Operation performance test and analysis of 4GQ–1C sugar-cane harvester
Vol 2, Issue 1, 2021
VIEWS - 122 (Abstract)
Download PDF
Abstract
4GQ-1C sugarcane harvester was designed to solve the current problems that large and medium-sized sugarcane harvesters had low adaptability in sloping, small row spacing, and small plots of sugarcane harvesting. In order to verify the adaptability and reliability of 4GQ-1C sugarcane harvester, field tests were carried out and compared with existing models. Results showed that the 4GQ-1C sugarcane harvester has good operation performance with a lower impurity rate and loss rate of sugarcane, stronger harvesting adaptability in small row spacing areas, and is more convenient in collecting sugarcane compared with sugarcane harvesters with power of 132 and 194 kw. Furthermore, 4GQ-1C sugarcane harvester is compact and flexible, with good adaptability and a good harvest effect in sugarcane growing areas with small and medium-sized planting scales, making it worth popularizing and applying to sugarcane harvest.
Keywords
References
Mo JL, Liu QT. Discussion on the mechanization technology od sugarcane harvesting in China. Journal of Agriculture Mechanization Research 2013; 35(3): 12–18.
Ou YG. Present situation and countermeasure of whole process mechanization of sugarcane production in China. Modern Agriculture Equipment 2019; 40(2): 3–8, 42.
Zhong L. Discussion on the application of sugarcane mechanized production in the new era. Modern Agriculture Research 2019; 9: 40–50.
Que LY. Thinking about the low efficiency of sugarcane harvesting mechanization in Guangxi. Sugarcane and Canesugar 2020; 3: 31–33.
Feng AL. High-yielding cultivation techniques of “Double High Sugar Assesses”. Modern Agriculture Research 2020; 26(6): 101–102.
Qin YP. Research on harvesting mode of 4GZQ-260 sugarcane combine harvester (Chinese). Guang Xi Agricultural Mechanization 2017; 3: 18–20.
Nong HL, Zeng BS, Mo JL, et al. International flow field simulation of impurity removing device based on Solid-Works flow simulation for sugarcane harvest. Agriculture Engineering 2017; 7(4): 133–137, 177.
Xiao L. Application of two harvesters in sugarcane harvesting. Sugarcane and Canesugar 2012; 3: 56–60.
Zhang CX, Liu H. Current situation and suggestions of sugarcane harvest mechanization in Guangxi. Agricultural Engineering 2019; 9(4): 5–9.
Yang ZZ, Zeng BS, Lu YT, et al. Design and experiment of 4GQ-1C sugarcane harvester. Modern Agricultural Equipment 2020; 41(4): 16–21.
AQSIQ, SAC. Measuring methods for agricultural machinery testing conditions—General rules. GB/T5262-2008, 3 June 2008.
NDRC. Test methods for sugarcane harvesting machinery. JB/T6275-2007, 8 October 2007.
Huang WF, Zeng BS, Mo JL, et al. Comparative experiment research of mechanized harvesting on newly planted cane and ratoon cane. Modern Agriculture Equipment 2020; 41(4): 27–32.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Weifeng Huang, Bosheng Zeng, Jianlin Mo, Zizeng Yang, Dejun Meng
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Prof. Zhengjun Qiu
Zhejiang University, China
Cheng Sun
Academician of World Academy of Productivity Science; Executive Chairman, World Confederation of Productivity Science China Chapter, China
Modern agricultural technology is evolving rapidly, with scientists collaborating with leading agricultural enterprises to develop intelligent management practices. These practices utilize advanced systems that provide tailored fertilization and treatment options for large-scale land management.
This journal values human initiative and intelligence, and the employment of AI technologies to write papers that replace the human mind is expressly prohibited. When there is a suspicious submission that uses AI tools to quickly piece together and generate research results, the editorial board of the journal will reject the article, and all journals under the publisher's umbrella will prohibit all authors from submitting their articles.
Readers and authors are asked to exercise caution and strictly adhere to the journal's policy regarding the usage of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) tools.