Incentivized adoption of smart tourism services: Host community perspective
Vol 4, Issue 2, 2023
Issue release: 30 December 2023
VIEWS - 15146 (Abstract)
Download PDF
Abstract
In developing nations, the success of development programs hinges on addressing stakeholder concerns. The growing popularity of smart tourism initiatives strengthens tourism infrastructure and elevates visitor experiences. Central to this development is the imperative to engage and secure the support of host communities in embracing smart tourism services. Recently, the momentum of incentivized adoption within smart tourism services has become pronounced among host communities. This research delves into the nuanced processes and outcomes of incentive adoption, shedding light on associated challenges. The study was conducted through interviews with host communities in smart cities; the study unveils that incentivized adoption spans diverse operational facets, encompassing digitalization of business, smart infrastructure development, training programs, the establishment of smart tourism centers, community-driven platforms, e-culture transition, and forward/backward linkages. The positive outcomes resulting from incentivized adoption include economic empowerment, community outreach, improved tourism infrastructure, and the enhancement of technical skills. However, challenges persist, ranging from e-safety concerns and e-literacy issues to resource constraints, cultural sensitivities, resistance to change, infrastructural gaps, and limited local involvement. This research contributes to the field by comprehensively understanding the multifaceted dynamics surrounding incentivized adoption in smart tourism, offering valuable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers alike.
Keywords
References
1. Eichelberger S, Peters M, Pikkemaat B, et al. Entrepreneurial ecosystems in smart cities for tourism development: From stakeholder perceptions to regional tourism policy implications. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 2020; 45: 319–329. doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.06.011
2. Ningrum TP. Smart city: The main assist factor for smart cities. International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System 2021; 5(01): 46–54. doi: 10.25124/ijies.v5i01.109
3. Romão J, Kourtit K, Neuts B, et al. The smart city as a common place for tourists and residents: A structural analysis of the determinants of urban attractiveness. Cities 2018; 78: 67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.007
4. Sengupta N, Chinnasamy R. Designing of an immaculate smart city with cloud based predictive analytics. International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems 2020; 09(6): 1079–1089. doi: 10.12785/ijcds/090606
5. Silva BN, Khan M, Han K. Towards sustainable smart cities: A review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society 2018; 38: 697–713. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.053
6. Boes K, Buhalis D, Inversini A. Conceptualising smart tourism destination dimensions. In: Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015. Springer International Publishing; 2015. pp. 391–403. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-14343-9_29
7. Khan M, Woo M, Nam K, et al. Smart city and smart tourism: A case of Dubai. Sustainability 2017; 9(12): 2279. doi: 10.3390/su9122279
8. Ismagilova E, Hughes L, Dwivedi YK, et al. Smart cities: Advances in research—An information systems perspective. International Journal of Information Management 2019; 47: 88–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.004
9. Balakrishnan J, Dwivedi YK, Malik FT, et al. Role of smart tourism technology in heritage tourism development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2021; 31(11): 2506–2525. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2021.1995398
10. Mohamed N, Al-Jaroodi J, Jawhar I, et al. Unmanned aerial vehicles applications in future smart cities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2020; 153: 119293. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.004
11. Buhalis D, Law R. Progress in information technology and tourism management: 20 years on and 10 years after the Internet—The state of eTourism research. Tourism Management 2008; 29(4): 609–623. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2008.01.005
12. Gretzel U, Koo C. Smart tourism cities: A duality of place where technology supports the convergence of touristic and residential experiences. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 2021; 26(4): 352–364. doi: 10.1080/10941665.2021.1897636
13. Jeong M, Shin HH. Tourists’ experiences with smart tourism technology at smart destinations and their behavior intentions. Journal of Travel Research 2019; 59(8): 1464–1477. doi: 10.1177/0047287519883034
14. Susanto E, Novianti S, Rafdinal W, et al. Visiting tourism destination: Is it influenced by smart tourism technology? Journal of Indonesian Tourism and Development Studies 2020; 8(3): 145–155. doi: 10.21776/ub.jitode.2020.008.03.04
15. Rastegar R, Ruhanen L. The injustices of rapid tourism growth. Annals of Tourism Research 2022; 97: 103504. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2022.103504
16. Zhang H, Yang Y. Is tourism growth able to shrink economic inequalities? A DSGE analysis. Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights 2023; 4(1): 100089. doi: 10.1016/j.annale.2023.100089
17. Nam T, Pardo TA. Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times; 12–15 June 2011; College Park Maryland, USA. doi: 10.1145/2037556.2037602
18. Cheng LK, Huang HL. Virtual tourism atmospheres: The effects of pleasure, arousal, and dominance on the acceptance of virtual tourism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 2022; 53: 143–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.10.002
19. Križaj D, Bratec M, Kopić P, et al. A Technology-based innovation adoption and implementation analysis of European smart tourism projects: Towards a smart actionable classification model (SACM). Sustainability 2021; 13(18): 10279. doi: 10.3390/su131810279
20. Femenia-Serra F, Perles-Ribes JF, Ivars-Baidal JA. Smart destinations and tech-savvy millennial tourists: Hype versus reality. Tourism Review 2019; 74(1): 63–81. doi: 10.1108/tr-02-2018-0018
21. Joshi S. Social network analysis in smart tourism driven service distribution channels: Evidence from tourism supply chain of Uttarakhand, India. International Journal of Digital Culture and Electronic Tourism 2018; 2(4): 1. doi: 10.1504/ijdcet.2018.10011543
22. Yavuz A. Digital Transformation in Tourism: Examining the Perspectives of Hotel Managers (Turkish) [Master’s thesis]. Duzce University; 2021.
23. Ivars-Baidal JA, Celdrán-Bernabeu MA, Femenia-Serra F, et al. Smart city and smart destination planning: Examining instruments and perceived impacts in Spain. Cities 2023; 137: 104266. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104266
24. Blasi S, Ganzaroli A, De Noni I. Smartening sustainable development in cities: Strengthening the theoretical linkage between smart cities and SDGs. Sustainable Cities and Society 2022; 80: 103793. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103793
25. Secinaro S, Brescia V, Lanzalonga F, et al. Smart city reporting: A bibliometric and structured literature review analysis to identify technological opportunities and challenges for sustainable development. Journal of Business Research 2022; 149: 296–313. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.032
26. Habeeb NJ, Weli ST. Relationship of smart cities and smart tourism: An overview. HighTech and Innovation Journal 2020; 1(4): 194–202. doi: 10.28991/hij-2020-01-04-07
27. Randhawa A, Kumar A. Exploring sustainability of smart development initiatives in India. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment 2017; 6(2): 701–710. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.08.002
28. Marimuthu M, D’Souza C, Shukla Y. Integrating community value into the adoption framework: A systematic review of conceptual research on participatory smart city applications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2022; 181: 121779. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121779
29. Sharif RA, Pokharel S. Smart city dimensions and associated risks: Review of literature. Sustainable Cities and Society 2022; 77: 103542. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103542
30. Jasrotia A, Gangotia A. Manifesting smart tourism destinations: A study based on selected Himalayan cities in India. Turyzm/Tourism 2023; 43–53. doi: 10.18778/0867-5856.33.2.04
31. Giampiccoli A, Mtapuri O. Further stages of the Investment Redistributive Incentive Model (IRIM) in tourism: Towards mainstreaming community-based tourism. Czasopismo Geograficzne 2021; 91(1–2): 269–284.
32. Spiteri A, Nepalz SK. Incentive-based conservation programs in developing countries: A review of some key issues and suggestions for improvements. Environmental Management 2005; 37(1): 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-0311-7
33. Tosun C. Expected nature of community participation in tourism development. Tourism Management 2006; 27(3): 493–504. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2004.12.004
34. Alexander CS, Smith A, Ivanek R. Safer not to know? Shaping liability law and policy to incentivize adoption of predictive AI technologies in the food system. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 2023; 6. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1298604
35. Li M, Ye H, Liao X, et al. How Shenzhen, China pioneered the widespread adoption of electric vehicles in a major city: Implications for global implementation. WIREs Energy and Environment 2020; 9(4). doi: 10.1002/wene.373
36. Narayan TA, Geyer J. Can results-based prizes to private sector incentivize technology adoption by farmers? Evidence from the AgResults Nigeria project that uses prizes to incentivize adoption of AflasafeTM. Agriculture & Food Security 2022; 11(1). doi: 10.1186/s40066-022-00377-2
37. Chiwaridzo OT. Harnessing renewable energy technologies for energy independence within Zimbabwean tourism industry: A pathway towards sustainability. Energy for Sustainable Development 2023; 76: 101301. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2023.101301
38. Lee TW. Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. Sage; 1999.
39. Wünderlich NV. Qualitative exploratory interview study. In: Acceptance of Remote Services. Springer; 2009. pp. 93–130. doi: 10.1007/978-3-8349-8533-0_5
40. Hagaman AK, Wutich A. How many interviews are enough to identify meta themes in multisited and cross-cultural research? Another perspective on Guest, Bunce, and Johnson’s (2006) landmark study. Field Methods 2016; 29(1): 23–41. doi: 10.1177/1525822x16640447
41. Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology & Health 2010; 25(10): 1229–1245. doi: 10.1080/08870440903194015
42. Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage; 2012.
43. Wang X, Zhen F, Tang J, et al. Applications, experiences, and challenges of smart tourism development in China. Journal of Urban Technology 2021; 29(4): 101–126. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2021.1879605
44. Maquera G, da Costa BBF, Mendoza Ó, et al. Intelligent digital platform for community-based rural tourism—A novel concept development in Peru. Sustainability 2022; 14(13): 7907. doi: 10.3390/su14137907
45. Matiku S, Zuwarimwe J, Tshipala N. Community-driven tourism projects’ economic contribution to community livelihoods—A case of Makuleke Contractual Park Community Tourism Project. Sustainability 2020; 12(19): 8230. doi: 10.3390/su12198230
46. Cirulis A, Paolis LTD, Tutberidze M. Virtualization of digitalized cultural heritage and use case scenario modeling for sustainability promotion of national identity. Procedia Computer Science 2015; 77: 199–206. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.384
47. Kaluarachchi Y. Potential advantages in combining smart and green infrastructure over silo approaches for future cities. Frontiers of Engineering Management 2020; 8(1): 98–108. doi: 10.1007/s42524-020-0136-y
48. Salman MY, Hasar H. Review on environmental aspects in smart city concept: Water, waste, air pollution and transportation smart applications using IoT techniques. Sustainable Cities and Society 2023; 94: 104567. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104567
49. Zhang K, Yu J, Wan X, et al. Data-driven decision-making of marine ecological civilization construction in island county of China. Ocean & Coastal Management 2023; 240: 106631. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106631
50. Kaluarachchi Y. Implementing data-driven smart city applications for future cities. Smart Cities 2022; 5(2): 455–474. doi: 10.3390/smartcities5020025
51. Silva BN, Khan M, Han K. Towards sustainable smart cities: A review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society 2018; 38: 697–713. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.053
52. Habib A, Alsmadi D, Prybutok VR. Factors that determine residents’ acceptance of smart city technologies. Behaviour & Information Technology 2019; 39(6): 610–623. doi: 10.1080/0144929x.2019.1693629
53. Labanauskaitė D, Fiore M, Stašys R. Use of E-marketing tools as communication management in the tourism industry. Tourism Management Perspectives 2020; 34: 100652. doi: 10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100652
54. Santos-Júnior A, Almeida-García F, Morgado P, et al. Residents’ quality of life in smart tourism destinations: A theoretical approach. Sustainability 2020; 12(20): 8445. doi: 10.3390/su12208445
55. Matteucci X, Koens K, Calvi L, et al. Envisioning the futures of cultural tourism. Futures 2022; 142: 103013. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2022.103013
56. Alizadeh H, Sharifi A. Societal smart city: Definition and principles for post-pandemic urban policy and practice. Cities 2023; 134: 104207. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104207
57. Zhao X, Xie C, Huang L, et al. How digitalization promotes the sustainable integration of culture and tourism for economic recovery. Economic Analysis and Policy 2023; 77: 988–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2023.01.005
58. Cudjoe D, Zhang H, Wang H. Predicting residents’ adoption intention for smart waste classification and collection system. Technology in Society 2023; 75: 102381. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102381
59. Lapuz MCM. The role of local community empowerment in the digital transformation of rural tourism development in the Philippines. Technology in Society 2023; 74: 102308. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102308
60. Boes K, Buhalis D, Inversini A. Smart tourism destinations: Ecosystems for tourism destination competitiveness. International Journal of Tourism Cities 2016; 2(2): 108–124. doi: 10.1108/ijtc-12-2015-0032
61. Viken A, Höckert E, Grimwood BSR. Cultural sensitivity: Engaging difference in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 2021; 89: 103223. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2021.103223
62. Del-Real C, Ward C, Sartipi M. What do people want in a smart city? Exploring the stakeholders’ opinions, priorities and perceived barriers in a medium-sized city in the United States. International Journal of Urban Sciences 2021; 27(sup1): 50–74. doi: 10.1080/12265934.2021.1968939
63. Ma XL, Wang R, Dai ML, et al. The action logic and interpretation framework of residents’ resistance in rural tourism development. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 2022; 51: 79–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.02.031
64. Soutar I, Devine-Wright P, Rohse M, et al. Constructing practices of engagement with users and communities: Comparing emergent state-led smart local energy systems. Energy Policy 2022; 171: 113279. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113279
65. Jolly D, Dimanche F. Investing in technology for tourism activities: Perspectives and challenges. Technovation 2009; 29(9): 576–579. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.05.004
66. Reino S, Frew AJ, Albacete‐Sáez C. ICT adoption and development: Issues in rural accommodation. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology 2011; 2(1): 66–80. doi: 10.1108/17579881111112421
67. Dar H. Conceptualizing the smart community in the ages of smart tourism: A literature perspective. Journal of Tourism and Development 2022; 39: 9–26.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Attambayintavida Vinodan, Sethumadhavan Meera, Mishra Shreeansh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Prof. Hung-Che Wu
Nanfang College Guangzhou, China
Processing Speed
-
-
-
- ＜7 days: submission to initial review decision;
-
-
-
- 35 days: received to accepted
- 57 days: received to online
Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.
