Noise contamination and automobile traffic along the Mexican frontier

Zamorano-González Benito, Peña-Cárdenas Fabiola, Velázquez-Narváez Yolanda, Vargas-Martínez José Ignacio, Parra-Sierra Víctor

Article ID: 2010
Vol 2, Issue 1, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ps.v2i1.2010
Received: 09 May 2021; Accepted: 01 June 2021; Available online: 15 June 2021; Issue release: 31 December 2021

VIEWS - 4195 (Abstract)

Download PDF

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to establish a correlation between the noise levels at major road intersections and the volume of vehicles passing through these areas. Method: A non-invasive electronic vehicle sound level meter was used for one-week periods; noise levels were assessed on a daily basis throughout the week, utilizing type I integrating sound level meters. Results: An annual average daily traffic volume of 2739 vehicles was recorded; an estimated noise level of 77.6 decibels for 12-hour spans was observed; peak noise levels reached 98.5 decibels, with the lowest recorded level at 58.3 decibels. Constraints: The fieldwork was conducted over a period shorter than one year, which may limit the comprehensiveness of the findings. Main findings: The city's noise levels surpass the World Health Organization's recommended threshold of 65 decibels, indicating that the city is experiencing noise pollution as a result of vehicular traffic.


Keywords

pollution, noise, traffic, sound


References

1. Kim KH, Ho DX, Brown RJC, et al. Some insights into the relationship between urban air pollution and noise levels. Science of The Total Environment. 2012; 424: 271-279. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.066

2. Hunashal RB, Patil YB. Assessment of Noise Pollution Indices in the City of Kolhapur, India. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012; 37: 448-457. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.310

3. Mehdi MR, Kim M, Seong JC, Arsalan MH. Spatio-temporal patterns of road traffic noise pollution in Karachi, Pakistan. Environment International. 2011; 37(1): 97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.08.003

4. World Health Organization [WHO]. Burden of disease from environmental noise. Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/_data/assets/pdf_file/0008/136466/e94888.pdf (accessed on 2 May 2020).

5. Chang TY, Lin HC, Yang WT, et al. A modified Nordic prediction model of road traffic noise in a Taiwanese city with significant motorcycle traffic. Science of the Total Environment. 2012; 432: 375-381. doi: 10.1016Zj.scitotenv.2012.06.016

6. Zhang M, Kang J, Jiao F. A social survey on the noise impact in open-plan working environments in China. Science of the Total Environment. 2012; 438: 517-526. doi: 10.1016Zj.scitotenv.2012.08.082

7. Hunashal RB, Patil YB. Assessment of Noise Pollution Indices in the City of Kolhapur, India. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012; 37: 448-457. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.310

8. Iglesias-Merchant C, Diaz-Balteiro L. Noise pollution mapping approach and accuracy on landscape scales. Science of total, environment. 2013; 449: 115-125. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.063

9. Paviotti M, Vogiatzis K. On the outdoor annoyance from scooter and motorcycle noise in the urban environment. Science of total environment. 2012; 430: 223-230. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.010

10. Zamorano B, Peña F, Parr V, Vargas JI. Social perception of urban noise. Ojeando la Agenda. 2014; 32: 2-21.

11. Fyhri A, Aasvang GM. Noise, sleep and poor health: Modeling the relationship between road traffic noise and cardiovascular problems. Science of The Total Environment. 2010; 408(21): 4935-4942. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.06.057

12. Gündogdu O, G6kdag M, Yüksel F. A traffic noise prediction method based on vehicle composition using genetic algorithms. Applied Acoustics. 2005; 66(7): 799-809. doi: 10.1016Zj.apacoust.2004.11.003

13. Li B, Tao S, Dawson RW, et al. A GIS based road traffic noise prediction model. Applied Acoustics. 2002; 63(6): 679-691. doi: 10.1016/S0003-682X(01)00066-4

14. Guedes ICM, Bertoli SR, Zannin PHT. Influence of urban shapes on environmental noise: A case study in Aracaju — Brazil. Science of The Total Environment. 2011; 412-413: 66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.10.018

15. Laszlo HE, McRobie ES, Stansfeld SA, et al. Annoyance and other reaction measures to changes in noise exposure—A review. Science of The Total Environment. 2012; 551-562. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.112

16. Szeremeta B, Zannin PHT. Analysis and evaluation of soundscapes in public parks through interviews and measurement of noise. Science of the Total Environment. 2009; 407(24): 6143-6149. doi: 10.1 016/j.scitotenv.2009.08.039

17. Vlachokostas C, Achillas C, Michailidou AV, Moussiopoulos V. Measuring combined exposure to environmental pressures in urban areas: An air quality and noise pollution assessment approach. Environment International. 2012; 39(1): 8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.09.007

18. Paunović K, Jakovljević B, Belojević G. Predictors of noise annoyance in noisy and quiet urban streets. Science of e Total Environment. 2009; 407(12): 3707-3711. doi: 10.1016/j.scit otenv.2009.02.033

19. Ögren M, Molnár P, Barregard L. Road traffic noise abatement scenarios in Gothenburg 2015–2035. Environmental Research. 2018; 164: 516-521. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.03.011

20. Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes [SCT]. Demand modeling for toll roads (Manual No. SCT-NIS-0420). Steer Davies and TransDirección General de Desarrollo Carretero. Available online: http://www.sct.gob.mx/normatecaNew/manual-de-modelacion-para-carreteras-de-cuota/ (accessed on 2 May 2020).

21. Mendoza A, Abarca E, Mayoral EF, Quintero FL. Recommendations for updating some elements of the geometric design of highways. Querétaro: IMT-SCT. Available online: http://www.imt.mx/archivos/Publicaciones/PublicacionTecnica/pt244.pdf (accessed on 2 May 2020).

22. Reyes RC, Cárdenas J. Traffic engineering: fundamentals and applications (Spanish), 8th ed. Mexico: Alfaomega; 2007.

23. International Standards Organization [ISO]. Acoustics-Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise. Part 1: Basic quantities and assessment procedures, ISO 1996-1:2016. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/59765.html (accessed on 2 May 2020).

24. Ortega M, Cardona JM. Methodology for the evaluation of urban environmental noise in the city of Medellín. Revista facultad nacional de salud pública. 2005; 23(2): 70-77.

25. Medrano H, Antezana J. Noise map of districts 10, 11 and 12 of the city of Cochabamba. Acta Nova. 2006; 3(3): 458-474.

26. Guzmán R, Barceló, C. Estimation of traffic noise pollution in Havana City, 2006. Cuban Journal of Hygiene and Epidemiology. 2008; 46(2).

27. Pacheco J, Franco JF, Behrentz E. Characterization of noise pollution levels in Bogotá: Pilot study. Revista de ingeniería. 2009; 30: 72-80. doi: 10.16924%2Friua.v0i30.230

28. Olague-Caballero CO, Wenglas-Lara G, Duarte-Rodríguez JG. Noise pollution on access roads to the city of Chihuahua. Ciencia UAT. 2016; 11(1): 101-115. doi: 10.29059/cienciauat.v11i1.551

29. Morelli X, Foraster M, Aguilera I, et al. Short-term associations between traffic-related noise, particle number and traffic flow in three European cities. Atmospheric Environment. 2015; 103: 25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.012

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Zamorano-González Benito, Peña-Cárdenas Fabiola, Velázquez-Narváez Yolanda, Vargas-Martínez José Ignacio, Parra-Sierra Víctor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).