Exploring the Nexus: A Systematic Literature Review on Meta-Influencers in  Immersive Brand Engagement

Md Golam Muttaquee Talukder; Olugbenga Akinade; Muhammad Zahid Iqbal

doi:10.54517/m8225

Publication Frequency

Quarterly (since 2025)

Journal Articles

Search scope

Journal Center

Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.

more

Volume Arrangement

2025

2024

2023

more

Featured Articles

Garment-aware gaussian for clothed human modeling from monocular video

Reconstructing the human body from monocular video input presents significant challenges, including a limited field of view and difficulty in capturing non-rigid deformations, such as those associated with clothing and pose variations. These challenges often compromise motion editability and rendering quality. To address these issues, we propose a cloth-aware 3D Gaussian splatting approach that leverages the strengths of 2D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and 3D Gaussian splatting for high-quality human body reconstruction from monocular video. Our method parameterizes 3D Gaussians anchored to a human template to generate posed position maps that capture pose-dependent non-rigid deformations. Additionally, we introduce Learnable Cloth Features, which are pixel-aligned with the posed position maps to address cloth-related deformations. By jointly modeling cloth and pose-dependent deformations, along with compact, optimizable linear blend skinning (LBS) weights, our approach significantly enhances the quality of monocular 3D human reconstructions. We also incorporate carefully designed regularization techniques for the Gaussians, improving the generalization capability of our model. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art techniques for animatable avatar reconstruction from monocular inputs, delivering superior performance in both reconstruction fidelity and rendering quality.

From paper to virtual: The meta-life of a historical cartographic artifact

The Charta of Rigas Velestinlis is one of the most important works of the eighteenth-century Neo-Hellenic Enlightenment and the most characteristic sample of Greek scholar cartography. Printed in Vienna in 1220 copies in 1796-1797, this emblematic map of the Balkan peninsula significantly influenced the development of ideas and perspectives that inspired the Greek War of Independence from the Ottoman Empire in 1821. The sixty (60) known remaining copies of this valuable material in Greece and abroad remain stored in the confined spaces of libraries, museums, and archives, strictly guarded for security, conservation, and preservation. This renders their access difficult to both the general public and the educational community. Since the Onassis Library and the General State Archives of Greece—Cartographic Heritage Archives both possess an original copy of this historical document each, they design and implement many educational programs aiming at highlighting its importance and reintroducing it to the public. This paper will present how the usage of new technologies, both in software and hardware, has facilitated the showcasing of cultural heritage artifacts, such as Rigas’ Charta, with an emphasis on technologies and resources that are freely available to everyone. It will also be demonstrated how the digitization projects, the digital libraries, repositories, and platforms implemented by many cultural and research organizations during the last decade, presented the opportunity for the new generation to come in contact with a variety of “locked away” historical documents, like Rigas’ Charta, allowing their reuse and reinterpretation while providing unlimited potential for the collection, research and presentation of facts, evidence and data. Furthermore, the incorporation of this digital cultural wealth in the school curriculum through targeted educational programs and the creative combination with open-source metaverse development tools, unleashed the possibilities of reviving the past, extending the life span of old materials to perpetuity. As a result, this multimodal approach paved the way for the emergence of a new more democratic, open-access, and inclusive educational model.

Deciphering avian emotions: A novel AI and machine learning approach to understanding chicken vocalizations

In this groundbreaking study, we present a novel approach to interspecies communication, focusing on the understanding of chicken vocalizations. Leveraging advanced mathematical models in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, we have developed a system capable of interpreting various emotional states in chickens, including hunger, fear, anger, contentment, excitement, and distress. Our methodology employs a cutting-edge AI technique we call Deep Emotional Analysis Learning (DEAL), a highly mathematical and innovative approach that allows for the nuanced understanding of emotional states through auditory data. DEAL is rooted in complex mathematical algorithms, enabling the system to learn and adapt to new vocal patterns over time. We conducted our study with a sample of 80 chickens, meticulously recording and analyzing their vocalizations under various conditions. To ensure the accuracy of our system’s interpretations, we collaborated with a team of eight animal psychologists and veterinary surgeons, who provided expert insights into the emotional states of the chickens. Our system demonstrated an impressive accuracy rate of close to 80%, marking a significant advancement in the field of animal communication. This research not only opens up new avenues for understanding and improving animal welfare but also sets a precedent for further studies in AI-driven interspecies communication. The novelty of our approach lies in its application of sophisticated AI techniques to a largely unexplored area of study. By bridging the gap between human and animal communication, we believe our research will pave the way for more empathetic and effective interactions with the animal kingdom.

Exploring the Nexus: A Systematic Literature Review on Meta-Influencers in Immersive Brand Engagement

Md Golam Muttaquee Talukder, Olugbenga Akinade, Muhammad Zahid Iqbal

Article ID: 8225
Vol 6, Issue 4, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/m8225

Download PDF

Abstract

Virtual Reality (VR) technology develops new, engaging ways for digital marketing to reach consumers through immersive environments. The rise of meta-influencers represents a fresh approach to marketing through influencers because these virtual personas can interact with customers in virtual spaces. For the purpose of this review, we define meta-influencers as AI-powered virtual influencers, typically hyper-realistic avatars or digital humans operating within immersive VR environments to influence consumer behaviour and brand engagement. The use of meta-influencers or virtual influencers presents organisations with improved scalability and managed promotional efforts, along with two major challenges regarding authenticity and privacy risks in data collection. Positive engagement between consumers and VR environments depends on the application of social presence components alongside gamification elements and digital rewards like NFTs. This study analyses 18 peer-reviewed studies regarding meta-influencers in VR marketing by using the PICO framework (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) to examine their influence on customer engagement as well as brand loyalty and immersive brand experiences. The study shows the requirement for ethical AI approaches to develop influencers together with standardised data protocols, which resolve emerging technological and moral problems in the AI domain. This study also proposed a conceptual model based on the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) framework to explain how meta-influencers shape consumer perceptions and behaviour in VR, helping consumers make purchasing decisions and encouraging long-term brand loyalty through immersive interactions.

Keywords

Virtual influencers; VR; Brand Engagement; Metaverse; Consumer Behaviour

References

1. Aman Kumar and Amit Shankar. “Investigating the role of metaverse influencers’ attributes for the next generation of services”. In: Journal of Services Marketing 38.7 (2024), pp. 816–838. doi: 10.1108/JSM- 09-2023-0320.

2. Rossella C. Gambetti and Robert V. Kozinets. “From killer bunnies to talking cupcakes: Theorizing the diverse universe of virtual influencers”. In: European Journal of Marketing 58.13 (2024), pp. 205–251. doi: 10.1108/EJM-12-2022-0948.

3. Farah Mohamad Farouk Saboune. “Virtual Reality in Social Media Marketing Will Be the New Model of Advertising and Monetization”. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS). IEEE, 2022. doi: 10. 1109/SNAMS58071.2022.10062551.

4. Dogan Gursoy et al. “Metaverse in services marketing: an overview and future research directions”. In: The Service Industries Journal 43.15-16 (2023), pp. 1140–1172. doi: 10.1080/02642069.2023.2252750.

5. Matthias Eggenschwiler et al. “Retailing in the metaverse: A framework of managerial considerations for success”. In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 79 (2024), p. 103791. doi: 10.1016/j. jretconser.2024.103791.

6. Nisreen Ameen, Giampaolo Viglia, and Levent Altinay. “Revolutionising services with cutting-edge technologies post major exogenous shocks”. In: The Service Industries Journal 43.3-4 (2023), pp. 125–133. doi: 10.1080/02642069.2023.2185934.

7. Garry Wei-Han Tan et al. “Metaverse in marketing and logistics: the state of the art and the path forward”. In: Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 35.12 (2023), pp. 2932–2946. doi: 10.1108/ APJML-01-2023-0078.

8. Mhamad Mrad, Zeyad Ramadan, and Lama I. Nasr. “Computer-generated influencers: The rise of digital personalities”. In: Marketing Intelligence & Planning 40.5 (2022), pp. 589–603. doi: 10.1108/MIP- 12- 2021- 0423.

9. M. Gulan, Y. Feng, G. F. N. Mvondo, and B. Niu. “How do virtual influencers affect consumer brand evangelism in the metaverse? The effects of virtual influencers’ marketing efforts, perceived coolness, and anthropomorphism”. In: Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 20.1 (2025), p. 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20010036.

10. Anna Mirowska and Jakov Arsenyan. “Sweet escape: The role of empathy in social media engagement with human versus virtual influencers”. In: International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 174 (2023), p. 103008. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103008.

11. G. D. Ritterbusch and M. R. Teichmann. “Defining the Metaverse: A Systematic Literature Review”. In: IEEE Access 11 (2023), pp. 12368–12377. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3241809.

12. Feifei Shi et al. “A New Technology Perspective of the Metaverse: Its Essence, Framework and Challenges”. In: Digital Communications and Networks (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2023.02.017.

13. D. Huang, K. K. F. So, J. Huang, and S. (S.) Huang. “Exploring the attractiveness of digital human influencers in destination marketing: The allure of two-path meaning transfer”. In: Tourism Management 110 (2025), p. 105166. https:// https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2025.105166

14. Veronica L. Thomas and Kerri Fowler. “Close Encounters of the AI Kind: Use of AI Influencers As Brand Endorsers”. In: Journal of Advertising 50.1 (2021), pp. 11–25. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2020.1810595.

15. S. Jayasingh, A. Sivakumar, and A. A. Vanathaiyan. “Artificial Intelligence influencers’ credibility effect on consumer engagement and purchase intention”. In: Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 20.1 (2025), p. 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20010017

16. Carlos Flavi´an, Sergio Ib´a˜nez-S´anchez, and Carlos Or´us. “The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience”. In: Journal of Business Research 100 (2019), pp. 547–560. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.050.

17. N. Yadav, S. Sota, and H. Chaudhary. “Applications of virtual reality in marketing (2000–2020): A 4C marketing-mix based review and future research agenda”. In: International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising 18.2/3 (2023), p. 121. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijima.2023.129660.

18. N. Ju, T. Kim, and H. Im. “Fake human but real influencer: The interplay of authenticity and humanlikeness in virtual influencer communication?”. In: Fashion and Textiles 11.1 (2024), p. 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-024-00380-0.

19. Li, H., Wang, Z., Liang, W. & Wang, Y. (2025). “X’s Day: Personality-Driven Virtual Human Behavior Generation.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 3514–3524.

20. K. K. W. Man, J. A. Patterson, and C. T. Simons. “Efficacy assessments of virtual reality systems for immersive consumer testing—Two case studies with tortilla chip evaluations”. In: IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 55.2 (2025), pp. 266–277. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2024.3524916.

21. A. Tabassum, E. Elmahjub, A. I. Padela, A. Zwitter, and J. Qadir. “Generative AI and the metaverse: A scoping review of ethical and legal challenges”. In: IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society 6 (2025), pp. 348–359. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCS.2025.3536082.

22. M. Al-kfairy, A. Alomari, M. G. Al-Bashayreh, O. Alfandi, and M. Tubishat. “Unveiling the metaverse: a survey of user perceptions and the impact of usability, social influence and interoperability”. In: Heliyon 10.10 (2024), e31413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31413.

23. H. Lee and C. Cho. “Virtual brand experience in digital reality advertising: conceptualization and measurement”. In: Journal of Consumer Behaviour 22.2 (2022), pp. 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2126.

24. H. T. Crogman, V. D. Cano, E. Pacheco, R. B. Sonawane, and R. Boroon. “Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Mixed Reality in Experiential Learning: Transforming Educational Paradigms”. In: Education Sciences 15.3 (2025), p. 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030303.

25. Esperanza Miyake. “I am a virtual girl from Tokyo: Virtual influencers, digital-orientalism and the (Im)materiality of race and gender”. In: Journal of Consumer Culture 23.1 (2023), pp. 209–228. doi: 10.1177/ 14695405221117195.

26. J. Scholz and K. Duffy. “We ARe at home: How augmented reality reshapes mobile marketing and consumer-brand relationships”. In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 44 (2018), pp. 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.05.004.

27. Z. Mo and M. Zhou. “Don’t Like Them but Take What They Said: The Effectiveness of Virtual Influencers in Public Service Announcements”. In: Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 19 (2024), pp. 2269–2288. doi: 10.3390/jtaer19030110. url: https: //doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19030110.

28. Tong (Tripp) Liu, Caroline Swee Lin Tan, and Carolina Quintero Rodriguez. “Virtual Reality in the Luxury Fashion Industry: A Systematic Literature Review”. In: Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC 28.2 (2024), pp. 1–18. https: //doi.org/10.1108/SJME-07-2023-0203.

29. F.Y. Lo and J.X. Peng. “Strategies for Successful Personal Branding of Celebrities on Social Media Platforms: Involvement or Information Sharing?” In: Psychology Marketing 39 (2022), pp. 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21667.

30. H.M. Gray, K. Gray, and D.M. Wegner. “Dimensions of Mind Perception”. In: Science 315 (2007), p. 619. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134475.

31. H. Hu and F. Ma. “Human-like Bots Are Not Humans: The Weakness of Sensory Language for Virtual Streamers in Livestream Commerce”. In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 75 (2023), p. 103541. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103541.

32. F. Liu and Y.-H. Lee. “Virtually Responsible? Attribution of Responsibility toward Human vs. Virtual Influencers and the Mediating Role of Consumer Identification”. In: Journal of Business Research 153 (2023), pp. 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103685.

33. A. Aleem, S.M.C. Loureiro, and R.G. Bilro. “Luxury fashion consumption: a review, synthesis and research agenda”. In: Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC 28.2 (2022), pp. 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-06-2021-0105.

34. Y. Na, Y. Kim, and D. Lee. “Investigating the Effect of Self-Congruity on Attitudes toward Virtual Influencers: Mediating the Effect of Emotional Attachment”. In: International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 40.18 (2023), pp. 5534–5547. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2023. 2238365. url: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2238365.

35. J. Kim, M. Kim, and S.-M. Lee. “Unlocking trust dynamics: An exploration of playfulness, expertise, and consumer behavior in virtual influencer marketing”. In: International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction (2024), pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2023.2300018.

36. Simone Lykke Tranholm Mouritzen, Valeria Penttinen, and Susanne Pedersen. “Virtual influencer marketing: the good, the bad and the unreal”. In: European Journal of Marketing 58.2 (2024), pp. 410–440. doi: 10.1108/EJM-12-2022-0915.

37. Yide Liu, Tao Ye, and Cheng Yu. “Virtual voices in hospitality: Assessing narrative styles of digital influencers in hotel advertising”. In: Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 61 (2024), pp. 281– 298. doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2024.11.004.

38. P. W. Stone. “Popping the (PICO) question in research and evidence-based practice”. In: Applied Nursing Research 15.3 (2002), pp. 197–198. https://doi.org/10.1053/apnr.2002.34181

39. J. P. Higgins and S. Green. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 [Updated September 2006]. Vol. 4. Updated September 2006. Chichester, UK: The Cochrane Library, 2006. Available online: www.cochrane.org/handbook (Accessed on 18 November 2024).

40. Alessandro Liberati et al. “The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration”. In: PLoS Medicine 6.7 (2009), e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.

41. Reinhold Wendler. “The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study”. In: Information and Software Technology 54.12 (2012), pp. 1317–1339. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2012.07.007.

42. Alison Cooke, Diana Smith, and Andrew Booth. “Beyond PICO: The SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis”. In: Qualitative Health Research 22 (2012), pp. 1435–1443. doi: 10.1177/1049732312452938.

43. Andrew Booth. “Clear and present questions: Formulating questions for evidence-based practice”. In: Library Hi Tech 24 (2006), pp. 355– 368. doi: 10.1108/07378830610692127.

44. Marianne B. Eriksen and Tove F. Frandsen. “The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: A systematic review”. In: Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA 106 (2018), p. 420. doi: 10.5195/ jmla.2018.345.

45. T. Hilken et al. “Augmenting the eye of the beholder: exploring the strategic potential of augmented reality to enhance online service experiences”. In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 45.6 (2017), pp. 884–905. doi: 10.1007/s11747-017-0541-x.

46. Systematic Review Division. What are the PICO elements in systematic review? Available online: https://pubrica.com/academy/systematic-review/the-pico-framework-for-framing-systematic-review-research-questions/. (Accessed on 18 November 2024).

47. M. J. Page et al. “Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: Development of the PRISMA 2020 statement”. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 134 (2021), pp. 103–112.

48. Covidence. “Better systematic review management”. In: (2023). Available online: https://www.covidence.org/blog/how-are-systematic-reviews-used/(accessed on 1 November 2024).

49. X. Zhang et al. “Accessibility within open educational resources and practices for disabled learners: A systematic literature review”. In: Smart Learning Environments 7 (2020), pp. 1–19.

50. A. Bilgihan, A. M. W. Leong, F. Okumus, and J. Bai. “Proposing a metaverse engagement model for brand development”. In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 78 (2024), p. 103781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103781

51. R. Payal, N. Sharma, and Y. K. Dwivedi. “Unlocking the impact of brand engagement in the metaverse on real-world purchase intentions: Analysing pre-adoption behaviour in a futuristic technology platform”. In: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 65 (2024), p. 101381.

52. C. Ferraro, S. Sands, V. Demsar, and J. Cohen. “Diversity representation in virtual environments: How brand motives mediate consumer perceptions”. In: Australasian Marketing Journal 32.3 (2024), pp. 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241244535.

53. S. Yadav, S. K. Pandey, and D. Sharma. “Marketing beyond reality: A systematic literature review on metaverse”. In: Management Research Review 47.7 (2024), pp. 1029–1051. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2023-0456.

54. G. Liyanaarachchi, M. Mifsud, and G. Viglia. “Virtual influencers and data privacy: Introducing the multi-privacy paradox”. In: Journal of Business Research 176 (2024), p. 114584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114584.

55. Q. Lin, S. I. Ng, N. K. Basha, X. Luo, and Y. Li. “Impact of virtual influencers on customer engagement of Generation Z consumers: A presence perspective”. In: Young Consumers 25.6 (2024), pp. 851–868. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-01-2024-1958.

56. B. Koles, A. Audrezet, J. G. Moulard, N. Ameen, and B. McKenna. “The authentic virtual influencer: Authenticity manifestations in the metaverse”. In: Journal of Business Research 170 (2024), p. 114325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114325

57. Y. Li, Z. Liu, L. Yuan, H. Tang, Y. Fan, and N. Xie. “Dynamic Scene Adjustment Mechanism for Manipulating User Experience in VR”. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (2024), pp. 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR58804.2024.00041.

58. H.-K. Zeng and C. A. Lin. “Consumer evaluation of virtual vs. human influencers via source credibility, perceived social similarity, and consumption motivation”. In: Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 20.3 (2025), p. 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20030168 .

59. T. Doligalski, N. Sarna, B. Koles, A. Siejka, and R. Kozielski. “Advertising in the metaverse and its implications for brands and society: A multi-stakeholder perspective”. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change 209 (2024), p. 123832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123832

60. X. Cao and J. Sun. “Exploring the effect of overload on the discontinuous intention of social media users: An S-O-R perspective”. In: Computers in Human Behavior 81 (2018), pp. 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.035.

61. K. Yoo, R. Welden, K. Hewett, and M. Haenlein. “The merchants of meta: A research agenda to understand the future of retailing in the metaverse”. In: Journal of Retailing 99.2 (2023), pp. 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2023.02.002.

62. A.K. Shelton. “Defining the lines between virtual and real-world purchases: Second life sells, but who’s buying?” In: Computers in Human Behavior 26.6 (2010), pp. 1223–1227. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03. 019.

63. E. Gadalla, K. Keeling, and I. Abosag. “Metaverse-retail service quality: a future framework for retail service quality in the 3D internet”. In: Journal of Marketing Management 29.13–14 (2013), pp. 1493–1517. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2013.835742.

64. C. Wu. The virtual reality and augmented reality adoption impact on customer loyalty for the fashion brands. 2024. doi: 10.20944/preprints202307.1408.v3

65. S. Lim and J. Oh. “Navigating privacy: A global comparative analysis of data protection laws”. In: IET Information Security (2025). https://doi.org/10.1049/ise2/5536763

Supporting Agencies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Academic Supporter

Institute for Metaverse, School of Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology (NUIST), China

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Zhigeng Pan

Director, Institute for Metaverse, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, China

Honorary Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Jianrong Tan

Academician, Chinese Academy of Engineering, China

Indexing & Archiving

News & Announcements

2025-05-20

Call for papers for SIGGRAPH ASIA 2025!

Conference Time

December 15-18, 2025

Conference Venue

Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Center (HKCEC)

...

2025-04-23

Metaverse Scientist Forum No.3

Metaverse Scientist Forum No.3 was successfully held on April 22, 2025, from 19:00 to 20:30 (Beijing Time)...

2025-04-21

Congratulations to Metaverse on being indexed in Scopus!

We received the Scopus notification on April 19th, confirming that the journal has been successfully indexed by Scopus...

2025-04-15

Updated Submission Guidelines for Manuscript Figures!

We are pleased to announce that we have updated the requirements for manuscript figures in the submission guidelines. Manuscripts submitted after April 15, 2025 are required to strictly adhere to the change. These updates are aimed at ensuring the highest quality of visual content in our publications and enhancing the overall readability and impact of your research. For more details, please find it in sumissions...

More Announcements...

Article Tools

Indexing metadata

How to cite item

Review policy