Nature-based solutions for climate change mitigation: A perspective on challenges, potential and limitations

Adriano Bressane, Rogério Galante Negri, Liliam César de Castro Medeiros

Article ID: 2499
Vol 4, Issue 2, 2023
VIEWS - 118 (Abstract)


This opinion article delves into the critical role of nature-based solutions (NbS) for climate change mitigation. Despite their recognized potential, the multifaceted challenges of NbS remain complex and under-explored. Both potential and limitations are discussed, including economic, social, and political considerations. The importance of an interdisciplinary approach and adaptation to diverse socioeconomic and cultural contexts to ensure equitable implementation of NbS is highlighted. This brief but critical perspective seeks to enrich the academic view and provide actionable insights for urban planners and policymakers. Finally, it proposes directions for future studies for researchers in the fields of sustainable urban development and climate change mitigation.


resilience; sustainability; climate change; anthropocene; urbanization

Full Text:



1. Santos MM, Lanzinha JCG, Ferreira AV. Review on urbanism and climate change. Cities 2021; 114: 103176. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103176

2. Pauleit S, Sauerwein M, Breuste J. Urbanisation and its challenges for ecological urban development. Urban Ecosystems: Function, Management and Development 2021; 1.

3. Pauleit S, Sauerwein M, Breuste J. Urbanisation and its challenges for ecological urban development. In: Urban Ecosystems: Function, Management and Development. Springer; 2021. pp. 1–39.

4. Locatelli L, Guerrero M, Russo B, et al. Socio-economic assessment of green infrastructure for climate change adaptation in the context of urban drainage planning. Sustainability 2020; 12(9): 3792. doi: 10.3390/su12093792

5. Pamukcu-Albers P, Ugolini F, La Rosa D, et al. Building green infrastructure to enhance urban resilience to climate change and pandemics. Landscape Ecology 2021; 36(3): 665–673. doi: 10.1007/s10980-021-01212-y

6. Choi C, Berry P, Smith A. The climate benefits, co-benefits, and trade-offs of green infrastructure: A systematic literature review. Journal of Environmental Management 2021; 291: 112583. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112583

7. Senosiain J. Urban regreeneration: Green urban infrastructure as a response to climate change mitigation and adaptation. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics 2020; 15(1): 33–38. doi: 10.18280/ijdne.150105

8. Shade C, Kremer P, Rockwell JS, et al. The effects of urban development and current green infrastructure policy on future climate change resilience. Ecology and Society 2020; 25(4). doi: 10.5751/es-12076-250437

9. Epelde L, Mendizabal M, Gutiérrez L, et al. Quantification of the environmental effectiveness of nature-based solutions for increasing the resilience of cities under climate change. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2022; 67: 127433. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127433

10. Raymond CM, Frantzeskaki N, Kabisch N, et al. A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environmental Science & Policy 2017; 77: 15–24. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008

11. Giupponi L, Borgonovo G, Giorgi A, et al. How to renew soil bioengineering for slope stabilization: Some proposals. Landscape and Ecological Engineering 2018; 15(1): 37–50. doi: 10.1007/s11355-018-0359-9

12. Bressane A, Fengler FH, Medeiros LC de C, et al. Enhancing energy sustainability of building projects through nature-based solutions: A fuzzy-based decision support system. Nature-Based Solutions 2024; 5: 100107. doi: 10.1016/j.nbsj.2023.100107

13. Barriuso F, Urbano B. Green roofs and walls design intended to mitigate climate change in urban areas across all continents. Sustainability 2021; 13(4): 2245. doi: 10.3390/su13042245

14. Cirrincione L, Marvuglia A, Scaccianoce G. Assessing the effectiveness of green roofs in enhancing the energy and indoor comfort resilience of urban buildings to climate change: Methodology proposal and application. Building and Environment 2021; 205: 108198. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108198

15. Quaranta E, Arkar C, Branquinho C, et al. A daily time-step hydrological-energy-biomass model to estimate green roof performances across Europe to support planning and policies. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2024; 93: 128211. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128211

16. Sayad B, Helmi MR, Osra OA, et al. Microscale investigation of urban heat island (UHI) in Annaba City: Unveiling factors and mitigation strategies. Sustainability 2024; 16(2): 747. doi: 10.3390/su16020747

17. Zheng Y, Chen L. Modeling the effect of green roofs for building energy savings and air pollution reduction in Shanghai. Sustainability 2023; 16(1): 286. doi: 10.3390/su16010286

18. Qiao Y, Dawson AR, Parry T, et al. Flexible pavements and climate change: A comprehensive review and implications. Sustainability 2020; 12(3): 1057. doi: 10.3390/su12031057

19. Kia A. Permeable concrete pavements for a climate change resilient built environment. Adapting the Built Environment for Climate Change 2023; 297–326. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-323-95336-8.00006-8

20. Zhu L, Li J, Xiao F. Carbon emission quantification and reduction in pavement use phase: A review. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) 2024; 11(1): 69–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jtte.2023.09.004

21. Mamajonova N, Oydin M, Usmonali T, et al. The role of green spaces in urban planning enhancing sustainability and quality of life. Holders of Reason 2024; 2(1): 346–358.

22. Ashofteh PS, Pourali Dougaheh M. Ranking the optimal combination of low-impact urban development systems under climate change with the TODIM multi-criteria decision-making method. Journal of Cleaner Production 2024; 434: 140108. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140108

23. Zhang B, Brack CL. Urban forest responses to climate change: A case study in Canberra. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2021; 57: 126910. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126910

24. Chen Q, Liu S, Pan Z, et al. Projected LUCC dynamics and ecosystem services in an emerging urban agglomeration under SSP-RCP scenarios and management implications. Available online: (accessed on 1 December 2023).

25. Locke DH, Baker M, Alonzo M, et al. Variation the in relationship between urban tree canopy and air temperature reduction under a range of daily weather conditions. Heliyon 2024; 10(3): e25041. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25041

26. Sousa-Silva R, Zanocco C. Assessing public attitudes towards urban green spaces as a heat adaptation strategy: Insights from Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning 2024; 245: 105013. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105013

27. Barkenbus JN. Prospects for electric vehicles. Sustainability 2020; 12(14): 5813. doi: 10.3390/su12145813

28. Wolfram P, Tu Q, Heeren N, et al. Material efficiency and climate change mitigation of passenger vehicles. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2020; 25(2): 494–510. doi: 10.1111/jiec.13067

29. Zhou W, Bi G, Wang Y, Zhao J. Economic analysis of online DC-Drive system for long distance heavy-duty transport vehicle incorporating multi-factor sensitivities. Available online: (accessed on 9 April 2024).

30. Ibekwe KI, Etukudoh EA, Nwokediegwu ZQS, et al. Energy security in the global context: A comprehensive review of geopolitical dynamics and policies. Engineering Science & Technology Journal 2024; 5(1): 152–168. doi: 10.51594/estj.v5i1.741

31. Umoh AA, Ohenhen PE, Chidolue O, et al. Incorporating energy efficiency in urban planning: A review of policies and best practices. Engineering Science & Technology Journal 2024; 5(1): 83–98. doi: 10.51594/estj.v5i1.729

32. Santos MM, Lanzinha JCG, Ferreira AV. Review on urbanism and climate change. Cities 2021; 114: 103176. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103176

33. Umoh AA, Adefemi A, Ibewe KI, et al. Green architecture and energy efficiency: A review of innovative design and construction techniques. Engineering Science & Technology Journal 2024; 5(1): 185–200. doi: 10.51594/estj.v5i1.743

34. Huang L, Chen K, Zhou M. Climate change and carbon sink: A bibliometric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2020; 27(8): 8740–8758. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07489-6

35. Shao H, Kim G. A Comprehensive review of different types of green infrastructure to mitigate urban heat islands: progress, functions, and benefits. Land 2022; 11(10): 1792. doi: 10.3390/land11101792

36. Olabi AG, Abdelkareem MA. Renewable energy and climate change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2022; 158: 112111. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112111

37. Lehmann S. Growing biodiverse urban futures: Renaturalization and rewilding as strategies to strengthen urban resilience. Sustainability 2021; 13(5): 2932. doi: 10.3390/su13052932

38. Siehr SA, Sun M, Aranda Nucamendi JL. Blue‐green infrastructure for climate resilience and urban multifunctionality in Chinese cities. WIREs Energy and Environment 2022; 11(5). doi: 10.1002/wene.447

39. Han H. Singapore, a garden city. The Journal of Environment & Development 2016; 26(1): 3–24. doi: 10.1177/1070496516677365

40. Ziersen J, Clauson-Kaas J, Rasmussen J. The role of Greater Copenhagen Utility in implementing the city’s Cloudburst Management Plan. Water Practice and Technology 2017; 12(2): 338–343. doi: 10.2166/wpt.2017.039

41. Grimm IJ, Piva JHT, Sampaio CAC. Municipal private natural heritage reserves: Uses and attributions of natural protected areas in the city of Curitiba (PR). In: Fuders F, Donoso P (editors). Ecological Economic and Socio Ecological Strategies for Forest Conservation: A Transdisciplinary Approach Focused on Chile and Brazil. Springer; 2020. pp. 227–240. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-35379-7_12

42. Cho MR. The politics of urban nature restoration: The case of Cheonggyecheon restoration in Seoul, Korea. International Development Planning Review 2010; 32(2): 145–165. doi: 10.3828/idpr.2010.05

43. Chang H, Baker AM, Starry O, et al. Seasonal variation in hydrologic performance of ecoroofs of multiple depths– a case study in Portland, Oregon, USA. Urban Water Journal 2020; 18(2): 128–135. doi: 10.1080/1573062x.2020.1850806

44. Bush J, Coffey B, Fastenrath S. Governing urban greening at a metropolitan scale: An analysis of the Living Melbourne strategy. Australian Planner 2020; 56(2): 95–102. doi: 10.1080/07293682.2020.1739093


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2024 Adriano Bressane, Rogério Galante Negri, Liliam César de Castro Medeiros

License URL: