URBAN immigrant diversity and entrepreneurial choice

Lingzheng Yu, Shiyan Lou, Jiannan Wang, Xiahai Wei

Article ID: 1685
Vol 2, Issue 1, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/cd.v2i1.1685
Received: 23 September 2021; Accepted: 14 October 2021; Available online: 17 November 2021;
Issue release: 31 December 2021

VIEWS - 4004 (Abstract)

Download PDF

Abstract

Based on the national dynamic monitoring data of floating population, this paper investigates the impact mechanism and effect of immigrant diversity on entrepreneurial choice. The study found that the diversity of immigrants will significantly reduce the probability of individual entrepreneurship. The mechanism is that entrepreneurship itself is a relatively open process. In a complex and diverse city, the interpersonal psychological distance is widened and there is a lack of mutual trust and social identity, so entrepreneurship is significantly restrained In addition, this paper finds that compared with self-employed, entrepreneurs in the form of enterprise employers can benefit from diversity, which indicates that diversity promotes "Schumpeter" entrepreneurship; The impact of diversity will also vary according to educational skills and regional differences This paper empirically reveals the impact of diversity on Immigrant Entrepreneurship decision-making, which can provide profound Policy Enlightenment under the background of "Mobile China"

Keywords

Immigrant diversity; Entrepreneurship selection; Wage earners


References

1. Alesina A, Harnoss J, Rapoport H. Birthplace diversity and economic prosperity. Journal of Economic Growth. 2016; 21(2): 101-138. doi: 10.1007/s10887-016-9127-6

2. Easterly W, Levine R. Africa’s Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic Divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1997; 112(4): 1203-1250. doi: 10.1162/003355300555466

3. Collier P. Implications of ethnic diversity. Economic Policy. 2001; 16(32): 128-166. doi: 10.1111/1468-0327.00072

4. Kemeny T, Cooke A. Spillovers from immigrant diversity in cities. Journal of Economic Geography. 2017; 18(1): 213-245. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbx012

5. Ottaviano GIP, Peri G. The economic value of cultural diversity: evidence from US cities. Journal of Economic Geography. 2005; 6(1): 9-44. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbi002

6. Ashraf Q, Galor O. Cultural Diversity, Geographical Isolation, and the Origin of the Wealth of Nations. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2011. doi: 10.3386/w17640

7. Peri G. The Effect of Immigration on Productivity: Evidence from US States. Review of Economics and Statistics. 2012; 94(1): 348-358. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00137

8. Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB, Lehmann EE. The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics. 2013; 41(4): 757-774. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9505-9

9. Sun B, Zhu P, Li W. Cultural diversity and new firm formation in China. Regional Studies. 2019; 53(10): 1371-1384. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1566700

10. Niebuhr A. Migration and innovation: Does cultural diversity matter for regional R&D activity? Papers in Regional Science. 2010; 89(3): 563-586. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2009.00271.x

11. Ozgen C, Nijkamp P, Poot J. The Impact of Cultural Diversity on Innovation: Evidence from Dutch Firm-Level Data. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published online 2011. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1941152

12. Lazear EP. Globalisation and the Market for Team‐Mates. The Economic Journal. 1999; 109(454): 15-40. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00414

13. Alesina A, La Ferrara E. Participation in Heterogeneous Communities*. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2000; 115(3): 847-904. doi: 10.1162/003355300554935

14. Alesina A, Ferrara EL. Who Trusts Others? Journal of Public Economics. 2002; 85(2): 207-234. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00084-6

15. Dai Y, Zhang J, Zeng Y, Pan Y. Social capital and enterprise debt financing. China industrial economy; 2009. pp. 99-108.

16. Wang D. Work experience of foreign funded enterprises and entrepreneurial activities of Entrepreneurs: Evidence from household surveys in China. Management world; 2014. pp. 136-148.

17. Kidd MP. Immigrant wage differentials and the role of self‐employment in australia*. Australian Economic Papers. 1993; 32(60): 92-115. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8454.1993.tb00133.x

18. Booth AL, Nolen P. Gender Differences in Risk Behaviour: Does Nurture Matter? The Economic Journal. 2012; 122(558): F56-F78. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02480.x

19. Taagepera R, Lee Ray J. A Generalized Index of Concentration. Sociological Methods & Research. 1977; 5(3): 367-384. doi: 10.1177/004912417700500306

20. Dong Z, Wei X, Zhang T. Entrepreneurship and unemployment: Empirical test of refugee effect and entrepreneur effect. Economic review; 2012. pp. 80-87.

21. Qu Z, Guo S. Registered residence and Entrepreneurship: A study on the difference of self employment between urban and rural residents -- Evidence from cgss2008. China's economic problems; 2017. pp. 72-86.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Lingzheng Yu, Shiyan Lou, Jiannan Wang, Xiahai Wei

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).