Noise contamination and automobile traffic along the Mexican frontier

Zamorano-González Benito, Peña-Cárdenas Fabiola, Velázquez-Narváez Yolanda, Vargas-Martínez José Ignacio, Parra-Sierra Víctor

Article ID: 2010
Vol 2, Issue 1, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ps.v2i1.2010
Received: 9 May 2021; Accepted: 1 June 2021; Available online: 15 June 2021; Issue release: 31 December 2021


Download PDF

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to establish a correlation between the noise levels at major road intersections and the volume of vehicles passing through these areas. Method: A non-invasive electronic vehicle sound level meter was used for one-week periods; noise levels were assessed on a daily basis throughout the week, utilizing type I integrating sound level meters. Results: An annual average daily traffic volume of 2739 vehicles was recorded; an estimated noise level of 77.6 decibels for 12-hour spans was observed; peak noise levels reached 98.5 decibels, with the lowest recorded level at 58.3 decibels. Constraints: The fieldwork was conducted over a period shorter than one year, which may limit the comprehensiveness of the findings. Main findings: The city's noise levels surpass the World Health Organization's recommended threshold of 65 decibels, indicating that the city is experiencing noise pollution as a result of vehicular traffic.


Keywords

pollution; noise; traffic; sound


References

1. Kim KH, Ho DX, Brown RJC, et al. Some insights into the relationship between urban air pollution and noise levels. Science of The Total Environment. 2012; 424: 271-279. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.066

2. Hunashal RB, Patil YB. Assessment of Noise Pollution Indices in the City of Kolhapur, India. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012; 37: 448-457. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.310

3. Mehdi MR, Kim M, Seong JC, Arsalan MH. Spatio-temporal patterns of road traffic noise pollution in Karachi, Pakistan. Environment International. 2011; 37(1): 97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.08.003

4. World Health Organization [WHO]. Burden of disease from environmental noise. Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/_data/assets/pdf_file/0008/136466/e94888.pdf (accessed on 2 May 2020).

5. Chang TY, Lin HC, Yang WT, et al. A modified Nordic prediction model of road traffic noise in a Taiwanese city with significant motorcycle traffic. Science of the Total Environment. 2012; 432: 375-381. doi: 10.1016Zj.scitotenv.2012.06.016

6. Zhang M, Kang J, Jiao F. A social survey on the noise impact in open-plan working environments in China. Science of the Total Environment. 2012; 438: 517-526. doi: 10.1016Zj.scitotenv.2012.08.082

7. Hunashal RB, Patil YB. Assessment of Noise Pollution Indices in the City of Kolhapur, India. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012; 37: 448-457. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.310

8. Iglesias-Merchant C, Diaz-Balteiro L. Noise pollution mapping approach and accuracy on landscape scales. Science of total, environment. 2013; 449: 115-125. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.063

9. Paviotti M, Vogiatzis K. On the outdoor annoyance from scooter and motorcycle noise in the urban environment. Science of total environment. 2012; 430: 223-230. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.010

10. Zamorano B, Peña F, Parr V, Vargas JI. Social perception of urban noise. Ojeando la Agenda. 2014; 32: 2-21.

11. Fyhri A, Aasvang GM. Noise, sleep and poor health: Modeling the relationship between road traffic noise and cardiovascular problems. Science of The Total Environment. 2010; 408(21): 4935-4942. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.06.057

12. Gündogdu O, G6kdag M, Yüksel F. A traffic noise prediction method based on vehicle composition using genetic algorithms. Applied Acoustics. 2005; 66(7): 799-809. doi: 10.1016Zj.apacoust.2004.11.003

13. Li B, Tao S, Dawson RW, et al. A GIS based road traffic noise prediction model. Applied Acoustics. 2002; 63(6): 679-691. doi: 10.1016/S0003-682X(01)00066-4

14. Guedes ICM, Bertoli SR, Zannin PHT. Influence of urban shapes on environmental noise: A case study in Aracaju — Brazil. Science of The Total Environment. 2011; 412-413: 66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.10.018

15. Laszlo HE, McRobie ES, Stansfeld SA, et al. Annoyance and other reaction measures to changes in noise exposure—A review. Science of The Total Environment. 2012; 551-562. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.112

16. Szeremeta B, Zannin PHT. Analysis and evaluation of soundscapes in public parks through interviews and measurement of noise. Science of the Total Environment. 2009; 407(24): 6143-6149. doi: 10.1 016/j.scitotenv.2009.08.039

17. Vlachokostas C, Achillas C, Michailidou AV, Moussiopoulos V. Measuring combined exposure to environmental pressures in urban areas: An air quality and noise pollution assessment approach. Environment International. 2012; 39(1): 8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.09.007

18. Paunović K, Jakovljević B, Belojević G. Predictors of noise annoyance in noisy and quiet urban streets. Science of e Total Environment. 2009; 407(12): 3707-3711. doi: 10.1016/j.scit otenv.2009.02.033

19. Ögren M, Molnár P, Barregard L. Road traffic noise abatement scenarios in Gothenburg 2015–2035. Environmental Research. 2018; 164: 516-521. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.03.011

20. Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes [SCT]. Demand modeling for toll roads (Manual No. SCT-NIS-0420). Steer Davies and TransDirección General de Desarrollo Carretero. Available online: http://www.sct.gob.mx/normatecaNew/manual-de-modelacion-para-carreteras-de-cuota/ (accessed on 2 May 2020).

21. Mendoza A, Abarca E, Mayoral EF, Quintero FL. Recommendations for updating some elements of the geometric design of highways. Querétaro: IMT-SCT. Available online: http://www.imt.mx/archivos/Publicaciones/PublicacionTecnica/pt244.pdf (accessed on 2 May 2020).

22. Reyes RC, Cárdenas J. Traffic engineering: fundamentals and applications (Spanish), 8th ed. Mexico: Alfaomega; 2007.

23. International Standards Organization [ISO]. Acoustics-Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise. Part 1: Basic quantities and assessment procedures, ISO 1996-1:2016. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/59765.html (accessed on 2 May 2020).

24. Ortega M, Cardona JM. Methodology for the evaluation of urban environmental noise in the city of Medellín. Revista facultad nacional de salud pública. 2005; 23(2): 70-77.

25. Medrano H, Antezana J. Noise map of districts 10, 11 and 12 of the city of Cochabamba. Acta Nova. 2006; 3(3): 458-474.

26. Guzmán R, Barceló, C. Estimation of traffic noise pollution in Havana City, 2006. Cuban Journal of Hygiene and Epidemiology. 2008; 46(2).

27. Pacheco J, Franco JF, Behrentz E. Characterization of noise pollution levels in Bogotá: Pilot study. Revista de ingeniería. 2009; 30: 72-80. doi: 10.16924%2Friua.v0i30.230

28. Olague-Caballero CO, Wenglas-Lara G, Duarte-Rodríguez JG. Noise pollution on access roads to the city of Chihuahua. Ciencia UAT. 2016; 11(1): 101-115. doi: 10.29059/cienciauat.v11i1.551

29. Morelli X, Foraster M, Aguilera I, et al. Short-term associations between traffic-related noise, particle number and traffic flow in three European cities. Atmospheric Environment. 2015; 103: 25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.012

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Zamorano-González Benito, Peña-Cárdenas Fabiola, Velázquez-Narváez Yolanda, Vargas-Martínez José Ignacio, Parra-Sierra Víctor

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).