Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.
Neutralizing the surging environmental pollution amidst renewable energy consumption and economic growth in Ghana: Insights from ARDL and quantile regression analysis
Vol 2, Issue 6, 2024
Download PDF
Abstract
This research explores the link between renewable energy consumption, economic growth, electricity accessibility, greenhouse gas emissions, and environmental degradation in Ghana from 1993 to 2020. Utilizing the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model and quantile regression, it analyzes the validity of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis. ARDL findings imply that renewable energy consumption (REC), greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), and power accessibility (ATE) have positive but statistically negligible long-term associations with CO2 emissions. In contrast, economic growth (ECG) shows a slight negative link. This suggests that current attempts to promote renewable energy and minimize emissions may only partially lower CO2 levels. Quantile regression demonstrates a positive correlation between REC and CO2 emissions, counter to the idea that more renewable energy consumption decreases emissions. GHG strongly affects environmental pollution (EVP) at all levels, whereas power accessibility (ATE) has a favorable effect at lower levels but becomes negative at higher ones. Economic growth’s impact on pollution is detrimental at lower and median values but needs more relevance at more significant levels. These results imply the need for stricter laws, technical breakthroughs, emission limitations, and carbon pricing to mitigate pollution coming from economic expansion.
Keywords
References
1. Khadka A, Hebert J, Maria Glymour M, et al. Quantile regressions as a tool to evaluate how an exposure shifts and reshapes the outcome distribution: A primer for epidemiologists. MedRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory); 2023. doi: 10.1101/2023.05.02.23289415
2. Acharya S, Shil A, Debbarma C, et al. Analysis of energy consumption, emission and saving opportunities in an educational institute in northeast India. International Journal of Energy and Water Resources. 2020; 4(4): 375-388. doi: 10.1007/s42108-020-00086-1
3. Achuo ED, Ojong N. Energy transition and pollution emissions in developing countries: are renewable energies guilty? International Journal of Development Issues. 2023; 22(3): 361-382. doi: 10.1108/ijdi-05-2023-0114
4. Adams S, Klobodu EKM, Apio A. Renewable and non-renewable energy, regime type and economic growth. Renewable Energy. 2018; 125: 755-767. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.135
5. Adenuga OT, Mpofu K, Modise RK. Energy–Carbon Emissions Nexus Causal Model towards Low-Carbon Products in Future Transport-Manufacturing Industries. Energies. 2022; 15(17): 6322. doi: 10.3390/en15176322
6. Agbata AE, Egolum PU, Offia AC, et al. Corporate governance and firm sustainability in the emerging economy: A literature review. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review. 2023; 6(4): 33-43. doi: 10.22495/cgsrv6i4p3
7. Sampene AK, Li C, Wiredu J. An outlook at the switch to renewable energy in emerging economies: The beneficial effect of technological innovation and green finance. Energy Policy. 2024; 187: 114025. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114025
8. Al-Attar AM. Vitamin E. Attenuates liver injury induced by exposure to lead, mercury, cadmium and copper in albino mice. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2011; 18(4): 395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2011.07.004
9. Ali A, Radulescu M, Balsalobre-Lorente D. A dynamic relationship between renewable energy consumption, nonrenewable energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from Asian emerging economies. Energy & Environment. 2023; 34(8): 3529-3552. doi: 10.1177/0958305x231151684
10. Asumadu-Sarkodie S, Yadav P. Achieving a cleaner environment via the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: determinants of electricity access and pollution in India. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 2019; 21(9): 1883-1889. doi: 10.1007/s10098-019-01756-3
11. Aydin C, Cetintas Y. Does Renewable Energy Determine the Environmental Impacts of Economic Growth? New Evidence from PSTR Analysis. 2022. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1388826/v1
12. Aydin M, Koc P, Sahpaz KI. Investigating the EKC hypothesis with nanotechnology, renewable energy consumption, economic growth and ecological footprint in G7 countries: panel data analyses with structural breaks. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy. 2023; 18(1). doi: 10.1080/15567249.2022.2163724
13. Izah SC, Ogwu MC. Sustainable Utilization and Conservation of Africa’s Biological Resources and Environment. Springer Nature Singapore; 2023. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-6974-4
14. Bahe AR, Staveley J, Classen J, et al. Emerging Environmental Contaminants: Current Science And Policy Concerns. Animal Agriculture and the Environment, National Center for Manure & Animal Waste Management White Papers; 2006. doi: 10.13031/2013.20253
15. Barış-Tüzemen Ö, Tüzemen S, Çelik AK. Does an N-shaped association exist between pollution and ICT in Turkey? ARDL and quantile regression approaches. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020; 27(17): 20786-20799. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08513-w
16. Baum S, Ma J, Payea K. Education Pays, 2013: The Benefits of Higher Education for Individuals and Society. Trends in Higher Education Series. In ERIC. College Board; 2013.
17. Baxi U. Human Rights Responsibility of Multinational Corporations, Political Ecology of Injustice: Learning from Bhopal Thirty Plus? Business and Human Rights Journal. 2015; 1(1): 21-40. doi: 10.1017/bhj.2015.7
18. Ampomah Asiedu B. Economic Growth and Environmental Pollution; Testing the EKC Hypothesis in Brazil. The Toxicity of Environmental Pollutants; 2022. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.104388
19. C OO, O OO, R FA, et al. Environmental pollution as health depreciator: the case of household generator use in nigeria. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. 2023; 29(1): 11-17. doi: 10.4314/gjpas.v29i1.2
20. de Abreu MCS, Soares RA, Daniel‐Vasconcelos V, et al. Does board diversity encourage an environmental policy focused on resource use, emission reduction and innovation? The case of companies in Latin America. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2022; 30(3): 1161-1176. doi: 10.1002/csr.2411
21. Çelik D. The Share of Renewable Energy as a Factor Affecting Economic Growth and Foreign Trade Balance (Turkish). Kent Akademisi. 2022; 15(2): 781-797. doi: 10.35674/kent.1094116
22. Chakravorty U, Emerick K, Ravago ML. Lighting Up the Last Mile: The Benefits and Costs of Extending Electricity to the Rural Poor. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2016. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2851907
23. Cloy JM, Smith KA. Greenhouse Gas Emissions☆. Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences; 2015. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-409548-9.05178-2
24. Asif M. Energy and Environmental Security in Developing Countries. Springer International Publishing; 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-63654-8
25. Dhillon DK, Kaur K. A nexus between sustainability, energy utilisation and economic growth at aggregate and disaggregate level: a case of India. International Journal of Energy Sector Management. 2023; 18(3): 433-456. doi: 10.1108/ijesm-09-2022-0013
26. Dion G. Green Debate. JEMS. 2021; 36(4): 16-16. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2510(11)70076-6
27. Eboe-Osuji C, Emeseh E. Nigerian Yearbook of International Law 2017. Springer International Publishing; 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-71476-9
28. Ali EB, Gyamfi BA, Bekun FV, et al. An empirical assessment of the tripartite nexus between environmental pollution, economic growth, and agricultural production in Sub-Saharan African countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023; 30(27): 71007-71024. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27307-4
29. Felix D, Edmond D. Managing Environmental Degradation Using Traditional, Cultural and Spiritual Strategies the Tale of Dagaaba and Birifor People. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies. 2023: 17-22. doi: 10.9734/ajess/2023/v38i4831
30. Field BG. GDP revisited. Journal of Mega Infrastructure & Sustainable Development. 2020; 2(3): 310-313. doi: 10.1080/24724718.2021.2087962
31. Fu Y, Yang C, Li T, et al. Study of renewable energy consumption under energy internet. Advances in Energy, Environment and Chemical Engineering Volume 1. 2022: 470-476. doi: 10.1201/9781003330165-69
32. Fumey MP, Wiredu J, Essuman AN. Evaluating taxation’s dual impact on business and social development: A case study of the Cape Coast metropolis in Ghana. Financial Statistical Journal. 2024; 7(1). doi: 10.24294/fsj.v6i2.3833
33. Giles DE. Roger Koenker, Victor Chernozhukov, et al. Handbook of Quantile Regression. Statistical Papers; 2018. 59(2): 849-850. doi: 10.1007/s00362-018-1004-2
34. Greenstone M, Hanna R. Environmental Regulations, Air and Water Pollution, and Infant Mortality in India. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2011. doi: 10.3386/w17210
35. Granger CWJ. Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica. 1969; 37(3): 424. doi: 10.2307/1912791
36. Grossman GM, Krueger AB. Economic Growth and the Environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1995; 110(2): 353-377. doi: 10.2307/2118443
37. Guo X, Huang K, Li L, et al. Renewable Energy for Balancing Carbon Emissions and Reducing Carbon Transfer under Global Value Chains: A Way Forward. Sustainability. 2022; 15(1): 234. doi: 10.3390/su15010234
38. Haider A, Rankaduwa W, Shaheen F, et al. The Nexus between GHGs Emissions and Clean Growth: Empirical Evidence from Canadian Provinces. Sustainability. 2023; 15(3): 2218. doi: 10.3390/su15032218
39. Dissanayake H, Perera N, Abeykoon S, et al. Nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth: Evidence from global economies. PLOS ONE. 2023; 18(6): e0287579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287579
40. Hashmi SH, Fan H, Fareed Z, et al. Asymmetric nexus between urban agglomerations and environmental pollution in top ten urban agglomerated countries using quantile methods. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020; 28(11): 13404-13424. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10669-4
41. He P, Liang J, Qiu Y, et al. Increase in domestic electricity consumption from particulate air pollution. Nature Energy. 2020; 5(12): 985-995. doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-00699-0
42. Hübler M. The inequality-emissions nexus in the context of trade and development: A quantile regression approach. Ecological Economics. 2017; 134: 174-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.015
43. Ibili F, Adams CA, Adebanji AO, et al. The state-of-the-art of practice of traffic noise regulations in Ghana. Noise & Vibration Worldwide. 2023; 54(4-5): 204-214. doi: 10.1177/09574565231161645
44. Gharbi I, Kammoun A, Kefi MK. To what extent does renewable energy deployment reduce pollution indicators? the moderating role of research and development expenditure: Evidence from the top three ranked countries. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2023; 11. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1096885
45. Islam MdS. Influence of economic growth on environmental pollution in South Asia: a panel cointegration analysis. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science. 2021; 5(3): 951-973. doi: 10.1007/s41685-021-00208-5
46. Ivanovski K, Hailemariam A. Is globalisation linked to CO2 emission? Evidence from OECD nations. Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 2021; 29(2): 241-270. doi: 10.1007/s10651-021-00520-5
47. Jantre SR, Bhattacharya S, Maiti T. Quantile Regression Neural Networks: A Bayesian Approach. Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice. 2021; 15(3). doi: 10.1007/s42519-021-00189-w
48. Jena PR, Majhi B, Majhi R. Estimating Long-Run Relationship between Renewable Energy Use and CO2 Emissions: A Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN) Approach. Sustainability. 2022; 14(9): 5260. doi: 10.3390/su14095260
49. Kayani UN, Sadiq M, Rabbani MR, et al. Examining the Relationship between Economic Growth, Financial Development, and Carbon Emissions: A Review of the Literature and Scientometric Analysis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 2023; 13(2): 489-499. doi: 10.32479/ijeep.14278
50. Anmol KT. Learning for development: factors that lead to successful development projects for marginalised communities affected by climate change in Bangladesh. University of Canterbury; 2020. doi: 10.26021/10813
51. Lau LS, Yii KJ, Ng CF, et al. Environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis: A bibliometric review of the last three decades. Energy & Environment. 2023: 0958305X2311777. doi: 10.1177/0958305x231177734
52. Li C, Sampene AK, Agyeman FO, et al. The role of green finance and energy innovation in neutralizing environmental pollution: Empirical evidence from the MINT economies. Journal of Environmental Management. 2022; 317: 115500. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115500
53. Li G, Koomson DA, Huang J, et al. A review from environmental management to environmental governance: paradigm shift for sustainable mining practice in Ghana. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2020; 23(7): 9710-9724. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-01050-z
54. Llácer-Iglesias RM, López-Jiménez PA, Pérez-Sánchez M. Energy Self-Sufficiency Aiming for Sustainable Wastewater Systems: Are All Options Being Explored? Sustainability. 2021; 13(10): 5537. doi: 10.3390/su13105537
55. López-González LM, López-Ochoa LM, Las-Heras-Casas J, et al. Final and primary energy consumption of the residential sector in Spain and La Rioja (1991–2013), verifying the degree of compliance with the European 2020 goals by means of energy indicators. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018; 81: 2358-2370. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.044
56. Manisalidis I, Stavropoulou E, Stavropoulos A, et al. Environmental and Health Impacts of Air Pollution: A Review. Frontiers in Public Health. 2020; 8. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014
57. Manta AG, Florea NM, Bădîrcea RM, et al. The Nexus between Carbon Emissions, Energy Use, Economic Growth and Financial Development: Evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries. Sustainability. 2020; 12(18): 7747. doi: 10.3390/su12187747
58. Elbadri M, Bsikre S, Alamari O, et al. Nexus between renewable energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in Algeria: New evidence from the Fourier‐Bootstrap ARDL approach. Natural Resources Forum. 2023; 47(3): 393-412. doi: 10.1111/1477-8947.12292
59. Ayyat MS, Mahmoud HK, El-Hais AEAM, et al. The role of some feed additives in fish fed on diets contaminated with cadmium. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017; 24(30): 23636-23645. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9986-1
60. Mose N, Fumey M, Kipchirchir E. Drivers of Carbon Emissions in Kenya: The Perspective of Technology. Asian Journal of Geographical Research. 2024; 7(2): 1-10. doi: 10.9734/ajgr/2024/v7i2226
61. Mukhtarov S, Aliyev F, Aliyev J, et al. Renewable Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from an Oil-Rich Economy. Sustainability. 2022; 15(1): 134. doi: 10.3390/su15010134
62. Murshed M. Can regional trade integration facilitate renewable energy transition to ensure energy sustainability in South Asia? Energy Reports. 2021; 7: 808-821. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.01.038
63. Muszeros O, Zsult KG. Collaboration of Communities and Non-Profit Organizations in Addressing Environmental Problems with African Countries. International Journal Papier Public Review. 2021; 2(2): 15-20. doi: 10.47667/ijppr.v2i2.83
64. Necibi MC, Dhiba D, El Hajjaji S. Contaminants of Emerging Concern in African Wastewater Effluents: Occurrence, Impact and Removal Technologies. Sustainability. 2021; 13(3): 1125. doi: 10.3390/su13031125
65. Neumann R, Mehlkop G. Neutralization strategies account for the concern-behavior gap in renewable energy usage – Evidence from panel data from Germany. Energy Research & Social Science. 2023; 99: 103041. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103041
66. Muhammad T, Farah Z, Sania A, et al. Nexus between Carbon emission per capita and Urbanization. Journal of Economics, Management & Business Administration. 2023; 1(2): 15-26. doi: 10.59075/jemba.v1i2.116
67. Okereafor U, Makhatha M, Mekuto L, et al. Toxic Metal Implications on Agricultural Soils, Plants, Animals, Aquatic life and Human Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(7): 2204. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072204
68. Osemene OF, Adinnu P, Fagbemi TO, et al. Corporate Governance and Environmental Accounting Reporting in Selected Quoted African Companies. Global Business Review. 2021; 25(4): 1096-1119. doi: 10.1177/09721509211010989
69. Paganelli MP. Population as a GDP Proxy in Adam Smith. Journal of Scottish Philosophy. 2021; 19(2): 115-123. doi: 10.3366/jsp.2021.0297
70. Mleczek P, Borowiak K, Budka A, et al. Possible sources of rare earth elements near different classes of road in Poland and their phytoextraction to herbaceous plant species. Environmental Research. 2021; 193: 110580. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110580
71. Pellagatti M, Masci C, Ieva F, et al. Generalized mixed‐effects random forest: A flexible approach to predict university student dropout. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal. 2021; 14(3): 241-257. doi: 10.1002/sam.11505
72. Pereira MG, Sena JA, Freitas MAV, et al. Evaluation of the impact of access to electricity: A comparative analysis of South Africa, China, India and Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2011; 15(3): 1427-1441. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.005
73. Piacentini RD, Garro S. Carbon neutral industries and compensation for greenhouse gas emissions. Drying Technology. 2022; 40(16): 3371-3372. doi: 10.1080/07373937.2022.2149181
74. Proudlove R, Finch S, Thomas S. Factors influencing intention to invest in a community owned renewable energy initiative in Queensland, Australia. Energy Policy. 2020; 140: 111441. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111441
75. Raihan A. Nexus between economic growth, natural resources rents, trade globalization, financial development, and carbon emissions toward environmental sustainability in Uruguay. Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics and Technology. 2023; 4(2): 55-65. doi: 10.33122/ejeset.v4i2.102
76. Rezania S, Park J, Md Din MF, et al. Microplastics pollution in different aquatic environments and biota: A review of recent studies. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2018; 133: 191-208. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.05.022
77. Nahrin R, Rahman MdH, Majumder SC, et al. Economic Growth and Pollution Nexus in Mexico, Colombia, and Venezuela (G-3 Countries): The Role of Renewable Energy in Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Energies. 2023; 16(3): 1076. doi: 10.3390/en16031076
78. Ross TA, Zhang J, Wille M, et al. Interplay between pollution and avian influenza virus in shorebirds and waterfowl. 2023. doi: 10.1101/2023.02.23.529812
79. Rykowska I, Wasiak W. Research trends on emerging environment pollutants – a review. Open Chemistry. 2015; 13(1). doi: 10.1515/chem-2015-0151
80. Sadhu SD, Garg M, Kumar A. Major environmental issues and new materials. New Polymer Nanocomposites for Environmental Remediation. 2018: 77-97. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-811033-1.00004-4
81. Saqib N, Usman M, Radulescu M, et al. Revisiting EKC hypothesis in context of renewable energy, human development and moderating role of technological innovations in E-7 countries? Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2022; 10. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1077658
82. Sarkar S. Mycoremediation—The promising thread between the present and future. International Journal of Chemical and Environmental Sciences. 2022; 3(4): 34-45. doi: 10.15864/ijcaes.3404
83. Saunois M, Bousquet P, Poulter B, et al. Variability and quasi-decadal changes in the methane budget over the period 2000–2012. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2017; 17(18): 11135-11161. doi: 10.5194/acp-17-11135-2017
84. Schneider N. Sustainable development or environmental Kuznets curve: some unresolved controversies. International Journal of Environmental Studies. 2022; 80(3): 531-534. doi: 10.1080/00207233.2022.2078109
85. Semenova G. Global environmental problems in the world. E3S Web of Conferences. 2020; 217: 11004. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202021711004
86. Singh VP, Yadav S, Yadav KK, et al. Environmental Degradation: Challenges and Strategies for Mitigation. Springer International Publishing; 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-95542-7
87. Ssali MW, Du J, Mensah IA, et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Investigating the nexus among environmental pollution, economic growth, energy use, and foreign direct investment in 6 selected sub-Saharan African countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2019; 26(11): 11245-11260. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04455-0
88. Tai-Young K, Jong-Bae B. Effective Removal of Air Pollutions by the Electrical Discharge. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering A. 2017; 6(11). doi: 10.17265/2162-5298/2017.11.001
89. La Rocca M, Liseo B, Salmaso L, et al. Nonparametric Statistics. Springer International Publishing; 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-57306-5
90. Tarun Mohanty A. Measuring GDP and Economic Growth: An Economic Barometer. International Journal of Tax Economics and Management. 2019; 2(1): 42-58. doi: 10.35935/tax/21.5842
91. Tetteh B, Baidoo ST. Environmental degradation, energy use, and globalization in Ghana: New empirical evidence from regime switching and neural network autoregression models. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy. 2022; 18(1): 679-695. doi: 10.1080/15487733.2022.2110680
92. Thangasamy R, Deo M. The Nexus Between Environmental Pollution, Energy Use and Economic Growth of EAGLEs: A Panel Econometric Analysis. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2022; 49(3). doi: 10.55863/ijees.2023.2491
93. Thi D, Tran VQ, Nguyen DT. The relationship between renewable energy consumption, international tourism, trade openness, innovation and carbon dioxide emissions: international evidence. International Journal of Sustainable Energy. 2023; 42(1): 397-416. doi: 10.1080/14786451.2023.2192827
94. Timur MC, Doğan-Çalişkan Z. The Importance of Energy Sources in the Prevention of Environmental Pollution. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences. 2017; 2(4): 68-73. doi: 10.24001/ijels.2.4.9
95. Tudor C. The Nexus between Pollution and Obesity and the Magnifying Role of Media Consumption: International Evidence from GMM Systems Estimates. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(16): 10260. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610260
96. Uddin MMM. Revisiting the impacts of economic growth on environmental degradation: new evidence from 115 countries. Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 2021; 28(1): 153-185. doi: 10.1007/s10651-020-00479-9
97. van Ruijven BJ, Schers J, van Vuuren DP. Model-based scenarios for rural electrification in developing countries. Energy. 2012; 38(1): 386-397. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.11.037
98. Vetter SH, Nayak D, McBey D, et al. Environmental Issues: Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Sustainable Food Science - A Comprehensive Approach. 2023: 216-248. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-823960-5.00043-3
99. Patidar VK, Wadhvani R, Shukla S, et al. Quantile Regression Comprehensive in Machine Learning: A Review. In: Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Students’ Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science (SCEECS). 2023. doi: 10.1109/sceecs57921.2023.10063026
100. Wang Q, Yang X, Li R, et al. Revisiting the impact of renewable energy on carbon emission in 130 countries—The mediating effect of resource rental rents and human capital. Energy & Environment. 2023: 0958305X2311777. doi: 10.1177/0958305x231177726
101. Wiredu J, Yang Q, Inuwa UL, et al. Energy transition in Africa: The role of human capital, financial development, economic development, and carbon emissions. Environmental Science & Policy. 2023; 146: 24-36. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.04.021
102. Yan C, Li H, Li Z. Environmental pollution and economic growth: Evidence of SO2 emissions and GDP in China. Frontiers in Public Health. 2022; 10. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.930780
103. Yilmaz R. Industrial Development and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Case Study on Ergene Basin (Turkish). Sosyal Bilimler Metinleri. 2022; 2022(2): 99-108. doi: 10.56337/sbm.1158780
104. You Y, Huang H, Shao L, et al. Research on the optimization and improvement of business environment based on the customer satisfaction model of ‘Access to Electricity’. E3S Web of Conferences. 2023; 369: 01009. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202336901009
105. Ünvan YA. A credit default swap application by using quantile regression technique. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods. 2020; 50(7): 1573-1586. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2019.1711126
106. Zhang T, Yin J, Li Z, et al. RETRACTED: A dynamic relationship between renewable energy consumption, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions: Evidence from Asian emerging economies. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2023; 10. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1092196
107. Zhong Q, Wang JL. Neural Networks for Partially Linear Quantile Regression. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. 2023; 42(2): 603-614. doi: 10.1080/07350015.2023.2208183
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Michael Provide Fumey, Gabriel Mordzifa Sackitey, John Wiredu, Clause Akrong-Nartey, Daniel Ewusi Arthur, Naftaly Mose
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Prof. Kittisak Jermsittiparsert
University of City Island, Cyprus