Rethinking institutional coordination as a transformational issue in providing and administering urban land for housing development in Ethiopia: Evidence from Bahir Dar metropolitan city

Mitiku Alemayehu Emiru, Achamyeleh Gashu Adam, Teshome Taffa Dadi

Article ID: 2738
Vol 5, Issue 1, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ec.v5i1.2738
VIEWS - 70 (Abstract)

Abstract

Institutional coordination and robust land administration are essential to ensuring sustainable land delivery and housing development in fast-growing cities. It also benefits urban dwellers, particularly low-income groups and homeless individuals. Despite efforts, Ethiopia’s metropolitan areas have institutional coordination challenges. The horizontal and vertical coordination between land administration and the government heavily influences the output of housing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of existing institutional coordination in urban land management to support effective land supply for residential purposes. The institution’s current and desired levels of coordination reveal a significant lack of vertical and horizontal coordination. In order to meet the study’s objectives, a mixed methodology was used, combining primary and secondary sources. The data collection process utilised rigorous methods like questionnaires, interviews, focus group discussions, field observations, and desk reviews to ensure accuracy and reliability for analysis and further decision-making. The findings unequivocally demonstrate that urban land administration institutions lack adequate vertical and peer coordination, severely hindering their ability to deliver land for housing development efficiently and effectively. Thus, urban and regional governments must rethink and restructure the current institutions for urban land administration, paving the way for a more efficient and effective system. This restructuring should incorporate robust vertical and horizontal coordination and address identified performance capability deficiencies. Ultimately, the study has provided a clear exit strategy that will contribute to the establishment of effective and efficient land administration functions. The study’s findings have significant implications for future urban land administration in Ethiopia and similar urban locations worldwide.

Keywords

horizontal coordination; urban land institution; vertical coordination

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. North DC. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1991; 5(1): 97–112. doi: 10.1257/jep.5.1.97

2. UN-Habitat. A Practical Guide for Conducting: Housing Profiles. UN-Habitat; 2010.

3. Enemark S, Clifford Bell K, Lemmen C, McLaren R. Fit-for-purpose land administration. International Federation of Surveyors; 2014.

4. Emiru MA. Institutional capacity as a barrier to deliver urban land for residential housing development in Ethiopia: the case of ANRS Bahir Dar. JAMA. 2022; 9(1): 1–16.

5. Enemark S. Capacity building for institutional development in surveying and land management. In: Proceedings of the Promoting Land Administration and Good Governance 5th FIG Regional Conference; 8-11 March, 2006; Accra, Ghana. pp. 1-13.

6. Prosper T. Challenging institutional frameworks in land administration: many institutions, but less property rights (case of Burundi). AJLP & GS. 2021; 4(1), 15-32.

7. Enemark S, McLaren R, & Antonio D. Fit-for-purpose land administration: capacity development for country implementation. World Bank Publications; 2018.

8. UN-Habitat. Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration. Guiding Principles for Country Implementation. UN-Habitat; 2016. pp. 1-118.

9. Matsumoto T, Crook J. Sustainable and inclusive housing in Ethiopia: A policy assessment. Coalition for Urban Transitions. 2021; 1–63.

10. FDRE Government. Constitution of the federal democratic republic of Ethiopia. proclamation no. 1/1995. Federal Negarit Gazeta. 1995; 1(1).

11. Adgeh DT, Menbere B, Taffse. Urban land acquisition and housing practices in Bahir Dar City and Debre Berhan, Ethiopia. Juds. 2021; 1(2): 61–71.

12. Agunbiade ME, Rajabifard A, Bennett R. Land administration for housing production: An approach for assessment. Land Use Policy. 2014; 38: 366-377. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.005

13. Badawy A. Factors affecting housing affordability in Kenya—A case study of Mombasa County. Strathmore University; 2019. p. 83.

14. Holmes R, Scott L, Both N, Chinsinga B. Strengthening institutional coordination of social protection in Malawi. An analysis of coordination structures and options. Overseas Development Institute; 2018.

15. Malik S, Roosli R, Yusof N. Institutional stakeholder collaborations (ISCs): A conceptual framework for housing research. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 2021; 37(1): 213-239. doi: 10.1007/s10901-021-09834-z

16. Kelly P, Mclaren R, Mueller H. Spatial information in megacity management. In: Proceedings of the International conference SDI; 15 September 2010. pp. 15-17.

17. Gløersen E, Michelet J. Experiences and concepts on vertical and horizontal coordination for regional development policy. Input Paper. 2014; 4.

18. Emiru MA, Adam AG, Dadi TT. Exploring institutional capacity of urban land delivery and administration for housing development in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia: Institutional analysis. Cogent Social Sciences. 2023; 9(2). doi: 10.1080/23311886.2023.2278208

19. UNDP. Institutional and Coordination. Guidance Note on Facilitating Integration and Coherence for SDG Implementation. UNDP; 2017. pp. 1-55.

20. Enemark S, van der Molen P. A framework for self-assessment of capacity needs in land administration. In: Proceedings of the Shaping the Change XXIII FIG Congress Munich; 8-13 October 8-13; Germany.

21. Ho S, Choudhury PR, Haran N, et al. Decentralization as a Strategy to Scale Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration: An Indian Perspective on Institutional Challenges. Land. 2021; 10(2): 199. doi: 10.3390/land10020199

22. World Bank. National Urban Development Spatial Plan Ethiopia’s Urban Development Scenarios Final Report. World Bank; 2015.

23. Koroso NH, Lengoiboni M, Zevenbergen JA. Urbanization and urban land use efficiency: Evidence from regional and Addis Ababa satellite cities, Ethiopia. Habitat International. 2021; 117: 102437. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102437

24. UNDP. Institutional and Coordination Mechanisms: Guidance Note on Facilitating Integration and Coherence for SDG Implementation. UNDP; 2017.

25. Chekole SD. Evaluation of urban land administration processes and institutional arrangements of Ethiopia: advocacy coalition theory. AJLPGS. 2020; 3(1).

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Mitiku Alemayehu Emiru, Achamyeleh Gashu Adam, Teshome Taffa Dadi

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/