Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.
Research on performance evaluation of rural revitalization project based on value engineering theory
Vol 1, Issue 1, 2021
VIEWS - 1482 (Abstract)
Download PDF
Abstract
At present, domestic research on rural revitalization mostly focuses on countermeasures and evaluation indicators, and there is little concern about rural performance evaluation. Based on the value engineering theory, this paper constructs the performance evaluation index system model of rural revitalization project, and applies Shapley method, triangular fuzzy number method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to perform indicator weighting and quantitative aggregation of data of the functional elements and cost, and uses the value coefficient as the evaluation criteria of the performance level of rural revitalization project, in order to judge the level of performance of rural revitalization project, analyze the resource utilization efficiency in the implementation process of rural revitalization project, and then point out the direction for the performance optimization measures of rural revitalization project.
Keywords
References
1. Cha J. The value engineering analyses of the cost risks for the general contract for the Olympic stadiums projects [Master’s Thesis]. Beijing: Beijing University of Chemical Technology; 2007. p. 91.
2. Wu Z. New requirements and path innovation of human capital development based on rural revitalization. Theory and Reform 2018; (6): 44–52.
3. Bao R, Liu S. Protecting and excavating rural culture to boost rural revitalization (in Chinese). Hengshui Ribao, November 12, 2018.
4. Zhao P, Wang H. Integration of three industries and opening up the context of rural industry revitalization (in Chinese). Nongcun Jingying Guanli 2018; (11): 20.
5. Liu W. Basic path of rural revitalization guided by grass-roots party building (in Chinese). Gansu Ribao, October 30, 2018.
6. Zheng J, Yang T. Construction of rural revitalization evaluation index system (in Chinese). Rural Economy and Science-Technology 2018; (17): 38–40.
7. Wei J, Lian Y. Research on evaluation index system of rural revitalization. Price: Theory & Practice 2018; (9): 82–85.
8. Hall C，Mcvittie A, Moran D. What does the public want from agriculture and the countryside? A review of evidence and methods. Journal of Rural Studies 2004; 20(2): 211–225.
9. Elands BHM, Wiersum KF. Forestry and rural development in European exploration of socio-political discourses. Forest Policy and Economics 2001; (3): 5–16.
10. Li S, Li J. Study on assessment and evaluation of new socialist countryside construction in Tianjin (in Chinese). Journal of Agrotechnical Economics 2006; (6): 60–64.
11. Tang S, Zheng T. Limitations of public and private law on ecological cost control (in Chinese). Social Scientist 2006; (1): 97–102.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Baoji Zhu, Renyong Hou, Jiaxing Xiao, Qing Yan
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Zhibiao Gao
Nankai University, China