Biodiversity and environment in cities —A case study of birds in urban and suburban areas of Japan

FuKui Wataru

Article ID: 1937
Vol 2, Issue 2, 2021

VIEWS - 43 (Abstract)

Abstract

In Japan, the environmental degradation in the urban and urban fringe area advanced from rapid economic growth to begin at the mid-1950s. The environmental aggravation such as large-scale development of the city with little consideration of environment, air pollution and the noise and so on had a big influence at the biological diversity. The habitation space of the creature is decreased or disappeared, and biological diversity suddenly is decreased. This tendency continued after stability of the economic growth of the mid-1970s. The environment of the urban area was not desirable space for the creatures. In addition, it decreased the ecosystem service. However, this problem lies in administration and private consciousness, and improves the consciousness of inhabitants and the reduction of the pollution, as well as the maintenance and creation of the urban greening advanced, and the environment of the urban area was improved

Keywords

biodiversity, environment; bird; green open space; patch; corridor; matrix; urban landscape




References

1. Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan. 2010 Annual report on the environment, the sound material-cycle, Society and the biodiversity in Ja-pan[R]. Tokyo, Ministry of the Environment, 2010, 174.

2. Biodiversity Center, Nature Conservation Bureau. Biodiversity in Japan[M]. Tokyo: Heibonsha Ltd, 2010: 210.

3. Environment Ministry. Conservation and sustaina-ble use of biodiversity[M]. White paper on envi-ronment, Environmental, circulatory society and biodiversity white paper. Ministry of environ-ment, Tokyo, 2018: 129-158

4. Ministr y of Environment. Biology Planning Room of Natural Environment Planning Course of Envi-ronment Bureau of Environment Province.Report on the Joint Assessment of Biodiversity and Ecosys-tem[R]. 2016: 157.

5. YAMADA H. Economic growth, urbanization and regional policy in postwar Japan[J]. Proceedings of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 1994: 1-12.

6. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. De-velopment of green and open space policy toward new stage[R]. 2016: 33.

7. Biodiversity Earth Strategy Planning Office, Natural Environment Planning Division, Natural Environ-ment Bureau, Ministry of the Environment. Con-sideration on disaster prevention and disaster miti-gation utilizing ecosystem[R]. 2016: 63.

8. UEMATSU H. The corporate alliance leverages and manages the public space in Umeda area: Leverag-ing a public space improves worth of surroundings areas[J]. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Land-scape Architecture, 2017, 80(4): 330-331.

9. UEDA T. Mori examples in Roppongi, Toranomon and Shinbashi: creating and nurturing cities[J]. City planning review, 2014, 63(2): 60-63.

10. OKUK I T. Improving SHIBUYA, launched: com-munity-based development through urban renais-sance special district[J]. City planning review, 2014, 63(2): 68-73.

11. FORMAN R T T. Land Mosaic[M]. Edinburgh: Cambridge University Press, 1995: 44-285.

12. Ministry Of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Current situation and issues of green policy[R]. 2015: 25.

13. FUKUI W. A basic study on the land use optimiza-tion from avifauna at urban fringe rural area[D]. Osaka: Osaka Prefecture University, 1999: 124.

14. BIDDY C J, BURGESS N D, HILL D A, et al. Bird Census Techniques[M]. Pittsburg: Academic Press, 1997: 665-104.

15. ICHINOSE T. Relationship between the appearance of birds in urban park and the vegetation and sur-rounding land uses: A basic study for ecological network planning in urban areas[J]. Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan, 2002, 37: 919-924.

16. ICHINOSET. Influence of the vegetation and sur-rounding land use on the bird distribution in the wintering season-Toward ecological network plan-ning in urban area-[J]. Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan, 2003, 38: 625-630.

17. KATOH K, YOSHIDA R, TAKAHASHI T, et al. Factors influencing avian species composition rec-orded in urban and suburban small wooded patch-es[J]. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture. 2015, 78(5): 671-676.

18. KATOH K, YOSHIDA R. Are bird communities in urban woods influenced by surrounding land cov-er?[J]. journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 2011, 74(5): 507-510.

19. KATOH K. Factors influencing bird occurrence in urban woods[J]. City planning review, 2010, 59(5): 58-61.

20. BLAKE J G, KARR J R. Breeding birds of isoland woodlots—Aerea and habitat relationships [J]. Ecology, 1987, 68(6): 1724-1734.

21. FUKUI W, TERASHIMA A. A simple investigation on factory planting of greening and birds in Sakai Senboku seaside industrial zone[J]. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, 2011, 37(1): 199-202.

22. RÜDISSER J, J WALDE, E TASSER, et al. Biodi-versity in cultural landscapes: influence of land use intensity on bird assemblages[J]. Landscape Ecol-ogy, 2015, 30(10): 1851-1863.

23. MÖRTBERG U M, WALLENTINUS H G. Red-listed forest bird species in an urban environ-ment—assessment of green space corridors[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2000, 50: 215-226.

24. SASAKI T, IMANISHI J, FUKUI W, et al. Fine-scale characterization of bird habitat using airborne Li-DAR in an urban park in Japan[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2016(17): 16-22.

25. SASAK I T, I MA N ISHI J, F UKU I W, et al. Fine-scale replication and quantitative assessment of forest vertical structure using LiDAR for forest avian hab-itat characterization[J]. Forest Science and Tech-nology, 2012: 1-9.

26. LOMAN J, T V SCHANTZ. Birds in a farm-land—more species in small than in large habitat island[J]. Conservation Biology, 1991(5): 176-188.

27. FERNÁNDEZ-JURICIC E. Can human disturbance promote nestedness? A case study with breed-ing birds in urban habitat fragments[J]. Oecologia, 2002, 131: 269-278.

28. FERNÁNDEZ-JURICIC E. Avian spatial segregation at edges and interiors of urban parks in Madrid[J]. Spain:Biodiversity and Conservation, 2000(10): 1303-1316.

29. FERNÁNDEZ-JURICIC E. Bird community com-position patterns in urban parks of Madrid The role of age, size and isolation[J]. Ecological Research, 2000(15): 373-383.

30. BUXTON V L, T J BENSON. Conservation-priority grassland bird response to urban landcover and habitat fragmentation[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2016, 19(2): 599-613.

31. GRAFIUS D R, R CORSTANJE, G M SIRIWARDENA, et al. A bird’s eye view: using circuit theory to study urban landscape connectivity for birds[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2017, 32(9): 1771-1787.

32. NJOROGE J B, FUKUI W, MOROMOTO Y. The habitat usage of vegetation types by avifauna community in the reclaimed site of EX PO’ 70 com memoration park[J]. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 2000, 63(5): 501-504.

33. NJOROGEJB, FUKUIW, NATSUHARA Y, et al. Controls of habitat usage by avifauna in the de-signed landscape of Expo’70 Park[J]. Bulletion of the International Association for Landscape Ecol-ogy-Japan, 2000, 5(2):66-70.

34. FUKUI W, MORIMOTO Y. Secular variation of avifauna in the Expo’70 Commemorative Park[J]. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, 2016, 42(1): 175-178.

35. STRAHBACH M W, S B LERMANP, WARREN S. Are small greening areas enhancing bird diversity? Insights from community-driven greening projects in Boston[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013, 114: 69-79.

36. FUKUI W. Relationship between the birds and pub-lic parks in a northern area of Fukuoka City, Ja-pan[C]//URBIO2010 Organizing Committee. Pro-ceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Urban Biodiversity and Design. Nagoya: UR-BIO2010 Organizing Committee, 2010: 244.

37. FUKUI W. The basic research of the avifauna at city park in Fukuoka City northern region[J]. Nishi- Nippon Junior College Bulletin of Landscape, 2009(13): 11-18.

38. FUKUI W. A case study on the relationship between wintering avifauna and urban planting space in Xiamen City, Fujian, China[J]. Journal of the Japa-nese Society of Revegetation Technology, 2018, 44(1): 143-146.

39. FUKUI W. A case study on the relationship be-tween breeding avifauna and urban planting space in Xiamen City, Fujian, China[J]. Journal of the Japa-nese Society of Revegetation Technology, 2017, 43(1): 227-230.

40. MIYAMOTOS, FUKUIW, TAKABAYASHI Y. The little corridor effect of the small linear green spaces on breeding avian species composition appearing in the block parks[J]. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture (Online Proceedings), 2019(12): 1-9.

41. MIYAMOTOS, FUKUIW, TA K A BAYASH I Y. Relationship between the bird species composition in the block park and the distance from large-scale habitat in Kyoto City, Japan[C]//CHSLA, JILA, KILA. The 16th Symposium of Landscape Archi-tecture Korea, China and Japan. South Korea, 2018: 31-39.

42. MIYAMOTO S, FUKUI W. A case study on rela-tionship between linear spaces in the city and its surrounding areas seen from the one of bird com-munities[J]. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 2016, 79(5): 703-706.

43. MIYAMOTOS , FUKUIW. A case study on rela-tionship between environmental conditions in the lake Biwa canal and surrounding areas and bird communities[J]. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, 2014, 40(1): 108-113.

44. TERADA M, FUKUIW, MIYAMOTO S. A case study on the relationship between road improvements of the second Keihan highway and birds habitat[J]. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology. 2015, 41(1): 263-266.

45. HAMADAA, FUKUIW. The relationship be-tween bird distribution and environmental condi-tions of the shrine woods in north urban area, Kyoto City[J]. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revege-tation Technology, 2013, 39(1): 125-128.

46. FUKUI W, NISHINO S. A case study on relation-ship between the birds and street trees in Kyoto City, Japan[J]. Journal of the Japanese Society of Reveg-etation Technology, 2014, 40(1): 223-226.

47. TAKABAYASHI Y, FUKU I W, MIYAMOTO S. En-vironmental factors influencing wintering birds in metropolitan riparian area and its surroundings[J]. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Ar-chitecture, 2018, 81(5): 695-698.

48. SHARMA N, S GAUR, R DHYANI, et al. Challenges of small protected areas in urban cities: a case study of Okhla Bird Sanctuary, India[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2016, 18(1): 295-310.

49. JOKIMÄKI J. Occurrence of breeding bird species in urban parks: Effects of park structure and broad-scale variables[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 1999(3): 21-34.

50. MOTEGI N, YANAI S. Study on the characteristics of bird distribution in rooftop vegetation in Tokyo Ward[J]. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Land-scape Architecture. 2005, 68(5): 597-600.

51. MTUMOTOR, FUKUIW, TAKABAYASHI Y. The relationship between internal environment and hi-erarchical structure and bird appearance in greening spaces associated with urban architecture[J]. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 2019, 82(5): 713-718.

52. MTUMOTOR, FUKUIW, MIYAMOTOS. The rela-tionship between environmental characteristics of small green space with the urban architecture and bird habitat[J]. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 2017, 80(5): 735-738.

53. MATSUMOTO A, FUKUI W. The relationship be-tween green space with the urban architecture and birds habitat[C]. World Green Infrastructure Network, 2015, Nagoya.

54. BRIANE, SWEARINGINRM, PULLINS C K, et al. Composition and diversity of avian communities using a new urban habitat: green roofs[J]. Envi-ronmental Management, 2016, 57(6): 1230-123.

55. FUKU W, MASUDA N. A case study on the rela-tionship between land use characteristics and avi-fauna at urban fringe rural area in West Kobe and East Harima[J]. Papers and proceedings of the Geographic Information Systems Association, 1998: 67-72.

56. FUKU W, MASUDA N, ABE D. A case study on the relationship between rural land use and avifauna in West Kobe and East Harima[J]. Journal of the Japa-nese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 1998, 61(5): 545-550.

57. FUKU W, KONDOH K, ABE D, et al. A case study on the relationship between rural landscape and avi-fauna at urban fringe area in West Kobe[J]. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, 1997, 60(5): 553-556.

58. FUKUI W, MASUDA N, ABE D. A Study of bird inhabitation as seen in farmlands in nishi ward of Kobe City and the eastern part of Akashi City[J]. Agriculture and life sciences, 1998(50): 49-58.

59. SAKASHITAH, FUKUIW. The relationship between the farmland in the city and the neighboring envi-ronmental conditions and avifauna at Takatsuki City[J]. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revege-tation Technology, 2014, 40(1): 227-230.

60. HAMADAA , FUKUIW, MIZUSHIMA M, et al. A study of the relationship between rural land use and bird in urban and fringe area from wide per-spective[J]. Journal of the Japanese Society of Re-vegetation Technology, 2016, 42(1): 62-67.

61. HAMADA A, FUKUI W, MIZUSHIMA M. The study of the relationship between connectivity of rural landuse and urban fringe area, Kyoto City[J]. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, 2015, 41(1): 145-150.

62. HAMADA A, FUKUI W, MIZUSHIMA M. A study of the relationship between agricultural field form and birds in urban fringe area, Kyoto City[J]. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, 2014, 40(1): 114-119.

63. BORGESF, M GLEMNITZ, A SCHULTZ, U STACHOW. Assessing the habitat suitability of ag-ricultural landscapes for characteristic breeding bird guilds using landscape metrics[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2017, 189: 166-186.

64. National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan. Public opinion poll report on environmental awareness 2016[R]. Tokyo, 2016: 70.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.