Research on interdisciplinary project-based geography fieldwork in education for sustainable development

Ruiyan Hua, Fengtao Guo, Yushan Duan, Hanxin Fan, Jiaqi Zhang

Article ID: 3101
Vol 2, Issue 5, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ssd3101
Received: 21 August 2024; Accepted: 16 October 2024; Available online: 23 October 2024;
Issue release: 31 October 2024

VIEWS - 691 (Abstract)

Download PDF

Abstract

The ability to solve real-world problems for a sustainable future has become a worldwide consensus, and interdisciplinary competencies and project-based learning (PBL) have become the focus of curriculum reform in China. This study investigates the effectiveness of interdisciplinary PBL fieldwork in geography education for sustainable development, focusing on the perceptions of students from a junior high school in Chongming, Shanghai, of the interdisciplinary effectiveness of PBL fieldwork. Over a one-month pilot program, the results suggest that the new fieldwork approach did not achieve the expected benefits. The significant gains of students can be grouped into four perspectives, namely, understanding of nature and classroom knowledge; problem-solving skills and environmental action; scientific spirit, environmental awareness, and interest in geography; and understanding of local needs and sustainable development issues, which increased their interest in learning. The students generally accepted the ability to collect information and data and the thinking ability of circular development. The influencing factors of activity effectiveness include the time and difficulty of the activity, cognitive and knowledge levels, learning habits of students, student participation, and teaching experience of teachers. The study offers valuable insights for improving fieldwork in other regions and for future research.

Keywords

junior high school; empirical research; PBL


References

1. Warren Flint R, McCarter W, Bonniwell T. Interdisciplinary education in sustainability: links in secondary and higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2000; 1(2): 191-202. doi: 10.1108/1467630010328261

2. Cairns R, Hielscher S, Light A. Collaboration, creativity, conflict and chaos: doing interdisciplinary sustainability research. Sustainability Science. 2020; 15(6): 1711-1721. doi: 10.1007/s11625-020-00784-z

3. Braßler M, Schultze M. Students’ Innovation in Education for Sustainable Development—A Longitudinal Study on Interdisciplinary vs. Monodisciplinary Learning. Sustainability. 2021; 13(3): 1322. doi: 10.3390/su13031322

4. Casinader N, Kidman G. Fieldwork, Sustainability, and Environmental Education: The Centrality of Geographical Inquiry. Australian Journal of Environmental Education. 2018; 34(1): 1-17. doi: 10.1017/aee.2018.12

5. Corney G, Reid A. Student teachers’ learning about subject matter and pedagogy in education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research. 2007; 13(1): 33-54. doi: 10.1080/13504620601122632.

6. Chalkley B, Blumhof J, Ragnarsdottir VK. Geography, earth and environmental sciences: A suitable home for ESD? In: Sustainability education. Routledge; 2010. pp. 93-107.

7. Guo F, Lane J, Duan Y, et al. Sustainable Development in Geography Education for Middle School in China. Sustainability. 2018; 10(11): 3896. doi: 10.3390/su10113896

8. Turner BL. Contested Identities: Human-Environment Geography and Disciplinary Implications in a Restructuring Academy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2002; 92(1): 52-74. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00279

9. Walshe N. An interdisciplinary approach to environmental and sustainability education: developing geography students’ understandings of sustainable development using poetry. Environmental Education Research. 2016; 23(8): 1130-1149. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2016.1221887

10. Casinader N. Kidman G. Fieldwork as a vehicle for sustainability education: The centrality of geographical inquiry. In: Issues in teaching and learning of education for sustainability. Routledge; 2019.

11. Houtsonen L. Introduction: Geographical education for sustainable living. Geo Journal. 2004; 60: 147-148.

12. Nation ML. Project-Based Learning for Sustainable Development. Journal of Geography. 2008; 107(3): 102-111. doi: 10.1080/00221340802470685

13. Yarnal B, Neff R. Whither Parity? The Need for a Comprehensive Curriculum in Human‐Environment Geography. The Professional Geographer. 2004; 56(1): 28-36. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.2004.05601005.x

14. Senyurt S. Education for sustainable development through fieldwork in geography lessons. The Beginning of the 21 St Century in Turkey; 2013. p. 153.

15. Zhang H. Contemporary Chinese Concepts of Fieldwork in Geographical Education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education. 1999; 8(2): 175-180. doi: 10.1080/10382049908667606

16. Li M. Action research on geography practice of senior high school students based on subject integration—take investigation of water environment in Wuyang section of Zhanghe river as an example [Master’s thesis]. Northwest Normal University; 2021.

17. Yang M. The basis spirit of the new revision of the compulsory education curriculum. Educational Research. 2022; 43:77-84.

18. Beijing Normal University Press. MOE&PRC: Geography curriculum standards for compulsory education. Beijing Normal University Press; 2022.

19. Ryrie AC, Furst A, Lauder M. Choices and chances: A study of pupils’ subject choices and future career intentions. Hodder and Stoughton for the Scottish Council for Research in Education; 1979.

20. Greckhamer T, Koro-Ljungberg M, Cilesiz S, et al. Demystifying Interdisciplinary Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 2008; 14(2): 307-331. doi: 10.1177/1077800407312049

21. Mansilla VB. Learning to synthesize: The development of interdisciplinary understanding. In: The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press; 2010. pp. 288-306.

22. Koether MC, McGarey D, Patterson M, et al. Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Education: Environmental Studies. Journal of Chemical Education. 2002; 79(8): 934. doi: 10.1021/ed079p934

23. Caviglia‐Harris JL, Hatley J. Interdisciplinary teaching. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2004; 5(4): 395-403. doi: 10.1108/14676370410561090

24. Clark WC. Sustainability Science: A room of its own. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007; 104(6): 1737-1738. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611291104

25. Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, et al. Sustainability Science. Science. 2001; 292(5517): 641-642. doi: 10.1126/science.1059386

26. Blockstein D, Greene J. Recommendations for education for a sustainable and secure future. National Council for Science and the Environment. 2003; 477.

27. Amran A, Perkasa M, Satriawan M, et al. Assessing students 21stcentury attitude and environmental awareness: promoting education for sustainable development through science education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019; 1157(2): 022025. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022025

28. Cheng VMY. Views on Creativity, Environmental Sustainability and Their Integrated Development. Creative Education. 2018; 09(05): 719-743. doi: 10.4236/ce.2018.95054

29. Becher T, Trowler P. Academic tribes and territories. McGraw-Hill Education (UK); 2001.

30. Matthewman S, Morgan J. English and geography: common ground? FromPlanet EarthtoPigs. Changing English. 2006; 13(3): 259-272. doi: 10.1080/13586840600971760

31. Efstratia D. Experiential Education through Project Based Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 152: 1256-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.362

32. Chew E. Views, Values and Perceptions in Geographical Fieldwork in Singapore Schools. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education. 2008; 17(4): 307-329. doi: 10.1080/10382040802401565

33. Lai KC, Lam CC. School-based assessment of fieldwork in Hong Kong: dilemmas and challenges. Geography. 2013; 98(1): 33-40. doi: 10.1080/00167487.2013.12094363

34. Lambert D, Reiss MJ. The place of fieldwork in geography qualifications. Geography. 2016; 101(1): 28-34. doi: 10.1080/00167487.2016.12093980

35. Tam TI. Teaching and learning sustainable development with fieldwork: A practical example of geography education in Macau. In: Program Book. Wikipedia; 2021. p. 56.

36. Boyle A, Maguire S, Martin A, et al. Fieldwork is Good: the Student Perception and the Affective Domain. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 2007; 31(2): 299-317. doi: 10.1080/03098260601063628

37. Foskett N. Teaching and learning through fieldwork. In: Teaching and learning geography. Routledge; 2002.

38. Marvell A, Simm D. Unravelling the geographical palimpsest through fieldwork: discovering a sense of place. Geography. 2016; 101(3): 125-136. doi: 10.1080/00167487.2016.12093996

39. Preston L. Field “work” vs. “feel” trip: Approaches to out-of-class experiences in geography education. Geographical Education. 2016; 29: 9-22.

40. Kern EL, Carpenter JR. Enhancement of Student Values, Interests and Attitudes in Earth Science Through a Field-Oriented Approach. Journal of Geological Education. 1984; 32(5): 299-305. doi: 10.5408/0022-1368-32.5.299

41. Ngcamu RN. The implementation of fieldwork in geography teaching in secondary school [PhD thesis]. University of Zululand; 2000.

42. Kaya H, Demirkaya H, Aydn F. Undergraduate students’ experiences in a geography fieldwork. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research. 2010; 6: 637-641.

43. Hope M. The Importance of Direct Experience: A Philosophical Defence of Fieldwork in Human Geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 2009; 33(2): 169-182. doi: 10.1080/03098260802276698

44. Yang D, Wang Z, Xu D, et al. Chinese Junior High School Students’ Perceptions of Geographic Fieldwork: A Case Study. Journal of Geography. 2013; 112(4): 156-164. doi: 10.1080/00221341.2012.732600

45. Kinder A. Acquiring geographical knowledge and understanding through fieldwork. Teaching Geography. 2018; 43: 109-112.

46. Ma KK. Field-based teaching and learning in environmental education: A case study on official curriculum in Hong Kong. HKU (HKUTO); 2016.

47. Bo F. Design of steam teaching activities for the cultivation of geographical practice skill: Taking “making a campus shadow clock” as an example. Teaching Reference of Middle School Geography. 2022; 07: 67-70.

48. Zhao Q. An example of geography teaching activities based on cultivation of geographical practice skill: Taking the “moon phase observation” as an example. Geography Teaching. 2022; 06: 23-26+17.

49. Zhou Y. The design and implementation of study travel course from the perspective of geographical practice skill: Taking “Xuedou mountain” as an example. Geography Teaching. 2022; 06: 58-60+35.

50. Wei L. The cultivation of geographical practice skill: A case study of the design of baogang group. Technology. 2022; 05: 51-53.

51. Feng C. Activity design based on rural geography to cultivate students’ geographical practice skill—taking “a preliminary study on the causes of diseases of brick and stone cultural relics in lianhuashan in guangzhou” as an example. Teaching Reference of Middle School Geography. 2022; 02: 80-82+85.

52. Job D, Day C, Smyth T. Beyond the bikesheds: Fresh approaches to fieldwork in the school locality. Geographical Association; 1999.

53. Kent M, Gilbertson DD, Hunt CO. Fieldwork in geography teaching: A critical review of the literature and approaches. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 1997; 21(3): 313-332. doi: 10.1080/03098269708725439

54. Kilpatrick WH. Dangers and Difficulties of the Project Method and how to Overcome Them—A Symposium. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 1921; 22(4): 1-6. doi: 10.1177/016146812102200407

55. Blumenfeld PC, Soloway E, Marx RW, et al. Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist. 1991; 26: 369-398.

56. Helle L, Tynjälä P, Olkinuora E. Project-based learning in post-secondary education–theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher Education. 2006; 51: 287-314.

57. Holubova R. Effective teaching methods--project-based learning in physics. Online Submission. 2008; 5: 27-36.

58. Hernández-Ramos P, De La Paz S. Learning History in Middle School by Designing Multimedia in a Project-Based Learning Experience. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2009; 42(2): 151-173. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2009.10782545

59. Cocco S. Student leadership development: The contribution of project-based learning [Master’s thesis]. Royal Roads Universit; 2006.

60. Kokotsaki D, Menzies V, Wiggins A. Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools. 2016; 19(3): 267-277. doi: 10.1177/1365480216659733

61. Kılınç A. Can project-based learning close the gap? Turkish Student Teachers and Proenvironmental Behaviours. International Journal of Enviroment and Science Education. 2010.

62. Luna Scott C. The futures of learning 3: What kind of pedagogies for the 21st century? UNESCO Digital Library; 2015.

63. Bramwell-Lalor S, Kelly K, Ferguson T, et al. Project-based Learning for Environmental Sustainability Action. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education. 2020; 36. doi: 10.4314/sajee.v36i1.10

64. Al-Balushi SM, Al-Aamri SS. The effect of environmental science projects on students’ environmental knowledge and science attitudes. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education. 2014; 23(3): 213-227. doi: 10.1080/10382046.2014.927167

65. Mukunda Vani M, Baig YM, Wesley C, et al. Sustainable Project-Based Learning: A More Practical Approach. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations. 2021; 34(0): 718. doi: 10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i0/157172

66. Lou SJ, Liu YH, Shih RC, et al. Effectiveness of on-line stem project-based learning for female senior high school students. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2010; 27: 399-410.

67. Khandakar A, Chowdhury MEH, Gonzales AJrSP, et al. Case Study to Analyze the Impact of Multi-Course Project-Based Learning Approach on Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability. 2020; 12(2): 480. doi: 10.3390/su12020480

68. Bell S. Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas. 2010; 83(2): 39-43. doi: 10.1080/00098650903505415

69. Hsu PS, Van Dyke M, Chen Y, et al. The effect of a graph‐oriented computer‐assisted project‐based learning environment on argumentation skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2014; 31(1): 32-58. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12080

70. Barak M, Asad K. Teaching image-processing concepts in junior high school: boys’ and girls’ achievements and attitudes towards technology. Research in Science & Technological Education. 2012; 30(1): 81-105. doi: 10.1080/02635143.2012.656084

71. Barak M. From ‘doing’ to ‘doing with learning’: reflection on an effort to promote self-regulated learning in technological projects in high school. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2012; 37(1): 105-116. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2012.658759

72. Doppelt Y. Implementation and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 2003; 13: 255-272.

73. Mioduser D, Betzer N. The contribution of Project-based-learning to high-achievers’ acquisition of technological knowledge and skills. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 2007; 18(1): 59-77. doi: 10.1007/s10798-006-9010-4

74. Karaçalli S, Korur F. The Effects of Project‐Based Learning on Students’ Academic Achievement, Attitude, and Retention of Knowledge: The Subject of “Electricity in Our Lives.” School Science and Mathematics. 2014; 114(5): 224-235. doi: 10.1111/ssm.12071

75. Geier R, Blumenfeld PC, Marx RW, et al. Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry‐based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2008; 45(8): 922-939. doi: 10.1002/tea.20248

76. Zhou C. A Study on Creative Climate in Project-Organized Groups (POGs) in China and Implications for Sustainable Pedagogy. Sustainability. 2018; 10(1): 114. doi: 10.3390/su10010114

77. Habok A. Implementation of a project-based concept mapping developmental programme to facilitate children’s experiential reasoning and comprehension of relations. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal. 2015; 23(1): 129-142. doi: 10.1080/1350293x.2014.991100

78. ChanLin L. Technology integration applied to project‐based learning in science. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2008; 45(1): 55-65. doi: 10.1080/14703290701757450

79. Zhang X. Project-based teaching design and evaluation research based on the cultivation of geography practice skill in high school students [Master’s thesis]. Shanghai Normal University; 2022.

80. Chou X. Project-based learning research aimed at the cultivation of high school students’ geography practice skill [Master’s thesis]. Guangzhou University; 2022.

81. Wen H. Research on the teaching strategy of geography practice skill in high school based on project-based learning [Master’s thesis]. Fujian Normal University; 2021.

82. Zhang H. Research on the cultivation of geographical practice skill on project-based learning [Master’s thesis]. Hangzhou Normal University; 2021.

83. Shan Y. Research on geography project-based learning design based on the geographical practical skill in high school students [Master’s thesis]. Chongqing Normal University; 2021.

84. Lin Y. Cultivation of geographic practice skill based on project-based learning: A case study of “social survey on location selection of service industry”. Geography Teaching. 2022; 18: 30-32+39.

85. Fang Y. Exploration of teaching strategy of geography practice skill in high school based on project-based learning [Master’s thesis]. East China Normal University; 2021.

86. Hui M. Cultivation of geographical practice skill based on project-based learning: Taking the project “research on the name of natural villages in Nanquan town in Wuxi city” as an example. Geography Teaching. 2021; 12: 55-57.

87. Shao Y, Wang F. Exploration of geography practice activities based on project-based learning: Taking “hangzhou qibao old street study travel activity” as an example. Geography Teaching. 2022; 02: 25-27.

88. Huang C. Teaching strategy of geography practice skill based on stem concept: Taking “preliminary investigation and exploration of water quality status of Tianma river in Huadu” as an example. Geography Teaching. 2018; 12: 39-42.

89. Zhai S. Design and implementation of secondary school geography expedition from interdisciplinary perspective: A case study of hexi corridor. In: Proceeding of the 2018 Annual Conference of Beijing Education Society.

90. Anderson J. Interdisciplinary project-based learning leads to success. Tech Directions. 2010; 70: 20.

91. Kempa R. Orion N. Students’ perception of co‐operative learning in earth science fieldwork. Research in Science and Technological Education. 1996; 14: 33-41.

92. Walshe N. Understanding students’ conceptions of sustainability. Environmental Education Research. 2008; 14: 537-558.

93. Dunphy A. Extending students’ understandings of sustainable development beyond the environment [Master’s thesis]. University of Cambridge; 2009.

94. Larmer J, Mergendoller JR. Seven essentials for project-based learning. Educational leadership. 2010; 68: 34-37.

95. Rieckmann M. Learning to transform the world: Key competencies in education for sustainable development. Issues and trends in education for sustainable development. 2018, 39: 39-59.

96. Lau EYH, Li H, Rao N. Parental involvement and children’s readiness for school in China. Educational Research. 2011; 53(1): 95-113. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2011.552243

97. Han LF, Foskett NH. Objectives and Constraints in Geographical Fieldwork: Teachers’ Attitudes and Perspectives in Senior High Schools in Taiwan. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education. 2007; 16(1): 5-20. doi: 10.2167/irg203.0

98. Salter CL. No Bad Landscape. Geographical Review. 2001; 91(1/2): 105. doi: 10.2307/3250810

99. Feng L. Teacher and student responses to interdisciplinary aspects of sustainability education: what do we really know? Environmental Education Research. 2012; 18(1): 31-43. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2011.574209

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Ruiyan Hua, Fengtao Guo, Yushan Duan, Hanxin Fan, Jiaqi Zhang

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0


This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).