Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. specializes in international journal publishing business. Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. adopts the Open Access publishing mode, and provides an important bridge for communication and sharing for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, agriculture and forestry, psychology policy.
Understanding the governance of smart destinations: The case of Florianopolis in Brazil
Vol 2, Issue 1, 2021
VIEWS - 107 (Abstract)
Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the process of tourism governance based on innovation in the use of ICT as a factor in the development of a smart tourism destination, and its relationship with public-private networks. The empirical analysis refers to the case study of the city of Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil. Therefore, the following methods were used: literature review, documentary analysis, in-depth and semi-structured interviews with tourism agents of the destination, and content analysis. The Atlas TI 8 software was used for data processing, which enabled a more detailed analysis in the understanding of the object of study of the research, through networks and conceptual maps in the cross-referencing of information. The results show that public-private relationships based on trust, joint decision-making, informal structures, strategic consensus, and the use of ICTs, seem to have a positive impact on the level of development and innovation in the smart tourism destination.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. López-Ávila A, Sánchez-García S. Destinos turísticos inteligentes (Spanish) [Smart tourism destinations]. Harvard Deusto Business Review 2013; 61–69.
2. Santos-Júnior A, Mendes-Filho L, Almeida-Garcí AF, et al. Smart tourism destinations: A study based on the vision of the stakeholders. Revista Turismo em Análise 2017; 28(3): 358–379.
3. Buhalis D, Amaranggana A. Smart tourism destinations. In: Xiang Z, Tussyadiah I (editors). Information and communication technologies in tourism. Dublin: Springer; 2014. p. 553–564.
4. Urban Systems [Interent]. Ranking connect smart cities. 2017. Available from: http://wwwconnectedsmartcitiescombr/resultados–do–ranking–connected–smartcities.
5. Endeavor [Internet]. Entrepreneurial cities index. 2017 [cited 2019]. Available from: http://infbendeavororgbr/ice2017.
6. Fernandes S. SmartCities: Inclusion sustainability resilience. Portugal: Ed Glaciar; 2017.
7. European Union. Directorate general for internal policies. Policy department A: Economic and scientific policy mapping smart cities in the EU. 2014 [cited 2019]. Available from: http://wwweuroparleuropaeu/studies.
8. Gobierno de españa, Ministerio de Industria, Energía and Turismo. Informe destinos turísticos inteligentes: Construyendo el futuro (Spanish) [Smart tourism destinations report: Building the future]. Madrid: SEGITTUR; 2015. Available from: https://wwwsegittures/opencms/export/sites/segitur/content/galerias/descargas/proyectos/Libro-Blanco-Destinos-Tursticos-Inteligentes-ok_enpdf.
9. Instituto valenciano de Tecnologías Turísticas. Destino Turístico Inteligente: Manual operativo para la configuración de destinos turísticos inteligentes (Spanish) [Smart tourist destination: Operational manual for the configuration of smart tourist destinations]. Alicante, Spain: University Institute of Tourism Research, University of Alicante; 2015.
10. Torres G, Ramos HA. Gobernanza y territorios: Notas para la implementación de políticas para el desarrollo (Spanish) [Governance and territories: Notes for the implementation of policies for development]. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Políticas Y Sociales 2008.
11. Stoker G. Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal 1998; 50(155): 17–28.
12. Rhodes RAW. The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies 1996; 44(4): 652–667.
13. Kooiman J, Van Vliet M. Governance and public management. In: Eliassen KA, Kooiman J (editors). Managing public organizations: Lessons from Contemporary European Experience. London: Sage; 1993. p. 58–72.
14. Flores FM (editor). Governance applications in SMEs for better decision making in the tourism industry. The datatu Mexico system. In: First International Conference on Measurement and Economic Analysis of Regional Tourism. Spain. San Sebastian: Donostia; 2009. p. 1–11.
15. UNDP. Good governance and sustainable human development. In: Governance for sustainable human development: A UNDP policy document. New York: UNDP; 1997. p. 1–11.
16. Edgar L, Marshall C, Bassett M. Partnerships: Putting good governance principles in practice Ottawa Ontario Canada: Institution Governance; 2006.
17. Nordin S, Svensson B. Innovative destination governance: the Swedish ski resort of Are. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation 2007; 8(1): 53–66.
18. Sitkin SB, Roth NL. Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organization Science 1993; 4(3): 367–392.
19. Bies RJ, Tripp TM. Beyond distrust: “Getting even” and the need for revenge. In: Kramer RM, Tyler TR (editors). Organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1996. p. 246–260.
20. Hwang W. Conceptualizing inter-regional partnership for tourism promotion: In case of the East Asia inter-regional tourism forum (EATOF). Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 2001; 6(1): 26–36.
21. Zhang X. Critical success factors for public-private partnerships in infrastructure development. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2005; 131(1): 3–14.
22. Beritelli P, Bieget T, Laesset C. Destination governance: Using corporate governance theories as a foundation for effective destination management. Journal of Travel Research 2007; 46: 96–107.
23. Rusko RT, Kylanen M, Saari R. Supply chain in tourism destinations. The case of Levi resort in Finnish Lapland. International Journal of Tourism Research 2009; 11: 71–87.
24. Robterson JP. An assessment of collaborative governance in a network for sustainable tourism: The case of Rede Turis. International Journal of Public Administration 2011; 34(5): 279–290.
25. Della Corte V, Aria M. Why strategic networks often fail: Some empirical evidence from the area of Naples. Tourism Management 2014; 45: 3–15.
26. Gomes C. A construção social de um destino turístico: Coimbra cidade e imaginário (Spanish) [The social construction of a tourist destination: Coimbra city and imagination]. In: Proceedings of the VI Portuguese Congress of Sociology Social Worlds: Knowledge and Practices. Portuguese Association of Sociology: APS (org); 2009.
27. Bolivar M, Meijer AJ. Smart governance: Using a literature review and empirical analysis to build a research model. Social Science Computer Review 2016; 34(6): 673–692.
28. Dawes SS. The evolution and continuing challenges of e-governance. Public Administration Review 2008; 68(s1).
29. Saxena KBC. Towards excellence in e–governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management 2005; 18(6); 498–513.
30. Gil AC. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa (Spanish) [How to prepare research projects]. São Paulo: Editora Atlas; 2002.
31. Bardini L. Content analysis Madrid: Akal Edícíones; 1996.
32. Sampieri HR, Collado CF, Lucio PB. Metodología de la investigación (Spanish) [Investigation methodology]. México: McGraw-Hill; 1998.
33. Cañas AJ, Ford KM, Coffey J, et al. Tools for building and sharing concept map-based knowledge models. Journal of educational computing 2000; 13(2): 145–158.
34. Federation of Industries of Santa Catarina [Internet]. Rotas estratégicas setoriais para a indústria catarinense 2022: Turismo (Spanish) [Sectoral strategic routes for the catarinense industry 2022: Tourism]. Florianopolis: FIESC; 2014. Available from: http://www.fecomercio-sc.com.br/noticias/santacatarina-ganha-planejamento-do-turismoate-2022/.
35. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e estatísticas [Internet]. Dados sobre florianópolis (Spanish) [Dice about florianopolis]. 2015 [updated 2017]. Available from: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/sc/florianopolis/panorama.
36. Gomes EL, Gândara JM, Ivars-Baidal J. É importante ser um destino turístico inteligente? A compreensão dos gestores públicos dos destinos do Estado do Paraná (Spanish) [Is it important to be a smart tourist destination? Under the understanding of two public managers two destinations of the State of Paraná]. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo 2017; 11(3): 503–536.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
