): 254-262. (in Chinese with English abstract)

32. State Environmental Protection Administration. HJ/T332—2006, Environmental Quality Evaluation Standards for Edible Agricultural Products [S]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2007.

33. Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China. HJ568—2010, Specification for Environmental Assessment of Livestock and Poultry Breeding Places [S]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2010.

34. Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China. HJ25. 3—2014, Technical Guidelines for Risk Assessment of Contaminated Sites [S]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2014.

35. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. GB18468-2001, Hygienic Standard for Paradichlorobenzene in Indoor Air [S]. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2002.

36. State Environmental Protection Administration. GB8978—1996, Integrated Wastewater Discharge Standard [S]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 1996.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Yuan Shen, Haihou Wang, Yueyue Tao, Changying Lu, Linlin Dong, Linlin Shi, Meijuan Jin, Xinwei Zhou, Mingxing Shen

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).