Owing to the incentives and constraints imposed by the green credit policy of 2012 in China, and in an attempt to try and secure more green credit, firms may choose to hypocritically disclose, in their environmental information disclosure documents, only a portion of the truth regarding their environmental practices. Although researchers have greatly explored the environmental impacts of the green credit policy, rarely have studies probed into the policy’s effects on firms’ environmental disclosure strategies. This study explores the impact of the green credit policy on listed firms’ hypocritical strategies regarding their environmental information disclosure. This study employs a theoretical and an empirical analysis, a difference-in-differences model, and data of Chinese listed companies from 2010–2017. We find that, after green credit policy implementation in 2012, firms are prone to adopting a catering strategy involving more, and more positive, environmental information disclosures and a concomitant fulfillment of less of their environmental responsibilities. Robustness tests consistently demonstrate pronounced catering behaviors among listed firms. The heterogeneous analyses indicate that firms that are non-heavily polluting and are located in cities with high financial development are more likely to adopt catering strategies. The internal reason why firms adopt catering strategies is the financial constraint effect caused by the green credit policy, while external reasons include rare capital market responses to catering behaviors.

1. Wang Y, Mao Q. Annual report on the development of global green finance (2022). Social Science Reference Publisher; 2023.

2. He L, Gan S, Zhong T. The impact of green credit policy on firms’ green strategy choices: Green innovation or green-washing? Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022; 29: 73307–73325. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20973-w

3. Dhaliwal DS. Li OZ. Tsang A, Yang YG. Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review. 2011; 86(1): 59–100.

4. Marquis C, Toffel MW, Zhou YH. Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of green-washing. Organization Science. 2016; 27: 483–504. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2015.1039

5. Huang Y. Government subsidies and corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2022; 74: 101480. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101480

6. Clarkson PM, Li Y, Richardson GD, Vasvari FP. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2008; 33: 303–327. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003

7. Lyon TP, Maxwell JW. Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy. 2011; 20: 3–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00282.x

8. Hu G, Wang X, Wang Y. Can the green credit policy stimulate green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Energy Economics. 2021; 98: 105134. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105134

9. Xing C, Zhang Y, Tripe D. Green credit policy and corporate access to bank loans in China: The role of environmental disclosure and green innovation. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2021; 77: 101838. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101838

10. Su T, Meng L, Wang K, Wu J. The role of green credit in carbon neutrality: Evidence from the breakthrough technological innovation of renewable energy firms. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2023; 101: 107135. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107135

11. Lai X, Yue S, Chen H. Can green credit increase firm value? Evidence from Chinese listed new energy companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021; 29: 18702–18720. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17038-9

12. Yao S, Pan Y, Sensoy A, et al. Green credit policy and firm performance: What we learn from China. Energy Economics. 2021; 101: 105415. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105415

13. Liu X, Wang E, Cai D. Green credit policy, property rights and debt financing: Quasi-natural experimental evidence from China. Finance Research Letters. 2019; 29: 129–135. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2019.03.014

14. Li W, Cui G, Zheng M. Does green credit policy affect corporate debt financing? Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021; 29: 5162–5171. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16051-2

15. Sun J, Wang F., Yin H, Zhang B. Money talks: The environmental impact of China’s green credit policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2019; 38: 653–680. doi: 10.1002/pam.22137

16. Zhang S, Wu Z, Wang Y, Hao Y. Fostering green development with green finance: An empirical study on the environmental effect of green credit policy in China. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021; 296: 113159. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113159

17. Chen Y, Xu Z, Wang X, Yang Y. How does green credit policy improve corporate social responsibility in China? An analysis based on carbon-intensive listed firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2022; 30: 889–904. doi: 10.1002/csr.2395.

18. Zhang A, Deng R, Wu Y. Does the green credit policy reduce the carbon emission intensity of heavily pollution industries? Evidence from China’s industries sectors. Journal of Environmental Management. 2022; 311: 114815. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114815

19. Li Y, Liao M, Liu Y. How does green credit policy affect polluting firms’ dividend policy? The China experience. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2023; 88: 102631. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102631

20. Cuny C. Voluntary disclosure incentives: Evidence from the municipal bond market. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2016; 62: 87–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2016.04.004

21. Gerged AM. Factors affecting corporate environmental disclosure in emerging markets: The role of corporate governance structures. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2020; 30: 609–629. doi: 10.1002/bse.2642

22. Huang Q, Li Y, Lin M, McBrayer GA. Natural disasters, risk salience, and corporate ESG disclosure. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2021; 72: 102152. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.102152

23. Fan H, Peng Y, Wang H, Xu Z. Greening through finance? Journal of Development Economics. 2021; 152: 102683. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102683

24. André FJ, Valenciano-Salazar JA. Voluntary carbon neutral programs. Adoption and firm’s strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022; 381: 135191. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135191

25. Zhang K, Wang Y, Huang Z. Do the green credit guidelines affect renewable energy investment? Empirical research from China. Sustainability. 2021; 13: 9331. doi: 10.3390/su13169331

26. Ma Y, Lu L, Cui J, Shi X. Can green credit policy stimulate firms’ green investments? International Review of Economics & Finance. 2024; 91: 123–137. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.01.009

27. Huang X, Xie J. Impact of green credit policies on the global value chain position of heavy polluting enterprises. Energy Policy. 2024; 192: 114269. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114269

28. Xu X, Li J. Asymmetric impacts of the policy and development of green credit on the debt financing cost and maturity of different types of enterprises in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020; 264: 121574. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121574

29. Zhao J, Huang J, Liu F. Green credit policy and investment-cash flow sensitivity: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Finance Research Letters. 2023; 52: 103502. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.103502

30. Li Z. Will cheap talk on environmental responsibility get punished (Chinese)? World Economy. 2018; 167–187.

31. Li C, Wang X. Local peer effects of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2022; 73: 102187. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102187

32. Bajo E, Chemmanur TJ, Simonyan K, Tehranian H. Underwriter networks, investor attention, and initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics. 2016; 122(2): 376–408. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.12.001

33. Degryse H, Goncharenko R, Theunisz C, Vadasz T. When green meets green: Environmental risk-pricing by banks. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2023; 78: 102355. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2023.102355

34. Zhou G, Liu C, Luo S. Resource allocation effect of green credit policy: Based on DID model. Mathematics. 2021; 9: 159–177. doi: 10.3390/math9020159

35. Liu Y, Yang C, Zhou S, Zhang Y. Research on the impact of green credit policy on environmental information disclosure (Chinese). Statistical Research. 2022; 39: 73–87.

36. Cho CH, Patten DM. The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2007; 32: 639–647. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009

37. Si L, Cao H. Does green credit policies improve corporate environmental social responsibility: The perspective of external constraints and internal concerns (Chinese). China Industrial Economics. 2022; 4: 137–155.

38. Sun X, Chen T, Ma X. Catering behavior of firms’ carbon information disclosure: Identification, premium loss and mechanisms (Chinese). China Industrial Economics. 2023; 1: 132–150.

39. Hu X, Hua R, Liu Q, Wang C. The green fog: Environmental rating disagreement and corporate greenwashing. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2023; 78: 101952. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.101952

40. Luo Y, Xiong G, Mardani A. Environmental information disclosure and corporate innovation: The “inverted U-shaped” regulation effect of media attention. Journal of Business Research. 2022; 146: 453–463. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.089

41. Xiong G, Luo Y. Smog, media attention, and corporate social responsibility—empirical evidence from Chinese polluting listed companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021; 28: 46116–46129. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11978-4

42. Wen H, Lee C. Zhou F. Green credit policy, credit allocation efficiency and upgrade of energy-intensive enterprises. Energy Economics. 2021; 94: 105099. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105099

43. Yang Y, Zhang J, Li Y. The effects of environmental information disclosure on stock price synchronicity in China. Heliyon. 2023; 9: e16271. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16271

44. Ren X, Zeng G, Sun X. The peer effect of digital transformation and corporate environmental performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Economic Modelling. 2023; 128: 106515. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106515

45. Zhang Z, You J. Does firm’s ESG information disclosure have contagion effect? Evidence from China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2024; 31(4): 3274–3296. doi: 10.1002/csr.2737

46. Yu EP, Luu BV, Chen CH. Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Research in International Business and Finance. 2020; 52: 101192. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192

47. Rambachan A, Roth J. A more credible approach to parallel trends. The Review of Economic Studies. 2023; 90: 2555–2591. doi: 10.1093/restud/rdad018

48. Wen W, Ke Y, Liu X. Customer concentration and corporate social responsibility performance: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review. 2021; 46: 100755. doi: 10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100755

49. Zhang D. Does green finance really inhibit extreme hypocritical ESG risk? A greenwashing perspective exploration. Energy Economics. 2023; 121: 106688. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106688

50. Olatubosun P, Nyazenga S. Greenwashing and Responsible Investment Practices: Empirical Evidence from Zimbabwe. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets. 2021; 13(1): 16‒36. doi: 10.1108/QRFM-12-2017-0125

51. Ying QW, He SY. Corporate innovation strategy under government R&D subsidy: indiscriminate or excellence (Chinese). Nankai Management Review. 2022; 25(2): 57–69.

52. Walker K, Wan F. The harm of symbolic actions and green-washing: Corporate actions and communications on environmental performance and their financial implications. Journal of Business Ethics. 2012; 109: 227–242. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-1122-4

53. Testa F, Miroshnychenko I, Barontini R, Frey M. Does it pay to be a greenwasher or a brownwasher? Business Strategy and the Environment. 2018; 27: 1104–1116. doi: 10.1002/bse.2058

54. Bolton P, Kacperczyk M. Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics. 2021; 142: 517–549. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008