Open Journal Systems

Embracing smart irrigation management techniques empowers growers to irrigate with greater efficiency, thereby promoting sustainable agricultural production. In this context, growers often rely on crop evapotranspiration (ETc) as a key factor in making informed irrigation decisions, underscoring the significance of accurately determining and spatially mapping crop water status. Technological progress, exemplified by the emergence of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), has brought about a revolutionary shift in agricultural monitoring. UAV platforms can capture high-resolution images with centimeter-level spatial accuracy and offer higher temporal coverage compared to satellite imagery. Considering these advancements, this study introduces a robust method for classifying water stress in cotton using a compact UAV platform and convolutional neural networks (CNN). The experiment was conducted at the USDA-ARS Cropping Systems Research Laboratory (CSRL) in Lubbock, Texas, where the cotton field was divided into 12 drip zones. The study included three replications to evaluate four irrigation treatments: “rainfed”, “full irrigation”, “percent deficit of full irrigation”, and “time delay of full irrigation”. The results demonstrated that the CNN model successfully classified the cotton water stress using the UAV-based RGB image, achieving an overall best prediction accuracy of approximately 91%. By segmenting the original cotton images into separate canopy and soil areas using morphological image processing methods, the authors also isolated and analyzed the individual contributions of these components to cotton water stress. Additionally, a random forest classifier revealed the relative importance of different image features in the classification process through feature importance analysis. These findings highlighted the state-of-the-art performance of the proposed system in cotton water stress classification and provided valuable insights into the key image features contributing to accurate classification. The authors concluded that integrating UAV-based RGB imagery and CNN models had great potential for assessing water stress in cotton.

A new approach to measure spatial variability of soil parameters and field technique to test-value specific fertilizer

Information on the distribution of soil properties is important to know the status of nutrients in the soils based on which fertilizer nutrients are recommended. Given the variability of nutrients in the soils, making a site-specific fertilizer recommendation seems to be a compelling work. To determine the spatial variability of soil nutrients and to make judicious and precise fertilizer recommendations, new measures are designed with this study. These measures are tested against the soil samples (n = 43) for total nitrogen (N), organic matter (OM), phosphorus (P2O5), and potassium (K2O) in the study area. The descriptive statistical analysis indicated an average of low nitrogen and organic matter, while phosphorus was found to be very high and the level of potassium was high. The spread of nutrients across the data sets, however, included low, medium, high, and very high levels of ratings. The Deviation Square Index was developed and applied for the variability measurement and found that the largest variation was with phosphorus distribution, followed by potassium, nitrogen, and organic matter. The coefficient of variation (CV%) analysis also exhibited similar trends in nutrient distributions. Nitrogen was the main determinant explaining the variations in rice yield, while phosphorus and potash were negatively related to the yield. An index of fertilizer nutrient recommendation called Test-Value Specific Dose (TVSD) was developed and used to calculate the nutrient recommendation for each sampled location. This new method gave easy and more accurate doses of fertilizer over the blanket recommendation to fit the variations across the soil samples.

Agroecological bases for the adaptation of agriculture to climate change

Clara Inés Nicholls, Miguel A. Altieri

Article ID: 1984
Vol 1, Issue 1, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ama.v1i1.1984
VIEWS - 93 (Abstract)

Abstract

Although many indigenous and peasant populations are particularly exposed to the impacts of climate change and are vulnerable, some communities are actively responding to the changing climate and have demonstrated innovation and resilience, using a diversity of strategies to cope with droughts, floods, hurricanes, etc. In this article, we argue that traditional farming systems offer a wide range of management options and designs that increase functional biodiversity in crop fields, thereby enhancing the resilience of agroecological systems. Many of the traditional agroecological strategies that reduce vulnerability to climate variability include crop diversification, maintenance of local genetic diversity, animal integration, addition of organic matter to the soil, water harvesting, etc. Several agroecologists have deciphered the agroecological principles underlying these strategies, which can be adapted by taking different technological forms (according to farm size) to design modern agricultural systems that become increasingly resilient to climatic extremes.

Keywords

agroecology; traditional agriculture; resilience; adaptation; climate change

Full Text:

PDF

References

1. Field CB, Barros VR. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cabridge University Press; 2014.

2. Jones PG, Thornton PK. The potential impacts of climate change on maize production in Africa and Latin America in 2055. Global Environmental Change 2003; 13(1): 51–59. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00090-0

3. ETC Group. Who will feed us? The peasant food web vs. the industrial food chain. Available online: https://www.etcgroup.org/whowillfeedus (accessed on 15 May 2020).

4. Adams MW, Ellingboe AH, Rossman EC. Biological uniformity and disease epidemics. BioScience 1971; 21(21): 1067–1070. doi: 10.2307/1295991

5. Heinemann JA, Massaro M, Coray DS, et al. Sustainability and innovation in staple crop production in the US Midwest. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 2014; 12(1): 71–88. doi: 10.1080/14735903.2013.806408

6. National Research Council. Genetic Vulnerability of Major Crops. National Academies of Science; 1972.

7. Thrupp LA. Cultivating Diversity: Agrobiodiversity and Food Security. World Resources Institute; 1988.

8. Lobell DB, Gourdji SM. The influence of climate change on global crop productivity. Plant Physiology 2012; 160(4): 1686–1697. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.208298

9. Makate C, Wang R, Makate M, Mango N. Crop diversification and livelihoods of smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe: Adaptive management for environmental change. SpringerPlus 2016; 5(1135). doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2802-4

10. Denevan WM. Prehistoric agricultural methods as models for sustainability. In: Advances in Plant Pathology. Academic Press; 1995. pp. 21–43. doi: 10.1016/S0736-4539(06)80004-8

11. Lin BB. Resilience in agriculture through crop diversification: Adaptive management for environmental change. BioScience 2011; 61(3): 183–193. doi: 10.1525/bio.2011.61.3.4

12. Vandermeer J. The Ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge University Press; 1989.

13. Murgueitio E, Calle Z, Uribe F, et al. Native trees and shrubs for the productive rehabilitation of tropical cattle ranching lands. Forest Ecology and Management 2011; 261(10): 1654–1663. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.09.027

14. Altieri MA, Nicholls CI. Biodiversity and Pest Management in Agroecosystems, 2nd ed. Haworth Press; 2004.

15. Magdoff F, Weil R. Soil organic matter management strategies. In: Advances in Agroecology. Springer; 2004. doi: 10.1201/9780203496374.ch2

16. Cleveland DA, Soleri D, Smith SE. Do folk crop varieties have a role in sustainable agriculture? BioScience 1994; 44(11): 740–751. doi: 10.2307/1312583

17. Magdoff F, van Es H. Building Soils for Better Crops. Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education; 2000.

18. Augé RM. Water relations, drought and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Mycorrhiza 2001; 11(1): 3–42. doi: 10.1007/s005720100097

19. Buckles D, Triomphe B, Sain G. Cover Crops in Hillside Agriculture: Farmer Innovation with Mucuna. International Development Research Center; 1998.

20. Natarajan M, Willey RW. The effects of water stress on yield advantages of intercropping systems. Field Crops Research 1986; 13: 117–131. doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(86)90015-8

21. Huang C, Liu Q, Heerink N, et al. Economic performance and sustainability of a novel intercropping system on the north China plain. Plos One 2015; 10(8): e0135518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135518

22. Malézieux E. Designing cropping systems from nature. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 2011; 32(1): 15–29. doi: 10.1007/s13593-011-0027-z

23. Holt-Giménez E. Measuring farmers’ agroecological resistance after Hurricane Mitch in Nicaragua: A case study in participatory, sustainable land management impact monitoring. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2002; 93(1–3): 87–105. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00006-3

24. Altieri MA, Nicholls CI. Agroecology and resilience to climate change: Principles and methodological considerations (Spanish). Agroecología 2013; 8(1): 7–20.

25. Francis CA. Multiple Cropping Systems. Macmillan; 1986.

26. DeWalt B. Using indigenous knowledge to improve agriculture and natural resource management. Human Organization 1994; 53(2): 123–131. doi: 10.17730/humo.53.2.ku60563817m03n73

27. Stigter CJ, Dawei Z, Onyewotu LOZ, et al. Using traditional methods and indigenous technologies for coping with climate variability. Climatic Change 2005; 70(1–2): 255–271. doi: 10.1007/s10584-005-5949-5

28. Altieri MA, Koohafkan P. Strengthening resilience of farming systems: A key prerequisite for sustainable agricultural production. In: Wake up Before It Is Too Late, Make Agriculture Truly Sustainable Now for Food Security in a Changing Climate. UNCTAD; 2013.

29. Altieri MA, Nicholls-Estrada CI, Henao-Salazar A, et al. Didactic Toolkit for the Design, Management and Assessment of Resilient Farming Systems. Third World Network; 2016.

30. Holt-Gimenez E. The Campesino A Campesino Movement: Farmer-led, Sustainable Agriculture in Central America and Mexico. Institute of Food and Development Policy; 1996.

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Zhengjun Qiu

Zhejiang University, China

Honorary Editor-in-Chief

Cheng Sun

Academician of World Academy of Productivity Science; Executive Chairman, World Confederation of Productivity Science China Chapter, China

News & Announcements

2024-05-01

Notice on the prohibition of using AI techniques to generate papers!

This journal values human initiative and intelligence, and the employment of AI technologies to write papers that replace the human mind is expressly prohibited. When there is a suspicious submission that uses AI tools to quickly piece together and generate research results, the editorial board of the journal will reject the article, and all journals under the publisher's umbrella will prohibit all authors from submitting their articles.

Readers and authors are asked to exercise caution and strictly adhere to the journal's policy regarding the usage of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) tools.

2024-01-14

We are recruiting Editorial Team Members

Advances in Modern Agriculture (AMA) is looking for members of the Editorial Board.

2023-12-28

Notice on the change of publication frequency

The publication frequency of Advances in Modern Agriculture is Quarterly since 2024, that means the journal will publish 4 issues per year from 2024 onwards.

More Announcements...

Article Tools

Indexing metadata

How to cite item

Review policy