Abstract
In Japan, the environmental degradation in the urban and urban fringe area advanced from rapid economic growth to begin at the mid-1950s. The environmental aggravation such as large-scale development of the city with little consideration of environment, air pollution and the noise and so on had a big influence at the biological diversity. The habitation space of the creature is decreased or disappeared, and biological diversity suddenly is decreased. This tendency continued after stability of the economic growth of the mid-1970s. The environment of the urban area was not desirable space for the creatures. In addition, it decreased the ecosystem service. However, this problem lies in administration and private consciousness, and improves the consciousness of inhabitants and the reduction of the pollution, as well as the maintenance and creation of the urban greening advanced, and the environment of the urban area was improved
Keywords
biodiversity, environment; bird; green open space; patch; corridor; matrix; urban landscape
References
Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan. Annual report on the environment, the sound material-cycle, Society and the biodiversity in Japan 2010. Tokyo, Ministry of the Environment; 2010. pp. 174.
Biodiversity Center, Nature Conservation Bureau. Biodiversity in Japan. Tokyo: Heibonsha Ltd; 2010. pp. 210.
Environment Ministry. Conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. In: White paper on environment, Environmental, circulatory society and biodiversity white paper. Ministry of environment; 2018. pp. 129–158
Ministry of Environment.Report on the Joint Assessment of Biodiversity and Ecosystem. Biology Planning Room of Natural Environment Planning Course of Environment Bureau of Environment Province; 2016. pp. 157.
Yamada H. Economic growth, urbanization and regional policy in postwar Japan. Proceedings of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers. 1994; 1994(494): 1–12. doi: 10.2208/jscej.1994.494_1
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Development of green and open space policy toward new stage. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport; 2016. pp. 33.
Biodiversity Earth Strategy Planning Office, Natural Environment Planning Division, Natural Environment Bureau, Ministry of the Environment. Consideration on disaster prevention and disaster mitigation utilizing ecosystem. Biodiversity Earth Strategy Planning Office, Natural Environment Planning Division, Natural Environment Bureau, Ministry of the Environment; 2016. pp. 63.
Uematsu H. The corporate alliance leverages and manages the public space in Umeda area: Leveraging a public space improves worth of surroundings areas. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture. 2017; 80(4): 330–331.
Ueda T. Mori examples in Roppongi, Toranomon and Shinbashi: creating and nurturing cities. City planning review. 2014; 63(2): 60–63.
Okuk I T. Improving shibuya, launched: community-based development through urban renaissance special district. City planning review. 2014; 63(2): 68–73.
Forman RTT. Land Mosaic. Edinburgh: Cambridge University Press; 1995. pp .44–285.
Ministry Of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Current situation and issues of green policy. Ministry Of Land, Infrastructure and Transport; 2015. pp. 25.
Fukui W. A basic study on the land use optimization from avifauna at urban fringe rural area [PhD thesis]. Osaka: Osaka Prefecture University; 1999. pp. 124.
Biddy CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, et al. Bird Census Techniques. Pittsburg: Academic Press. 1997; pp. 665–104.
Ichinose T. Relationship between the appearance of birds in urban parks and the vegetation and surrounding land uses. Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan. 2002; 37(0): 919–924. doi: 10.11361/journalcpij.37.919
Ichinose T. Infuence of the vegetation and surrounding land use on the bird distribution in the wintering season. Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan. 2003; 38.3(0): 625–630. doi: 10.11361/journalcpij.38.3.625
Katoh K, Yoshida R, Takahashi T, et al. Factors influencing avian species composition recorded in urban and suburban small wooded patches. Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture. 2015; 78(5): 671–676. doi: 10.5632/jila.78.671
Katoh K, Yoshida R. Are bird communities in urban woodlands influenced by surrounding land cover? Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture. 2011; 74(5): 507–510. doi: 10.5632/jila.74.507
Katoh K. Factors influencing bird occurrence in urban woods. City planning review. 2010; 59(5): 58–61.
Blake JG, Karr JR. Breeding Birds of Isolated Woodlots: Area and Habitat Relationships. Ecology. 1987; 68(6): 1724–1734. doi: 10.2307/1939864
Fukui W, Terashima A. A simple survey of factory greening in the Sakai-Senboku coastal industrial area based on greening and bird habitat. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology. 2011; 37(1): 199–202. doi: 10.7211/jjsrt.37.199
Rüdisser J, Walde J, Tasser E, et al. Biodiversity in cultural landscapes: influence of land use intensity on bird assemblages. Landscape Ecology. 2015; 30(10): 1851–1863. doi: 10.1007/s10980-015-0215-3
Mörtberg U, Wallentinus HG. Red-listed forest bird species in an urban environment-assessment of green space corridors. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2000; 50(4): 215–226. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00090-6
Sasaki T, Imanishi J, Fukui W, et al. Fine-scale characterization of bird habitat using airborne LiDAR in an urban park in Japan. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2016; 17: 16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.03.007
Sasak T, Imanishi J, Fukui W, et al. Fine-scale replication and quantitative assessment of forest vertical structure using LiDAR for forest avian habitat characterization. Forest Science and Technology. 2012; 8(3): 1–9. doi: 10.1080/21580103.2012.704969
Loman J, Von Schantz T. Birds in a Farmland—More Species in Small than in Large Habitat Island. Conservation Biology. 1991; 5(2): 176–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00122.x
Fernández-Juricic E. Can human disturbance promote nestedness? A case study with breeding birds in urban habitat fragments. Oecologia. 2002; 131(2): 269–278. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-0883-y
Fernández-juricice. Avian spatial segregation at edges and interiors of urban parks in Madrid, Spain. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2000; 10: 1303–1316. doi: 10.1023/A:1016614625675
Fernández‐Juricic E. Bird community composition patterns in urban parks of Madrid: The role of age, size and isolation. Ecological Research. 2000; 15(4): 373–383. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2000.00358.x
Buxton VL, Benson TJ. Conservation-priority grassland bird response to urban landcover and habitat fragmentation. Urban Ecosystems. 2016; 19(2): 599–613. doi: 10.1007/s11252-016-0527-3
Grafius DR, Corstanje R, Siriwardena GM, et al. A bird’s eye view: using circuit theory to study urban landscape connectivity for birds. Landscape Ecology. 2017; 32(9): 1771–1787. doi: 10.1007/s10980-017-0548-1
Njoroge JB, Fukui W, Moromoto Y. The habitat usage of vegetation types by avifauna community in the reclaimed site of EX PO’ 70 com memoration park. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture. 2000; 63(5): 501–504. doi: 10.5632/jila.63.501
Njoroge JB, Fukui W, Natuhara Y, et al. Controls of habitat usage by avifauna in the designed landscape of Expo’70 Park. Bulletion of the International Association for Landscape Ecology-Japan. 2000; 5(2): 66–70. doi: 10.5738/jale.5.66
Fukui W, Morimoto Y. Secular variation of avifauna in the Expo’70 Commemorative Park. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology. 2016; 42(1): 175–178. doi: 10.7211/jjsrt.42.175
Strohbach MW, Lerman SB, Warren PS. Are small greening areas enhancing bird diversity? Insights from community-driven greening projects in Boston. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2013; 114: 69–79. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.02.007
Fukui W. Relationship between the birds and public parks in a northern area of Fukuoka City, Japan. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Urban Biodiversity and Design; 2010. pp. 244.
Fukui W. The basic research of the avifauna at city park in Fukuoka City northern region. Nishi- Nippon Junior College Bulletin of Landscape. 2009; (13): 11–18.
Wataru F. A case study on the relationship between wintering avifauna and urban planting space in Xiamen City, Fujian, China. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology. 2018; 44(1): 143–146. doi: 10.7211/jjsrt.44.143
Fukui W. A case study on the relationship between breeding avifauna and urban planting space in Xiamen City, Fujian, China. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology. 2017; 43(1): 227–230. doi: 10.7211/jjsrt.43.227
Miyamoto S, Fukui W, Takabayashi Y. The Little Corridor Effect of the Small Linear Green Spaces on Breeding Avian Species Composition Appearing in the Block Parks. Landscape Research Japan Online. 2019; 12(0): 1–9. doi: 10.5632/jilaonline.12.1
Miyamoto S, Fukui W, Takabayashi Y. Relationship between the bird species composition in the block park and the distance from large-scale habitat in Kyoto City, Japan. In: Proceedings of the 16th Symposium of Landscape Architecture Korea, China and Japan; 2018. pp. 31–39.
Miyamoto S, Fukui W. A Case Study on Relationship between Linear Spaces in the City and Its Surrounding Areas seen from the one of Bird Communities. Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture. 2016; 79(5): 703–706. doi: 10.5632/jila.79.703
Miyamoto S, Fukui W. A case study on relationship between environmental conditions inthe lake Biwa canal and surrounding areas and bird communities. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology. 2014; 40(1): 108–113. doi: 10.7211/jjsrt.40.108
Terada M, Fukui W, Miyamoto S. A case study on the relationship between road improvements of the second Keihan highway and birds habitat. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology. 2015; 41(1): 263–266. doi: 10.7211/jjsrt.41.263
Hamada A, Fukui W. The relationship between bird distribution and environmental conditions of the shrine woods in north urban area, Kyoto City. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology. 2013; 39(1): 125–128. doi: 10.7211/jjsrt.39.125
Fukui W, Nishino S. A case study on relationship between the birds and street trees in Kyoto City, Japan. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology. 2014; 40(1): 223–226. doi: 10.7211/jjsrt.40.223
Takabayashi Y, Fukui W, Miyamoto S. Environmental Factors Influencing Wintering Birds in Metropolitan Riparian Area and its Surroundings. Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture. 2018; 81(5): 695–698. doi: 10.5632/jila.81.695
Sharma N, Gaur S, Dhyani R, et al. Challenges of small protected areas in urban cities: a case study of Okhla Bird Sanctuary, India. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2015; 18(1): 295–310. doi: 10.1007/s10668-015-9628-z
Jokimäki J. Occurrence of breeding bird species in urban parks: Effects of park structure and broad-scale variables. Urban Ecosystems. 1999; 3: 21–34. doi: 10.1023/A:1009505418327
Motegi N, Yanai S. A Study on the Characteristics of Bird Distribution in Rooftop Vegetation in Tokyo Ward. Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture. 2005; 68(5): 597–600. doi: 10.5632/jila.68.597
Matsumoto A, Fukui W, Takabayashi Y. The relationship between internal green environment, especially among stratification of plants with the urban architecture and bird appearance. Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture. 2019; 82(5): 713–718. doi: 10.5632/jila.82.713
Matsumoto A, Fukui W, Miyamoto S. The Relationship between Environmental Characteristics of Small Green Space with the Urban Architecture and Bird Habitat. Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture. 2017; 80(5): 735–738. doi: 10.5632/jila.80.735
Matsumoto A, Fukui W. The relationship between green space with the urban architecture and birds habitat. World Green Infrastructure Network. 2015.
Washburn BE, Swearingin RM, Pullins CK, et al. Composition and Diversity of Avian Communities Using a New Urban Habitat: Green Roofs. Environmental Management. 2016; 57(6): 1230–1239. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0687-1
Fukui W, Masuda N. A case study on the relationship between land use characteristics and avifauna at urban fringe rural area in West Kobe and East Harima. Papers and proceedings of the Geographic Information Systems Association. 1998; pp. 67–72.
Fukui W, Masuda N, Abe D. A case study on the relationship between rural land use and avifauna in West Kobe and East Harima. Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture. 1998; 61(5): 545–550. doi: 10.5632/jila.61.545
Fukui W, Kondoh K, ABE D, et al. A case study on the relationship between rural landscape and avifauna at urban fringe area in West Kobe. Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture. 1997; 60(5): 553–556. doi: 10.5632/jila.60.553
Fukui W, Masuda N, Abe D. A Study of bird inhabitation as seen in farmlands in nishi ward of Kobe City and the eastern part of Akashi City. Agriculture and life sciences. 1998; (50): 49–58.
Sakashita H, Fukui W. The relationship between the farmland in the city and the neighboring environmental conditions and avifauna at Takatsuki City. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology. 2014; 40(1): 227–230. doi: 10.7211/jjsrt.40.227
Hamada A, Fukui W, Mizushima M, et al. A study of the relationship between rural land use and bird in urban and fringe area from wide perspective. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology. 2016; 42(1): 62–67. doi: 10.7211/jjsrt.42.62
Hamada A, Fukui W, Mizushima M. The study of the relationship between connectivity of rural landuse and urban fringe area, Kyoto city. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology. 2015; 41(1): 145–150. doi: 10.7211/jjsrt.41.145
Hamada A, Fukui W, Mizushima M. A study of the relationship between agricultural field form and birds in urban fringe area, Kyoto City. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology. 2014; 40(1): 114–119. doi: 10.7211/jjsrt.40.114
Borges F, Glemnitz M, Schultz A, et al. Assessing the habitat suitability of agricultural landscapes for characteristic breeding bird guilds using landscape metrics. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2017; 189(4). doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-5837-2