Publication Frequency
Semi-annual
Journal Articles
Search
Search scope
Volume Arrangement
Featured Articles
The exacerbation of climate change impacts within metropolitan areas is a well-documented phenomenon, often leading to severe consequences that pose significant risks to human populations. The impact of urban vegetation and planting design on these factors can be observed. However, it is worth mentioning that while there is an extensive body of literature on the consequences of climate change, there is a relatively small number of studies specifically focused on examining the role of vegetation as a mitigating factor in urban environments. This review paper aims to critically examine existing studies pertaining to the role of urban vegetation in mitigating the detrimental effects of the urban environment. The objective is to offer practical recommendations that can be implemented by city planners. By conducting a comprehensive examination of the literature available in Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, employing specific keywords pertaining to urban vegetation and climate change, we have identified five prominent concerns pertaining to the urban environment. These concerns encompass particulate matter, gaseous pollution, noise pollution, water runoff, and the urban heat island effect. The present analysis highlights that the impact of urban vegetation on the negative consequences of climate change cannot be unequivocally classified as either positive or negative. This is due to the fact that the influence of urban greenery is intricately connected to factors such as the arrangement, makeup, and dispersion of vegetation, as well as the specific management criteria employed. Hence, this research has the potential to enhance comprehension of the multifaceted nature of urban green spaces and establish a solid groundwork for subsequent investigations.
Tourism has been instrumental in fostering regional economic growth, enhancing the quality of life of residents, and boosting the image of urban areas in Shaanxi, thanks to the accelerated economic and social development of recent years. Nevertheless, the issue of aligning urban development and tourism in terms of space, resources, and the industrial chain remains a significant concern. This paper establishes an evaluation index system for tourism and urban development in the Shaanxi region from 2009 to 2019. It then employs the systematic coupling coordination model to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the coupling coordination degree of tourism and urban development in the region, as well as its various influencing factors. The study demonstrates that the coupling and coordination degree of tourism and urban development in the Shaanxi region exhibited a trend of continuous improvement from 2009 to 2019. The region underwent three stages of development: “uncoordinated development (2009–2011), transformation development (2012–2016), and coordinated development (2017–2019).” The coupling coordination level was elevated from “mild dissonance” to “intermediate coordination” in 2019. In contrast, the tourism economic development of Shaanxi cities remains unequal, as evidenced by the existence of two distinct categories of development: the “lagging tourism economy” and the “coordinated tourism economy.” The findings of this investigation indicate that the general trend of urban development and tourism in Shaanxi is favorable; however, the disparities in the progress of the tourism economy among cities necessitate additional regional coordination and cooperation. The theoretical support for the relevant research and a reference basis for tourism development planning and urban policy making are provided by the evaluation index system and the systematic coupling coordination model proposed in this paper. This will facilitate the sustainable and coordinated development of the tourism industry and cities in Shaanxi.
A review of global carbon emission management studies
Article ID: 2753
Vol 5, Issue 1, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ec.v5i1.2753
Vol 5, Issue 1, 2024
Received: 16 March 2024; Accepted: 18 May 2024; Available online: 29 May 2024; Issue release: 30 June 2024
Download PDF
Abstract
Under the background of climate warming, the importance of global carbon emission management has become more and more significant. This article reviews and organizes the existing literature on carbon emission management, focusing on the research status from the perspectives of economic instruments for carbon reduction and international cooperation. It explores the economic effects of different policy tools and the emission reduction measures of various countries. This article intends to see the progress and shortcomings of global climate governance through the organization of past research results and provide directions for future research.
Keywords
carbon emission management; economic instruments; international cooperation
References
- International Energy Agency. CO2 Emissions in 2023: A new record high, but is there light at the end of the tunnel? Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-in-2023 (accessed on 2 March 2024).
- World bank. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2020. World Bank; 2020. doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1586-7
- Poterba J. Tax Policy to Combat Global Warming: On Designing a Carbon Tax. National Bureau of Economic Research; 1991. doi: 10.3386/w3649
- Bovenberg AL, Goulder LH. Optimal Environmental Taxation in the Presence of Other Taxes: General- Equilibrium Analyses. The American Economic Review. 1996; 86(4): 985-1000.
- Goulder LH. Effects of Carbon Taxes in an Economy with Prior Tax Distortions: An Intertemporal General Equilibrium Analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 1995; 29(3): 271-297. doi: 10.1006/jeem.1995.1047
- Cornwell A, Creedy J. Carbon Taxation, Prices and Inequality in Australia. Fiscal Studies. 1996; 17(3): 21-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.1996.tb00492.x
- Callan T, Lyons S, Scott S, et al. The distributional implications of a carbon tax in Ireland. Energy Policy. 2009; 37(2): 407-412. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.034
- Andersson JJ. Carbon Taxes and CO2 Emissions: Sweden as a Case Study. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy. 2019; 11(4): 1-30. doi: 10.1257/pol.20170144
- Meckling J. Carbon Coalitions: Business, Climate Politics, and the Rise of Emissions Trading. The MIT Press; 2011; doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9078.001.0001
- Wang ZJ, Zhao LT. The impact of the global stock and energy market on EU ETS: A structural equation modelling approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021; 289: 125140. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125140
- Bakam I, Pajot G, Matthews RB. Estimating carbon price from a closed emissions trading scheme in the agricultural sector. Journal of Land Use Science. 2012; 7(2): 221-238. doi: 10.1080/1747423x.2011.563324
- Jiang J, Ye B, Ma X, Miao L. Controlling GHG emissions from the transportation sector through an ETS: institutional arrangements in Shenzhen, China. Climate Policy. 2015; 16(3): 353-371. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.1003526
- Pan W, Kim MK, Ning Z, Yang H. Carbon leakage in energy/forest sectors and climate policy implications using meta-analysis. Forest Policy and Economics. 2020; 115: 102161. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102161
- Timilsina GR. Carbon Taxes. Journal of Economic Literature. 2022; 60(4): 1456-1502. doi: 10.1257/jel.20211560
- Goulder LH, Schein AR. Carbon Taxes Versus Cap And Trade: A Critical Review. Climate Change Economics. 2013; 4(3): 1350010. doi: 10.1142/s2010007813500103
- Tong J, Yue T, Xue J. Carbon taxes and a guidance-oriented green finance approach in China: Path to carbon peak. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022; 367: 133050. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133050
- Bonnie R, Carey M, Petsonk A. Protecting terrestrial ecosystems and the climate through a global carbon market. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2002; 360(1797): 1853-1873. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1036
- Kim Y, Tanaka K, Matsuoka S. Environmental and economic effectiveness of the Kyoto Protocol. PLOS ONE. 2020; 15(7): e0236299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236299
- Jalil SA, Wan Mohamed WM. Carbon dioxide emissions and institutional factors in developing nations: An application of the GMM technique. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021; 685(1): 012008. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/685/1/012008
- Ali H, Tiwari SK. Overview of Legal and Policy Measures of Carbon Trading and Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) In India. Current World Environment. 2021; 16(1): 259-267. doi: 10.12944/cwe.16.1.26
- Gechev V. The Puny Success of the Kyoto Protocol. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published online 2020. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3658757
- Mor S, Aneja R, Madan S, Ghimire M. Kyoto Protocol and Paris Agreement: Transition from Bindings to Pledges – A Review. Millennial Asia. 2023; 097639962211415. doi: 10.1177/09763996221141546
- Öker F, Adıgüzel H. Reporting for Carbon Trading and International Accounting Standards. Accounting and Corporate Reporting - Today and Tomorrow. Published online September 20, 2017. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.68959
- Bataille C, Åhman M, Neuhoff K, et al. A review of technology and policy deep decarbonization pathway options for making energy-intensive industry production consistent with the Paris Agreement. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018; 187: 960-973. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.107
- Dong C, Dong X, Jiang Q, et al. What is the probability of achieving the carbon dioxide emission targets of the Paris Agreement? Evidence from the top ten emitters. Science of The Total Environment. 2018; 622-623: 1294-1303. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.093
- Hekkert MP, Van den Reek J, Worrell E, Turkenburg WC. The impact of material efficient end-use technologies on paper use and carbon emissions. Resources, conservation and recycling. 2002; 6(3): 241-266. doi: 10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00081-2
- Mason B, Perks MP. Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) forests in Atlantic Europe: changes in forest management and possible consequences for carbon sequestration. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 2011; 26(S11): 72-81. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2011.564383
- Wiedinmyer C, Hurteau MD. Prescribed Fire As a Means of Reducing Forest Carbon Emissions in the Western United States. Environmental Science & Technology. 2010; 44(6): 1926-1932. doi: 10.1021/es902455e
- Wang Y, Hirvonen J, Qu K, et al. The Impact of Energy Renovation on Continuously and Intermittently Heated Residential Buildings in Southern Europe. Buildings. 2022; 12(9): 1316. doi: 10.3390/buildings12091316
- Sun L, Wang X, Hu Z, et al. Carbon reduction and cost control of container shipping in response to the European Union Emission Trading System. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2024; 31(14): 21172-21188. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32434-7
- Freedman O, Freedman M, Stagliano AJ. Assessing CO2 emissions reduction: Progress toward the Kyoto Protocol goals in the European Union. International Journal of Business and Social Research. 2015; 5(11): 75-86.
- Herrador M, de Jong W, Nasu K, Granrath L. Circular economy and zero-carbon strategies between Japan and South Korea: A comparative study. Science of The Total Environment. 2022; 820: 153274.
- Erdoğan S, Yıldırım S, Yıldırım DÇ, Gedikli A. The effects of innovation on sectoral carbon emissions: Evidence from G20 countries. Journal of Environmental Management. 2020; 267: 110637. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110637
- Hu S, Zhang P, Wei T. Financial Measures to Reduce Carbon Emissions in Britain, Japan and the United States: A SWOT Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(17): 10771. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710771
- Zhang Y, Kang W, Wang M, Zhuang L. Carbon Tariffs’ Impacts on China’s Economy and Carbon Emission: A Study Based on META-Regression Analysis. Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies. 2019; 07(03): 1950012. doi: 10.1142/s234574811950012x
- Bosetti V, Carraro C, Tavoni M. Delayed Participation of Developing Countries to Climate Agreements: Should Action in the EU and US be Postponed? SSRN Electronic Journal. Published online 2008. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1266143
- Hu Y, Ren S, Wang Y, Chen X. Can carbon emission trading scheme achieve energy conservation and emission reduction? Evidence from the industrial sector in China. Energy Economics. 2020; 85: 104590. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104590
- Garg A, Avashia V. Carbon competition up above: estimating greenhouse gas emissions of Indian domestic airlines. Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management. 2011; 1(2): 93-104. doi: 10.1080/20430779.2011.579345
- Dash DP, Behera SR, Rao DT, et al. Governance, urbanization, and pollution: A cross-country analysis of global south region. Cogent Economics & Finance. 2020; 8(1): 1742023. doi: 10.1080/23322039.2020.1742023
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jinxi Deng
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Editor-in-Chief
Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Indexing & Archiving
.jpg)
.jpg)
News & Announcements
2024-08-08
Meet our new EBMs!
The journal is pleased to welcome a new team of editorial board members dedicated to collaborating in order to elevate the journal's quality and prominence.
2024-07-11
Eco-cities are becoming a reality!
In the context of eco-city development, the term "eco-city" encompasses a multifaceted ecosystem characterized by the interdependence of natural, social, and economic systems. This concept emphasizes the need for sustainability through environmental friendliness, social equity, and economic growth. Various models of eco-cities, including garden cities, green cities, and landscape cities, reflect the ongoing exploration of achieving harmony between humans and nature in urban living environments.
Member Application
Journal Center
Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.
