Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.
Analysis of gender and institutional level of arrangement in REDD+ pilot sites, Cross River State, Nigeria
Vol 2, Issue 5, 2024
VIEWS - 51 (Abstract)
Download PDF
Abstract
This study assessed genders’ institutional level of arrangement in REDD+ pilot sites, Cross River State, Nigeria. Data were collected through literature and policy document review and Focus Group Discussion (FGD). The total number of 270 documents with three, Level 1: Non-substantive inclusion, Level 2: Superficial inclusion and Level 3: Integrated inclusion. The gender were classified as Men and Women for the search engine. The results showed that only 95 of the 270 REDD+ related documents mentioned gender (representing 51% of the total documents). Nearly half of the texts that include the crucial phrases were categorized at Level 1, which means that gender concerns were not material. Regardless of how it is seen, the meager inclusion of gender mainstreaming discussion can only be found in Level 3. This 7% translated to only 12 out of the 270 documents which truly and fully understood the gender mainstreaming ideas. The study concluded that communities’ policy interventions such as REDD+ still exhibit non-compliance of gender mainstreaming and institutional level of arrangement, therefore, this study recommend that “sincerity” of gender mainstreaming from the government and other stakeholders is a panacea for the success of any climate change adaptation programme such as REDD+.
Keywords
References
1. Larson AM, Solis D, Duchelle AE et al. Gender Lessons for Climate Initiatives: A Comparative Study of REDD+ Impacts on Subjective Wellbeing. World Development. 2018; 108: 86-102.
2. Duchelle AE, de Sassi C, Jagger P, et al. Balancing carrots and sticks in REDD+: implications for social safeguards. Ecology and Society. 2017; 22(3). doi: 10.5751/es-09334-220302
3. UN-REDD. UN-REDD Methodological Brief on Gender. United Nations REDD Programme. 2017.
4. Nigeria REDD+ Readiness Programme. UN Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries National Programme Document. Federal Ministry of Environment: 2012.
5. Basiru AO, Mukundi JB, Oeba VO. Gender and Social Vulnerability Assessment of Forest-Based Communities to Climate Change and Variability in Southwest Nigeria. Applied and Social Science International Research Journal. 2018; 1: 56-68.
6. George T, Anthony O, Olawale O, et al. Factors militating against gender mainstreaming in Nigeria. Gender and Behaviour 2019; 11: 14038-14045.
7. UNFCCC. UN Climate Change Annual Report. 2018; 8-49.
8. Igiebor OT. Gender Equity Policies and Women in Academic Leadership Positions in Nigeria. PhD diss., ResearchSpace@ Auckland, 2021.
9. Satyal, Poshendra, Esteve C, et al. Justice-related impacts and social differentiation dynamics in Nepal’s REDD+ projects. Forest Policy and Economics. 2020; 117: 102203
10. Basiru AO, Oladoye AO, Adekoya OO. et al. Livelihood vulnerability index: gender dimension to climate change and variability in REDD+ piloted sites, Cross River State, Nigeria. Land 2022; 11: 1240.
11. Onojeghuo AO, Fonweban J, Godstime KJ. et al. Community participation in forest management across protected areas in south eastern Nigeria. Ife Journal of Science. 2016; 18: 213-228.
12. Isyaku U. Beyond Policy Design: REDD+ Implementation and Institutional Complexities of Environmental Governance in Cross River State, Nigeria. University of Leicester, Leicester. 2017; 326.
13. Akindele J, Oladepo O, Richard A. Linguistic Diversity, Nigerian Indigenous Languages and the Choice of the English Language for Nigeria’s National Sustainability. Voices: A Journal of English Studies 2022; 7: 72-83.
14. Juma, Edwin AB, Paul O, et al. Understanding levels and motivations of rural women engaging in Forest Management Institutions: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Ecology and The Natural Environment 2021; 13: 51-62.
15. Duma MG. Gender Mainstreaming Plan for Gender-Responsive Public Schools. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning 2022; 5: 144-161
16. Asiyanbi AP. A political ecology of REDD+: Property rights, militarised protectionism, and carbonised exclusion in Cross River. Geoforum. 2016b; 77: 146-156.
17. Tegegne YT, Charles P, Sven W, et al. REDD+ and equity outcomes: Two cases from Cameroon. Environmental Science & Policy 2021; 124: 324-335.
18. Awono A, Somorin OA, Atyi REA, et al. Tenure and participation in local REDD+ projects: Insights from southern Cameroon. Environmental Science and Policy. 2014; 35: 76-86.
19. Nuesiri E. Local government authority and representation in REDD+: a case study from Nigeria. International Forestry Review. 2016; 18: 306-318.
20. Asiyanbi AP. Beyond utopia and a ‘power‐full’state: a reply to Nuesiri. The Geographical Journal. 2016a; 182: 104-106.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Prof. Kittisak Jermsittiparsert
University of City Island, Cyprus
