A study on the impact of digital economy on green technology innovation of enterprises

Ying Hu, Xuanming Zhang

Article ID: 2617
Vol 4, Issue 2, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ec.v4i2.2617
VIEWS - 128 (Abstract)

Abstract

With global economic transformation and environmental sustainability increasingly taking center stage, the role of the digital economy (DE) becomes particularly critical in corporate green technology innovation (GTI). Based on the data of Chinese A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2011 to 2020, this paper explores the interactive effects of DE and GTI and the mechanism role of data resources (DR) in them, as well as conducts in-depth analyses for different regional and city characteristics. The main findings are as follows: First, DE significantly promotes the process of GTI. Second, from the perspective of regional differences, the promotion effect of DE on green technology innovation is particularly prominent in the eastern and central regions. And analyzed from the city level, its positive effect is most significant in the second-tier cities but shows a negative effect in the fourth and fifth-tier cities. Further examined from the perspective of resource dependence, DE inhibits green technology innovation in resource-based cities while showing a significant facilitating effect in non-resource-based cities. Third, DE can further promote green technology innovation by enhancing firms’ DR. Fourth, the study reveals the threshold effect of DR in this relationship: when DR < 2.5649, DE presents an inhibitory effect on green technological innovation, while its promotional effect begins to appear when 2.5649 ≤ DR < 4.2767, and the promotional effect of DE on GTI becomes more obvious when DR ≥ 4.2767.


Keywords

digital economy; green technology innovation; data resources; resource-based cities; threshold modeling

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Tapscott D. The digital economy anniversary edition: Rethinking promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. Innovation Journal 1999; 5: 156–168.

2. Luo S, Yimamu N, Li Y, et al. Digitalization and sustainable development: How could digital economy development improve green innovation in China? Business Strategy and the Environment 2022; 32(4): 1847–1871. doi: 10.1002/bse.3223

3. Hao X, Li Y, Ren S, et al. The role of digitalization on green economic growth: Does industrial structure optimization and green innovation matter? Journal of Environmental Management 2023; 325: 116504. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116504

4. Sun Z, Liu J, Tansuchat R. China’s digital economy and enterprise labor demand: The mediating effects of green technology innovation. Sustainability 2023; 15(15): 11682. doi: 10.3390/su151511682

5. He Z, Lu W, Hua G, et al. Factors affecting enterprise level green innovation efficiency in the digital economy era – Evidence from listed paper enterprises in China. BioResources 2021; 16(4): 7648–7670. doi: 10.15376/biores.16.4.7648-7670

6. Ma D, Zhu Q. Innovation in emerging economies: Research on the digital economy driving high-quality green development. Journal of Business Research 2022; 145: 801–813. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.041

7. Krishnan S, Teo TSH, Lim VKG. Examining the relationships among e-government maturity, corruption, economic prosperity and environmental degradation: A cross-country analysis. Information & Management 2013; 50(8): 638–649. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2013.07.003

8. Dou Q, Gao X. How does the digital transformation of corporates affect green technology innovation? An empirical study from the perspective of asymmetric effects and structural breakpoints. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023; 428: 139245. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139245

9. Geng Y, Zheng Z, Ma Y. Digitization, perception of policy uncertainty, and corporate green innovation: A study from China. Economic Analysis and Policy 2023; 80: 544–557. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2023.09.006

10. Wang C, Yan G, Ou J. Does digitization promote green innovation? Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023; 20(5): 3893. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053893

11. Zhou M. The digital economy and the regional economic gap: An inverted u-shaped relationship. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems 2022; 1(1): 53–61. doi: 10.54097/fcis.v1i1.1462

12. Awan AG, Yaqoob R. Economic value of introducing technology to improve productivity: An ARDL approach. Innovation and Green Development 2023; 2(3): 100069. doi: 10.1016/j.igd.2023.100069

13. Crouzet N, Eberly JC, Eisfeldt AL, et al. The economics of intangible capital. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2022; 36(3): 29–52. doi: 10.1257/jep.36.3.29

14. Zheng K, Li Y, Xin X. The influencing mechanism of high-speed rail on innovation: Firm-level evidence from China. Sustainability 2022; 14(24): 16592. doi: 10.3390/su142416592

15. Asiaei K, O’Connor NG, Barani O, et al. Green intellectual capital and ambidextrous green innovation: The impact on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment 2022; 32(1): 369–386. doi: 10.1002/bse.3136

16. Wu H, Hao Y, Geng C, et al. Ways to improve cross-regional resource allocation: Does the development of digitalization matter? Journal of Economic Analysis 2023. doi: 10.58567/jea02040001

17. Radziwon A, Bogers MLAM, Chesbrough H, et al. Ecosystem effectuation: creating new value through open innovation during a pandemic. R&D Management 2021; 52(2): 376–390. doi: 10.1111/radm.12512

18. He C, He S, Mu E, et al. Environmental economic geography: Recent advances and innovative development. Geography and Sustainability 2022; 3(2): 152–163. doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2022.05.002

19. Liao B, Li L. How can urban agglomeration market integration promote urban green development: Evidence from China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2021; 29(7): 10649–10664. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16490-x

20. Li Z, Huang Z, Su Y. New media environment, environmental regulation and corporate green technology innovation: Evidence from China. Energy Economics 2023; 119: 106545. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106545

21. Konda P. Domestic deployment in the formative phase of the Chinese electric vehicles sector: Evolution of the policy-regimes and windows of opportunity. Innovation and Development 2022; 13(3): 493–516. doi: 10.1080/2157930x.2022.2053806

22. Feng S, Chong Y, Li G, et al. Digital finance and innovation inequality: Evidence from green technological innovation in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022; 29(58): 87884–87900. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21826-2

23. Gao Y, Ye L. Characteristics and evolution of knowledge innovation network in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration—A case study of China National Knowledge Infrastructure. PLOS ONE 2023; 18(4): e0283853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283853

24. Nie L, Gong H, Lai X. Green research intensity and diversified performance: The moderating role of environmental regulation. European Journal of Innovation Management 2022; 27(2): 447–473. doi: 10.1108/ejim-02-2022-0100

25. Yin X, Chen D, Ji J. How does environmental regulation influence green technological innovation? Moderating effect of green finance. Journal of Environmental Management 2023; 342: 118112. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118112

26. Jiang Y, Guo C, Wu Y. Does digital finance improve the green investment of Chinese listed heavily polluting companies? The perspective of corporate financialization. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022; 29(47): 71047–71063. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20803-z

27. Li G, Liu M. Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of economic resilience: Evidence from resource-based cities in China. Sustainability 2022; 14(16): 10434. doi: 10.3390/su141610434

28. Xu S, Yang C, Huang Z, et al. Interaction between digital economy and environmental pollution: New evidence from a spatial perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022; 19(9): 5074. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095074

29. Peng D, Elahi E, Khalid Z. Productive service agglomeration, human capital level, and urban economic performance. Sustainability 2023; 15(9): 7051. doi: 10.3390/su15097051

30. Marei Y, Abu Afifa M, Abdallah A, et al. Big data and big data analytics in audit brainstorming sessions: Canadian qualitative research. In: Yaseen SG (editor). Digital Economy, Business Analytics, and Big Data Analytics Applications. Springer International Publishing; 2022. Volume 1010. pp. 657–671. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-05258-3_51

31. Pan W, Xie T, Wang Z, et al. Digital economy: An innovation driver for total factor productivity. Journal of Business Research 2022; 139: 303–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.061

32. Yoo K, Welden R, Hewett K, et al. The merchants of meta: A research agenda to understand the future of retailing in the metaverse. Journal of Retailing 2023; 99(2): 173–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2023.02.002

33. Bibri SE, Krogstie J, Kaboli A, et al. Smarter eco-cities and their leading-edge artificial intelligence of things solutions for environmental sustainability: A comprehensive systematic review. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology 2024; 19: 100330. doi: 10.1016/j.ese.2023.100330

34. Javaid M, Haleem A, Singh RP, et al. Understanding the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies in improving environmental sustainability. Sustainable Operations and Computers 2022; 3: 203–217. doi: 10.1016/j.susoc.2022.01.008

35. Yang S, Chai J. The influence of enterprises’ green marketing behavior on consumers’ green consumption intention—Mediating role and moderating role. Sustainability 2022; 14(22): 15478. doi: 10.3390/su142215478

36. Manta O. Digital financial technologies and green finance, support tools for the sustainable development of the economy. In: Economic Growth under Globalisation (Romanian). National Geographic Society; 2022.

37. Wan J, Pu Z, Tavera C. The impact of digital finance on pollutants emission: Evidence from Chinese cities. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022; 30(15): 42923–42942. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18465-4

38. Ding Q, Huang J, Chen J. Does digital finance matter for corporate green investment? Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China. Energy Economics 2023; 117: 106476. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106476

39. Huang Q, Yu Y, Zhang S. Internet development and manufacturing productivity enhancement: Intrinsic mechanisms and Chinese experience (Chinese). Chinese Industrial Economy 2019; 8: 5–23.

40. Dou Q, Gao X. The double-edged role of the digital economy in firm green innovation: Micro-evidence from Chinese manufacturing industry. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022; 29(45): 67856–67874. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20435-3

41. Wooldridge JM. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data MIT press. Cambridge 2002; 108(2): 245–254.

42. Lin BQ, Tan RP. Economic agglomeration and green economic efficiency in China (Chinese). Economic Research 2019; 54(2): 119–132.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Ying Hu, Xuanming Zhang

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/