Open Journal Systems

Embracing smart irrigation management techniques empowers growers to irrigate with greater efficiency, thereby promoting sustainable agricultural production. In this context, growers often rely on crop evapotranspiration (ETc) as a key factor in making informed irrigation decisions, underscoring the significance of accurately determining and spatially mapping crop water status. Technological progress, exemplified by the emergence of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), has brought about a revolutionary shift in agricultural monitoring. UAV platforms can capture high-resolution images with centimeter-level spatial accuracy and offer higher temporal coverage compared to satellite imagery. Considering these advancements, this study introduces a robust method for classifying water stress in cotton using a compact UAV platform and convolutional neural networks (CNN). The experiment was conducted at the USDA-ARS Cropping Systems Research Laboratory (CSRL) in Lubbock, Texas, where the cotton field was divided into 12 drip zones. The study included three replications to evaluate four irrigation treatments: “rainfed”, “full irrigation”, “percent deficit of full irrigation”, and “time delay of full irrigation”. The results demonstrated that the CNN model successfully classified the cotton water stress using the UAV-based RGB image, achieving an overall best prediction accuracy of approximately 91%. By segmenting the original cotton images into separate canopy and soil areas using morphological image processing methods, the authors also isolated and analyzed the individual contributions of these components to cotton water stress. Additionally, a random forest classifier revealed the relative importance of different image features in the classification process through feature importance analysis. These findings highlighted the state-of-the-art performance of the proposed system in cotton water stress classification and provided valuable insights into the key image features contributing to accurate classification. The authors concluded that integrating UAV-based RGB imagery and CNN models had great potential for assessing water stress in cotton.

A new approach to measure spatial variability of soil parameters and field technique to test-value specific fertilizer

Information on the distribution of soil properties is important to know the status of nutrients in the soils based on which fertilizer nutrients are recommended. Given the variability of nutrients in the soils, making a site-specific fertilizer recommendation seems to be a compelling work. To determine the spatial variability of soil nutrients and to make judicious and precise fertilizer recommendations, new measures are designed with this study. These measures are tested against the soil samples (n = 43) for total nitrogen (N), organic matter (OM), phosphorus (P2O5), and potassium (K2O) in the study area. The descriptive statistical analysis indicated an average of low nitrogen and organic matter, while phosphorus was found to be very high and the level of potassium was high. The spread of nutrients across the data sets, however, included low, medium, high, and very high levels of ratings. The Deviation Square Index was developed and applied for the variability measurement and found that the largest variation was with phosphorus distribution, followed by potassium, nitrogen, and organic matter. The coefficient of variation (CV%) analysis also exhibited similar trends in nutrient distributions. Nitrogen was the main determinant explaining the variations in rice yield, while phosphorus and potash were negatively related to the yield. An index of fertilizer nutrient recommendation called Test-Value Specific Dose (TVSD) was developed and used to calculate the nutrient recommendation for each sampled location. This new method gave easy and more accurate doses of fertilizer over the blanket recommendation to fit the variations across the soil samples.

Research on the influence of Internet technology popularization on the green development of agriculture in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

Xin Yi, Li Cheng

Article ID: 2081
Vol 4, Issue 1, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ama.v4i1.2081
VIEWS - 3828 (Abstract)

Download PDF

Abstract

Based on the panel data from 2000 to 2018, the super efficiency SBM-DEA model is used to calculate the agricultural green development efficiency of 11 provinces and cities in the Yangtze River economic belt, and then the Tobit econometric model is used to empirically test the impact of Internet technology popularization on the agricultural green development of the Yangtze River economic belt. The results show that: (1) on the whole, the efficiency of agricultural green development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt showed a downward trend in fluctuations from 2000 to 2018; in terms of regions, the efficiency of agricultural green development in various regions of the Yangtze River Economic Belt varies greatly, showing a spatial pattern of “downstream > upstream > midstream”. (2) The popularization of Internet technology has significantly promoted the green development of agriculture in the Yangtze River Economic Belt; at the same time, there is a significant positive correlation between rural human capital and the green development of agriculture in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, while the level of agricultural mechanization, the degree of capital deepening, the level of urbanization, and agricultural economic growth inhibit the improvement of the green development of agriculture in the Yangtze River Economic Belt to a certain extent. Therefore, the local governments of the Yangtze River Economic Belt should actively promote the popularization of Internet technology, enhance the Internet awareness of farmers, and give better play to the enabling role of Internet technology in the green development of agriculture in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.

Keywords

Yangtze River Economic Belt; popularization of Internet technology; green development of agriculture; super efficiency SBM-DEA model

References

1. Wang J. Policy interpretation of the “Overall Plan for Ecological and Environmental Big Data Construction” (Chinese). Environmental Protection 2016; 14: 12–14.

2. Yu F. Xi Jinping’s new thoughts on green development and the green transformation and development of agriculture (Chinese). China Rural Survey 2016; 5: 2–9.

3. Sun W, Wang R, Jiang Q, Huang S. Research on the connotation and evaluation of agricultural green development (Chinese). China Journal of Agricultural Resources and Reginal Planning 2019; 4: 14–21.

4. Tu Z, Gan T. Research on regional differences and driving forces of green agricultural development in China (Chinese). Wuhan University Journal (Philosophy & Social Sciences) 2019; 3: 165–178.

5. Jin S. Evaluation of inter-provincial agricultural green development levels and regional differences in China (Chinese). Seeker 2019; 2: 89–95.

6. Wei Q, Zhang B, Jin S. Construction of China’s agricultural green development index and regional comparative study (Chinese). Issues in Agricultural Economy 2018; 11: 11–20.

7. Zhao H, Yu F. Evaluation of agricultural green development level in major grain-producing areas based on entropy value method (Chinese). Reform 2019; 11: 136–146.

8. Gong Q, Li X. Construction and measurement of agricultural green development index: 2005–2018 (Chinese). Reform 2020; 1: 133–145.

9. Qi Y, Han S, Deng X. Development of green agriculture in China: Production level measurement, spatial differences and convergence analysis (Chinses). Journal of Agrotechnical Economics 2020; 4: 51–65.

10. Zheng L, Hong M. Spatiotemporal characteristics and driving factors of agricultural ecological efficiency in China (Chinese). Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics 2019; 5: 46–56.

11. Li M, Bai H. Credit supports research on agricultural green development (Chinese). Research of Agricultural Modernization 2019; 6: 900–906.

12. Xue L, Shen Y, Xu C. Agricultural industry agglomeration and agricultural green development: Efficiency measurement and impact (Chinese). Economic Survey 2020; 3: 45–53.

13. Wang J. The role of the Internet and its impact on agriculture (Chinese). Rural Economy 2001; 6: 21–22.

14. Liu J. “Digital agriculture” and sustainable agricultural development (Chinese). Dongyue Tribune 2010; 2: 70–73.

15. Zhang Z, Mao X. “Internet+” reshapes China’s agriculture: Representation, mechanism and essence (Chinese). Reform 2020; 7: 134–144.

16. Huang Y, Zhou Z, Huang J. Comparative analysis of regional rural ecological environment governance efficiency based on DEA (Chinese). Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment 2015; 3: 75–80.

17. Tu Z, Gan T, Wang K. Research on the efficiency loss of agricultural subsidy policy based on the perspective of green development (Chinese). Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences) 2019; 2: 39–49.

18. Fang Y, Zeng X. China’s inter-provincial agricultural ecological efficiency evaluation and analysis of improvement paths (Chinese). Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment 2021; 1: 135–142.

19. Wang B, Zhang W. Inter-provincial differences and influencing factors of China’s agricultural ecological efficiency—based on panel data analysis of 31 provinces from 1996 to 2015 (Chinese). China Rural Economy 2018; 1: 46–62.

20. Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 2001; 130(3): 498–509. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5

21. Li L, Fan D, Kong J. Hubei launches “combination punch” for green agricultural development (Chinese). Available online: http://news.hbtv.com.cn/p/1737311.html (accessed on 27 September 2019).

22. Wang Q, Xu Y. Rural areas are surging with new momentum - Zhejiang uses “Internet +” to help rural revitalization (Chinese). Available online: https://zjnews.zjol.com.cn/zjnews/zjxw/201712/t20171202_5892559.shtml (accessed on 2 December 2017).

23. Wang W. The “embarrassment” of environmental philosophy: The paradox between technology and environment (Chinese). Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 2017; 5: 34–41.

24. Pan D. Calculation of China’s agricultural green productivity and analysis of its influencing factors based on the perspective of resource and environmental constraints (Chinese). Statistics & Information Forum 2014; 8: 27–33.

25. Tang J, Yin J. Analysis of rural ecological environment problems under the background of urbanization in the past 40 years of reform and opening up (Chinese). Modern Economic Research 2018; 10: 104–109.

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Zhengjun Qiu

Zhejiang University, China

Honorary Editor-in-Chief

Cheng Sun

Academician of World Academy of Productivity Science; Executive Chairman, World Confederation of Productivity Science China Chapter, China

Processing Speed

- - - ＜5 days from submission to initial review decision;
  - 64% acceptance rate

News & Announcements

2024-09-11

Smart agriculture is becoming a reality!

Modern agricultural technology is evolving rapidly, with scientists collaborating with leading agricultural enterprises to develop intelligent management practices. These practices utilize advanced systems that provide tailored fertilization and treatment options for large-scale land management.

2024-05-01

Notice on the prohibition of using AI techniques to generate papers!

This journal values human initiative and intelligence, and the employment of AI technologies to write papers that replace the human mind is expressly prohibited. When there is a suspicious submission that uses AI tools to quickly piece together and generate research results, the editorial board of the journal will reject the article, and all journals under the publisher's umbrella will prohibit all authors from submitting their articles.

Readers and authors are asked to exercise caution and strictly adhere to the journal's policy regarding the usage of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) tools.

2024-01-14

We are recruiting Editorial Team Members

Advances in Modern Agriculture (AMA) is looking for members of the Editorial Board.

2023-12-28

Notice on the change of publication frequency

The publication frequency of Advances in Modern Agriculture is Quarterly since 2024, that means the journal will publish 4 issues per year from 2024 onwards.

More Announcements...

Journal Center

Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.

more

Article Tools

Indexing metadata

How to cite item

Review policy