Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.
Student’s Perception of the Use of the Metaverse in Higher Education on the Employability of Spanish Talent Market
Vol 6, Issue 4, 2025
Download PDF
Abstract
Keywords
References
1. Bonnet, D., & Westerman, G. The new elements of digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review. 2021; 62(2), 82–89.
2. Qian, Y., Wang, J., & Cai, Y. Revolutionizing educational landscapes: A systematic review of Metaverse applications, paradigms and emerging technologies. Cogent Education. 2023; 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2264006
3. Saeed, A., Ali, A., & Ashfaq, S. Employees' training experience in a metaverse environment? Feedback analysis using structural topic modeling. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2024;, 208.
4. Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. Development and validation of students’ digital competence scale (SDiCoS). International journal of educational technology in higher education. 2022; 19(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00330-0
5. Goulart, V. G., Liboni, L. B., & Cezarino, L. O. Balancing skills in the digital transformation era: The future of jobs and the role of higher education. Industry and Higher Education. 2022; 36(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222211029796
6. Koo, H. Training in lung cancer surgery through the metaverse, including extended reality, in the smart operating room of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Korea. Journal of educational evaluation for health professions. 2021; 18. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.33
7. Chen, M. The philosophy of the metaverse. Ethics and Information Technology. 2023; 25(3), 41.
8. Mystakidis, S. Sustainable engagement in open and distance learning with play and games in virtual reality: playful and gameful distance education in VR. In Handbook of Research on Gamification. 2022. Dynamics and User Experience Design (pp. 409–424). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
9. Ng, D. T. K. What is the metaverse? Definitions, technologies and the community of inquiry. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2022; 38(4), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7945
10. Onu, P., Pradhan, A., & Mbohwa, C. Potential to use metaverse for future teaching and learning. Education and Information Technologies. 2024; 29(7), 8893–8924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12167-9
11. Hwang, Y., Lee, S., & Jeon, J. Integrating AI chatbots into the metaverse: Pre-service English teachers’ design works and perceptions. Education and Information Technologies. 2025; 30(4), 4099–4130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12924-4
12. Showkat, M., Nagina, R., & Baba, M. A. Transforming workplaces with metaverse technologies: employee perspectives from emerging economies. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-02-2024-4305
13. Johnson, H. Russell, and Michael R. Vitale. Creating competitive advantage with interorganizational information systems. 1988: MIS quarterly, 153–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/248839
14. Drucker, P. The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review, 1988; 66 (1), pp. 45–53. https://doi.org/10.35426/IAv14n63.04
15. Bloomfield, B.P. & Coombs, R. Information technology, control and power: The centralization and decentralization debate revisited. Journal of Management Studies, 1992; 29 (4), p. 459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00674.x
16. Chatfield, A, & N. Andersen, N.The impact of IOS-enabled business process change on business outcomes: Transformation of the value chain of Japan Airlines. Journal of Management Information Systems. 1997; 14 (1), pp. 13–40. Available online: https://universidadunie.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/impact-ios-enabled-business-process-change-on/docview/218918895/se-2 (accessed on 20 may 2025)
17. Grover, V. & Kohli. R. Revealing your hand: Caveats in implementing digital business strategy. MIS Quarterly, 2013; 37 (2), pp. 655–662.
18. Kogut, B. The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management Journal, 2000; 21 (3), pp. 405–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<405::AID-SMJ103>3.0.CO;2-5
19. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management annals. 2011; 5(1), 317–371. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.590299
20. Gulati, R., Puranam, P. & Tushman, M. Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 2012; 33 (6), pp. 571–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1975
21. Henfridsson, O., Mathiassen, L. & Svahn, F. Managing technological change in the digital age: the role of architectural frames. Journal of Information Technology. 2014; 29.1, 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2013.30
22. Henriette, E., Feki, M. & Boughzala, I. The shape of digital transformation: A systematic literature review. Paper presented at the MCIS 2015 proceedings (2015)
23. Hess, T., Benlian, A., Matt, C. & Wiesböck, F. Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. 2016; MIS Quarterly Executive, 15 (2), pp. 123–139. Available online: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429286797-7/options-formulating-digital-transformation-strategy-thomas-hess-christian-matt-alexander-benlian-florian-wiesb%C3%B6ck (accessed on 19 August 2025)
24. Fichman R.G., Dos Santos B.L., Zheng Z. Digital innovation as a fundamental and powerful concept in the information systems curriculum. MIS Quart. 2014; 38(2):329–343. Available online: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.2.01 (accessed on 1 August 2025)
25. Gao P., Müller N., Kaas H.-.W., Mohr D., Wee D., Hensley R., Guan M., Möller T., Eckhard G., Bray G., Beiker S., Brotschi A. & Kohler D. 2016. Automotive Revolution Perspective Towards 2030, McKinsey Report.
26. Paluch S., Antons D., Brettel M., Hopp C., Salge T.O., Piller F., Wentzel D. Stage-gate and agile development in the digital age: promises, perils, and boundary conditions. J. Bus. Res. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.063
27. Chanias, H. Understanding digital transformation strategy formation: insights from Europe's automotive industry. PACIS 2016 Proceed.
28. Hillman, A.J., Withers, M.C. & Collins, B.J. Resource dependence theory: A review Journal of Management, 2009; 35 (6), pp. 1404–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469
29. Eden, R., Jones, A.B., Casey, V. & Draheim, M. Digital transformation requires workforce transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 2018; 18 (1), pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00005
30. Legner, C., Eymann, T., Hess, T., Matt, C., Böhmann, T. P. Drews, T.P. & Ahlemann, F. Digitalization: Opportunity and challenge for the business and information systems engineering community. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 2017; 59 (4), pp. 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0484-2
31. Lanzolla, G., Pesce, D. & Tucci, C.L. The digital transformation of search and recombination in the innovation function: Tensions and an integrative framework. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2021; 38 (1), pp. 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12546
32. Nair, A., Yan, T., Ro, Y.K., Oke, A., Chiles, T.H. & Lee, S.Y. How environmental innovations emerge and proliferate in supply networks: A complex adaptive systems perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2016; 52 (2), pp. 66–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12102
33. Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A. & Song, M. Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. 2017; MIS Quarterly, 41 (1), pp. 223–238. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26629644 (accessed on 20 July 2025)
34. Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. Digital innovation: Towards a transdisciplinary perspective. In Handbook of digital innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing. 2020; pp. 2-12. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788119986.00008
35. Monaghan, S. Tippmann, E. & Coviello, N. Born digitals: Thoughts on their internationalization and a research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies. 2020; 51 (1), pp. 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00290-0
36. Dalenogare, L.S., Benitez, G.B., Ayala, N.F. & Frank, A.G.The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production. 2018; 204, 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019
37. Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D., & Wright, M. Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2018; 12(1), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266
38. Kamalaldin, A., Linde, L., Sjödin, D. & V. Parid, V. Transforming provider-customer relationships in digital servitization: A relational view on digitalization. Industrial Marketing Management, 2020; 89, pp. 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.004
39. Butollo, F. Digitalization and the geographies of production: Towards reshoring or global fragmentation?. Competition and Change, 2021; 25 (2), pp. 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529420918160
40. Lansiti, M. & Lakhani, K.R. The truth about blockchain. Harvard Business Review, 2017; 5 (1), pp. 119–127.
41. Calvano, E., Calzolari, Denicolo, V. & Pastorello, S. Artificial intelligence, algorithmic pricing, and collusion. The American Economic Review, 2020; 110 (10), pp. 3267–3297. Available online: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.20190623 (accessed on 20 May 2025)
42. Zhang, J., & Chen, Z. Exploring human resource management digital transformation in the digital age. Journal of the knowledge economy. 2024; 15(1), 1482–1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01214-y
43. Van Veldhoven, Z., & Vanthienen, J. Digital transformation as an interaction-driven perspective between business, society, and technology. Electronic markets. 2022; 32(2), 629–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00464-5
44. Fitzgerald M., Kruschwitz N., Bonnet D., Welch M. Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2014; 55(2), 1.
45. Buonocore, F., Annosi, M. C., de Gennaro, D., & Riemma, F. Digital transformation and social change: Leadership strategies for responsible innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2024; 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2024.101843
46. Westerman G., Calméjane C., Bonnet D., Ferraris P. & McAfee, A. Digital transformation: A roadmap for billion-dollar organizations (pp. 1–68). MIT Sloan Management, MIT Center for Digital Business and Capgemini Consulting. 2011.
47. Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. Metaverse in education: Contributors, cooperations, and research themes. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. 2023; 16(6), 1111–1129. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3277952
48. Gaglio, C., Kraemer-Mbula, E., & Lorenz, E. The effects of digital transformation on innovation and productivity: Firm-level evidence of South African manufacturing micro and small enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022; 182, 121785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121785
49. Solis B., Lieb R. & Szymanski J. The 2014 state of digital transformation. Altimeter Group. 2014.
50. Soto-Acosta, P. Navigating uncertainty: post-pandemic issues on digital transformation. Information Systems Management. 2024; 41(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2023.2274531
51. Stolterman E., Fors, A. C., Truex, D. P. & Wastell, D. Information technology and the good life. In Kaplan B., Truex D. P., Wastell D., et al. (Eds.), Information systems research: Relevant theory and informed practice. 2004; (pp. 687–693). Kluwer Academic Publishers. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_45 (accessed on 1 July 2025)
52. Liu, C., & Zowghi, D. Citizen involvement in digital transformation: a systematic review and a framework. Online Information Review. 2023; 47(4), 644–660. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2022-0237
53. Gössling, S., & Humpe, A. Net-zero aviation: Time for a new business model?. Journal of Air Transport Management. 2023 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102353
54. Hinings, B., Gegenhuber T. & Greenwood R. Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization. 2018; 28(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004
55. Bagnoli, C., Albarelli, A., Biazzo, S., et al. Digital business models for industry 4.0. Future of business and finance. 2022; 10, 978–983. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97284-4
56. Parviainen, P., Tihinen, M., Kääriäinen, J., Teppola, S. Tackling the digitalization challenge: How to benefit from digitalization in practice. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management. 2017; 5(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm050104
57. Bilan, Y., Oliinyk, O., Mishchuk, H., & Skare, M. (2023). Impact of information and communications technology on the development and use of knowledge. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 191, 122519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122519
58. Wang, Q., Hu, S., & Li, R. Could information and communication technology (ICT) reduce carbon emissions? The role of trade openness and financial development. Telecommunications Policy. 2024; 48(3). Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308596123002100 (accessed on 15 June 2025)
59. Hess, T., Benlian, A., Matt, C., & Wiesböck, F. How German media companies defined their digital transformation strategies. MIS Quarterly Executive. 2016; 15(2), 103–119.
60. Wang, Q., Li, W., Yu, Z., Abbasi, Q., Imran, M., Ansari, S. & Zhu, T. An overview of emergency communication networks. Remote Sensing, 15(6), 1595.
61. Sebastian, I. M., Moloney, K. G., Ross J. W., Fonstad, N. O., Beath, C. & Mocker, M. How big old companies navigate digital transformation. 2017; MIS Quarterly Executive. 2023; 16(3), 197–213. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7932928 (accesed 17 June 2025)
62. Paul, J., Ueno, A., Dennis, C., Alamanos, E., Curtis, L., Foroudi, P. & Wirtz, J. Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary perspective and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2024; 48(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.13015
63. Kraus, S., Jones, P., Kailer, N., Weinmann, A., Chaparro-Banegas, N., & Roig-Tierno, N. Digital transformation: An overview of the current state of the art of research. Sage Open, 2021; 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/215824402110475
64. Van Der Schaft, A. H., Lub, X. D., Van Der Heijden, B., & Solinger, O. N. (2024). How employees experience digital transformation: A dynamic and multi-layered sensemaking perspective. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 48(5), 803-820. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480221123098
65. Liu D., Chen S., Chou T. Resource fit in digital transformation: Lessons learned from the CBC Bank global e-banking project. Management Decision. 2011; 49(10), 1728–1742. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111183852
66. Berman S. J. Digital transformation: Opportunities to create new business models. Strategy and Leadership, 2012; 40(2), 16–24. Available online: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/10878571211209314/full/html (accessed on 23 July 2025)
67. Cosa, M. Business digital transformation: strategy adaptation, communication and future agenda. Journal of Strategy and Management. 2024; 17(2), 244–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-09-2023-0233
68. Andriole S. J. Five myths about digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review. 2017; 58(3), 20–22. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11633.003.0005
69. He, B., & Gan, L. Exploring the synergistic effect of CEO power and technological expertise in driving corporate digital transformation. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2025; 98, 103918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.103918
70. Singh, N., Vishnani, S., Khandelwal, V., Sahoo, S., & Kumar, S. A systematic review of paradoxes linked with digital transformation of business. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 2024; 37(4), 1348-1373. Available online: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-658-38424-1 (accessed on 22 June 2025)
71. Xin, A., Chen, X., & Wu, C. Digital transformation and supply chain concentration: evidence from China. Applied Economics. 2024; 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2422641
72. Gottschalk P. Research propositions for knowledge management systems supporting electronic business. International Journal of Innovation and Learning. 2006; 3(6), 593–606. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2006.010514
73. Gilli, K., Lettner, N., & Guettel, W. The future of leadership: new digital skills or old analog virtues?. Journal of Business Strategy. 2024; 45(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-06-2022-0093
74. Bogers M., Chesbrough H. & Moedas C. Open innovation: Research, practices, and policies. California Management Review, 2018; 60(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617745086
75. Xu, M., Zhang, Y., Sun, H., Tang, Y., & Li, J. How digital transformation enhances corporate innovation performance: The mediating roles of big data capabilities and organizational agility. Heliyon. 2024; 10(14). DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34905 External Link
76. Berman, S. J., Abraham, S., Battino, B., Shipnuck, L., & Neus, A. New business models for the new media world. Strategy & Leadership. 2007; 35(4), 23–30. Available online: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/10878570710761354 (accessed on 27 June 2025)
77. Leso, B. H., Cortimiglia, M. N., Ghezzi, A., & Minatogawa, V. Exploring digital transformation capability via a blended perspective of dynamic capabilities and digital maturity: a pattern matching approach. Review of Managerial Science. 2024; 18(4), 1149–1187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00692-3
78. Yang, C. H. How artificial intelligence technology affects productivity and employment: Firm-level evidence from Taiwan. Research Policy. 2022; 51(6), 104536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104536
79. Kolade, O., & Owoseni, A. Employment 5.0: The work of the future and the future of work. Technology in Society. 2022; 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102086
80. Rospigliosi, P. A. Metaverse or Simulacra? Roblox, Minecraft, Meta and the turn to virtual reality for education, socialisation and work. Interactive learning environments. 2022; 30(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2022899
81. Avila, S. Implementing augmented reality in academic libraries. Public Services Quarterly. 2017; 13(3), 190–199. https://doi.org /full/10.1080/15228959.2017.1338541?needAccess=true
82. Park, S. M., & Kim, Y. G. A metaverse: Taxonomy, components, applications, and open challenges. IEEE access. 2022; 10, 4209–4251. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3140175
83. Scavarelli, A., Arya, A., & Teather, R. J. Virtual reality and augmented reality in social learning spaces: a literature review. Virtual reality. 2021; 25(1), 257–277. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10055-020-00444-8 (accessed on 18 July 2025)
84. Scavarelli, A. Towards a more inclusive and engaging virtual reality framework for social learning spaces (Doctoral dissertation, Carleton University). 2023. Available online: file:///D:/CARPETAS%20DEL%20SISTEMA/Nueva%20carpeta/scavarelli--anthony--towards-a-more-inclusive-and-engaging-virtual-reality-framework-for-social-learning-spaces.pdf (accessed on 1 July 2025)
85. Rebbani, Z., Azougagh, D., Bahatti, L., & Bouattane, O. Definitions and applications of augmented/virtual reality: A survey. Int. J. 2021; 9(3). https://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2021/21932021
86. Azuma, R. A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environment. 1997; 6(4), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.35
87. Özçelik, N. P., Ekşi, G., & Baturay, M. H. Augmented reality (AR) in language learning: A principled review of 2017–2021. Participatory Educational Research. 2022; 9(4), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.83.9.4
88. Yuen, S. C. Y., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Johnson, E. Augmented reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE). 2011; 4(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0401.10
89. Li, Q., Duan, S., Moallem, M., & Wadadekar, R. Promoting equity in CS/CT education: A study of preservice teachers. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). 2024; pp. 360–366. Available online: https://www.learntechlib.org/d/223957/ (accessed on 12 June 2025)
90. Castillo, A. A. V., Quesada, A. J. F., Valdes, Y. D. L. C. R., & Rivero, L. B. Metaverse: an emerging research area. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research. 2022; (1), 15. Available online: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9869830 (accessed on 18 June 2025)
91. İbi̇li̇, E., Ölmez, M., İbi̇li̇, A. B., Bi̇lal, F., Ci̇han, A., & Okumuş, N. Assessing the effectiveness and student perceptions of synchronous online flipped learning supported by a metaverse-based platform in medical English education: A mixed-methods study. Education and Information Technologies. 2024; 29(14), 18643–18673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12542-0
92. Gündüz, N., & Sincar, M. Data Privacy and Security Challenges in Metaversities: The Ethical Dilemmas in the Future of Higher Education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century. 2025; 83(4), 525–544.
93. Di Natale, A. F., Bartolotta, S., Gaggioli, A., Riva, G., & Villani, D. Exploring students’ acceptance and continuance intention in using immersive virtual reality and metaverse integrated learning environments: The case of an Italian university course. Education and Information Technologies. 2024; 29(12), 14749–14768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12436-7
94. Mayer, R. E. The past, present, and future of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review. 2024; 36(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1
95. Sweller, J. The development of cognitive load theory: Replication crises and incorporation of other theories can lead to theory expansion. Educational Psychology Review. 2023; 35(4), 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09817-2
96. Xu, K. M., Coertjens, S., Lespiau, F., Ouwehand, K., Korpershoek, H., Paas, F., & Geary, D. C. An evolutionary approach to motivation and learning: Differentiating biologically primary and secondary knowledge. Educational Psychology Review. 2024; 36(2), 45. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-024-09880-3 (accessed on 1 July 2025)
97. Baxter, K. A., Sachdeva, N., & Baker, S. The Application of Cognitive Load Theory to the Design of Health and Behavior Change Programs: Principles and Recommendations. Health Education & Behavior. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981251327185
98. Huang, R., Tlili, A., Liu, D., Xu, L., Guerriero, S., Van Herwegen, J., & Kucirkova, N. What is the Science of Learning? a comprehensive review and analysis of the existing definitions. Smart Learning Environments. 2025; 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00418-w
99. Qayyum, A., Butt, M. A., Ali, H., et al. Secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence-extended reality (AI-XR) for metaverses. ACM Computing Surveys. 2024; 56(7), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3614426
100. Chinta, S. V., Wang, Z., Yin, Z., Hoang, N., Gonzalez, M., Quy, T. L., & Zhang, W. FairAIED: Navigating fairness, bias, and ethics in educational AI applications. 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.18745
101. Lomellini, A., Lowenthal, P. R., Snelson, C., & Trespalacios, J. H. Accessible and inclusive online learning in higher education: a review of the literature. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2025; 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-024-09424-2
102. Navas-Bonilla, C. D. R., Guerra-Arango, J. A., Oviedo-Guado, D. A., & Murillo-Noriega, D. E. Inclusive education through technology: a systematic review of types, tools and characteristics. In Frontiers in Education. 2025; (Vol. 10). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1527851
103. Li, Q., Moallem, M., Boettinger, J., Cai, Q., & Levi, M. An educational model of equity and computing: a study of marginalized student experience during COVID pandemic. Educational technology research and development. 2025; 73(2), 1155–1177. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423-024-10443-0 (accessed on 28 June 2025)
104. Al-kfairy, M., & Alfandi, O. The ethical dilemma of educational metaverse. Recent advances in Evolution of Education and Outreach. 2024; 1(1), 006–016. Available online: https://www.biolscigroup.com/articles/RAEEO-1-102.php (accessed on 29 June 2025)
105. Davis, F. D., & Granić, A. Evolution of TAM. In The technology acceptance model: 30 years of TAM. Springer International Publishing. 2024; pp. 19-57. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-45274-2_2 (accessed on 17 june 2025)
106. Davis, F. D. Technology acceptance model: TAM. Al-Suqri, MN, Al-Aufi, AS: Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption. 1989; 205(219), 5. Available online: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/b/busadwp/images/b/1/4/b1409190.0001.001.pdf (access 17 June 2025)
107. Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & management,. 2001; 38(4), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
108. Ramírez-Correa, P. E., Rondán-Cataluña, F. J., & Arenas-Gaitán, J. Student information system satisfaction in higher education: the role of visual aesthetics. Kybernetes. 2018; 47(8), 1604–1622. Available online: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/k-08-2017-0297/full/html (accessed on 20 June 2025)
109. Lee, H. H., Fiore, A. M., & Kim, J. The role of the technology acceptance model in explaining effects of image interactivity technology on consumer responses. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 2006; 34(8), 621–644. Available online: https://www.emerald.com/ijrdm/article-abstract/34/8/621/151756/The-role-of-the-technology-acceptance-model-in?redirectedFrom=fulltext (accessed on 21 June 2025)
110. Ramírez-Correa, P., Rondán-Cataluña, F. J., & Arenas-Gaitán, J. Influencia del género en la percepción y adopción de e-learning: Estudio exploratorio en una universidad chilena. Journal of technology management & innovation. 2010; 5(3), 129–141. Available online: https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0718-27242010000300010&script=sci_arttext (accessed on 16 June 2025)
111. Nguyen, N. T. T., Tran, P. T., Dang, T. Q., & Nguyen, L. T. The future of non-contact commerce: the role of voice payments. Journal of Financial Services Marketing. 2024; 29(4), 1260–1278. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41264-024-00292-6 (accessed on 13 June 2025)
112. Kalınkara, Y., & Özdemir, O. Anatomy in the metaverse: Exploring student technology acceptance through the UTAUT2 model. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2024; 17(2), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2353
113. Mukred, M., Mokhtar, U. A., Hawash, B., AlSalman, H., Zohaib, M., & Abuzawayda, Y. I. Exploring the potential of metaverse adoption in higher education: A diffusion of innovation model approach to enhancing student engagement. SAGE Open. 2025; 15(3). Available online: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/21582440251363668 (accessed on 7 July 2025)
114. Xie, J., Al-Shaibani, G. K., Zhao, J., & Talib, O. The current status and contributing factors of the metaverse adoption in education: A systematic review. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2025;17(4). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/17301
115. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly. 2003; 425-478. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/30036540 (accessed on 7 July 2025)
116. Venkatesh, V. Adoption and use of AI tools: a research agenda grounded in UTAUT. Annals of operations research. 2022; 308 (1), 641–652. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-020-03918-9 (accessed on 19 June 2025)
117. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science. 2000 46 (2), 186–204. Available online: https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 (accessed on 8 Juy 2025)
118. Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Science. 2008; 39 (2), 273–312. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x (accessed on 20 June 2025)
119. Lee, J., Kim, J., & Choi, J. Y. The adoption of virtual reality devices: The technology acceptance model integrating enjoyment, social interaction, and strength of the social ties. Telematics and Informatics. 2019;, 39, 37–48. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0736585318306415 (accessed on 7 June 2025)
120. Nguyen, A. H. D., Le, T. T., Dang, T. Q., & Nguyen, L. T. Understanding metaverse adoption in education: The extended UTAUMT model. Heliyon. 2024; 10(19). Available online: https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(24)14772-X?uuid=uuid%3Afb339403-3b2b-45f0-9660-ada6344de2c3 (accessed on 2 July 2025)
121. Salloum, S., Al Marzouqi, A., Alderbashi, K. Y., Shwedeh, F., Aburayya, A., Al Saidat, M. R., & Al-Maroof, R. S. Sustainability model for the continuous intention to use metaverse technology in higher education: a case study from Oman. Sustainability. 2023; 15(6), 5257. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065257
122. López-Belmonte, J., Pozo Sánchez, S., Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., & Lampropoulos, G. Metaverso en Educación: una revisión sistemática. 2023. https://doi.org/10.6018/RED.511421
123. Cheng, Y., Zhou, X., & Li, Y. The effect of digital transformation on real economy enterprises’ total factor productivity. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2023; 85, 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.02.007
124. Medina Rojas, L. M., & Alvarado Mendoza, D. A. El Metaverso como generador de ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje inmersivo en la educación superior. 2024.
125. Reer, F., Wehden, L. O., Janzik, R., Tang, W. Y., & Quandt, T. Virtual reality technology and game enjoyment: The contributions of natural mapping and need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior. 2022; 132, 107242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107242
126. Miguélez-Juan, B., Gómez, P. N., & Mañas-Viniegra, L. La Realidad Virtual Inmersiva como herramienta educativa para la transformación social: Un estudio exploratorio sobre la percepción de los estudiantes en Educación Secundaria Postobligatoria. Aula abierta. 2019; 48(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.48.2.2019.157-166
127. Jo, H., & Park, D. H. Affordance, usefulness, enjoyment, and aesthetics in sustaining virtual reality engagement. Scientific Reports. 2023; 13(1), 15097. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42113-1
128. Lascano, M. A. G., Tiviano, M. B. M., Briones, G. A. T., et al. El Metaverso Educativo: Transformando la Enseñanza en Espacios Virtuales de Aprendizaje Interactivo. Ciencia Latina: Revista Multidisciplinar. 2025; 9(4).
129. Barráez-Herrera, D. P. Metaversos en el Contexto de la Educación Virtual. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0. 2022; 13(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v13i1.300
130. Acedo, A. S., Alcocer, A. C., Cascarano, P., & Barrio, M. G. A-frame y la formación en metaverso para el desarrollo de nuevos perfiles profesionales en comunicación. Prisma Social: revista de investigación social. 2025; (49), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.55738/alaic.v21i41.946
Supporting Agencies
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Prof. Zhigeng Pan
Professor, Hangzhou International Innovation Institute (H3I), Beihang University, China
Prof. Jianrong Tan
Academician, Chinese Academy of Engineering, China
.jpg)
.jpg)
Conference Time
December 15-18, 2025
Conference Venue
Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Center (HKCEC)
...
Metaverse Scientist Forum No.3 was successfully held on April 22, 2025, from 19:00 to 20:30 (Beijing Time)...
We received the Scopus notification on April 19th, confirming that the journal has been successfully indexed by Scopus...
We are pleased to announce that we have updated the requirements for manuscript figures in the submission guidelines. Manuscripts submitted after April 15, 2025 are required to strictly adhere to the change. These updates are aimed at ensuring the highest quality of visual content in our publications and enhancing the overall readability and impact of your research. For more details, please find it in sumissions...
