Open Journal Systems

Plant genetic transformation promotes modern agriculture and the food safety of genetically modified plants

Maye Gao, Junjie Liu, Di’an Ni

Article ID: 2042
Vol 3, Issue 1, 2022

VIEWS - 145 (Abstract)

Abstract

The contribution of business marketing of genetically modified (GM) plants to crop improvement, reduced use of pesticides, and the improvement of the ecological environment was presented. The toxicity and allergy of GM food, the ecological risks confronted by GM plant cultivation, and the necessity of government inspection of GM products were also discussed. GM plants and their derived products have been consumed as food for more than 30 years since the commercialization of transgenic plants in 1995. Most scientific papers have proved that there is no significant discrepancy between GM plants and non-GM plants in composition till now. The discovery of natural transgenic sweet potatoes has further demonstrated the safety of GM foods.

Keywords

transgenic plants; crop breeding and improvement; safety of genetically modified food

Full Text:

PDF

References

1. Kou Y, Shi L. Safety evaluation of using antibiotic resistance genes as markers in transgenic plants (Chinese). Chinese Journal of Antibiotics 2006; 31: 577–580.

2. Hohn B, Levy AA, Puchta H. Elimination of selection markers from transgenic plants. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2001; 12(2): 139–143. doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(00)00188-9

3. Ding Y, Li H, Chen LL, et al. Recent advances in genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9. Frontiers in Plant Science 2016; 7. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00703

4. Yu M, Li X, Gao M, et al. Establishment of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing system for lettuce (Chinese). Plant Physiology Journal 2017; 4: 736–746.

5. Chen X, Wang C, Bo R. Current status of pesticide use in China and countermeasures and suggestions (Chinese). Pesticide Science and Administration 2016; 37(2): 4–8.

6. Yun J, Ma C, Feng Y, et al. Biosafety of transgenic crops: Scientific evidence (Chinese). China Biotechnology 2016; 36: 122–138.

7. Nordlee JA, Taylor SL, Townsend JA, et al. Identification of a Brazil-nut allergen in transgenic soybeans. New England Journal of Medicine 1996; 334(11): 688–692. doi: 10.1056/nejm199603143341103

8. Buzoianu SG, Walsh MC, Rea MC, et al. High-throughput sequence-based analysis of the intestinal microbiota of weanling pigs fed genetically modified MON810 maize expressing Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab (Bt Maize) for 31 days. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2012; 78(12): 4217–4224. doi: 10.1128/aem.00307-12

9. Buzoianu SG, Walsh MC, Rea MC, et al. Transgenerational effects of feeding genetically modified maize to nulliparous sows and offspring on offspring growth and health1. Journal of Animal Science 2013; 91(1): 318–330. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5360

10. Appenzeller LM, Malley L, MacKenzie SA, et al. Subchronic feeding study with genetically modified stacked trait lepidopteran and coleopteran resistant (DAS-Ø15Ø7-1xDAS-59122-7) maize grain in Sprague-Dawley rats. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2009; 47(7): 1512–1520. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.03.041

11. MacKenzie SA, Lamb I, Schmidt J, et al. Thirteen week feeding study with transgenic maize grain containing event DAS-Ø15Ø7-1 in Sprague–Dawley rats. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2007; 45(4): 551–562. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.09.016

12. Zhang M. On the improvement of the legal system of gene pollution isolation of transgenic crops in China (Chinese). Legality Vision 2016; 5(1): 195–196.

13. Xu L, Liu P, Xiong L, et al. Identification system of agricultural genetically modified products in major countries and regions in the world (Chinese). Journal of Biosafety 2014; 23(3): 301–304.

14. Chrispeels MJ. Yes indeed, most Americans do eat GMOs every day! Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2014; 56(1): 4–6. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12147

15. Moran NA, Jarvik T. Lateral transfer of genes from fungi underlies carotenoid production in aphids. Science 2010; 328(5978): 624–627. doi: 10.1126/science.1187113

16. White FF, Garfinkel DJ, Huffman GA, et al. Sequences homologous to Agrobacterium rhizogenes T-DNA in the genomes of uninfected plants. Nature 1983; 301(5898): 348–350. doi: 10.1038/301348a0

17. Furner IJ, Huffman GA, Amasino RM, et al. An Agrobacterium transformation in the evolution of the genus nicotiana. Nature 1986; 319(6052): 422–427. doi: 10.1038/319422a0

18. Matveeva TV, Bogomaz DI, Pavlova OA, et al. Horizontal gene transfer from genus agrobacterium to the plant linaria in nature. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 2012; 25(12): 1542–1551. doi: 10.1094/mpmi-07-12-0169-r

19. Matveeva TV, Lutova LA. Horizontal gene transfer from Agrobacterium to plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 2014; 5. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00326

20. Kreuze JF, Perez A, Untiveros M, et al. Complete viral genome sequence and discovery of novel viruses by deep sequencing of small RNAs: A generic method for diagnosis, discovery and sequencing of viruses. Virology 2009; 388(1): 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.03.024

21. Kyndt T, Quispe D, Zhai H, et al. The genome of cultivated sweet potato contains Agrobacterium T-DNAs with expressed genes: An example of a naturally transgenic food crop. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2015; 112(18): 5844–5849. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419685112

22. Yang J, Moeinzadeh MH, Kuhl H, et al. The haplotype-resolved genome sequence of hexaploid Ipomoea batatas reveals its evolutionary history. BioRxiv 2016: 064428. doi: 10.1101/064428

23. Yang J, Fan W, Wang H, et al. Recent progress in genome sequencing of sweet potato (Chinese). Plant Physiology Journal 2017; 2017(5): 768–771.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ama.v3i1.2042
(145 Abstract Views, 0 PDF Downloads)