Return to spatial differentiation and respect life diversity–Two core supporting points to avoid the deviation of urban fine governance
Vol 2, Issue 1, 2021
VIEWS - 48 (Abstract)
Abstract
Modern urban governance emphasizes the precise governance of the “short board” of urban governance, forming a mechanism of fine governance. In view of the historical basis and realistic structure of the differentiation of physical space at the block level and the diversity of life at the community level in modern cities, the short board of urban governance should be confirmed and solved through democratic participation based on the context of spatial differentiation and diversity of life, rather than through simple administrative urban planning, so as to form a corresponding structure consistent with rigid urban management. The vitality of a city lies in the construction of differentiated block space and diversified community autonomy. Therefore, the urban path of fine governance is fine governance based on public recognition. It should include the establishment of the concept of spatial differentiation and diversity of life, the construction of democratic relations among modern urban governance subjects, the transformation of urban planning to community planning, and the avoidance of destructive renewal and one-way material construction, go beyond the sports regulation of urban issues and apply the big data technology in modern urban governance.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Wu Z, Li D. Principles of urban planning China Construction Industry Press; 2010–31–33.
2. Alan digaetano, John S. Klemanski. Modes of Governance in Comparative Perspective (pp. 13–30) , NED New edition Power and City Governance, Volume: 4, University of Minnesota Press ; 1999.
3. Buildings can be read, streets are suitable for walking, and the city always has temperature Jiefang Daily, 2017.05.18
4. Urban management should be as delicate as embroidery. http:// news. Ifeng. Com. 2017–03–05.
5. Jane Jacobs, The Death And Life Of Great American Cities, Published by Random House; 1992.
6. Ade Kearns and Ray Forrest, Social Cohesion and Multilevel Urban Governance, Urban Studies, Vol. 37, No. 5–6, 995–1017, 2000.
7. Tong M. Contemporary Chinese Urban Design Reader. China Construction Industry Press; 2016.
8. Zang Z, Fan Y. Urban Environmental Governance: Exploration and wisdom of East Asia. Shanghai People’s publishing house, 2017
9. Fredericktaylor Principles of scientific management Translated by Ma Fengcai China Machine Press; 2014
10. W. Edwards Deming and Joyce, The Essential Deming: Leadership Principles from the Father of Quality, edited by Orsini, mcgraw Hill Education; 1 edition, December 11, 2012.
11. Zhang X. New Delicacy Management Theory, Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2011; 211: 183–187
12. Wang X, Luo S. Local government in the new urbanization period of the United States: the game between regional planning and local autonomy Xiamen University Press; 225–242.
13. Inception Workshop on Urban Governance and Turning Africa Cities Around Partnership for African Social and Governance Research (PASGR), BOMA Hotel Nairobi, June 2015.
14. John Friedmann, The Governance of City Building, China’s Urban Transition, NED New edition, University of Minnesota Press; 2005.p.95–116.
15. Zhang W “The world of cities”: modern cities and their problems. Social Science Literature Press; 2012.
16. Mao Z. Oppose the book doctrine Collected works of Mao Zedong’s investigation. Beijing: People’s publishing house; 1991–2.
17. Soonhee K: Collaborative Leadership and Local Governance, The Future of Public Administration around the World Book Subtitle: The Minnowbrook Perspective, edited by ROSEMARY O’LEARY, DAVID M.VAN SLYKE, SOONHEE KIM, Published by: Georgetown University Press; 2010.
18. Peter R. Hugh Sykes Urban renewal manual. Translated by yeqimao and nixiaohui Beijing: China Construction Industry Press; 2009.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
