Outage performance of users in CR-NOMA network systems

Huu Q. Tran

Article ID: 2846
Vol 2, Issue 4, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/cte2846
Received: 23 August 2024; Accepted: 9 October 2024; Available online: 26 October 2024;
Issue release: 30 December 2024

VIEWS - 2590 (Abstract)

Download PDF

Abstract

Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) and Cognitive Radio (CR) technologies present viable solutions to mitigate spectrum scarcity in wireless communication systems. This paper focuses on evaluating the performance of CR-NOMA networks, particularly for user devices operating under a Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer (SWIPT) framework. We derive explicit mathematical expressions for key performance metrics, including outage probability (OP) and system throughput, as they relate to various power allocation coefficients. Comprehensive simulations are conducted to validate our theoretical findings, revealing that appropriate power allocation significantly impacts user fairness and overall network throughput. The analysis covers a wide range of realistic channel conditions, including Rayleigh fading, to ensure robustness. Additionally, our study addresses the challenge of limiting interference to the primary network by optimizing the transmission power of secondary users while adhering to interference constraints. The results show that the primary user device (D1) consistently outperforms the secondary user device (D2), emphasizing the importance of strategic resource management. These contributions provide deeper insights into the factors affecting outage performance in CR-NOMA systems, offering effective solutions for enhancing the robustness, fairness, and efficiency of next-generation wireless communication networks.


Keywords

cognitive radio; cooperative relaying; non-orthogonal multiple access; simultaneous wireless information and power transfer


References

1. Weinberg S. Gravitation and Cosmology. New York: Wiley; 1972.

2. Gu YQ. Dynamical Reason for a Cyclic Universe. Symmetry. 2021; 13(12): 2272. doi: 10.3390/sym13122272

3. Caldwell RR, Dave R, Steinhardt PJ. Cosmological Imprint of an Energy Component with General Equation of State. Physical Review Letters. 1998; 80(8): 1582–1585. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.80.1582

4. Turner MS. Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the Universe. Physica Scripta. 2000; T85(1): 210. doi: 10.1238/physica.topical.085a00210

5. Peebles PJE, Ratra B. The cosmological constant and dark energy. Reviews of Modern Physics. 2003; 75(2): 559–606. doi: 10.1103/revmodphys.75.559

6. Carroll SM. Quintessence and the Rest of the World: Suppressing Long-Range Interactions. Physical Review Letters. 1998; 81: 3067. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3067

7. Zlatev I, Wang LM, Steinhardt PJ. Quintessence, Cosmic Coincidence, and the Cosmological Constant. Physical Review Letters. 1999; 82: 896-899. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.896

8. Faraoni V. Inflation and quintessence with nonminimal coupling. Physical Review D. 2000; 62: 023504. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.023504

9. Gasperini M, Piazza F, Veneziano G. Quintessence as a runaway dilaton. Physical Review D. 2002; 65: 023508. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.023508

10. Capozziello S. Curvature Quintessence. International Journal of Modern Physics D. 2002; 11: 483. doi: 10.1142/S0218271802002025

11. Caldwell RR, Linder EV. Limits of Quintessence. Physical Review letter. 2005; 95: 141301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.141301

12. Astashenok AV, Nojiri S, Odintsov SD, Scherrer RJ. Scalar dark energy models mimicking ΛCDM with arbitrary future evolution. Physics Letters B. 2012; 713: 145-153. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.06.017

13. Tsujikawa S. Quintessence: A review. Quantum Gravity. 2013; 30: 214003. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/30/21/214003

14. Shahalam M, Pathak SD, Verma MM, et al. Dynamics of interacting quintessence. The European Physical Journal C. 2015; 75(8): 395. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3608-1

15. Han C, Pi S, Sasaki M. Quintessence saves Higgs instability. Physics Letters B. 2019; 791: 314-318. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.02.037

16. Sahni V. The cosmological constant problem and quintessence. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 2002; 19(13): 3435–3448. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/19/13/304

17. S. Turner M, Huterer D. Cosmic Acceleration, Dark Energy, and Fundamental Physics. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan. 2007; 76(11): 111015. doi: 10.1143/jpsj.76.111015

18. Ishak M. Remarks on the Formulation of the Cosmological Constant/Dark Energy Problems. Foundations of Physics. 2007; 37(10): 1470–1498. doi: 10.1007/s10701-007-9175-z

19. Szydłowski M, Kurek A, Krawiec A. Top ten accelerating cosmological models. Physics Letters B. 2006; 642(3): 171–178. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2006.09.052

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Huu Q. Tran

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/