Open Journal Systems

Recovering of soil contaminated by hydrocarbons mixing Recovering of soil polluted by hydrocarbons mixing

Rico-Cerda José Luis, Ignacio -De la Cruz Juan Luis, Mondragón -Reynel Perla Guadalupe, Sánchez -Yáñez Juan Manuel

Article ID: 2014
Vol 4, Issue 1, 2023

VIEWS - 31 (Abstract)

Abstract

In Mexico, an agricultural soil poor in nitrogen (N) contaminated by a hydrocarbon derivative such as automotive residual oil (ARA), with a relatively high concentration of 100,000 ppm, is an environmental problem, but also because it drastically affects soil properties associated with the mineralization of organic matter and loss of fertility, since it exceeds the maximum accepted limit of 4,400 ppm of the Mexican standard called, NOM-138-SEMARNAT-2012 (NOM-138). An alternative solution is to treat it with ecological actions to eliminate the ARA and recover fertility. Therefore, the objectives of this research were: i) bioremediation of soil contaminated by 100000 ppm of ARA ii) phytoremediation using Sorghum vulgare with Aspergillus inger and Penicillium chrysogenum to decrease ARA to a value below 4400 ppm of NOM-138. For this purpose, soil recovery was performed using the variable-response: disappearance of ARA by Soxhlet at the beginning and after bioremediation and at the end of phytoremediation with S. vulgare with phenology and biomass to seedling. All experimental data were validated by ANOVA/Tukey HSD P<0.05%. The results indicated that bioremediation and phytoremediation of soil contaminated by 100,000 ppm of ARA, decreased it to 3400 ppm, a value lower than the maximum established by NOM-138, sufficient for soil recovery in agricultural production, in 120 days, a relatively short period of time.

Keywords

Soil, ARA, biostimulation, NOM-138, S. vulgare, mushrooms.

Full Text:

PDF

References

1. Wu M, Dick WA, Li W, Wang X, Yang Q, Wang T, et al. Bioaugmentation and biostimulation of hydrocarbon degradation and the microbial com munity in a petroleum-contaminated soil. Int Bi- odeterior Biodegradation 2016;107:158-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.11.019

2. General law of ecological balance and -environmental protection [online]. Mexico: Cámara de Diputados H. Congreso de la Unión; 2017 [¬Accessed 20 May 2018]. Available at: http://www .diputados.gob.mx/Leyes Bblio/pdf/1 48 240117 .pdf.

3. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM- 138-SEMAR NAT/SSA1-2012, Límites máximos permisibles de hidrocarburos en suelos y lineamientos para el muestreo en la caracterización y especificaciones para la remediación. DOF Secretaria de Gobernación -[online]. 2013. [Accessed 20 May 2018]. Available at: http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota de- talle.php? codigo=5313544&fécha=10/09/201 3.

4. Thapa B, KC A, Ghimire A. A review on bioremediation ¬of petroleum hydrocarbon -contaminants in soil. Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology 2012;8(1):164-70. DOI: https://doi. org/10.3126/kuset.v8i1.6056.

5. Shahi A, Aydin S, Ince B, Ince O. Evaluation of microbial population and functional genes during the bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil as an effective monitoring approach. Ecotox- icol Environ Saf 2016;125:153-60. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.11.029.

6. Rivera Ortiz P, Rivera Lárraga JE, Andrade -Limas EDC, Heyer Rodríguez L, De la Garza ¬Requena FR, Castro Meza BI. Biostimulation and bioremediation of -hydrocarbon-contaminated drill cuttings. Rev Int Contam Ambie 2018;34(2):249-62. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.20937/RICA.2018.34.02.06.

7. Torri SI, Cabrera MN, Alberti C. Potential respiration during biostimulation of a soil contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Rev Int Contam Ambient 2018;34(1):127-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20937/rica.2018. 34.01.11

8. Reyes Reyes MA, Puentes Cala EA, Casanova Montes EL, López Deluque F, Panqueva Alvarez JH, Castillo Villamizar GA. Immobilization of potentially ¬crude oil-degrading bacteria ¬in natural and synthetic organic matrices¬. Rev Int Contam Ambie 2018;34(4):597- 609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20937/RICA.2018. 34.04.04

9. Guevara Espinosa MaD, Cruz Miranda N, Rivera Morales C, Fuentes Ortiz AK. Phytoremediation of soils contaminated with Mn and Cu from Octmum ¬basilicum. Rev Latinoam Ambient Cienc [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Oct 5];9(22): 76-89. Retrieved from:http://cmas.siu.buap.mx/portal pprd/work/sites/rl ac/resources/LocalContent/109/1/9/9(22)-6.pdf.

10. Leitão AL, Enguita FJ. Gibberellins in Penicilli- um strains: challenges for endophyte-plant host interactions under salinity stress. Microbiol Res 2016;183:8-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. micres.2015.11.004.

11. Solyman SN, Abdel Monem M, Abou Taleb K, Osman HS, El-Sharkawy RM. Production of plant growth regulators by some fungi isolated under salt stress. SAJRM 2019;3(1):1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/sajrm/2019/v3i130076

12. Bilal L, Asaf S, Hamayun M, Gul H, Iqbal A, Ullah I, et al. Plant growth promoting endophytic fungi Asprgillus fumigatus TS1 and Fusarium proliferatum BRL1 produce gibberellins and ¬regulates plant endogenous hormones. Symbiosis 2018;76(2):117-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s13199-018-0545-4.

13. Garcia González MM, Farías Rodríguez R, Peña Cabriales JJ, Sánchez-Yáñez JM. Inoculation of wheat var. Pavón with Azospirillum spp. and Azoto- bacter beijerinckii. Terra Latinoam 2005;23(1): 65-72.

14. Contreras H, Carreño C. Efficiency of petroleum hydrocarbon biodegradation by -filamentous fungi ¬isolated from contaminated soil. Rev de Investig Agroproduccion Sustentable 2018;1(1):27-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25127/ ucni.vlil.269.

15. Hernández Valencia I, Mager D. Use of Panicum maximum and Brachiaria brizantha to phytoremediate soils contaminated with a -light petroleum crude oil. Bioagro 2003;15(3):149-56.

16. Delgadillo López AE, González Ramírez CA, Prieto García F, Villagómez-Ibarra JR, Acevedo Sandoval O. Phytoremediation: an alternative to eliminate contamination. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst 2011;14(2):597-612.

17. Ite AE, Ibok UJ. Role of plants and microbes in bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons -contaminated soils. Int J Environ Bioremediat Biodegrad ¬2019;7(1):1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 12691/ijebb-7-1-1.

18. Mexican Official Norm N OM-021 -SEMARNAT -2000, which establishes the specifications of ¬fertility, salinity and soil classification, study, sampling and analysis. Mexico. DOF Secretaria de Gobernación [online]. 2013. [Accessed 20 May 2019]. Available at: http://diariooficial. gob.mXnota detalle.php?codigo=717582&fecha =31/12/2002.

19. Sánchez-Yáñez J. Breve Tratado de Microbiología ¬Agrícola, teoría y práctica, Ed. Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Centro de Investigaciones y Desarrollo del Estado de Michoacán. SEDAGRO COSUSTENTA, SA de CV, Morelia, Michoacan, Mexico; 2007:p. 118-9.

20. Baltierra Trejo E, Marquez Benavides L, Sanchez-Yáñez ¬JM. Inconsistencies and ambiguities in calculating enzyme activity: The case of lacca se. J Microbiol Methods 2015;119:126-31. DOI: https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.mimet.2015.10.00 7

21. Walpole ER, Myers RH, Myers SL. Probability and Statistics for Engineering and Science [-Internet]. Naucalpan de Juárez; 2007. Retrieved from: http://librosenpdf.org/libro-pdf-probabi lidad-y-estadistica/

22. Riojas González HH, Gortáres Moroyoqui P, Mondaca Fernández I, Balderas Cortes JJ. -Influence of surfactants in the remediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils. Bistua 2016;7(1):94-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18359/ rfbb.2066.

23. Ramos Oseguera CA, Castro Ramírez AE, León Martínez NS, Álvarez Solís JD, Huerta Lwanga E. Vermicomposting to recover sandy loam soil fertility and peanut ¬(Arachis hypogaea L.) yield. Terra Latinoam 2019;37(1):45-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28940/ tl.v37i1.331.

24. Jiménez Hernández V, Guerra Sánchez R. Obtaining an ¬enriched medium to make the bioavailability of ¬weathered ¬hydrocarbons ¬in a coastal soil ¬more efficient. Rev Int Contam Ambient 2016;32(4):413-24. DOI: https: //doi.org/10.20937/RICA.2016.32.04.05.

25. Alvaro CES, Arocena LA, Martínez MA, Nu- delman NES. Aerobic biodegradation of -hydrocarbon fractions from ¬oil activity in a soil of the ¬Northern¬ Patagonia region¬, Argentina. Rev Int Contam Ambie 2017;33(2):247-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 2093 7/RICA.2017.33.33.02.06.

26. Velásquez Arias JA. Soil and water contamination by hydrocarbons in Colombia. Analysis of phytoremediation as a biotechnological recovery strategy. Rev Investig Agrar ¬Ambient 2017;8(1):151-67. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.22490/21456453.1846

27. Mohsenzadeh F, Chehregani Rad AC, Akbari M. Evaluation of oil removal efficiency and enzymatic ¬activity in some fungal strains for bioremediation ¬of petroleum-polluted soils. Iranian J ¬Environ Health 2012;9(1):26. DOI: https://doi.org /10.1186/1735-2746-9-26.

28. Barrios Ziolo LF, Robayo Gómez J, Prieto Cada- vid S, Cardona Gallo SA. Bioremediation of soils contaminated with used ¬motor oils. Revista Cintex 2015;20(1):69-96.

29. Effendi AJ, Kamath R, McMillen S, Sihota N, Zuo E, Sra K, et al. Strategies for Enhancing Bioremediation ¬for Hydrocarbon-Impacted Soils. In: Society of Petroleum Engineers International. Asia Pacific Health, Safety, Security, ¬Environment and Social Responsibility Conference. ¬Society of Petroleum Engineers 2017 [Internet]. ¬Society of Petroleum Engineers. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1109/ITME.2015.163.

30. Leitão AL. Potential of Penicillium species in the bioremediation field. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009;6(4):1393-417. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ijerph6041393.

31. Chaudhary S, Shankar A, Singh A, Prasad V. Usefulness of Penicillium in enhancing plants -resistance to abiotic stresses: An overview. In: Chaudhary S, Shankar A, Singh A, Prasad V, ¬editors. New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Elsevier; 2018. p. 277-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ B978-0-444-63501-3.00017-X.