Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.
The (partial) replacement of synthetic polymers with bioplastics is due to increased production of conventional packaging plastics causing for severe environmental pollution with plastics waste. The bioplastics, however, represent complex mixtures of known and unknown (bio)polymers, fillers, plasticizers, stabilizers, flame retardant, pigments, antioxidants, hydrophobic polymers such as poly(lactic acid), polyethylene, polyesters, glycol, or poly(butylene succinate), and little is known of their chemical safety for both the environment and the human health. Polymerization reactions of bioplastics can produce no intentionally added chemicals to the bulk material, which could be toxic, as well. When polymers are used to food packing, then the latter chemicals could also migrate from the polymer to food. This fact compromises the safety for consumers, as well. The scarce data on chemical safety of bioplastics makes a gap in knowledge of their toxicity to humans and environment. Thus, development of exact analytical protocols for determining chemicals of bioplastics in environmental and food samples as well as packing polymers can only provide warrant for reliable conclusive evidence of their safety for both the human health and the environment. The task is compulsory according to legislation Directives valid to environmental protection, food control, and assessment of the risk to human health. The quantitative and structural determination of analytes is primary research task of analysis of polymers. The methods of mass spectrometry are fruitfully used for these purposes. Methodological development of exact analytical mass spectrometric tools for reliable structural analysis of bioplastics only guarantees their safety, efficacy, and quality to both humans and environment. This study, first, highlights innovative stochastic dynamics equations processing exactly mass spectrometric measurands and, thus, producing exact analyte quantification and 3D molecular and electronic structural analyses. There are determined synthetic polymers such as poly(ethylenglycol), poly(propylene glycol), and polyisoprene as well as biopolymers in bags for foodstuffs made from renewable cellulose and starch, and containing, in total within the 20,416–17,495 chemicals per sample of the composite biopolymers. Advantages of complementary employment in mass spectrometric methods and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy is highlighted. The study utilizes ultra-high resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometric and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic data on biodegradable plastics bags for foodstuffs; high accuracy quantum chemical static methods, molecular dynamics; and chemometrics. There is achieved method performance |r| = 0.99981 determining poly(propylene glycol) in bag for foodstuff containing 20,416 species and using stochastic dynamics mass spectrometric formulas. The results highlight their great capability and applicability to the analytical science as well as relevance to both the fundamental research and to the industry.
Physical-chemical contamination in fracking areas
Vol 5, Issue 1, 2024
Issue release: 30 June 2024
VIEWS - 9227 (Abstract)
Download PDF
Abstract
Despite the scientific consensus on the need to limit global warming, the urgency for the autonomous provision of energy resources has led many States to authorize projects that apply non-conventional fossil fuel extraction techniques, such as horizontal drilling and high-volume hydraulic fracturing of shale. Although few studies present conclusive evidence, these techniques are accused of causing dangers to the environment and to the health of the people who work and live in fracking areas, so that the States are faced with the dilemma of extending their energy autonomy for a few years, squeezing their natural gas and oil reserves to the end, or seeking a balance with the planet by moving towards more sustainable energy sources. Based on the review of studies that present evidence of physical and chemical contamination and other impacts on the environment in areas where the fracking technique has been developed, a panorama of risks for people living near extraction platforms and the dangers of developing fracking projects in tropical climate zones is presented.
Keywords
References
1. Campin D. The Unknown Risks of Fracking. In: Proceeding of the Asia Pacific Unconventional Resources Technology Conference; 2019.
2. Richburg CM, Slagley J. Noise concerns of residents living in close proximity to hydraulic fracturing sites in Southwest Pennsylvania. Public Health Nursing. 2018; 36(1): 3-10. doi: 10.1111/phn.12540
3. Weinhold B. The Future of Fracking: New Rules Target Air Emissions for Cleaner Natural Gas Production. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2012; 120(7). doi: 10.1289/ehp.120-a272
4. Cotton M, Rattle I, Van Alstine J. Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: An argumentative discourse analysis. Energy Policy. 2014; 73: 427-438. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.031
5. Howarth RW. Ideas and perspectives: is shale gas a major driver of recent increase in global atmospheric methane? Biogeosciences. 2019; 16(15): 3033-3046. doi: 10.5194/bg-16-3033-2019
6. Oyelakin OA. Thermal-swing adsorption to capture and recover toxic vapor emissions from condensate storage tanks [PhD thesis]. Texas A&M University- Kingsville; 2016.
7. Paulik LB, Hobbie KA, Rohlman D, et al. Environmental and individual PAH exposures near rural natural gas extraction. Environmental Pollution. 2018; 241: 397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.010
8. Hoyos Botero, C. A model for documentary research. Medellín: Señal Editorial; 2000.
9. Gómez Vargas M, Galeano Higuita C, Jaramillo Muñoz DA. The state of the art: a research methodology (Spanish). Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Sociales. 2015; 6(2): 423. doi: 10.21501/22161201.1469
10. Guerrero Useda, ME. Methodological guide I. Topic review, Bogotá; 2015.
11. Enciso L, Pacheco D, Rivera D, et al. (2014). Analysis of risk factors in brick kiln workers in Ubaté. IIEC. 2014; 3(3): 5-10.
12. Bravo Mendoza O, Sánchez Celís M. Comprehensive risk management (Spanish), 4th ed. Bogotá: B&S; 2012.
13. Porter M, Savigny KW. Natural Hazard and Risk Management for South American Pipelines. 4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B. Published online January 1, 2002: 861-869. doi: 10.1115/ipc2002-27235
14. Rosa L, D’Odorico P. The water-energy-food nexus of unconventional oil and gas extraction in the Vaca Muerta Play, Argentina. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 207: 743-750. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.039
15. Sanchéz Cano JE, Barrios DÁ, Pérez Domínguez AD. Feasibility of using fracking in the exploitation of unconventional petroleum resources in semiarid areas of Mexico. Sustainable development of arid and semi-arid areas in the face of climate change, Durango: Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango; 2019. pp. 74-92.
16. Rosenman KD. Hydraulic Fracturing and the Risk of Silicosis. Clinical Pulmonary Medicine. 2014; 21(4): 167-172. doi: 10.1097/cpm.0000000000000046
17. Soeder DJ. Fracking and the Environment. Springer International Publishing; 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59121-2
18. Zanganeh B., Soroush M., Williams-Kovacs JD, Clarkson CR. Parameters Affecting Load Recovery and Oil Breakthrough Time after Hydraulic Fracturing in Tight Oil Wells. Day 1 Tue, October 20, 2015. Published online October 20, 2015. doi: 10.2118/175941-ms
19. Charry-Ocampo SA, Perez AJ. Effects of hydraulic stimulation (fracking) on the water resource: Implications in the Colombian context (Spanish). Ciencia e Ingeniería Neogranadina. 2017; 28(1): 135-164. doi: 10.18359/rcin.2549
20. Maloney KO, Young JA, Faulkner SP, et al. A detailed risk assessment of shale gas development on headwater streams in the Pennsylvania portion of the Upper Susquehanna River Basin, U.S.A. Science of The Total Environment. 2018; 610-611: 154-166. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.247
21. Salinas Avellaneda A. Environmental health criteria to be taken into account in fracking projects. Revista de Salud Ambiental, vol. 15, nº Especial XIII Congreso Español de Salud Ambiental; 2015. pp. 12-64.
22. Arnedo Cárdenas AE, Yunes Cañate KM. Fracking: unconventional oil and gas extraction, and its environmental impact. Cartagena; 2015.
23. Gross SA, Avens HJ, Banducci AM, et al. Analysis of BTEX groundwater concentrations from surface spills associated with hydraulic fracturing operations. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 2013; 63(4): 424-432. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2012.759166
24. Vergel M, Becerra L. Impacts of fracking and a look at the Colombian landscape (Spanish). Journal de Ciencia e Ingeniería. 2020; 12(1): 264-274. doi: 10.46571/jci.2020.1.23
25. Guerrero Useda ME. Pipeline rupture due to external interference, environmental damage and sustainability in Colombia (Spanish). Producción + Limpia. 2018; 13(2): 7-13. doi: 10.22507/pml.v13n2a1
26. Purvis RM, Lewis AC, Hopkins JR, et al. Effects of ‘pre-fracking’ operations on ambient air quality at a shale gas exploration site in rural North Yorkshire, England. Science of The Total Environment. 2019; 673: 445-454. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.077
27. Howarth RW, Ingraffea A, Engelder T. Should fracking stop? Nature. 2011; 477(7364): 271-275. doi: 10.1038/477271a
28. Osborn SG, Vengosh A, Warner NR, et al. Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011; 108(20): 8172-8176. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100682108.
29. Guo M, Xu Y, Chen YD. Fracking and Pollution: Can China Rescue Its Environment In Time? Environmental Science & Technology. 2014; 48(2): 891-892. doi: 10.1021/es405608b
30. Molofsky LJ, Connor JA, Wylie AS, et al. Evaluation of Methane Sources in Groundwater in Northeastern Pennsylvania. Groundwater. 2013; 51(3): 333-349. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12056
31. Moritz A, Hélie JF, Pinti DL, et al. Methane Baseline Concentrations and Sources in Shallow Aquifers from the Shale Gas-Prone Region of the St. Lawrence Lowlands (Quebec, Canada). Environmental Science & Technology. 2015; 49(7): 4765-4771. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00443
32. Burkhart J, Huber T, Bolling G. Potential Radon release during Fracking in Colorado. The American Association of Radon Scientists and Technologists. Spingfield, IL, 20-27 Radon Symposiun Pape, Spingfield. 2013.
33. Carpenter DO. Hydraulic fracturing for natural gas: impact on health and environment. Reviews on Environmental Health. 2016; 31(1): 47-51. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2015-0055
34. Bandreddy NA. Defining Correlation Between Radon, Uranium Deposits, and Oil and Gas Wells Using GIS Regression Methods [PhD thesis]. University of Toledo; 2019.
35. Leusch F, Bartkow M. A short primer on benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes. Griffith University; 2010.
36. Queensland Government. Information sheet Petroleum and Gas. Fraccing and BTEX. Queensland Government; 2018.
37. Srebotnjak T, Rotkin-Ellman M. Fracking Fumes: Air Pollution from Hydraulic Fracturing Threatens Public Health and Communities. NRDC Issue BRIEF; 2014. pp. 1-12.
38. Esswein EJ, Breitenstein M, Snawder J, et al. Occupational Exposures to Respirable Crystalline Silica During Hydraulic Fracturing. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 2013; 10(7): 347-356. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.788352
39. Hays J, McCawley M, Shonkoff SBC. Public health implications of environmental noise associated with unconventional oil and gas development. Science of The Total Environment. 2017; 580: 448-456. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.118
40. Assessing Environmental Impacts of Horizontal Gas Well Drilling Operations. Available online: https://dep.wv.gov/oil-and-gas/Horizontal-Permits/legislativestudies/Documents/Project%20Overview%20-%20Water%20and%20Pits%20and%20Impoundments%20Feb%2015,%202013%20submitted%20Feb.%2020,%202013.pdf (accessed on 2 June 2022).
41. Todd SW, Hoffman MT, Henschel JR, et al. The potential impacts of fracking on biodiversity of the Karoo Basin, South Africa. Hydraulic Fracturing in the Karoo: Critical Legal and Environmental Perspectives. Juta & Company (Pty) Ltd, Cape Town. 2016; 278-301.
42. Habicht S, Hanson L, Faeth P. The potential environmental impact from fracking in the Delaware River basin. CNA Analysis and Solutions, Arlington, Virginia, USA; 2015.
43. Werner AK, Vink S, Watt K, et al. Environmental health impacts of unconventional natural gas development: a review of the current strength of evidence. Science of the Total Environment. 2015; 505: 1127-1141.
44. López Suárez A. Prices and pandemic would deplete the Nation’s oil reserves. PORTFOLIO (Spanish). Available online: https://www.portafolio.co/economia/precios-y-pandemia-le-quitarian- reservas-de-petroleo-a-la-nacion-540681 (accessed on 2 June 2022).
45. Goldstein BD, Brooks BW, Cohen SD, et al. The Role of Toxicological Science in Meeting the Challenges and Opportunities of Hydraulic Fracturing. Toxicological Sciences. 2014; 139(2): 271-283. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu061
46. Witter RZ, Tenney L, Clark S, et al. Occupational exposures in the oil and gas extraction industry: State of the science and research recommendations. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2014; 57(7): 847-856. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22316
47. Resnikoff M. Radon in Natural Gas from Marcellus Shale. Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine. 2011; 2(4): 317-331. doi: 10.1615/ethicsbiologyengmed.2012006074
48. Tian W, Wu X, Liu D, et al. Investigating Effects of Pore Size Distribution and Pore Shape on Radon Production in Marcellus Shale Gas Formation. Energy & Fuels. 2019; 33(2): 700-707. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b03311
49. Boyle MD, Soneja S, Quirós-Alcalá L, et al. A pilot study to assess residential noise exposure near natural gas compressor stations. Hoppin J, ed. PLOS ONE. 2017; 12(4): e0174310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174310
50. Lee AT, Geary C, Wright DR, et al. Vulnerability of birds to contaminated water sources in the Karoo region of South Africa. Ostrich. 2019; 90(4): 397-406. doi: 10.2989/00306525.2019.1638846
51. Rodríguez Barajas YC. Controversy as fracking in Colombia regained momentum. Vanguardia; 2019.
52. De Luna Uribe AG. Ecology, population densities and conservation status of the primates of the Colombian Magdalena Medio with emphasis on one of the primates most threatened with extinction in the world, the brown spider monkey (Ateles hybridus). University of Madrid; 2018.
53. Solano Naranjo D. Development of El Llanito: a construction from the community, Bogotá [PhD thesis]. Universidad de los Andes; 2020.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 María Eugenia Guerrero Useda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
.jpg)
Prof. Hongxing Dai
Beijing University of Technology, China
