Investigation into the electro-microbial approach for the remediation of soil contaminated with oil

Tingting Li, Di Wu, Liang Xin, Enbiao Wang, Ziyu Zhao, Pai Peng

Article ID: 2006
Vol 3, Issue 1, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ps.v3i1.2006
Received: 09 November 2022; Accepted: 07 December 2022; Available online: 20 December 2022;
Issue release: 31 December 2022

VIEWS - 3561 (Abstract)

Download PDF

Abstract

A graphite electrode was placed at each end of the soil contaminated with oil, and a direct current (DC) voltage of 24 V was applied to decrease the electrical potential across the soil between the electrodes to 1 V/cm. The study examined the impact of the combined electrokinetic and microbial remediation method on various soil parameters such as pH, soil temperature, organic carbon content, and the availability of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in petroleum-contaminated soil. The findings revealed that after the combined treatment, the degradation rate of the simulated soil contaminated with 2% petroleum reached an optimal level of 67.5%. Additionally, the availability of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium increased by factors of 1.5, 1.4, and 1.2, respectively. The integration of electric remediation also demonstrated its ability to maintain the soil's pH and temperature within a stable range, thus creating a favorable environment for microbial activity and enhancing the rate of oil degradation.


Keywords

Electro-microbial remediation; Highly efficient petroleum-degrading bacteria; Petroleum


References

1. Liu CY, Jiang X, Ma YC, et al. Pollutant and soil types influence effectiveness of soil-applied absorbents in reducing rice plant uptake of persistent organic pollutants. Journal of Pedosphere. 2017; 27(3): 537-547.

2. Sarma H, Nava AR, Prasad MNV. Mechanistic understanding and future prospect of microbe-enhanced phytoremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 2019; 13: 318-330. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2018.12.004

3. Hassan A. An overview of persistent organic pollutants along the coastal environment of Kuwait. Open Chemistry. 2021; 19(1): 149-156. doi: 10.1515/chem-2021-0198

4. Yamashita R, Takada H, Nakazawa A, et al. Global Monitoring of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) Using Seabird Preen Gland Oil. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2018; 75(4): 545-556. doi: 10.1007/s00244-018-0557-3

5. Tripathi S, Sharma P, Chandra R. Degradation of organometallic pollutants of distillery wastewater by autochthonous bacterial community in biostimulation and bioaugmentation process. Bioresource Technology. 2021; 338: 125518. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125518

6. Luo Q, Wang H, Zhang X, et al. In situ bioelectrokinetic remediation of phenol-contaminated soil by use of an electrode matrix and a rotational operation mode. Chemosphere. 2006; 64(3): 415-422. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.11.064

7. Priyadarshanee M, Chatterjee S, Rath S, et al. Cellular and genetic mechanism of bacterial mercury resistance and their role in biogeochemistry and bioremediation. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2022; 423: 126985. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126985

8. Schmidt C, Barbosa M, Dealmeida M. A laboratory feasibility study on electrokinetic injection of nutrients on an organic, tropical, clayey soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2007; 143(3): 655-661. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.009

9. Saini A, Bekele DN, Chadalavada S, et al. A review of electrokinetically enhanced bioremediation technologies for PHs. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2020; 88: 31-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2019.08.010

10. Wang Y, Li F, Rong X, et al. Remediation of Petroleum-contaminated Soil Using Bulrush Straw Powder, Biochar and Nutrients. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2017; 98(5): 690-697. doi: 10.1007/s00128-017-2064-z

11. Wang Y, Li F, Rong X, et al. Remediation of oil contaminated soil by combined application of biomass materials and nutrients. Journal of Agricultural Environmental Sciences. 2018; 37(2): 232-238.

12. Shi L, Li F, Wang Y, et al. Study on remediation effect of different biomass carbons on total hydrocarbons and components of oil contaminated soil in Liaohe Oilfield. Journal of ecological environment. 2019; 28(1): 199-206.

13. Janos P. Separation methods in the chemistry of humic substances. Journal of Chromatographya. 2003; 983(1-2): 118.

14. Xie C. Analysis technology of petroleum pollutants in the environment. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press; 1987.

15. Xiang J, Fan L, Zhang N, et al. Effects of phosphorus application on rhizosphere soil nutrients and microbial communities of Fargesia under drought stress. Journal of ecology. 2021; (23): 110.

16. Fan G, Wang Y, Fang G, et al. Review of chemical and electrokinetic remediation of PCBs contaminated soils and sediments. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 2016; 18(9): 1140-1156. doi: 10.1039/c6em00320f

17. Hao Y. Study on remediation of arsenic contaminated soil by microbial combined electrodynamic technology. Guiyang: Guizhou University; 2020

18. Maillacheruvu K, Alshawabkeh AN. Anaerobic microbial activity under electric fields. US: Springer; 2002.

19. Li X, Lv J, Ma Y, et al. Changes of microbial flora and functional genes in oil contaminated soil during natural aging. Journal of Xinjiang University (Natural Science Edition). 2021; 38(4): 472-480.

20. Wang JY, Huang XJ, Kao JCM, et al. Simultaneous removal of organic contaminants and heavy metals from kaolin using an upward electrokinetic soil remediation process. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2007; 144(1-2): 292-299. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.026

21. Lear G, Harbottle MJ, Sills G, et al. Impact of electrokinetic remediation on microbial communities within PCP contaminated soil. Environmental Pollution. 2007; 146(1): 139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.06.037

22. Isosaari P, Piskonen R, Ojala P, et al. Integration of electrokinetics and chemical oxidation for the remediation of creosote-contaminated clay. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2007; 144(1-2): 538-548. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.068

23. Fan R, Ma Y, Zhang X, et al. Influencing factors of microbial electrokinetic remediation efficiency in pyrene contaminated saline alkali soil. China Environmental Science. 2021; 41(2): 801-812.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Tingting Li, Di Wu, Liang Xin, Enbiao Wang, Ziyu Zhao, Pai Peng

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).