The role of humans in the future of medicine: Completing the cycle

Nitzan Kenig; Aina Muntaner Vives

doi:10.54517/m3129

Publication Frequency

Quarterly (since 2025)

Journal Articles

Search scope

Journal Center

Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.

more

Volume Arrangement

2025

2024

2023

more

Featured Articles

Content creation or interpolation: AI generative digital art in the classroom

The integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools in art and design has disrupted the traditional creative landscape, leading to debates on the legitimacy of AI-generated art and the emergence of new markets such as non-fungible tokens (NFTs). The US Copyright Office’s February 21, 2023, ruling withdrawing copyright protection for AI-generated comic artwork, while protecting the accompanying text and arrangement, highlights the contested nature of AI art and suggests that significant human intervention in the creative process will be required for monetization. Whether considered content interpolation or content creation, AI generative content for the creation of art and design is here with human-AI collaboration. To explore the potential of AI tools in creative practice, this study introduced students in a digital art course to Craiyon and Midjourney generative AI tools, with DALL-E 2 selected as the primary tool due to its varied output. The students were tasked with selecting a preferred prompt from one tool and then reproducing the output from both tools. The results revealed significant variations in replicating the outputs of different AI tools and limited exploration of prompt engineering, leading to restrictions in the iterative process of artmaking. The students agreed that generative AI tools are not a substitute for human creativity and should be used for final projects. The study demonstrates the potential and limitations of integrating AI tools in art and design and suggests the need for further research in developing effective prompt engineering strategies.

From motion to magic: Real-time virtual-real stage effects via 3D motion capture

Immersive cultural performances with virtual-real fusion effects are the future development trend in the exhibition and stage industry. However, current virtual-real stage performances heavily rely on traditional sequential design and arrangements. During the performance, actors must move to specific positions based on the musical beat and execute predetermined actions with a pre-designed amplitude and frequency to synchronize with the fixedly played stage visual effects; otherwise, major performance accidents such as plot inconsistencies or continuity errors may occur. To address the problem, this paper introduces a real-time generation system for stage visual effects based on multi-view multi-person 3D motion capture. The system utilizes multi-view 3D motion capture technique to achieve non-intrusive real-time interaction perception of target actors in the stage space. By perceiving the spatial position and performance actions of the target actors, corresponding stage visual effects are generated in real-time. This is followed by the seamless integration of sound effects and immersive high-definition display, ultimately realizing multidimensional real-time interaction between real actors and virtual visual effects in the stage space. We conducted an experimental virtual-real stage performance, lasting approximately two minutes, in a physical theater to validate the effectiveness of our proposed method. The experiment not only produced a unique innovative effect of blending stage and technology but also effectively enhanced the sense of presence and interactivity of the stage performance, providing actors with more freedom and control in their performances.

The role of humans in the future of medicine: Completing the cycle

Nitzan Kenig, Aina Muntaner Vives

Article ID: 3129
Vol 6, Issue 1, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/m3129

Received: 4 December 2024; Accepted: 6 January 2025; Available online: 15 January 2025; Issue release: 30 June 2025

VIEWS - 34 (Abstract)

Download PDF

Abstract

The progression of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has reshaped our understanding of intelligence, consciousness, and the human condition, challenging long-held assumptions about the mind and its relationship with machines. Starting with Alan Turing’s Imitation Game, the narrative of assessment of AI has continually evolved. This historical context underlines the importance of moving beyond mere facts to confront philosophical questions about AI’s role and limitations, especially in its capacity for consciousness and emotional resonance. In healthcare, the evolution of AI reflects a transformative cycle. Historically, medicine began as an empathic endeavor, where caregivers provided comfort amid limited knowledge. Over centuries, advancements in science elevated physicians to authoritative figures, creating a paternalistic doctor-patient dynamic. Today, with the advent of AI and technologies like the metaverse, healthcare knowledge is becoming democratized. Patients can increasingly access AI-driven diagnostics and interactions, creating a potential era of “algorithmic paternalism” where machines dominate the knowledge hierarchy. Looking to the future, as AI assumes cognitive and diagnostic responsibilities, the human aspect of medicine will gain renewed importance. Physicians will return to their foundational role as empathic caregivers, focusing on human connection and emotional support—qualities that AI, despite its advances, cannot fully replicate today. This shift completes a historical cycle, reaffirming the enduring value of humanity in medicine and positioning the physician as a central figure in the emotionally nuanced landscape of healthcare.

Keywords

metaverse; artificial intelligence; doctor-patient relationship; human-computer interaction; ethics

References

1. Turing AM. I.—Computing Machinery And Intelligence. Mind. 1950; LIX(236): 433–460. doi: 10.1093/mind/lix.236.433

2. Jefferson G. The Mind of Mechanical Man. BMJ. 1949; 1(4616): 1105–1110. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.4616.1105

3. Swash M, Evans J. Hughlings Jackson’s clinical research: evidence from contemporary documents. Neurology. 2006; 67(4): 666–672. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000230142.89488.a0

4. Aminololama-Shakeri S, López JE. The Doctor-Patient Relationship With Artificial Intelligence. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2019; 212(2): 308–310. doi: 10.2214/ajr.18.20509

5. Wang Y, Li C, Qu L, et al. Application and challenges of a metaverse in medicine. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 2023; 10. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1291199

6. Massetti M, Chiariello GA. The metaverse in medicine. European Heart Journal Supplements. 2023; 25(Supplement_B): B104–B107. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad083

7. Chilamkurthy S, Ghosh R, Tanamala S, et al. Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study. Lancet Lond Engl. 2018; 392(10162): 2388–2396.

8. Reddy S. Generative AI in healthcare: an implementation science informed translational path on application, integration and governance. Implementation Science. 2024; 19(1): 27. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01357-9

9. Antel R, Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi S, Guadagno E, et al. The use of artificial intelligence and virtual reality in doctor-patient risk communication: A scoping review. Patient Education and Counseling. 2022; 105(10): 3038–3050. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.06.006

10. Howell MD, Corrado GS, DeSalvo KB. Three Epochs of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care. JAMA. 2024; 331(3): 242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.25057

11. Vearrier L, Derse AR, Basford JB, et al. Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Medicine: Benefits, Risks, and Recommendations. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2022; 62(4): 492–499. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2022.01.001

12. Kenig N, Echeverria JM, Vives AM. Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Systematic Review of Use and Validation. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(23): 7108. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237108

13. Kawarase MA, Anjankar A. Dynamics of Metaverse and Medicine: A Review Article. Cureus. 2022; 14(11): e31232. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31232

14. Lorenzini G, Ossa LA, Shaw DM, Elger BS. Artificial intelligence and the doctor–patient relationship expanding the paradigm of shared decision making. Bioethics. 2023; 37(5): 424–429. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13158

15. Allen MR, Webb S, Mandvi A, et al. Navigating the doctor-patient-AI relationship—a mixed-methods study of physician attitudes toward artificial intelligence in primary care. BMC Primary Care. 2024; 25(1): 42. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02282-y

16. Sauerbrei A, Kerasidou A, Lucivero F, et al. The impact of artificial intelligence on the person-centred, doctor-patient relationship: some problems and solutions. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2023; 23(1): 73. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02162-y

17. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine. 2019; 25(1): 44–56. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7

18. Reddy S, Rogers W, Makinen VP, et al. Evaluation framework to guide implementation of AI systems into healthcare settings. BMJ Health & Care Informatics. 2021; 28(1): e100444. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100444

19. Rivera SC, Liu X, Chan AW, et al. Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI Extension. Lancet Digit Health. 2020; 2(10): e549–560.

20. Muller H, Mayrhofer MT, Van Veen EB, Holzinger A. The Ten Commandments of Ethical Medical AI. Computer. 2021; 54(7): 119–123. doi: 10.1109/mc.2021.3074263

21. Kenig N, Echeverria JM, Rubi C. Ethics for AI in Plastic Surgery: Guidelines and Review. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2024; 48(11): 2204–2209. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-03932-3

22. Kenig N, Echeverria JM, Vives AM. Human Beauty according to Artificial Intelligence. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open. 2023; 11(7): e5153. doi: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005153

23. Jacoba CMP, Celi LA, Lorch AC, et al. Bias and Non-Diversity of Big Data in Artificial Intelligence: Focus on Retinal Diseases. Seminars in Ophthalmology. 2023; 38(5): 433–441. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2023.2168486

24. Council of Europe Steering Committee for Human Rights in the fields of Biomedicine and Health (CDBIO). Report On The Impact Of Artificial Intelligence On The Doctor-Patient Relationship. Available online: https://rm.coe.int/inf-2022-5-report-impact-of-ai-on-doctor-patient-relations-e/1680a68859 (accessed on 22 November 2024).

25. Riedl R, Hogeterp SA, Reuter M. Do patients prefer a human doctor, artificial intelligence, or a blend, and is this preference dependent on medical discipline? Empirical evidence and implications for medical practice. Frontiers in Psychology. 2024; 15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1422177

26. World Health Organization. Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence for Health: WHO Guidance, 1st ed. World Health Organization; 2021. p. 1.

27. Bjerring JC, Busch J. Artificial Intelligence and Patient-Centered Decision-Making. Philosophy & Technology. 2020; 34(2): 349–371. doi: 10.1007/s13347-019-00391-6

28. Magrabi F, Ammenwerth E, McNair JB, et al. Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support: Challenges for Evaluating AI and Practical Implications. Yearbook of Medical Informatics. 2019; 28(01): 128–134. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677903

29. Coiera E. The fate of medicine in the time of AI. Lancet Lond Engl. 2018; 392(10162): 2331–2332.

30. Hughlings-Jackson J. Observations on the Physiology and Pathology of Hemi-Chorea. Edinb Med J. 1868; 14(4): 294–303.

31. Gregory J. Understanding the communication skills that support nurses to provide person-centred care. Nursing Standard. 2024; 39(2): 61–66. doi: 10.7748/ns.2024.e12132

32. Sany SBT, Behzhad F, Ferns G, et al. Communication skills training for physicians improves health literacy and medical outcomes among patients with hypertension: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Services Research. 2020; 20(1): 60. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4901-8

33. Hashim MJ. Patient-Centered Communication: Basic Skills. Am Fam Physician. 2017; 95(1): 29–34.

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Academic Supporter

Institute for Metaverse, School of Artificial Intelligence (School of Future Technology), Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology (NUIST), China

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Zhigeng Pan

Director, Institute for Metaverse, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, China

Honorary Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Jianrong Tan

Academician, Chinese Academy of Engineering, China

Indexing & Archiving

News & Announcements

2025-01-21

Metaverse supports CSFC2025 as a partner journal

Metaverse (eISSN: 2810-9791) is honored to support CSFC2025 as a cooperative journal of the conference....

2025-01-02

Announcement Regarding Change in Publication Frequency

Metaverse will transition from a semi-annual to a quarterly publication schedule, with new issues slated for release in March, June, September, and December...

More Announcements...

Article Tools

Indexing metadata

How to cite item

Review policy