The importance of the government’s role in sustainable development in rural areas

Andi Cudai Nur, Tilemachos Koliopoulos, Risma Niswaty, Haedar Akib

Article ID: 2253
Vol 4, Issue 1, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/st.v4i1.2253
VIEWS - 127 (Abstract)

Abstract

This study focuses on developing tourist villages as sustainable tourist destinations. The aim of this research is to determine the role of the government in tourism development which is carried out in a comprehensive and integrated manner by wisely utilizing natural resources, culture and geographical conditions. sustainable development, especially in rural areas, is expected to contribute to increasing welfare, equality and environmental awareness for the community. The research method was carried out using a qualitative approach, using observation, documentation and interview techniques to collect various complete data and information by determining research data sources, collecting and analyzing qualitative data, making conclusions and recommendations. The research results show that the government's role is quite large, although it has not succeeded in achieving targets in implementing various tourism developments in rural areas related to three role indicators, namely: 1) regulator, 2) dynamist, and 3) facilitator.


Keywords

tourism village development; role of government; regulatory indicators; dynamists and facilitators

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Darsana IM, Sudjana IM. A literature study of Indonesian tourism human resources development in the era of society 5.0. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan 2022; 14(3): 2691–2700.

2. Lemy DM, Frans T, Pramezwary A. Tourism development in Indonesia. In: Delivering Tourism Intelligence. Emerald Publishing Limited; 2019. pp. 91–108.

3. Sutawa GK. Issues on Bali tourism development and community empowerment to support sustainable tourism development. Procedia Economics and Finance 2012; 4: 413–422. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00356-5

4. Büyüközkan G, Mukul E, Kongar E. Health tourism strategy selection via SWOT analysis and integrated hesitant fuzzy linguistic AHP-MABAC approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 2021; 74: 100929. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2020.100929

5. Kiper T. Role of ecotourism in sustainable development. In: Özyavuz M (editor). Advances in Landscape Architecture. IntechOpen; 2013.

6. Misra I. Tourism development and promotion in central kalimantan post pandemi Covid-19: A sustainable economic approach. International Journal of Business, Technology and Organizational Behavior (IJBTOB) 2023; 3(2): 73–85. doi: 10.52218/ijbtob.v3i2.264

7. Surya B, Syafri S, Sahban H, Sakti HH. Natural resource conservation based on community economic empowerment: Perspectives on watershed management and slum settlements in Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Land 2020; 9(4): 104. doi: 10.3390/land9040104

8. Couto G, Castanho RA, Pimentel P, et al. The impacts of COVID-19 crisis over the tourism expectations of the Azores archipelago residents. Sustainability 2020; 12(18): 7612. doi: 10.3390/su12187612

9. Nur AC. Policy strategy integrated development of tourism destinations in South Sulawesi. JISPO Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik 2019; 9(2): 203–217.

10. Hayward P, Tran GTH. At the edge: Heritage and tourism development in Vietnam’s Con Dao archipelago. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures 2014; 3(2): 113–124. doi: 10.1016/j.imic.2014.10.002

11. Islahuddin, Akib H, Eppang BM, et al. Reconstruction of the actor collaboration model in the development of marine tourism destinations in the new normal local economy. Linguistics and Culture Review 2021; 5(S2): 1505–1520. doi: 10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.2013

12. Wijaya N, Furqan A. Coastal tourism and climate-related disasters in an archipelago country of Indonesia: Tourists’ perspective. Procedia Engineering 2018; 212: 535–542. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.069

13. Svels K. World heritage, tourism and community involvement: A comparative study of the high coast (Sweden) and Kvarken archipelago (Finland). Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 2015; 15(1–2): 183–201. doi: 10.1080/15022250.2015.1009708

14. Fattah S, Rahman A. Analysis of regional economic development in the regency/municipality at South Sulawesi Province in Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 2013; 4(1): 1–9.

15. Kambo GA. Local wisdom Pasang ri Kajang as a political power in maintaining indigenous people’s rights. ETNOSIA: Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia 2021; 6(2): 265–280. doi: 10.31947/etnosia.v6i2.10585

16. Saleh H, Surya B, Ahmad DNA, Manda D. The role of natural and human resources on economic growth and regional development: With discussion of open innovation dynamics. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2020; 6(4): 103. doi: 10.3390/joitmc6040103

17. Nara N, Abdullah MT. Performance of state civil services at the population and civil registration services of Bulukumba District. Enrichment: Journal of Management 2022; 12(5): 3843–3848. doi: 10.35335/enrichment.v12i5.807

18. Douvere F, Ehler CN. New perspectives on sea use management: Initial findings from European experience with marine spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Management 2009; 90(1): 77–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.004

19. Dunning JH. Trade, location of economic activity and the MNE: A search for an eclectic approach. In: Ohlin B, Hesselborn PO, Wijkman PM (editors). The International Allocation of Economic Activity. Palgrave Macmillan; 1977. pp. 395–418.

20. Young OR, Osherenko C, Ekstrom J, et al. Solving the crisis in ocean governance: Place-based management of marine ecosystems. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 2007; 49(4): 20–32. doi: 10.3200/ENVT.49.4.20-33

21. Mensah J. Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences 2019; 5(1): 1653531. doi: 10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531

22. Nur R, Widayaty C, Reski P. Development in Bulukumba district. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Sciences Education (ICSSE 2020); 24–27 September 2020; Banjarmasin, Indonesia. pp. 389–393.

23. Yusuf H, Tamsah H, Ferial EW, et al. The influence of experience, education, and training, and work environment on the performance of village midwives in Bulukumba Regency. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management; 5–8 April 2021; Sao Paulo, Brazil. pp. 3622–3630.

24. Saleh H, Abubakar H, Suriani S. Determining factors affecting the interest in investment in Bulukumba area of South Sulawesi. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University 2020; 55(1): 1–17. doi: 10.35741/issn.0258-2724.55.1.35

25. Altukhov A, Drokin VV, Zhuravlev AS. From the food sovereignty ensuring strategy to the strategy of improving the Agro-food complex competitiveness. Economy of Regions 2016; 12(3): 852–864. doi: 10.17059/2016-3-20

26. Altieri MA, Toledo VM. The agroecological revolution in Latin America: Rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. Journal of Peasant Studies 2011; 38(3): 587–612. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.582947

27. Knop K. Re/statements: Feminism and state sovereignty in international law. In: The Nature of International Law, 1st ed. Routledge; 2001. pp. 385–436.

28. Jain PK, Gupta S, Yadav SS. Public Sector Enterprises In India. The Impact of Disinvestment and Self Obligation on Financial Performance. Springer; 2014.

29. Jerch R, Kahn ME, Li S. The efficiency of local government: The role of privatization and public sector unions. Journal of Public Economics 2017; 154: 95–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.08.003

30. Perez MS, Cannella GS. Disaster capitalism as neoliberal instrument for the construction of early childhood education/care policy: Charter schools in post-katrina New Orleans. International Critical Childhood Policy Studies Journal 2011; 4(1): 47–68.

31. Nonaka I, Hirose A, Takeda Y. Meso’‐foundations of dynamic capabilities: Team‐level synthesis and distributed leadership as the source of dynamic creativity. Global Strategy Journal 2016; 6(3): 168–182. doi: 10.1002/gsj.1125

32. Hasanah M. The role of parents in children memorizing the Qur’an in middle school based on the Amanatul ummah Islamic boarding school. TAFKIR: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education 2021; 2(2): 139–156. doi: 10.31538/tijie.v2i2.43

33. Bradshaw TK. The post-place community: Contributions to the debate about the definition of community. Community Development 2008; 39(1): 5–16. doi: 10.1080/15575330809489738

34. Davis K, Moore WE. Some principles of stratification. American Sociological Association 1945; 10(2): 242–249. doi: 10.2307/2085643

35. Loftus B. Police occupational culture: Classic themes, altered times. Policing and Society 2010; 20(1): 1–20. doi: 10.1080/10439460903281547

36. Kettl DF. The transformation of governance: Globalization, devolution, and the role of government. Public Administration Review 2000; 60(6): 488–497. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00112

37. Nur AC, Koliopoulos T, Guntur M, Wahyuni S. Tourism sustainability through the new normal era tourism area development strategy. Journal Emerging Environmental Technologies and Health Protection (JEETHP) 2022; 5(2): 26–38.

38. Nur AC, Niswaty R. Policy strategy for the development of integrated tourism destinations in the tourism village area of Bulukumba Regency, South Sulawesi. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Politik 2019; 9(2): 203–217.

39. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, And Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage; 2017.

40. Yusuf IDS, Rostitawati T, Obie M. Cultural and natural resources as a tourism destination in Gorontalo regency-Indonesia: its potentials, problems, and development. International Journal of Tourism & Hospitality Reviews 2019; 6(2): 1–7. doi: 10.18510/ijthr.2019.621

41. Nur AC, Koliopoulos T. Optimizing the management of rural area potential for Indonesia’s development towards industrialization in the flow of globalization. Journal Emerging Environmental Technologies and Health Protection (JEETHP) 2022; 5(1): 30–46.

42. Koliopoulos T, Valeri M. Efficient healthcare policy and engineering management facilities for planning sustainable tourism development in post-COVID-19 crisis recovery. In: Valeri M (editor). Tourism Risk. Emerald Publishing Limited; 2022. pp. 155–162. doi: 10.1108/978-1-80117-708-520221011

43. Koliopoulos T, Papakonstantinou D, Ciarkowska K, et al. Green designs in hydraulics—Construction infrastructures for safe agricultural tourism and sustainable sports tourism facilities mitigating risks of tourism in crisis at post COVID-19 era. In: de Carvalho JV, Liberato P, Peña A (editors). Advances in Tourism, Technology and Systems. Springer; 2022. pp. 37–47. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-9701-2_4

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Andi Cudai Nur, Tilemachos Koliopoulos, Risma Niswaty, Haedar Akib

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).