Tourism destination sustainability: The systematic literature review
Vol 5, Issue 1, 2024
VIEWS - 561 (Abstract)
Download PDF
Abstract
The sustainable development of tourism destinations is a continual and evolving process crucial for long-term value and well-being. However, the existing literature reveals a gap in understanding how to effectively evaluate the sustainable development of tourism objects, with a predominant focus on developed countries. This raises concerns about the applicability of similar strategies in underdeveloped nations. This study employs an analysis of the scientific literature to address the identified research problem. We propose a more inclusive and comprehensive approach to sustainable tourism management, aiming to equalize the distribution of economic, social, and cultural dimensions. Our focus is on developing a theoretical evaluation model that goes beyond conventional frameworks and includes both broad and narrow dimensions. The research uncovers that sustainable development, as presented by various authors, encompasses economic benefits, environmental protection, and social dimension management. We introduce a sustainability management model that surpasses existing systems, offering a holistic perspective. Moreover, we emphasize the significance of voluntary publicity for environmental and socio-cultural activities in enhancing a tourism destination’s image and societal value. Our study contributes a theoretical evaluation model based on global criteria for sustainable tourism. This model not only evaluates the dimensions of coherence broadly but also incorporates specific criteria for a nuanced analysis of the current situation and potential opportunities. The proposed framework aims to guide tourism destinations in achieving economic benefits without compromising the environment and prioritizing the well-being of local communities, thus fostering a more sustainable and equitable development process.
Keywords
References
1. Roman M, Roman M, Niedziółka A. Spatial Diversity of Tourism in the Countries of the European Union. Sustainability. 2020, 12(7): 2713. doi: 10.3390/su12072713
2. Schmutz V, Elliott M. Tourism and Sustainability in the Evaluation of World Heritage Sites, 1980–2010. Sustainability. 2016, 8(3): 261. doi: 10.3390/su8030261
3. Roblek V, Drpić D, Meško M, et al. Evolution of Sustainable Tourism Concepts. Sustainability. 2021, 13(22): 12829. doi: 10.3390/su132212829
4. Palazzo M, Gigauri I, Panait MC, et al. Sustainable Tourism Issues in European Countries during the Global Pandemic Crisis. Sustainability. 2022, 14(7): 3844. doi: 10.3390/su14073844
5. Čiegis, R., Dilius, A., Mikalauskienė, A. Assessment of the dynamics of sustainable development in Lithuania (Lithuanian). Regional Formation and Development Studies. 2014, 1(11). doi:10.15181/rfds.v12i1.685
6. Lim MML, Søgaard Jørgensen P, Wyborn CA. Reframing the sustainable development goals to achieve sustainable development in the Anthropocene—A systems approach. Ecology and Society. 2018, 23(3). doi: 10.5751/es-10182-230322
7. Commission of the European Communities. Communication from the commission to the council, the european parliament, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions: Basic orientations for the sustainability of European tourism. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2003:0716:FIN:en:PDF (accessed on 1 April 2024).
8. Estol J, Camilleri MA, Font X. European Union tourism policy: an institutional theory critical discourse analysis. Tourism Review. 2018, 73(3): 421-431. doi: 10.1108/tr-11-2017-0167
9. Rahmadian E, Feitosa D, Zwitter A. A systematic literature review on the use of big data for sustainable tourism. Current Issues in Tourism. 2021, 25(11): 1711-1730. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2021.1974358
10. León-Gómez A, Ruiz-Palomo D, Fernández-Gámez MA, et al. Sustainable Tourism Development and Economic Growth: Bibliometric Review and Analysis. Sustainability. 2021, 13(4): 2270. doi: 10.3390/su13042270
11. Jasinskas E. Challenges of sustainable tourism development (Lithuanian). In: Siaurodinienė V, Jonikienė L, Židonienė M (editors). Sustainable Development Problems and Their Solutions in Lithuania (Lithuanian). Vilnius University, Aleksandras Stulginskis University; 2015. pp. 400–420.
12. Panasiuk A. European funds as a determinant of the development of tourism enterprises (Polish). Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu. 2014, 354. doi: 10.15611/pn.2014.354.12
13. Wullur M, Samehe V. Importance Performance Analysis using Dematel: A Case Study on Tourist Destination Attributes in Manado Indonesia. Web of Conferences. 2020, 76: 01024. doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20207601024
14. Luo Y, Chen Y, Zheng W. A literature review on evaluating tourism destinations. In: ISME 2016 - Information Science and Management Engineering IV. SciTePress; 2016. doi: 10.5220/0006449903290334
15. Zemla M. Tourism destination: The networking approach. Moravian Geographical Reports. 2016, 24(4): 2–14. doi: 10.1515/mgr-2016-0018
16. Panić A, Koščak M, Pavlakovič B. Managing a sustainable tourism destination. In: Proceedings of The International Conference on Research in Management & Economics; 15–17 December 2018; Belgrade, Serbia. pp. 30–46. doi: 10.33422/ime.2018.12.74
17. Weaver BD. Asymmetrical Dialectics of Sustainable Tourism: Toward Enlightened Mass Tourism. Journal of Travel Research. 2014, 53(2): 131–140. doi: 10.1177%2F0047287513491335
18. Hanafiah MH, Azman I, Jamaluddin MR, et al. Responsible Tourism Practices and Quality of Life: Perspective of Langkawi Island communities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2016, 222: 406–413. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.194
19. Juandi VS, Andari R, Setiyorini HPD. The Influence of Sustainable Tourism Development towards Tourists’ Satisfaction inSaung Angklung Udjo. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2018, 145(1): 012020. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/145/1/012020
20. Santos-Roldán L, Castillo Canalejo AM, Berbel-Pineda JM, et al. Sustainable Tourism as a Source of Healthy Tourism. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020, 17(15): 5353. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155353
21. Henderson JC. Tourism: economic, physical and social impacts. Annals of Leisure Research. 2018, 21(4): 522-524. doi: 10.1080/11745398.2018.1457008
22. Sala S, Crenna E, Secchi M, et al. Environmental sustainability of European production and consumption assessed against planetary boundaries. Journal of Environmental Management. 2020, 269: 110686. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110686
23. Mikalauskienė, A., Mikalauskas, I. Theoretical aspects of sustainability assessment and application in tourism and other sectors (Lithuanian). In: Siaurodinienė V, Jonikienė L, Židonienė M (editors). Sustainable Development Problems and Their Solutions in Lithuania (Lithuanian). Vilnius University, Aleksandras Stulginskis University; 2015. pp. 381–399.
24. Pollesch NL, Dale VH. Normalization in sustainability assessment: Methods and implications. Ecological Economics. 2016, 130: 195-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.018
25. Poudel S, Nyaupane PG, Budruk M. Stakeholders’ Perspectives of Sustainable Tourism Development: A New Approach to Measuring Outcomes. Journal of Travel Research. 2016, 55(4): 465-480. doi: 10.1177%2F0047287514563166
26. Oželienė D, Drejeris R. Analysis of methodological potential for evaluation of corporate sustainable development (Lithuanian). Mokslas—Lietuvos ateitis. 2015; 7(2): 189-198. doi: 10.3846/mla.2015.745
27. Chang D, Lee CKM, Chen CH. Review of life cycle assessment towards sustainable product development. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2014, 83: 48-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.050
28. Kedang RNM, Soesilo NI. Sustainable tourism development strategy in Bintan Regency based on Tourism Area Life Cycle. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021, 716(1): 012138. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/716/1/012138
29. Herrero CC, Laso J, Cristóbal J, et al. Tourism under a life cycle thinking approach: A review of perspectives and new challenges for the tourism sector in the last decades. Science of The Total Environment. 2022, 845: 157261. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157261
30. Soranta K, Landis EA, Jing F, Suto H. The role of life cycle approaches in sustainable development of tourism. In: Supply Chain Management of Tourism Towards Sustainability. Springer; 2020. pp. 13-29. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-58225-8_2
31. Arzoumanidis I, Walker AM, Petti L, et al. Life Cycle-Based Sustainability and Circularity Indicators for the Tourism Industry: A Literature Review. Sustainability. 2021, 13(21): 11853. doi: 10.3390/su132111853
32. Global Sustainable Tourism Council. GSTC destination criteria. Available online: https://www.gstcouncil.org/gstc-criteria/gstc-destination-criteria/ (accessed on 1 April 2024).
33. Strambach S, Surmeier A. Knowledge dynamics in setting sustainable standards in tourism – the case of ‘Fair Trade in Tourism South Africa.’ Current Issues in Tourism. 2013, 16(7-8): 736-752. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2013.785485
34. Sharpley R. Sustainable tourism governance: local or global? Tourism Recreation Research. 2022, 48(5): 809-812. doi: 10.1080/02508281.2022.2040295
35. Rodriguez RA, Lopez AG, Caballero JLJ. Has implementing an ecolabel increased sustainable tourism in Barcelona? Cuadernos de Turismo. 2017, 40: 93-134. doi: 10.6018/turismo.40.309631
36. Saarinen J, Lubbe B, Moswete NN (editors). Southern African Perspectives on Sustainable Tourism Management: Tourism and Changing Localities, 1st ed. Springer International Publishing; 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-99435-8
37. Ruhanen L, Weiler B, Moyle BD, et al. Trends and patterns in sustainable tourism research: a 25-year bibliometric analysis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2015, 23(4): 517-535. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2014.978790
38. Spenceley A. Sustainable tourism certification in the African hotel sector. Tourism Review. 2018, 74(2): 179-193. doi: 10.1108/tr-09-2017-0145
39. Nepal SK. The Quest for Sustainable Tourism in Nepal. Current History. 2022, 121(834): 147-153. doi: 10.1525/curh.2022.121.834.147
40. Huang CC, Liang WY, Tseng TL (Bill), et al. A rough set-based corporate memory for the case of ecotourism. Tourism Management. 2015, 47: 22-33. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.004
41. Leu TC. Tourism as a livelihood diversification strategy among Sámi indigenous people in northern Sweden. Acta Borealia. 2019, 36(1): 75-92. doi: 10.1080/08003831.2019.1603009
42. Lesar L, Weaver D, Gardiner S. From Spectrum to Multiverse: A New Perspective on the Diversity of Quality Control Tools for Sustainable Tourism Theory and Practice, Journal of Travel Research. 2019, 59(3): 424-449. doi: 10.1177%2F0047287519841715
43. Font X, McCabe S. Sustainability and marketing in tourism: its contexts, paradoxes, approaches, challenges and potential. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2017, 25(7): 869-883. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2017.1301721
44. Mojić J, Šušić V. Planning models of sustainable tourism development destination. Available online: http://isc2014.ekonomskifakultet.rs/ISCpdfs/ISC2014-11.pdf (accessed on 1 April 2024).
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Saulius Papečkys, Edmundas Jasinskas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Prof. Hung-Che Wu
Nanfang College Guangzhou, China
Processing Speed
-
-
-
- <5 days from submission to initial review decision;
-
-
- 64% acceptance rate
Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.