Image destination engagement from a cultural perspective—A neuromarketing approach for a Spanish-German study

José Manuel Mas, Kathrin Jaszus, Andrés Gómez, Fernando García Monleon

Article ID: 2463
Vol 5, Issue 1, 2024
VIEWS - 376 (Abstract)


The importance of the image of the tourist destination in the communication and marketing of a tourist destination is beyond doubt. For this reason, numerous studies address these issues. However, not so many do so from the perspective of the emotion the receiver feels, which is why this study deals with analyzing the emotion generated in the receiver through neuromarketing techniques and measuring the level of engagement felt. As a fundamental part of this study, we added the variable of cultural differences, both generically and specifically for gender and age. We are mainly guided by the theories of Life Cycle Theory and Generational Theory to analyze age differences. At the same time, gender differences are approached from the Gender Role Theory. The sample comprises hundred individuals with apparent cultural differences, one sample of German origin and residence and the other of Spanish origin and residence, 50/50. We approached the study from the point of view of the emotion felt by the receiver of the message based on ten neuromarketing techniques (EGG) and ten images used by a famous tourist destination known in both countries. The results suggest that not only are there differences in the emotion felt after viewing images of a tourist destination, but that these differences are also explained by cultural background, gender, and age.


image destination engagement; tourism neuromarketing; cultural differences; gender differences; age differences

Full Text:



1. Josiassen A, Assaf AG, Woo L, et al. The Imagery–Image Duality Model. Journal of Travel Research. 2015, 55(6): 789-803. doi: 10.1177/0047287515583358

2. Crompton JL. An Assessment of the Image of Mexico as a Vacation Destination and the Influence of Geographical Location Upon That Image. Journal of Travel Research. 1979, 17(4): 18-23. doi: 10.1177/004728757901700404

3. Beerli A, Martín JD. Factors influencing destination image. Annals of Tourism Research. 2004, 31(3): 657-681. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2004.01.010

4. Bastiaansen M, Straatman S, Mitas O, et al. Emotion Measurement in Tourism Destination Marketing: A Comparative Electroencephalographic and Behavioral Study. Journal of Travel Research. 2020, 61(2): 252-264. doi: 10.1177/0047287520981149

5. Hosany S, Martin D, Woodside AG. Emotions in Tourism: Theoretical Designs, Measurements, Analytics, and Interpretations. Journal of Travel Research. 2020, 60(7): 1391-1407. doi: 10.1177/0047287520937079

6. Volo S. Emotions in tourism: From exploration to design. In: Fesenmaier, DR, Xiang Z (editors). Design Science in Tourism: Foundations of Destination Management. Springer; 2017. pp. 31–40. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-42773-7_3

7. Bastiaansen M, Straatman S, Driessen E, et al. My destination in your brain: A novel neuromarketing approach for evaluating the effectiveness of destination marketing. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management. 2018, 7: 76-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.09.003

8. Michael I, Ramsoy T, Stephens M, et al. A study of unconscious emotional and cognitive responses to tourism images using a neuroscience method. Journal of Islamic Marketing. 2019, 10(2): 543-564. doi: 10.1108/jima-09-2017-0098

9. Costa PT, Terracciano A, McCrae RR. Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001, 81(2): 322-331. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322

10. Hill, PhD, MPH CV, et al. The National Institute on Aging Health Disparities Research Framework. Ethnicity & Disease. 2015, 25(3): 245. doi: 10.18865/ed.25.3.245

11. Brumfiel EM, Robin C. 1 Gender, Households, and Society: An Introduction. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association. 2008, 18(1): 1-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-8248.2008.00001.x

12. Malakhova N. Gender as a subject of interdisciplinary research. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2018); 25–27 April 2018; Moscow, Russia. doi: 10.2991/iccessh-18.2018.332

13. Zehetner A, Zehetner D, Lepeyko T, et al. Generation Z’s expectations of their leaders: A cross-cultural, multi-dimensional investigation of leadership styles. European Conference on Management Leadership and Governance. 2022, 18(1): 447-455. doi: 10.34190/ecmlg.18.1.891

14. Chiappori PA, Molina JA. The intra-spousal balance of power within the family: Cross-cultural evidence. In: Halford WK, van de Vijver F (editors). Cross-Cultural Family Research and Practice. Academic Press; 2020. pp. 185-209. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-815493-9.00006-5

15. Cole ER. Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist. 2009, 64(3): 170-180. doi: 10.1037/a0014564

16. Rice C, Harrison E, Friedman M. Doing Justice to Intersectionality in Research. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies. 2019, 19(6): 409-420. doi: 10.1177/1532708619829779

17. Goold A, Craig A, Coldwell J. Accommodating culture and cultural diversity in online teaching. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2007, 23(4). doi: 10.14742/ajet.1248

18. Roos P, Gelfand M, Nau D, et al. Societal threat and cultural variation in the strength of social norms: An evolutionary basis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2015, 129: 14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.01.003

19. Scholtens B, Dam L. Cultural Values and International Differences in Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics. 2007, 75(3): 273-284. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9252-9

20. Manuti A, Scardigno R, Mininni G. Me, myself, and God: Religion as a psychocultural resource of meaning in later life. Culture & Psychology. 2016, 22(1): 3-34. doi: 10.1177/1354067x14551294

21. Hanel PHP, Maio GR, Soares AKS, et al. Cross-Cultural Differences and Similarities in Human Value Instantiation. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018, 9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00849

22. Welz G. The cultural swirl: Anthropological perspectives on innovation. Global Networks. 2003, 3(3): 255-270. doi: 10.1111/1471-0374.00061

23. Shaw LA, Wainryb C. The outsider’s perspective: Young adults’ judgments of social practices of other cultures. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 1999, 17(3): 451-471. doi: 10.1348/026151099165393

24. Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Call J, et al. Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2005, 28(5): 675-691. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x05000129

25. Lehman DR, Chiu C yue, Schaller M. Psychology and Culture. Annual Review of Psychology. 2004, 55(1): 689-714. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141927

26. Park SO, Choi SU, Kim ST, et al. The Relationship between Corporate Culture and Value at Different Life Cycle Stages. Sustainability. 2021, 13(4): 2334. doi: 10.3390/su13042334

27. Yang Y, Heijungs R. On the use of different models for consequential life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2017, 23(4): 751-758. doi: 10.1007/s11367-017-1337-4

28. Taji W, Scrivner C, Maestripieri D. Toward a general theory of human individual differences: Can evolutionary psychology meet the challenge? Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. 2020, 14(4): 384-389. doi: 10.1037/ebs0000216

29. Woodruff DS, Birren JE. Age changes and cohort difference in personality. Developmental Psychology. 1972, 6(2): 252-259. doi: 10.1037/h0032086

30. Ledimo O. Generational Differences In Organizational Justice Perceptions: An Exploratory Investigation Across Three Generational Cohorts. Foundations of Management. 2015, 7(1): 129-142. doi: 10.1515/fman-2015-0031

31. Bisin A, Verdier T. The Economics of Cultural Transmission and Socialization. Available online: (accessed on 21 February 2024).

32. Jacobs RC, Campbell DT. The perpetuation of an arbitrary tradition through several generations of a laboratory microculture. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1961, 62(3): 649-658. doi: 10.1037/h0044182

33. Endendijk JJ, Groeneveld MG, van der Pol LD, et al. Gender Differences in Child Aggression: Relations With Gender‐Differentiated Parenting and Parents’ Gender‐Role Stereotypes. Child Development. 2016, 88(1): 299-316. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12589

34. Fallon MA, Jome LM. An Exploration of Gender-Role Expectations and Conflict among Women Rugby Players. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2007, 31(3): 311-321. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00374.x

35. Cobb RA, Walsh CE, Priest JB. The Cognitive-Active Gender Role Identification Continuum. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy. 2009, 21(2): 77-97. doi: 10.1080/08952830902911339

36. Bowleg L. The Problem with the Phrase Women and Minorities: Intersectionality—an Important Theoretical Framework for Public Health. American Journal of Public Health. 2012, 102(7): 1267-1273. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2012.300750

37. Aspinall C, Jacobs S, Frey R. Intersectionality and nursing leadership: An integrative review. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2022, 32(11-12): 2466-2480. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16347

38. Ray R. An Intersectional Analysis to Explaining a Lack of Physical Activity Among Middle Class Black Women. Sociology Compass. 2014, 8(6): 780-791. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12172

39. Hofstede G. Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. 2011, 2(1). doi: 10.9707/2307-0919.1014

40. Connell RW, Messerschmidt JW. Hegemonic Masculinity. Gender & Society. 2005, 19(6): 829-859. doi: 10.1177/0891243205278639

41. Reeser TW. Concepts of masculinity and masculinity studies. In: Horlacher S (editor). Configuring Masculinity in Theory and Literary Practice. Brill; 2020.

42. Karandashev V. Cultural Models of Emotions. Springer International Publishing; 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-58438-2

43. Lucassen G, Lubbers M. Who Fears What? Explaining Far-Right-Wing Preference in Europe by Distinguishing Perceived Cultural and Economic Ethnic Threats. Comparative Political Studies. 2011, 45(5): 547-574. doi: 10.1177/0010414011427851

44. Brinkmann S. Culture as practices: A pragmatist conception. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. 2007, 27-28(2-1): 192-212. doi: 10.1037/h0091293

45. Giorgi S, Lockwood C, Glynn MA. The Many Faces of Culture: Making Sense of 30 Years of Research on Culture in Organization Studies. Academy of Management Annals. 2015, 9(1): 1-54. doi: 10.5465/19416520.2015.1007645

46. Cheung ML, Pires G, Rosenberger PJ. The influence of perceived social media marketing elements on consumer–brand engagement and brand knowledge. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 2020, 32(3): 695-720. doi: 10.1108/apjml-04-2019-0262

47. Ergün N, Özkan Z, Griffiths MD. Social media addiction and poor mental health: examining the mediating roles of internet addiction and phubbing. Psychological Reports. 2023. doi: 10.1177/00332941231166609

48. Shi Y, Gao Y, Cao R. Research on the construction of analytic hierarchy process of cultural tourism competitiveness. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Economy, Judicature, Administration and Humanitarian Projects (JAHP 2019). 12–14 September 2019; Kaifeng, China. doi: 10.2991/jahp-19.2019.173

49. Li M, Zhang H, Xiao H, et al. A Grid-group Analysis of Tourism Motivation. International Journal of Tourism Research. 2013, 17(1): 35-44. doi: 10.1002/jtr.1963

50. Tiberghien G, Bremner H, Milne S. Performance and visitors’ perception of authenticity in eco-cultural tourism. Tourism Geographies. 2017, 19(2): 287-300. doi: 10.1080/14616688.2017.1285958

51. Wang C, Liu J, Zhang T. ‘What if my experience was not what I expected?’: Examining expectation-experience (dis)confirmation effects in China’s rural destinations. Journal of Vacation Marketing. 2021, 27(4): 365-384. doi: 10.1177/13567667211006763

52. Malone T, Wilder H. Chasing ubuntu: using ICTs to promote reflective practice. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal. 2008, 2(2): 118-125. doi: 10.1108/17504970810883388

53. Betsy N, Gloria H. An Integrated Cognitive Perspective of Travel Motivation and Repeated Travel Behaviour. Annals of Cognitive Science. 2018, 2(1). doi: 10.36959/447/341

54. Gimenez-Nadal JI, Molina JA, Ortega R. Like my parents at home? Gender differences in children’s housework in Germany and Spain. Empirical Economics. 2016, 52(4): 1143-1179. doi: 10.1007/s00181-016-1100-x

55. Baluku MM, Groh J, Dalbert C, et al. Cultural differences in geographic mobility readiness among business management students in Germany and Spain ahead of graduation. SN Social Sciences. 2021, 1(7). doi: 10.1007/s43545-021-00171-0

56. Wilde A, Diekman AB. Cross-Cultural Similarities and Differences in Dynamic Stereotypes: A Comparison Between Germany and the United States. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2005, 29(2): 188-196. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00181.x

57. Scollon CN, Diener E, Oishi S, et al. Emotions Across Cultures and Methods. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2004, 35(3): 304-326. doi: 10.1177/0022022104264124

58. Kumar V, Kaushal V, Kaushik AK. Building relationship orientation among travellers through destination brand authenticity. Journal of Vacation Marketing. 2022, 29(3): 331-347. doi: 10.1177/13567667221095589

59. Garcia-Retamero R, Galesic M, Gigerenzer G. Enhancing Understanding and Recall of Quantitative Information about Medical Risks: A Cross-Cultural Comparison between Germany and Spain. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 2011, 14(1): 218-226. doi: 10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n1.19

60. FUR—Forschungsgemeinschaft Urlaub und Reisen. First selected results:53. Travel analysis (German). Available online: (accessed on 2 December 2023).

61. Mas JM, Gómez A, Carrero O. Emotions in fear communication: A cross‐cultural neuromarketing approach. Psychology & Marketing. 2023. doi: 10.1002/mar.21947

62. García-Madariaga J, Blasco López MF, Burgos IM, et al. Do isolated packaging variables influence consumers’ attention and preferences? Physiology & Behavior. 2019, 200: 96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.04.030

63. Biercewicz K, Borawski M, Duda J. Method for Selecting an Engagement Index for a Specific Type of Game Using Cognitive Neuroscience. International Journal of Computer Games Technology. 2020, 2020: 1-19. doi: 10.1155/2020/2450651

64. Moya I, García-Madariaga J, Blasco MF. What Can Neuromarketing Tell Us about Food Packaging? Foods. 2020, 9(12): 1856. doi: 10.3390/foods9121856

65. Mora M, Elzo-Aizarna J, Rozas-Fuertes S, et al. Implicit reaction vs explicit emotional response: Protected designation of origin in apple cider. Food Quality and Preference. 2020, 79: 103773. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103773

66. Çakar T, Gez K. Neuroscience applications on the assessments of TV Ads. In: Santos MAD (editor). Applying Neuroscience to Business Practice. IGI Global; 2017. pp. 231-256. doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-1028-4.ch010

67. Millan YA, Liliana Chaves M, Barrero JC. A Review on Biometric Devices to be Applied in ASD Interventions. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Congreso Internacional de Innovación y Tendencias en Ingeniería (CONIITI); 30 September 2020–2 October 2020; Bogota, Colombia. doi: 10.1109/coniiti51147.2020.9240291

68. Dmochowski JP, Sajda P, Dias J, et al. Correlated Components of Ongoing EEG Point to Emotionally Laden Attention – A Possible Marker of Engagement? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2012, 6. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00112

69. Fernandez‐Lores S, Crespo‐Tejero N, Fernández‐Hernández R, et al. Framing, risk perception and social health campaigns: A neuroscientific analysis. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 2023, 23(1): 76-89. doi: 10.1002/cb.2151

70. Hsu M. Neuromarketing: Inside the Mind of the Consumer. California Management Review. 2017, 59(4): 5-22. doi: 10.1177/0008125617720208

71. Steele A, Jacobs D, Siefert C, et al. Leveraging Synergy and Emotion In a Multi-Platform World. Journal of Advertising Research. 2013, 53(4): 417-430. doi: 10.2501/jar-53-4-417-430

72. Casado‐Aranda L, Sánchez‐Fernández J, Bigne E, et al. The application of neuromarketing tools in communication research: A comprehensive review of trends. Psychology & Marketing. 2023, 40(9): 1737-1756. doi: 10.1002/mar.21832

73. Kågesten A, Gibbs S, Blum RW, et al. Understanding Factors that Shape Gender Attitudes in Early Adolescence Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLoS ONE. 2016, 11(6): e0157805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157805


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2024 José Manuel Mas, Kathrin Jaszus, Andrés Gómez, Fernando García Monleon

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).