
Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.

The (partial) replacement of synthetic polymers with bioplastics is due to increased production of conventional packaging plastics causing for severe environmental pollution with plastics waste. The bioplastics, however, represent complex mixtures of known and unknown (bio)polymers, fillers, plasticizers, stabilizers, flame retardant, pigments, antioxidants, hydrophobic polymers such as poly(lactic acid), polyethylene, polyesters, glycol, or poly(butylene succinate), and little is known of their chemical safety for both the environment and the human health. Polymerization reactions of bioplastics can produce no intentionally added chemicals to the bulk material, which could be toxic, as well. When polymers are used to food packing, then the latter chemicals could also migrate from the polymer to food. This fact compromises the safety for consumers, as well. The scarce data on chemical safety of bioplastics makes a gap in knowledge of their toxicity to humans and environment. Thus, development of exact analytical protocols for determining chemicals of bioplastics in environmental and food samples as well as packing polymers can only provide warrant for reliable conclusive evidence of their safety for both the human health and the environment. The task is compulsory according to legislation Directives valid to environmental protection, food control, and assessment of the risk to human health. The quantitative and structural determination of analytes is primary research task of analysis of polymers. The methods of mass spectrometry are fruitfully used for these purposes. Methodological development of exact analytical mass spectrometric tools for reliable structural analysis of bioplastics only guarantees their safety, efficacy, and quality to both humans and environment. This study, first, highlights innovative stochastic dynamics equations processing exactly mass spectrometric measurands and, thus, producing exact analyte quantification and 3D molecular and electronic structural analyses. There are determined synthetic polymers such as poly(ethylenglycol), poly(propylene glycol), and polyisoprene as well as biopolymers in bags for foodstuffs made from renewable cellulose and starch, and containing, in total within the 20,416–17,495 chemicals per sample of the composite biopolymers. Advantages of complementary employment in mass spectrometric methods and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy is highlighted. The study utilizes ultra-high resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometric and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic data on biodegradable plastics bags for foodstuffs; high accuracy quantum chemical static methods, molecular dynamics; and chemometrics. There is achieved method performance |r| = 0.99981 determining poly(propylene glycol) in bag for foodstuff containing 20,416 species and using stochastic dynamics mass spectrometric formulas. The results highlight their great capability and applicability to the analytical science as well as relevance to both the fundamental research and to the industry.
The problem of small-scale marine oil spills discharged by unattributable vessels: A review
Vol 6, Issue 1, 2025
Download PDF
Abstract
Oil pollution is one of the most conspicuous forms of damage to the marine environment. It can be divided into two categories: large-scale and small-scale spills. Considerable research has been conducted on large-scale spills, including investigations into the damage caused, the methods of remediation employed, the compensation paid, and the reasons for a sharp decrease in the number of major oil spills during the last 20 years. However, very little attention has been paid to small-scale spills, leaving largely unresearched the reasons for their continued occurrence, the damage they cause, and the lack of compensation paid out for them. Because the number of large-scale marine oil spills has greatly reduced in recent years, there may be a perception that the problem of marine oil spills has been broadly brought under control. However, this would be to ignore the issue of small-scale spills, which have not decreased and are causing severe problems in coastal areas. The perpetrators of these small-scale spills are very difficult to identify, so they invariably escape detection and thereby avoid having to pay for the clean-up and damages costs caused by their actions. The main aim of this review paper is to draw attention to the lack of research into this unsatisfactory situation. The paper describes the scale and type of damage caused by small-scale spills; analyzes the problem of identifying unattributable polluters; considers ways of remediating oil spills; and evaluates current procedures for obtaining compensation for clean-up operations. Given the escalating frequency of these small-scale spills and their profound impact on marine ecosystems and vulnerable communities, it is imperative that researchers, policymakers, and stakeholders prioritize the development of effective strategies to address this pressing issue. The time to act is now, as the health of our coastlines and the livelihoods of countless individuals depend on our ability to confront the challenges posed by small-scale oil spills.
Keywords
References
1. Riazi MR. Sources and Causes of Oil Spills. Oil Spill Occurrence, Simulation, and Behavior; 2021. doi: 10.1201/9780429432156-3
2. Shavykin A, Karnatov A. Main Development Problems of Vulnerability Mapping of Sea-Coastal Zones to Oil Spills. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2018; 6(4): 115. doi: 10.3390/jmse6040115
3. Hassanshahian M, Amirinejad N, Askarinejad Behzadi M. Crude oil pollution and biodegradation at the Persian Gulf: A comprehensive and review study. J Environ Health Sci Engineer. 2020; 18: 1415-1435. doi: 10.1007/s40201-020-00557-x
4. Loyeh EN, Mohsenpour R. Investigation of oil pollution on aquatic animals and methods of its prevention. J Aquac Mar Biol. 2020.
5. Pound J. Surety not quid pro quo conditions and the D.C. circuit’s free-floating expansion of coast guard authority in magic pipe investigations in Marine Watervale Co. v. United States Department of Homeland Security. Tulane Maritime Law Journal. 2016.
6. Gullo BS. Illegal discharge of oil on the high seas: The U.S. Coast Guard’s ongoing battle against vessel polluters and a new approach toward establishing environmental compliance. Military Law Review; 2011.
7. Marine Defenders. Marine oil pollution. Available online: https://www.marinedefenders.org/oil-pollution-facts.html (10 October 2024).
8. Sankaran K. Protecting oceans from illicit oil spills: environment control and remote sensing using spaceborne imaging radars. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications. 2019; 33(18): 2373-2403. doi: 10.1080/09205071.2019.1685409
9. Andrews N, Bennett NJ, Le Billon P, et al. Oil, fisheries and coastal communities: A review of impacts on the environment, livelihoods, space and governance. Energy Research & Social Science. 2021; 75: 102009. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102009
10. Aldosari KR. Marine Safety and Pollution Prevention from Oil Spills in the Arabian Gulf: A Comparative Study of Applicable International and Regional Conventions. Sweden, World Maritime University; 2019.
11. Barron MG, Vivian DN, Heintz RA, et al. Long-Term Ecological Impacts from Oil Spills: Comparison of Exxon Valdez, Hebei Spirit, and Deepwater Horizon. Environmental Science & Technology. 2020; 54(11): 6456-6467. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05020
12. Sevgili C, Fiskin R, Cakir E. A data-driven Bayesian Network model for oil spill occurrence prediction using tankship accidents. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022; 370: 133478. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133478
13. Hebbar AA, Dharmasiri IG. Management of marine oil spills: A case study of the Wakashio oil spill in Mauritius using a lens-actor-focus conceptual framework. Ocean & Coastal Management. 2022; 221: 106103. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106103
14. Salomon M, Markus T. Handbook on Marine Environment Protection. Springer International Publishing; 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-60156-4
15. Yip TL, Talley WK, Jin D. The effectiveness of double hulls in reducing vessel-accident oil spillage. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2011; 62(11): 2427-2432. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.08.026
16. Tiquio MaGJP, Marmier N, Francour P. Management frameworks for coastal and marine pollution in the European and South East Asian regions. Ocean & Coastal Management. 2017; 135: 65-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.003
17. Dietl G. Musandam: Creating a new region across the water. In: Regionalizing Oman. United Nations University Series on Regionalism. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013.
18. Ahmad H, Khan TA, Durur H, et al. Analytic approximate solutions of diffusion equations arising in oil pollution. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science. 2021; 6(1): 62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.joes.2020.05.002
19. ITOPF (International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation Limited). Oil Tanker Spill Statistics 2022. International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation Limited, UK; 2023.
20. Walker TR, Adebambo O, Del Aguila Feijoo MC, et al. Environmental Effects of Marine Transportation. World Seas: An Environmental Evaluation; 2019. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-805052-1.00030-9
21. Carpenter A. OSPAR review of the state of the North Sea: Oil inputs and their impact on the marine environment of the North Sea. In: Oil Pollution in the North Sea. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. Cham: Springer; 2016. doi: 10.1007/698_2015_413
22. Mura J. Oil pollution violations and enforcement: Who is responsible for maintaining the oil record book?. Loyola Maritime Law Journal. 2018.
23. Arslan O, Solmaz MS, Usluer HB. Determination of the perception of ship management towards environmental pollion caused by routine operations of ships. Aquatic Research. 2022; 5(1): 39-52. doi: 10.3153/ar22005
24. Lunde Hermansson A, Hassellöv IM. Tank cleaning and its impact on the marine environment. Swedish Institute for the Marine Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden; 2022.
25. Vollaard B. Temporal displacement of environmental crime: Evidence from marine oil pollution. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 2017; 82: 168-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2016.11.001
26. Zielinski O, Busch JA, Cembella AD, et al. Detecting marine hazardous substances and organisms: sensors for pollutants, toxins, and pathogens. Ocean Science. 2009; 5(3): 329-349. doi: 10.5194/os-5-329-2009
27. Shu H. Study on the Mechanism of Compensation Fund System for Shipping Oil Pollution Damage in China and International Oil Pollution Compensation Funds. MSc dissertation, World Maritime University, Dalian, China; 2020.
28. Mong’ina MK. Waste Oil Management by Petroleum Business Operators: an Analysis of the Legal and Institutional Framework [PhD thesis]. University of Nairobi; 2018.
29. Zhang Z, Sun H, Guo Y. The Impact of Marine Oil Spills on the Ecosystem. International Journal of Engineering Sciences and Technologies. 2024; 2(1). doi: 10.58531/ijest/2/1/1
30. Mesquita Pedrosa Ferreira B, dos Santos Quinamo T. The 2019 Brazilian oil spill: Perceptions of affected fishers. In: Blue Justice: Small-Scale Fisheries in a Sustainable Ocean Economy, Cham: Springer; 2022.
31. Moroni D, Pieri G, Tampucci M. Environmental Decision Support Systems for Monitoring Small Scale Oil Spills: Existing Solutions, Best Practices and Current Challenges. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2019; 7(1): 19. doi: 10.3390/jmse7010019
32. Ivanov AY, Evtushenko NV, Evtushenko VM. Distribution and main sources of oil spills in the Persian Gulf based on satellite monitoring with synthetic aperture radar. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2023; 45(23): 8859-8879. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2023.2249606
33. Hyder K, Wright S, Kirby M, et al. The role of citizen science in monitoring small-scale pollution events. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2017; 120(1-2): 51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.04.038
34. Abou El-Magd I, Zakzouk M, Abdulaziz AM, et al. The Potentiality of Operational Mapping of Oil Pollution in the Mediterranean Sea near the Entrance of the Suez Canal Using Sentinel-1 SAR Data. Remote Sensing. 2020; 12(8): 1352. doi: 10.3390/rs12081352
35. Berti A. Tracking and tracing polluting ships. Ship Technology; 2020.
36. Inojosa FCP, Pedrosa LF, Castro MCTD, et al. Lessons learned from a mystery oil spill that hit the Brazilian coast in 2019. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 2022; 94(suppl 2). doi: 10.1590/0001-3765202220210309
37. Osofsky HM, Baxter-Kauf K, Hammer B, & Mailander A. Environmental justice and the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill. New York University Environmental Law Journal; 2012.
38. Singh A, Asmath H, Chee CL, et al. Potential oil spill risk from shipping and the implications for management in the Caribbean Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2015; 93(1-2): 217-227. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.01.013
39. Camphuysen K, Vollaard B. Oil pollution in the Dutch Sector of the North Sea. In: Oil Pollution in the North Sea. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. Cham: Springer. 2015; 4: 117-140. doi: 10.1007/698_2015_430
40. Kaiser MJ. Offshore Service Industry and Logistics Modeling in the Gulf of Mexico. Springer International Publishing; 2015. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17013-8
41. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) (2024) Oil spills. Available online: https://www.noaa.gov/education/resource-collections/ocean-coasts/oil-spills? (accessed on 5 October 2024).
42. ITOPF (International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation Limited). Oil spill statistics 2018. Available online: https://www.connaissancedesenergies.org/sites/connaissancedesenergies.org/files/pdf-actualites/Oil_Spill_Stats_2018.pdf (accessed on 5 October 2024).
43. ITOPF (International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation Limited) Oil spill statistics. Available online: https://www.ITOPF.org/knowledge-resources/data-statistics/statistics/ (accessed on 5 October 2024).
44. EMSA (European Maritime Safety Agency). Addressing illegal oil discharges in the marine environment: Annual report. Available online: https://EMSA.europa.eu/publications/reports (accessed on 5 October 2024).
45. Paddison L, Ramalho da Silva B, Bernhard M, & Muller M. Revealed: Ships may dump oil up to 3,000 times a year in Europe’s waters. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/mar/22/revealed-ships-may-dump-oil-up-to-3000-times-a-year-in-europes-waters (accessed on 15 October 2024).
46. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) How oil spills impact marine life. NOAA Ocean Service. Available online: https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/oilimpacts.html (accessed on 5 October 2024).
47. Purohit BK, Tewari S, Prasad KSNV, et al. Marine oil spill clean-up: A review on technologies with recent trends and challenges. Regional Studies in Marine Science. 2024; 80: 103876. doi: 10.1016/j.rsma.2024.103876
48. Su DT, Tzu FM, Cheng CH. Investigation of Oil Spills from Oil Tankers through Grey Theory: Events from 1974 to 2016. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2019; 7(10): 373. doi: 10.3390/jmse7100373
49. Chen J, Zhang W, Wan Z, et al. Oil spills from global tankers: Status review and future governance. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 227: 20-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.020
50. Asif Z, Chen Z, An C, et al. Environmental Impacts and Challenges Associated with Oil Spills on Shorelines. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2022; 10(6): 762. doi: 10.3390/jmse10060762
51. Huang D, Sebastian R, Zhang L, et al. Biocompatible Herder for rapid oil spill treatment over a wide temperature range. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2019; 62: 103948. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103948
52. Morandin LA, O’Hara PD. Offshore oil and gas, and operational sheen occurrence: is there potential harm to marine birds?. Environmental Reviews. 2016; 24(3): 285-318. doi: 10.1139/er-2015-0086
53. Quist LM, Nygren A. Debating the unknowns of marine oil exploration in Mexico. The Extractive Industries and Society. 2019; 6(3): 855-862. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2019.06.005
54. Onyena AP, Sam K. A review of the threat of oil exploitation to mangrove ecosystem: Insights from Niger Delta, Nigeria. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2020; 22: e00961. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00961
55. Liu B, Zhang W, Han J, et al. Tracing illegal oil discharges from vessels using SAR and AIS in Bohai Sea of China. Ocean & Coastal Management. 2021; 211: 105783. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105783
56. Warnock AM, Hagen SC, Passeri DL. Marine Tar Residues: A Review. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 2015; 226(3). doi: 10.1007/s11270-015-2298-5
57. Svejkovsky J, Hess M, Muskat J, et al. Characterization of surface oil thickness distribution patterns observed during the Deepwater Horizon (MC-252) oil spill with aerial and satellite remote sensing. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2016; 110(1): 162-176. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.066
58. Saleem A, Al Maashri A, Eldirdiry O, et al. Detection of Oil Spill Pollution in Seawater Using Drones: Simulation & Lab-based Experimental Study. 2021 IEEE International IOT, Electronics and Mechatronics Conference (IEMTRONICS); 2021. doi: 10.1109/iemtronics52119.2021.9422576
59. Times of Oman. Oil spill drifts towards Musandam beaches. Available online: https://timesofoman.com/article/35200-oil-spill-drifts-towards-musandam-beaches (accessed on 15 October 2024).
60. Truskewycz A, Gundry TD, Khudur LS, et al. Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contamination in Terrestrial Ecosystems—Fate and Microbial Responses. Molecules. 2019; 24(18): 3400. doi: 10.3390/molecules24183400
61. Zhao J, Temimi M, Ghedira H, et al. Exploring the potential of optical remote sensing for oil spill detection in shallow coastal waters-a case study in the Arabian Gulf. Optics Express. 2014; 22(11): 13755. doi: 10.1364/oe.22.013755
62. Ossai IC, Ahmed A, Hassan A, et al. Remediation of soil and water contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbon: A review. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 2020; 17: 100526. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2019.100526
63. Robinson EM. Effects of Oil on Mollusk and Crustacean Populations, Behavior, and Predator-Prey Interactions. LSU Doctoral Dissertation; 2018.
64. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) How does oil get into the ocean?. Available online: https://blog.response.restoration.noaa.gov/how-does-oil-get-ocean (accessed on 5 October 2024).
65. White HK, Hsing PY, Cho W, et al. Impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on a deep-water coral community in the Gulf of Mexico. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012; 109(50): 20303-20308. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118029109
66. Krupp F, Abuzinada AH. Impact of oil pollution and increased sea surface temperatures on marine ecosystems and biota in the Gulf. In: Protecting the Gulf’s Marine Ecosystems from Pollution. Basel: Birkhäuser; 2008.
67. Burger J, Gochfeld M. Initiating events, functional remediation, and assessment of risk to ecological resources. Ecological Indicators. 2016; 71: 32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.012
68. Grosell M, Pasparakis C. Physiological Responses of Fish to Oil Spills. Annual Review of Marine Science. 2021; 13(1): 137-160. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-040120-094802
69. Oberholster PJ, Blaise C, Botha AM. Phytobenthos and phytoplankton community changes upon exposure to a sunflower oil spill in a South African protected freshwater wetland. Ecotoxicology. 2010; 19(8): 1426-1439. doi: 10.1007/s10646-010-0528-6
70. Keesing JK, Gartner A, Westera M, et al. Impacts and Environmental Risks of Oil Spills on Marine Invertebrates, Algae and Seagrass: A Global Review from an Australian Perspective. Oceanography and Marine Biology; 2018: 311-370. doi: 10.1201/9780429454455-5
71. Issa N, Vempatti S. Oil Spills in the Arabian Gulf: A Case Study and Environmental Review. Environment and Natural Resources Research. 2018; 8(2): 144. doi: 10.5539/enrr.v8n2p144
72. Adeniran MA, Oladunjoye MA, Doro KO. Soil and groundwater contamination by crude oil spillage: A review and implications for remediation projects in Nigeria. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2023; 11. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1137496
73. Al Fartoosi FM. The Impact of Maritime Oil Pollution in the Marine Environment: Case Study of Maritime Oil Pollution in the Navigational Channel of Shatt Al-Arab. MSc thesis, Sweden: World Maritime University; 2013.
74. World Resources Institute (WRI). Reefs at Risk in the Middle East. Available online: https://www.wri.org/data/reefs-risk-middle-east (accessed on 15 October 2024).
75. Huang D, Zhang Y, Yu WQ. Traceability of oil spill from bayesian classification. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 2020; XLII-3/W10: 133-140. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-3-w10-133-2020
76. ITOPF (International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation Limited). Oil Tanker Spill Statistics. The International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation Limited, London, UK; 2015.
77. Su DT, Tzu FM, Cheng CH. Investigation of Oil Spills from Oil Tankers through Grey Theory: Events from 1974 to 2016. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2019; 7(10): 373. doi: 10.3390/jmse7100373
78. De Oliveira Estevo M, Lopes PFM, De Oliveira Júnior JGC, et al. Immediate social and economic impacts of a major oil spill on Brazilian coastal fishing communities. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2021; 164: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.111984
79. Hassler B. Oil spills from shipping: A case study of the governance of accidental hazards and intentional pollution in the Baltic Sea. Environmental Governance of the Baltic Sea; 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27006-7_6
80. Neves AA, Pinardi N, Martins F, et al. Towards a common oil spill risk assessment framework – Adapting ISO 31000 and addressing uncertainties. Journal of Environmental Management. 2015; 159: 158-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.044
81. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) Oil Spills, U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Response and Restoration, Emergency Response Division, Seattle, WA, USA; 2018.
82. Michel J, Fingas M. Oil spills: Causes, consequences, prevention, and countermeasures. In: World Scientific Series in Current Energy Issues. Fossil Fuels; 2016. doi: 10.1142/9789814699983_0007
83. Owens EH, Taylor E, Parker HA. Spill site characterization in environmental forensic investigations. Standard Handbook Oil Spill Environmental Forensics; 2016. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-803832-1.00001-5
84. Tarr M, Zito P, Overton E, et al. Weathering of Oil Spilled in the Marine Environment. Oceanography. 2016; 29(3): 126-135. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2016.77
85. Wang Z, Yang C, Yang Z, et al. Petroleum biomarker fingerprinting for oil spill characterization and source identification. Standard Handbook Oil Spill Environmental Forensics; 2016. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-803832-1.00004-0
86. Telli Karakoç F, Atabay H, Tolun L, et al. Fast scanning of illegal oil discharges for forensic identification: a case study of Turkish coasts. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2015; 187(4). doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4421-x
87. Beyer J, Trannum HC, Bakke T, et al. Environmental effects of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill: A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2016; 110(1): 28-51. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.027
88. Câmara SF, Pinto FR, Silva FR da, et al. Socioeconomic vulnerability of communities on the Brazilian coast to the largest oil spill (2019–2020) in tropical oceans. Ocean & Coastal Management. 2021; 202: 105506. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105506
89. Esiri AE, Babayeju OA, & Ekemezie IO. Advancements in remote sensing technologies for oil spill detection: Policy and implementation. Engineering Science & Technology Journal. 2024; 5(6): 2016-2026. doi: 10.51594/estj.v5i6.1219
90. Ismayilova N. Oil Spill Cleanup Techniques—A bibliographic analysis of the latest methods and their efficiency. ScienceOpen Preprints; 2021.
91. Zhong L, Wu J, Wen Y, et al. Analysis of Factors Affecting the Effectiveness of Oil Spill Clean-Up: A Bayesian Network Approach. Sustainability. 2023; 15(6): 4965. doi: 10.3390/su15064965
92. Tewari S, Sirvaiya A. Oil spill remediation and its regulation. International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science. 2015.
93. Dhaka A, Chattopadhyay P. A review on physical remediation techniques for treatment of marine oil spills. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021; 288: 112428. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112428
94. Ndimele PE, Saba AO, Ojo DO, et al. Remediation of Crude Oil Spillage. The Political Ecology of Oil and Gas Activities in the Nigerian Aquatic Ecosystem; 2018. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809399-3.00024-0
95. ITOPF (International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation Limited). Use of skimmers in oil pollution response. Available online: https://www.ITOPF.org/knowledge-resources/documents-guides/tip-05-use-of-skimmers-in-oil-pollution-response/ (accessed on 5 October 2024).
96. Hoang AT, Nguyen XP, Duong XQ, et al. Sorbent-based devices for the removal of spilled oil from water: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021; 28(23): 28876-28910. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13775-z
97. White HK, Karras S. The Use of Dispersants in Marine Oil Spill Response. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings. 2021; 2021(1). doi: 10.7901/2169-3358-2021.1.689431
98. Fingas M. In-Situ Burning for Oil Spill Countermeasures. CRC Press; 2018. doi: 10.1201/9780429506376
99. Mamozai W, Hesam AM, Hemma WH. Impacts of crude oils on water quality: A comprehensive review. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences. 2024; 2(1):126-138. doi: 10.59324/ejtas.2024.2(1).09
100. Azizian S, Khosravi M. Advanced oil spill decontamination techniques. Advanced Low-Cost Separation Techniques in Interface Science; 2019. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-814178-6.00012-1
101. Li Y, Huang W, Lyu X, et al. An adversarial learning approach to forecasted wind field correction with an application to oil spill drift prediction. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 2022; 112: 102924. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102924
102. Li P, Cai Q, Lin W, et al. Offshore oil spill response practices and emerging challenges. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2016; 110 (1): 6-27. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.020
103. Farrington JW. Oil Pollution in the Marine Environment I: Inputs, Big Spills, Small Spills, and Dribbles. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 2013; 55(6): 3-13. doi: 10.1080/00139157.2013.843980
104. Osborne OE, Willie MMC, O’Hara PD. The effects of oil spill dispersant use on marine birds: a review of scientific literature and identification of information gaps. Environmental Reviews. 2023; 31(2): 243-255. doi: 10.1139/er-2022-0072
105. Ye, X., Zhu, Z., Merlin, F., Yang, M., Chen, B., Lee, K. & Zhang, B. (2021) ‘Ecological impact analysis of dispersants and dispersed oil: An overview’, JEIL 5: 120–133. doi:10.3808/jeil.202100058.
106. Amundsen T. The Use and Environmental Impacts of Dispersants for Marine Oil Spill Cleanup Focusing on Corexit: A Literature Review. Master’s thesis, University of Stavanger, Norway; 2022.
107. Grote M, van Bernem C, Böhme B, et al. The potential for dispersant use as a maritime oil spill response measure in German waters. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2018; 129(2): 623-632. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.050
108. Liu X, Zhang C, Geng R, et al. Are oil spills enhancing outbreaks of red tides in the Chinese coastal waters from 1973 to 2017?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021; 28(40): 56473-56479. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14549-3
109. Brassington KJ, Pollard SJ, Coulon F. Weathered hydrocarbon biotransformation: implications for bioremediation, analysis, and risk assessment. Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology, Berlin: Springer; 2010.
110. Varjani SJ. Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons. Bioresource Technology. 2017; 223: 277-286. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.037
111. Overton EB, Wetzel DL, Wickliffe JK, et al. Spilled oil composition and the natural carbon cycle: The true drivers of environmental fate and effects of oil spills. Scenarios and Responses to Future Deep Oil Spills. Cham: Springer; 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-12963-7_3
112. Das K, Janardhan P. Effect of sea state parameters on oil spill trajectory and weathering process: a case study of the MV Wakashio oil spill in Mauritius. Environment, Development and Sustainability; 2024. doi: 10.1007/s10668-024-05898-3
113. Kumar V, Shahi SK, Singh S. Bioremediation: An eco-sustainable approach for restoration of contaminated sites. In: Microbial Bioprospecting for Sustainable Development. Singapore: Springer; 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-0053-0_6
114. Dave DAEG. Ghaly, AE. Remediation Technologies for Marine Oil Spills: A Critical Review and Comparative Analysis. American Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2011; 7(5): 423-440. doi: 10.3844/ajessp.2011.423.440
115. Ivshina IB, Kuyukina MS, Krivoruchko AV, et al. Oil spill problems and sustainable response strategies through new technologies. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 2015; 17(7): 1201-1219. doi: 10.1039/c5em00070j
116. Cozzarelli IM, Bekins BA, Baedecker MJ, et al. Progression of natural attenuation processes at a crude-oil spill site: I. Geochemical evolution of the plume. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. 2001; 53(3-4): 369-385. doi: 10.1016/S0169-7722(01)00174-7
117. Chang SE, Stone J, Demes K, et al. Consequences of oil spills: a review and framework for informing planning. Ecology and Society. 2014; 19(2). doi: 10.5751/es-06406-190226
118. Adonteng-Kissi O, Oke BR, Meribe NC, et al. Environmental Impact of Oil and Gas Exploration on Livelihoods in Nigeria’s Eastern Obolo: Exploring the People’s Rights to Fair Compensation. Forum for Development Studies. 2021; 48(3): 539-570. doi: 10.1080/08039410.2021.1947364
119. Etkin DS. Modeling oil spill response and damage costs. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Freshwater Spills Symposium; 2004.
120. Sinlapapiromsuk T. Compensation for Economic Loss Following an Oil Spill Incident: Building a New Framework for Thailand [PhD thesis]. University of Washington; 2017.
121. IMO (International Maritime Organization). International Convention on the Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage. Available online: https://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/International-Convention-on-the-Establishment-of-an-International-Fund-for-Compensation-for-Oil-Pollution-Damage-(FUND).aspx (accessed on 5 October 2024).
122. Billah M. Effects of Insurance on Maritime Liability Law. Springer International Publishing; 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-03488-1
123. IMO (International Maritime Organization). Response to marine pollution. The International Maritime Organization, UK; 2021.
124. Schmitt A, Spaeter S. Hedging strategies and the financing of the 1992 International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund. Working Papers of BETA 2005-12, Strasbourg: Bureau d’Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS; 2005.
125. IOPC Fund. About the IOPC funds. The International Oil Pollution Compensation Funds, UK; 2021.
126. IOPC Fund. Incident report: Nesa R3. The International Oil Pollution Compensation Funds, UK; 2022.
127. Kiran RBK. Liability and compensation for oil pollution damage: An examination of IMO conventions. NUJS Law Review; 2010.
128. Juste-Ruíz J. Compensation for pollution damage caused by oil tanker accidents: from “Erika” to “Prestige.” Aegean Review of the Law of the Sea and Maritime Law. 2009; 1(1): 37-60. doi: 10.1007/s12180-009-0007-1
129. Soto-Oñate D, Caballero G. Oil spills, governance and institutional performance: The 1992 regime of liability and compensation for oil pollution damage. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017; 166: 299-311. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.021
130. Dong B, Zhu L, Li K, et al. Acceptance of the international compensation regime for tanker oil pollution and its implications for China. Marine Policy. 2015; 61: 179-186. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.08.001
131. Singh B. How P & I Clubs Work - Procedure for Accident Response. Maritime Law. Available online: https://www.marineinsight.com/maritime-law/how-p-i-clubs-work-procedure-for-accident-response/ (accessed on 15 October 2024).
132. Yang Y. Liability and compensation for oil spill accidents: International regime and its implementation in China. Natural Resources Journal. 2017.
133. UNEP. The Global Programme of Action for Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-based Activities. UN Environment Programme, Gigiri Nairobi, Kenya; 2014.
134. Pedersen PT. Review and application of ship collision and grounding analysis procedures. Marine Structures. 2010; 23(3): 241-262. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2010.05.001
135. Escobar H. Mystery oil spill threatens marine sanctuary in Brazil. Science. 2019; 366(6466): 672-672. doi: 10.1126/science.366.6466.672
136. IOPC Fund. Annual Report: Report on the Activities of the International Oil Pollution Compensation Funds 2003. The International Oil Pollution Compensation Funds, UK; 2003.
137. IOPC Fund. Annual Report: Report on the Activities of the International Oil Pollution Compensation Funds 2004. The International Oil Pollution Compensation Funds, UK; 2004.
138. Daisy NS, Hafezi MH, Liu L, et al. A Comprehensive Review of Canadian Marine Oil Spill Response System through the Lens of Decanting Regulations and Practices. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2022; 10(9): 1310. doi: 10.3390/jmse10091310
139. Opaluch JJ. Liability for Natural Resource Damages from Oil Spills: A Survey. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics. 2020; 14(1): 37-111. doi: 10.1561/101.00000114
140. Hemminger HS. United States and Canada Transboundary Oil Spill Liability and Compensation Regimes: An Overview. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings. 2021; 2021(1). doi: 10.7901/2169-3358-2021.1.1141278
141. OSLTF Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. Annual Report FY 2004-FY 2008. National Pollution Funds Center, United States Coast Guard; 2009.
142. Liu D, Zhu L. Assessing China’s legislation on compensation for marine ecological damage: A case study of the Bohai oil spill. Marine Policy. 2014; 50: 18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.05.009
143. Read S. Personal communication by email. Marine Pollution Response Services (MPRS). New Zealand; 2023.
144. Ellis JI, Clark MR, Rouse HL, et al. Environmental management frameworks for offshore mining: The New Zealand approach. Marine Policy. 2017; 84: 178-192. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.07.004
145. De Cola E. Compensation for Ship-Source Oil Spills: Considerations for Modernizing Canada’s Marine Liability Regime to Support Indigenous Communities. Seldovia: Nuka Research and Planning Group; 2020.
146. Farnworth SE. Liability for Pollution Damage from Offshore Oil Spills: The CLC and Fund Conventions, the EU’s Environmental Liability Directive and their implications for New Zealand Law [PhD thesis]. New Zealand: University of Waikato; 2017.
147. Ministry of Environment. Finnish Oil Pollution Compensation Fund. Helsinki; 2020.
148. Cornish V. Gulf of Mexico Marine Mammal Research and Monitoring Meeting: Summary Report. Marine Mammal Commission; 2015.
149. Naggea J, Miller R. A comparative case study of multistakeholder responses following oil spills in Pointe d’Esny, Mauritius, and Huntington Beach, California. Ecology and Society. 2023; 28(1). doi: 10.5751/es-13737-280124
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
.jpg)
Beijing University of Technology, China