Recovering of soil contaminated by hydrocarbons mixing

Sánchez -Yáñez Juna Manuel

Article ID: 2014
Vol 4, Issue 2, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ps.v4i2.2014
Received: 19 July 2023; Accepted: 10 August 2023; Available online: 20 August 2023; Issue release: 31 December 2023


Download PDF

Abstract

In Mexico, an agricultural soil poor in nitrogen (N) contaminated by a hydrocarbon derivative such as automotive residual oil (ARA), with a relatively high concentration of 100,000 ppm, is an environmental problem, but also because it drastically affects soil properties associated with the mineralization of organic matter and loss of fertility, since it exceeds the maximum accepted limit of 4400 ppm of the Mexican standard called, NOM-138-SEMARNAT-2012 (NOM-138). An alternative solution is to treat it with ecological actions to eliminate the ARA and recover fertility. Therefore, the objectives of this research were: i) bioremediation of soil contaminated by 100,000 ppm of ARA ii) phytoremediation using Sorghum vulgare with Aspergillus inger and Penicillium chrysogenum to decrease ARA to a value below 4400 ppm of NOM-138. For this purpose, soil recovery was performed using the variable-response: disappearance of ARA by Soxhlet at the beginning and after bioremediation and at the end of phytoremediation with S. vulgare with phenology and biomass to seedling. All experimental data were validated by ANOVA/Tukey HSD P < 0.05%. The results indicated that bioremediation and phytoremediation of soil contaminated by 100,000 ppm of ARA, decreased it to 3400 ppm, a value lower than the maximum established by NOM-138, sufficient for soil recovery in agricultural production, in 120 days, a relatively short period of time.


Keywords

soil; ARA; biostimulation; NOM-138; S. vulgare; mushrooms


References

1. Wu M, Dick WA, Li W, et al. Bioaugmentation and biostimulation of hydrocarbon degradation and the microbial community in a petroleum-contaminated soil. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2016; 107: 158-164. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.11.019

2. General law of ecological balance and environmental protection. Available online: http://www.diputados.gob.mx/Leyes Bblio/pdf/1 48 240117.pdf (accessed on 2 June 2023).

3. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-138-SEMAR NAT/SSA1-2012, Maximum permissible limits of hydrocarbons in soils and guidelines for sampling in the characterization and specifications for remediation. DOF Secretary of the Interior (Spanish). Available online: http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota de- talle.php? codigo=5313544&fécha=10/09/2013 (accessed on 2 June 2023).

4. Thapa B, KC AK, Ghimire A. A Review on bioremediation Of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminants in Soil. Kathmandu University Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology. 1970; 8(1): 164-170. doi: 10.3126/kuset.v8i1.6056

5. Shahi A, Aydin S, Ince B, et al. Evaluation of microbial population and functional genes during the bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil as an effective monitoring approach. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2016; 125: 153-160. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.11.029

6. Rivera Ortiz P, Rivera Lárraga JE, et al. Biostimulation and bioremediation of oil-contaminated drill cuttings (Spanish). Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental. 2018; 34(2): 249-262. doi: 10.20937/rica.2018.34.02.06

7. Torri SI, Cabrera MN, Alberti C. Potential respiration during biostimulation of a soil contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Rev Int Contam Ambient. 2018; 34(1):127-36. doi: 10.20937/rica.2018. 34.01.11.

8. Reyes Reyes MA, Puentes Cala EA, Casanova Montes EL, López Deluque F, Panqueva Alvarez JH, Castillo Villamizar GA. Immobilization of potentially crude oil-degrading bacteria in natural and synthetic organic matrices. Rev Int Contam Ambie. 2018; 34(4): 597- 609. doi: 10.20937/RICA.2018. 34.04.04

9. Guevara Espinosa MaD, Cruz Miranda N, Rivera Morales C, et al. Phytoremediation of soils contaminated with Mn and Cu from Octmum basilicum. Rev Latinoam Ambient Cienc. 2018; 9(22): 6-89.

10. Leitão AL, Enguita FJ. Gibberellins in Penicilli- um strains: challenges for endophyte-plant host interactions under salinity stress. Microbiol Res. 2016; 183: 8-18. doi: 10.1016/j. micres.2015.11.004

11. Solyman SNED, Abdel-Monem MO, Abou-Taleb KA, et al. Production of Plant Growth Regulators by Some Fungi Isolated under Salt Stress. South Asian Journal of Research in Microbiology. Published online March 4, 2019: 1-10. doi: 10.9734/sajrm/2019/v3i130076

12. Bilal L, Asaf S, Hamayun M, et al. Plant growth promoting endophytic fungi Asprgillus fumigatus TS1 and Fusarium proliferatum BRL1 produce gibberellins and regulates plant endogenous hormones. Symbiosis 2018; 76(2):117-27. doi: 10.1007/ s13199-018-0545-4

13. Garcia González MM, Farías Rodríguez R, Peña Cabriales JJ, et al. Inoculation of wheat var. Pavón with Azospirillum spp. and Azoto- bacter beijerinckii. Terra Latinoam. 2005; 23(1): 65-72.

14. Contreras H, Carreño C. Efficiency of petroleum hydrocarbon biodegradation by filamentous fungi isolated from contaminated soil. Rev de Investig Agroproduccion Sustentable. 2018; 1(1): 27-33. doi: 10.25127/ ucni.vlil.269

15. Hernández Valencia I, Mager D. Use of Panicum maximum and Brachiaria brizantha to phytoremediate soils contaminated with a light petroleum crude oil. Bioagro. 2003; 15(3): 149-56.

16. Delgadillo López AE, González Ramírez CA, Prieto García F, et al. Phytoremediation: an alternative to eliminate contamination. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst. 2011; 14(2): 597-612.

17. Ite AE, Ibok UJ. Role of plants and microbes in bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons contaminated soils. Int J Environ Bioremediat Biodegrad. 2019; 7(1):1-19. doi: 10. 12691/ijebb-7-1-1

18. Mexican Official Norm N OM-021-SEMARNAT-2000, which establishes the specifications of fertility, salinity and soil classification, study, sampling and analysis. Available online: http://diariooficial. gob.mXnota detalle.php?codigo=717582&fecha =31/12/2002 (accessed on 2 June 2023).

19. Sánchez-Yáñez J. Brief Treatise on Agricultural Microbiology, theory and practice, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Centro de Investigaciones y Desarrollo del Estado de Michoacán (Spanish). Sedagro Cosustenta, SA de CV, Morelia, Michoacan; 2007. p. 118-119.

20. Baltierra Trejo E, Marquez Benavides L, Sanchez-Yáñez JM. Inconsistencies and ambiguities in calculating enzyme activity: The case of lacca se. J Microbiol Methods. 2015; 119: 126-31. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.10.007

21. Walpole ER, Myers RH, Myers SL. Probability and Statistics for Engineering and Science. Available online: http://librosenpdf.org/libro-pdf-probabi lidad-y-estadistica/ (accessed on 2 June 2023).

22. Riojas González HH, Gortáres Moroyoqui P, Mondaca Fernández I, et al. Influence of surfactants in the remediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils. Bistua. 2016; 7(1): 94-115. doi: 10.18359/ rfbb.2066

23. Ramos Oseguera CA, Castro Ramírez AE, León Martínez NS, et al. Vermicomposting to recover sandy loam soil fertility and peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) yield. Terra Latinoam. 2019; 37(1): 45-55. doi: 10.28940/tl.v37i1.331

24. Jiménez Hernández V, Guerra Sánchez R. Obtaining an enriched medium to make the bioavailability of weathered hydrocarbons in a coastal soil more efficient. Rev Int Contam Ambient. 2016; 32(4): 413-24. doi: 10.20937/RICA.2016.32.04.05.

25. Alvaro CES, Arocena LA, Martínez MA, et al. Aerobic biodegradation of hydrocarbon fractions from oil activity in a soil of the Northern Patagonia region, Argentina. Rev Int Contam Ambie. 2017; 33(2): 247-57. doi: 10. 2093 7/RICA.2017.33.33.02.06

26. Velásquez Arias JA. Soil and water contamination by hydrocarbons in Colombia (Spanish). Análisis de la fitorremediación como estrategia biotecnológica de recuperación. Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental. 2017; 8(1): 151-167. doi: 10.22490/21456453.1846

27. Mohsenzadeh F, Chehregani Rad A, Akbari M. Evaluation of oil removal efficiency and enzymatic activity in some fungal strains for bioremediation of petroleum-polluted soils. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering. 2012; 9(1). doi: 10.1186/1735-2746-9-26

28. Barrios Ziolo LF, Robayo Gómez J, Prieto Cada-vid S, et al. Bioremediation of soils contaminated with used motor oils. Revista Cintex. 2015; 20(1): 69-96.

29. Effendi AJ, Kamath R, McMillen S, et al. Strategies for Enhancing Bioremediation for Hydrocarbon-Impacted Soils. In: Proceeding of the Society of Petroleum Engineers International. Asia Pacific Health, Safety, Security, Environment and Social Responsibility Conference; 2017. doi: 10.1109/ITME.2015.163

30. Leitão AL. Potential of Penicillium Species in the Bioremediation Field. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2009; 6(4): 1393-1417. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6041393

31. Chaudhary S, Shankar A, Singh A, et al. Usefulness of Penicillium in enhancing plants resistance to abiotic stresses: An overview. In: Chaudhary S, Shankar A, Singh A, et al. (editors). New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Elsevier; 2018. pp. 277-84. doi: 10.1016/ B978-0-444-63501-3.00017-X

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Juna Manuel Sánchez-Yáñez

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).