Quarry operations and soil health: Tracing metal pollution in Awi and Njagachan communities, Nigeria

Udiba Ugumanim Udiba, Dorothy Kuka Modey, John Ama, Joseph Etim Amah, Nwuyi Okori Sam-Uket, Edward Odey Emuru, Confidence Ikenna Chukwubuike

Article ID: 3155
Vol 6, Issue 1, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ps3155
Received: 12 December 2024; Accepted: 8 January 2025; Available online: 8 February 2025; Issue release: 30 June 2025


Download PDF

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of quarry operations on soil health by evaluating the metal pollution status of soils around major quarry communities (Awi and Njagachan) in Akamkpa, Nigeria. Soil samples were subjected to wet digestion and quantified using an Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (Model AA-6800, Japan). The concentrations of lead (63.34–96.34 mg/kg), cadmium (4.29–7.40 mg/kg), mercury (2.34–3.76 mg/kg), arsenic (2.48–5.21 mg/kg), and selenium (1.22–2.75 mg/kg) were all below the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA), Dutch remediation levels, and other soil guidelines. However, significant spatial variation in metal levels across quarry sites points to anthropogenic influences, with quarries likely contributing to the elevated metal concentrations. Contamination factors indicated moderate contamination by lead, considerable contamination by cadmium, and very high contamination by mercury. The degree of contamination was high for all quarries except Ding Zing quarry, which showed a very high degree during the wet season. Ecological risk assessment revealed low potential risk from lead and arsenic, moderate to high risk from cadmium, and very high risk from mercury. Geo-accumulation indices suggested that soils were largely unpolluted by lead and arsenic but ranged from unpolluted to moderately polluted by cadmium and mercury. The study concludes that quarry activities contribute to elevated metal concentrations, posing varying levels of ecological risk. Continuous monitoring is strongly recommended to prevent potential long-term human and environmental health risks, with a focus on addressing mercury contamination. Regulatory measures should be enforced to mitigate further pollution. 


Keywords

quarry operations; soil health; heavy metals; pollution status; ecological risk


References

1. Ogbiji JE, Ogbiji A. Quarry industries and socio-economic development in some selected communities in Cross River State of Nigeria. World Wide Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Development. 2016; 2(12): 10–14.

2. Inyaka GI, Alkali M, Mba EH, et al. Assessment of dust concentration & compounds at quarry sites in Akamkpa Cross River State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Geological Research. 2021; 4(1): 40–47.

3. Akinola MO, Aiyesanmi AF. Environmental implications of rock quarrying activities in Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2015; 8(2): 45–56.

4. Swain CK. Environmental pollution indices: a review on concentration of heavy metals in air, water, and soil near industrialization and urbanisation. Discover Environment. 2024; 2(5).

5. Tiimub BM, Sarkodie PA, Monney A, et al. Heavy Metal Contamination of Soil by Quarry Dust at Asonomaso in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. Chemistry and Materials Research. 2015; 7: 42–50.

6. Adewole AT, Adesina AG. Impact of Quarrying on Soil Quality in Nigeria. Environmental Pollution Journal. 2021; 45(3): 299–310.

7. Ogundele AO, Adeoye DA, Adebayo KJ, et al. Heavy Metal Contamination from Quarry Activities in Southwest Nigeria. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2019; 191(5): 327.

8. Nwachukwu E, Udo AO, Mbina SO. Environmental Impact of Quarrying in Cross River State, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Science and Toxicology. 2018; 13(1): 14–23.

9. Doran JW, Zeiss MR. Soil health and sustainability: Managing the biotic component of soil quality. Applied Soil Ecology. 2000; 15(1): 3–11.

10. Ololade IA, Ajayi OO. Contamination profile of major rivers along the highways in Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2009; 2(3): 186–194.

11. Adewole MB, Adesina AO. Impact of limestone quarrying activities on soil properties in Ogun State, Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2011; 6(11): 2372–2377.

12. Bada BS, Fagbayibgo AI. Environmental impact assessment of quarrying in Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2009; 2(2): 34–42.

13. Ogbonna O, Nwosu P. Heavy metal content in soils and plants around a cement factory in Gombe State, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology. 2011; 3(3): 77–84.

14. Singh G, Chaturvedi R. Environmental impacts of mining on biodiversity of Angul-Talcher open mining site, Orissa, India: A case study. International Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2010; 1(3): 135–142.

15. Population Stat, Calabar, Nigeria population. Available online: https://populationstat.com/nigeria/calabar (accessed on 12 June 2024).

16. Davidson J, Smith R, Thomas P. Geology and geomorphology of the Oban Massif region, southeastern Nigeria. Geological Society of Nigeria Press; 2019. pp. 45–47.

17. Hakanson L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control: A sedimentological approach. Journal of Water Research. 1980, 14(8): 975–1001.

18. Qingjie G, Jun D, Yunchuan X, et al. Calculating Pollution Indices by Heavy Metals in Ecological Geochemistry Assessment and A Case Study in Parks of Beijing. Journal of China University of Geosciences. 2008; 9(3): 230–241.

19. Thomilson DC, Wilson DJ, Harris CR, et al. Problem in Heavy metals in estuaries and the formation of pollution index. Helgol Wissmeeresunlter. 1980; 33(1–4): 566–575.

20. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency (2023), Regional Screening Levels (RSLs)–Generic Tables (2023). Available online: https://www.epa.gov/risk/regional-screening-levels-rsls-generic-tables (accessed on 6 July 2024).

21. Dutch Target and Intervention Values, 2000 (the New Dutch List) Available online: http://esdat.net/Environmental%20Standards/Dutch/annexS I2000Dutch%20Environmental%20Standards.pdf (accessed on 2 June 2024).

22. DEFRA and the Environment Agency. CLR11 Model Procedures for the Management of land contamination. DEFRA and the Environment Agency; 2004.

23. Jeffries J. Using Soil Guideline Values. Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7c94b8ed915d6969f45e46/scho0309bpqm-e-e.pdf (accessed on 2 June 2024).

24. Environment Agency (2014). Soil Guideline Values for heavy metals in soil. Available online: https://www.alsenvironmental.co.uk/media-uk/pdf/datasheets/contaminated-land/als_cl_heavy-metals-guidelines-in-soil_uk_feb_17_v2.pdf (accessed on 2 June 2024).

25. Ekpo FE, Nzegblue EC, Asuquo ME. A comparative study of the influence of heavy metals on soil & crops growing within quarry environment at Akamkpa, Cross River State, Nigeria. Global Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2011; 11(1): 1–10.

26. Kumar R, Singh P, Sharma N. Assessment of heavy metal contamination in quarry sites of India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2020; 192(5): 289.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).