Open Journal Systems

Publication Frequency

Semi-annual

Journal Articles

Search scope

Volume Arrangement

2024

2023

more

Featured Articles

A review on the role of green vegetation in improving urban environmental quality

The exacerbation of climate change impacts within metropolitan areas is a well-documented phenomenon, often leading to severe consequences that pose significant risks to human populations. The impact of urban vegetation and planting design on these factors can be observed. However, it is worth mentioning that while there is an extensive body of literature on the consequences of climate change, there is a relatively small number of studies specifically focused on examining the role of vegetation as a mitigating factor in urban environments. This review paper aims to critically examine existing studies pertaining to the role of urban vegetation in mitigating the detrimental effects of the urban environment. The objective is to offer practical recommendations that can be implemented by city planners. By conducting a comprehensive examination of the literature available in Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, employing specific keywords pertaining to urban vegetation and climate change, we have identified five prominent concerns pertaining to the urban environment. These concerns encompass particulate matter, gaseous pollution, noise pollution, water runoff, and the urban heat island effect. The present analysis highlights that the impact of urban vegetation on the negative consequences of climate change cannot be unequivocally classified as either positive or negative. This is due to the fact that the influence of urban greenery is intricately connected to factors such as the arrangement, makeup, and dispersion of vegetation, as well as the specific management criteria employed. Hence, this research has the potential to enhance comprehension of the multifaceted nature of urban green spaces and establish a solid groundwork for subsequent investigations.

Analytical study on the coupling coordination degree of tourism and urban development—Taking Shaanxi as an example

Tourism has been instrumental in fostering regional economic growth, enhancing the quality of life of residents, and boosting the image of urban areas in Shaanxi, thanks to the accelerated economic and social development of recent years. Nevertheless, the issue of aligning urban development and tourism in terms of space, resources, and the industrial chain remains a significant concern. This paper establishes an evaluation index system for tourism and urban development in the Shaanxi region from 2009 to 2019. It then employs the systematic coupling coordination model to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the coupling coordination degree of tourism and urban development in the region, as well as its various influencing factors. The study demonstrates that the coupling and coordination degree of tourism and urban development in the Shaanxi region exhibited a trend of continuous improvement from 2009 to 2019. The region underwent three stages of development: “uncoordinated development (2009–2011), transformation development (2012–2016), and coordinated development (2017–2019).” The coupling coordination level was elevated from “mild dissonance” to “intermediate coordination” in 2019. In contrast, the tourism economic development of Shaanxi cities remains unequal, as evidenced by the existence of two distinct categories of development: the “lagging tourism economy” and the “coordinated tourism economy.” The findings of this investigation indicate that the general trend of urban development and tourism in Shaanxi is favorable; however, the disparities in the progress of the tourism economy among cities necessitate additional regional coordination and cooperation. The theoretical support for the relevant research and a reference basis for tourism development planning and urban policy making are provided by the evaluation index system and the systematic coupling coordination model proposed in this paper. This will facilitate the sustainable and coordinated development of the tourism industry and cities in Shaanxi.

Transport-land use systems of sustainable London city

Shifeng Wang, Sicong Wang, Hui Wang

Article ID: 2379
Vol 4, Issue 1, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ec.v4i1.2379

Received: 15 February 2023; Accepted: 13 May 2023; Available online: 29 May 2023; Issue release: 30 June 2023

VIEWS - 7790 (Abstract)

Download PDF

Abstract

Transportation and land use are interrelated and should be investigated simultaneously for sustainable urban. This paper investigates the interaction between transport and land-use systems using TRANUS model, to support the sustainable development of the London city, provide implicative information for London Mayor’s Transport Strategy (MTS), and reduce transport energy use and CO₂ emissions. Three infrastructure improvements scenarios for 2025 for MTS are examined. Results show that the trips will increase from 2012 to 2025 by over 1 million. High-occupancy car, bike, rail and tube are still the main transit, and CrossRail will be increasingly recognized. The transport energy use in 2025 high scenario is the smallest compared to 2025 baseline and low scenario. The transport CO₂ emissions show difference for these three 2025 scenarios, with low and high scenarios having smaller transport CO₂ emissions than baseline. These have informative implications for UK national infrastructure plans, and suggest that accounting environmental benefits of infrastructures will contribute to reduce the underinvestment in infrastructure.

Keywords

energy; transport; urban sustainability; infrastructure; CO2 emissions

References

1. United Nations. World urbanization prospects: The 2018 revision. Available online: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/ (accessed on 25 March 2019).

2. Spiekermann K, Wegener M. Evaluating urban sustainability using land-use transport interaction models. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 2004; 4: 251–272. doi: 10.18757/ejtir.2004.4.3.4268

3. Godschalk D. Land use planning challenges: coping with conflicts in visions of sustainable development and livable communities. Journal of the American Planning Association 2004; 70: 5–13. doi: 10.1080/01944360408976334

4. Keirstead J, Jennings M, Sivakumar A. A review of urban energy system models: approaches, challenges and opportunities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2012; 16: 3847–3866. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.047

5. International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2012. International Energy Agency; 2012.

6. Pye S, Daly H. Modelling sustainable urban travel in a whole systems energy model. Applied Energy 2015; 159: 97–107. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.127

7. Brandi A, Gori S, Nigro M, Petrlli M. Development of an integrated transport-land use model for the activities relocation in urban areas. Transportation Research Procedia 2014; 3: 374–383. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.018

8. Acheampong RA, Silva EA. Land use-transport interaction modelling: a review of the literature and future research directions. The Journal of Transport and Land Use 2015; 8: 11–38. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.2015.806

9. Inturri G, Ignaccolo M, Pira ML, et al. Influence of accessibility, land use and transport policies on the transport energy dependence of a city. Transportation Research Procedia 2017; 25C: 3277–3289. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.165

10. Lowry SA. A model of the metropolis. Available online: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM4035.html (accessed on 29 January 2023).

11. Wilson AG. Entropy in urban and regional modelling. Pion. Limited; 1970.

12. Zhou J, Lin J, Cui S, et al. Exploring the relationship between urban transportation energy consumption and transition of settlement morphology: A case study on Xiamen Island, China. Habitat International 2013; 37: 70–79. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.12.008

13. Kii M, Nakanishi H, Nakamura K, Doi K. Transportation and spatial development: An overview and a future direction. Transport Policy 2016; 49: 148–158. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.015

14. Li P, Zhao P, Brand C. Future energy use and CO2 emissions of urban passenger transport in China: A travel behaviour and urban form based approach. Applied Energy 2018; 211: 820–842. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.022

15. Transport for London. Transport 2025: Transport Vision for a Growing World City. Transport for London; 2006.

16. Transport for London. Travel in London: Report 6. Available online: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/cdn/static/cms/documents/travel-in-london-report-6.pdf (accessed on 10 November 2014).

17. Mayor of London. Urban Greening. Available online: https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/environment/parks-green-spaces-and-biodiversity/urban-greening# (accessed on 20 April 2019).

18. Infrastructure UK. National infrastructure plan 2011. Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7b177e40f0b66a2fc05190/nip_2011.pdf (accessed on 29 January 2023).

19. City of London. Local plan 2015. Available online: https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/services/environment-and-planning/planning/planning-policy/local-plan/Documents/local-plan-2015.pdf (accessed on 20 April 2019).

20. de la Barra T. Integrated Land Use and Transport Modelling. Cambridge University Press; 1989.

21. de la Barra T. TRANUS user guide. Available online: http://www.tranus.com/tranus-english/download-install (accessed on 10 August 2014).

22. Potter S. Transport energy and emissions: Urban public transport. In: Hensher D, Button K (editors). Handbook of Transport and the Environment. Elsevier; 2003. Volume 4. pp. 247–262.

23. DEFRA (UK Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs). Government GHG conversion factors for company reporting. Available online: http://www.ukconversionfactorscarbonsmart.co.uk/ (accessed on 27 October 2015).

24. Cairns S, Sloman L, Newson C, et al. Smarter choices: Assessing the potential to achieve traffic reduction using ”soft measures”. Transport Reviews 2008; 28: 593–618. doi: 10.1080/01441640801892504

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Jianming Cai

Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

Processing Speed

- - - ＜5 days from submission to initial review decision;
62% acceptance rate

News & Announcements

2024-08-08

Meet our new EBMs!

The journal is pleased to welcome a new team of editorial board members dedicated to collaborating in order to elevate the journal's quality and prominence.

2024-07-11

Eco-cities are becoming a reality!

In the context of eco-city development, the term "eco-city" encompasses a multifaceted ecosystem characterized by the interdependence of natural, social, and economic systems. This concept emphasizes the need for sustainability through environmental friendliness, social equity, and economic growth. Various models of eco-cities, including garden cities, green cities, and landscape cities, reflect the ongoing exploration of achieving harmony between humans and nature in urban living environments.

2024-05-15

Notice of policies update!

There are some changes in our web pages and policies; please be aware of them.

More Announcements...

Member Application

Apply to be a reviewer

Apply to be EBM

Journal Center

Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.

more

Article Tools

Indexing metadata

How to cite item

Review policy