Exploring factors and customer perceptions of airport services: A quantitative textual analysis

Mohammad Sayed Noor, Narariya Dita Handani

Article ID: 2485
Vol 5, Issue 1, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/st.v5i1.2485
Received: 11 January 2024; Accepted: 26 January 2024; Available online: 19 March 2024;
Issue release: 30 June 2024

VIEWS - 6360 (Abstract)

Download PDF

Abstract

This study conducted an analysis of 1500 user generated content from Google Travel to examine the factors influencing airport services and customer perceptions. Quantitative textual analysis is employed to extract meaningful insights. Our findings highlighted the most frequently used words in airport user generated content, reflecting critical aspects of airport experiences such as the airport itself, the quality of service, and international travel. A cluster analysis revealed five distinct clusters, representing flight operations, location, views, customer feelings, and intangible services. A co-occurrence network analysis showed strong correlations among keywords associated with positive experiences, underscoring the importance of service quality and infrastructure in customer satisfaction. Furthermore, through topic modeling, we categorized words into five distinct groups: airport flights, ground services, international services, customer experience, and location. The practical implications of this study are substantial. The insights can help airport management identify strengths and areas needing improvement, ultimately enhancing customer satisfaction and the overall airport experience.

Keywords

Dhaka; Hazrat Shahjalal International Airport; HSIA; Bangladesh; service quality; topic modeling; cluster analysis; co-occurrence analysis; KH-Coder


References

1. Wadud Z. Simultaneous Modeling of Passenger and Cargo Demand at an Airport. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2013; 2336(1): 63-74. doi: 10.3141/2336-08

2. Dhaka Airport. Available online: https://www.dhaka-airport.com/ (accessed on October 2023).

3. IATA. The importance of air transport to the air transport sector makes a major contribution to UAE’s economy Air transport facilitates flows of goods, investment and people. IATA. 2018; 1-4.

4. Civil Aviation Authority of Bangladesh. Available online: http://caab.gov.bd/airports/shahjalal.html (accessed on 15 October 2023).

5. Adeniran A, Fadare S. Relationship between passengers’ satisfaction and service quality in murtala muhammed international airport, Lagos, Nigeria. Int J Res Ind Eng. 2018; 7(3). doi: 10.22105/riej.2018.134686.1045

6. Halpern N, Mwesiumo D. Airport service quality and passenger satisfaction: The impact of service failure on the likelihood of promoting an airport online. Research in Transportation Business & Management. 2021; 41: 100667. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100667

7. Bezerra GCL, Gomes CF. Measuring airport service quality: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Air Transport Management. 2016; 53: 85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.02.001

8. Fodness D, Murray B. Passengers’ expectations of airport service quality. Journal of Services Marketing. 2007; 21(7): 492-506. doi: 10.1108/08876040710824852

9. Pabedinskaitė A, Akstinaitė V. Evaluation of the Airport Service Quality. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 110: 398-409. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.884

10. Lubbe B, Douglas A, Zambellis J. An application of the airport service quality model in South Africa. Journal of Air Transport Management. 2011; 17(4): 224-227. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2010.08.001

11. Shadiyar A, Ban HJ, Kim HS. Extracting Key Drivers of Air Passenger’s Experience and Satisfaction through Online Review Analysis. Sustainability. 2020; 12(21): 9188. doi: 10.3390/su12219188

12. Ban HJ, Kim HS. Understanding Customer Experience and Satisfaction through Airline Passengers’ Online Review. Sustainability. 2019; 11(15): 4066. doi: 10.3390/su11154066

13. Barakat H, Yeniterzi R, Martín-Domingo L. Applying deep learning models to twitter data to detect airport service quality. Journal of Air Transport Management. 2021; 91: 102003. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.102003

14. Kwon HJ, Ban HJ, Jun JK, et al. Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis of Online Review for Airlines. Information. 2021; 12(2): 78. doi: 10.3390/info12020078

15. Sezgen E, Mason KJ, Mayer R. Voice of airline passenger: A text mining approach to understand customer satisfaction. Journal of Air Transport Management. 2019; 77: 65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.04.001

16. Bunchongchit K, Wattanacharoensil W. Data analytics of Skytrax’s airport review and ratings: Views of airport quality by passengers types. Research in Transportation Business & Management. 2021; 41: 100688. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100688

17. Kuflik T, Minkov E, Nocera S, et al. Automating a framework to extract and analyse transport related social media content: The potential and the challenges. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2017; 77: 275-291. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.02.003

18. Lee K, Yu C. Assessment of airport service quality: A complementary approach to measure perceived service quality based on Google reviews. Journal of Air Transport Management. 2018; 71: 28-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2018.05.004

19. Öğüt H, Taş O. The Effect Of Online Reviews On Hotel Pricing. Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS-2019). 2009.

20. Wang Y, Kim J. Interconnectedness between online review valence, brand, and restaurant performance. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 2021; 48: 138-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.05.016

21. Bakır M, Akan Ş, Özdemir E, et al. How to Achieve Passenger Satisfaction in the Airport? Findings from Regression Analysis and Necessary Condition Analysis Approaches through Online Airport Reviews. Sustainability. 2022; 14(4): 2151. doi: 10.3390/su14042151

22. Uysal AK, Gunal S. The impact of preprocessing on text classification. Information Processing & Management. 2014; 50(1): 104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2013.08.006

23. Sera, H. A corpus stylistic approach to Kazuo Ishiguro’s The Unconsoled: How do readers interpret and feel about the story? Journal of Cultural Science. 2022; 56: 75-101.

24. Nunesa R, Carvalhoa IS. Arbutus unedo L. in literature, a bibliographic review and a case study for text mining using a combination of software programs to expedite the process. Ricardo Jorge Dos Santos Nunes. 2017; 33.

25. Nattuthurai P. Content Analysis of Dark Net Academic Journals from 2010-2017 Using KH Coder. ACET Journal of Computer Education & Research. 2017; 12(1): 1-10.

26. Song Y, Liu S, Liu X, et al. Automatic Taxonomy Construction from Keywords via Scalable Bayesian Rose Trees. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 2015; 27(7): 1861-1874. doi: 10.1109/tkde.2015.2397432

27. Chakraborty V, Chiu V, Vasarhelyi M. Automatic classification of accounting literature. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. 2014; 15(2): 122-148. doi: 10.1016/j.accinf.2014.01.001

28. Kushima M, Yamazaki T, Araki K. Text data mining of the nursing care life log from electronic medical record. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science. 2019; 2239: 257-261.

29. McIlroy S, Ali N, Hassan AE. Fresh apps: an empirical study of frequently-updated mobile apps in the Google play store. Empirical Software Engineering. 2016; 21: 1346-1370.

30. Noerhartati E, Handani ND, Dhaneswara N. Exploring the Influence of Online Reviews on Sales. JWEE. 2023. doi: 10.28934/jwee23.34

31. Gower JC. A Comparison of Some Methods of Cluster Analysis. Biometrics. 1967; 23(4): 623. doi: 10.2307/2528417

32. Zhu M, Tanaka K, Akamatsu T. Visualizing the annual transition of ocean policy in Japan using text mining. Marine Policy. 2023; 155: 105754. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105754

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Mohammad Sayed Noor, Narariya Dita Handani

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).