Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.
Patriarchy in Southern Africa and war in West Africa: Twin impediments to sustainable social development in Africa
Vol 2, Issue 3, 2024
VIEWS - 2048 (Abstract)
Download PDF
Abstract
Close to 4 decades post-publishing of the Brundtland Report, a global blueprint that emphasised multilateralism and interdependence of nations as the basis for a tenable sustainable development, gender inequalities and untenable development persist in Africa. There is a need to continuously redefine the pathways for eliminating poverty and gender inequalities as the basis for sustainability. A better understanding of the causes of gender inequality as well as an acknowledgement of the fact that gender equality and sustainable development are inseparable is also imperative. This review study, through a desk review of available literature, explored three central issues: why gender inequality and sustainable development must be addressed together in everyday theory and practice, how patriarchy and war cause gender inequalities and untenable sustainability in Africa, and how these twin pandemics must be confronted to ensure achievement of the 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) and their 86 targets, drawing from case studies of Southern and West Africa. Focusing on a number of social determinants of well-being, including good health for all, sexual and reproductive health services, education for all, quality of employment, gender rights, and basic requirements such as food and portable water, the review study argues that development efforts in Africa have proved gender unequal and thus unsustainable. The review study advanced arguments for a holistic view of sustainable social development, contending that market-focused indicators of development that disregard social determinants of well-being misrepresent reality. Market-focused neo-liberal patterns of growth neglect human needs and compound poverty and undergrowth. On the other hand, integrating a people centred approach to growth helps understand the connections, ruptures, and trade-offs between dimensions of gender equality and sustainability in a way that facilitates holistic growth.
Keywords
References
1. Leach M, Lyla M, Prabhakaran P. Gender Equality and Sustainable Development: A Pathways Approach. UN Women; 2016.
2. Parpart JL, Connelly P, Barriteau EV. Theoretical Perspectives on Gender and Development. International Development Research Centre; 2000.
3. Kitch SL. Does War have Gender? In: Hunter AE (editor). On Peace, War, and Gender: A Challenge to Genetic Explanations. The Feminist Press; 1991. pp. 92-103.
4. Odera JA, Mulusa J. SDGs, Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment: What Prospects for Delivery? In: Kaltenborn M, Krajewski M, Kuhn H (editors). Sustainable Development Goals and Human Rights. Interdisciplinary Studies in Human Rights; 2020.
5. Alonso H, Gustafson M. Bibliography on the History of U.S. Women in Movements for Peace. Women’s Studies Quarterly. 1984; 12(2): 46-50.
6. World Commission on Environment and Development. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Our common future. Available online: https://www.google.com/search?q=The+Brundtland+Report percent5B6percent5D+percent28World+Commission+on+Environment+and+Development (accessed on 27 November 2023).
7. Barron P, Cord L, Cuesta J, et al. Social Sustainability in Development: Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century. World Bank Group; 2023. doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1946-9
8. Beegle K, Christiaensen L. Accelerating Poverty Reduction in Africa. World Bank; 2019. doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1232-3
9. Kent SK. The Politics of Sexual Difference: World War I and the Demise of British Feminism. Journal of British Studies. 1988; 27(3): 232-253. doi: 10.1086/385912
10. Brewer, A. Marxist Theories of Imperialism: A Critical Survey. Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1980.
11. Kamester M, Vellacott J. Militarism versus Feminism: Writings on Women and War. Virago Press; 1987.
12. Hirsu L, Hashemi L, Quezada-Rayes Z. SDG 5: Achieve Gender Equality and Empower all Women and Girls. Jean Monnet Sustainable Development Goals. Policy Brief Series. RMIT University. Available online: https://www.rmit.edu.au/content/dam/rmit/rmit-images/college-of-dsc-images/eu-centre/ sdg-5-policy-brief.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2023).
13. United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs; 2015.
14. Mshweshwe L. Understanding domestic violence: masculinity, culture, traditions. Heliyon. 2020; 6(10): e05334. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05334
15. Sikweyiya Y, Addo-Lartey AA, Alangea DO, et al. Patriarchy and gender-inequitable attitudes as drivers of intimate partner violence against women in the central region of Ghana. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1). doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08825-z
16. Bannerji, H. Patriarchy in the Era of Neoliberalism: The Case of India. Social Scientist. 2016; 4(3/4): 3-27.
17. Parekh S, Wilcox, S. Feminist perspectives on globalization. Available online: https://plato.stanford.edu/archive/spr2020/entries/feminism-globalization/ (accessed on 19 December 2023).
18. Campbell B. End of Equality (Manifestos for the 21st Century). Paper Back. Seagull Books; 2014.
19. Hundle AK. Postcolonial Patriarchal Nativism, Domestic Violence and Transnational Feminist Research in Contemporary Uganda. Feminist Review. 2019; 121(1): 37-52. doi: 10.1177/0141778918818835
20. Hearn J, Collinson DL. Men, Masculinities, Managements and Organisational Culture. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung. 1998; 12(2): 210-222. doi: 10.1177/239700229801200205
21. DeKeseredy WS. Bringing Feminist Sociological Analyses of Patriarchy Back to the Forefront of the Study of Woman Abuse. Violence Against Women. 2020; 27(5): 621-638. doi: 10.1177/1077801220958485
22. Dhar S. Gender and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Indian Journal of Gender Studies. 2018; 25(1): 47-78. doi: 10.1177/0971521517738451
23. Hepp P, Somerville C, Borisch B. Accelerating the United Nation’s 2030 Global agenda: Why prioritization of the gender goal is essential. Global Policy. 2019; 10(4): 677-685. doi: 10.1111/ 1758-5899.12721
24. Agarwal B. Gender equality, food security and the sustainable development goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2018; 34: 26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.07.002
25. Asadikia A, Rajabifard A, Kalantari M. Systematic prioritisation of SDGs: Machine learning approach. World Development. 2021; 140: 105269. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105269
26. Obura DO. Getting to 2030 - Scaling effort to ambition through a narrative model of the SDGs. Marine Policy. 2020; 117: 103973. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103973
27. Del Río Castro G, González Fernández MC, Uruburu Colsa Á. Unleashing the convergence amid digitalization and sustainability towards pursuing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A holistic review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021; 280: 122204. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122204
28. Political Economy in Southern Africa. Political conflict and development in SADC. Available online: https://politicaleconomy.org.za/2019/01/political-conflict-and-development-in-sadc/ (accessed on 27 December 2023).
29. Aeby M. SADC—The Southern Arrested Development Community? Enduring Challenges to Peace and Security in Southern Africa. The Nordic Africa Institute; 2019.
30. Adebajo A, Nagar D, Paterson M, et al. Peacekeeping and peacebuilding: SADC’s evolving security architecture. In: Governance and security challenges in post-apartheid Southern Africa. Centre for Conflict Resolution; 2013. pp. 35-45.
31. Ufere N, Gaskin J, Perelli S, et al. Why is bribery pervasive among firms in sub-Saharan African countries? Multi-industry empirical evidence of organizational isomorphism. Journal of Business Research. 2020; 108: 92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.060
32. Alence R, Mattes R. Mineral Governance Barometer: Southern Africa. OSISA/South African Resource Watch; 2016.
33. Mbonigaba J, Tipoy CK, Awolusi OD. Mineral resources endowment and economic growth in Southern African countries. International Journal of Diplomacy and Economy. 2018; 4(1): 59. doi: 10.1504/ijdipe.2018.10012382
34. Meta. 2023 Sustainability Report. Available online: https://sustainability.fb.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Meta-2023-Sustainability-Report-1.pdf (accessed on 27 November 2023).
35. Thornton, G. Women in Business 2023: The push for parity. Available online: (https://www.grantthornton.global/en/insights/wib-2023/ (accessed on 19 December 2023
36. 5050 Women on Board. Gender Diversity Index Fourth Quarter 2022 Key Findings. Available online: https://www.5050WOB-2022-Q4-Infograohic-FINAL.pdf (accessed on 25 December 2023
37. World Economic Forum. Global Gender Gap Report 2023. Insight Report June 2023. Available online: https://www.WEF_GGGR_2023.pdf (weforum.org) (accessed on 27 December 2023).
38. Meta. 2023 Sustainability Report. Available online: https://sustainability.fb.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Meta-2023-Sustainability-Report-1.pdf (accessed on 27 November 2023).
39. Alize le R. SADC. Available online: https://futures.issafrica.org/geographic/recs/sadc (accessed on 3 December 2023).
40. Jauch H. Time to Turn the Tide Tackling Poverty, Inequality and Unemployment in Southern Africa. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Available online: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/08221.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2023).
41. Development Finance International, Norwegian Church Aid and Oxfam. The Crisis of Extreme Inequality in SADC Fighting Austerity and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Oxfam International; 2022.
42. Dasgupta P, Weale M. On measuring the quality of life. World Development. 1992; 20(1).
43. United States Department of State. Seychelles 2019 Human Rights Report: Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor. Available online: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/SEYCHELLES-2019-HUMAN-RIGHTS-REPORT.pdf (accessed on 8 December 2023).
44. Girls not brides. Available online: https://www.girlsnotbrides.org/ (accessed on 27 December 2023).
45. African Union. 2nd Men’s Conference on Positive Masculinity: Advancing actions and promoting positive masculinity to end violence against women and girls. Available online: https://au.in/en/newsevents/20221110/secon-men’s-conference-positive-masculinity (accessed on 30 November 2023).
46. Oxfam. Briefing Report, July 2019. Available online: https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/620837/bp-west-africa-inequality-crisis-090719-en.pdf (accessed on 21 October 2020).
47. UNDP. Human Development Report 2019, Inequalities in human development in the 21st century Briefing note for countries on the 2019 Human Development Report. Available online: http://hdr.undp. org/sites/all/themes/hdr_theme/country-notes/fr/SEN.pdf (accessed on 21 December 2020).
48. UNDP. Africa Human Development Report 2016: Accelerating Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Africa. Available online: https://hdr.undp.org/content/regional-human-development-report-2016-africa (accessed on 25 November 2023).
49. UNDP. The 2020 Human Development Report. UNDP; 2020.
50. Oxfam, Development Finance International. The commitment to reducing inequality index 2022. Available online: https://www.mn-cri-2022-mey-111022-en.pdf (accessed on 23 December 2023).
51. World Bank. Nigeria Overview. Press Release, 19 December 2023. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/nigeria/overview#:~:text=From percent202015 per cent2D2022 percent2C percent20however percent2C, as percent20the percent20COVID per cent2D19 percent20pandemic (accessed on 30 November 2023).
52. Ucha C. Poverty in Nigeria: Some Dimensions and Contributing Factors. U. Global Majority E-Journal. 2010; 1(1): 46-56.
53. Okunlola OC, Okafor IG. Conflict–Poverty Relationship in Africa: A Disaggregated Approach. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics. 2020; 34(1): 104-129. doi: 10.1177/0260107920935726
54. Justino P, Verwimp P. Poverty Dynamics, Violent Conflict, and Convergence in Rwanda. Review of Income and Wealth. 2012; 59(1): 66-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.2012.00528.x
55. USAID. Fact sheet, Sexual and Gender-Based Violence (GBV) in Mali. Available online http://www.usaid.gov/mali (accessed on 12 December 2023).
56. Addison T, Bach K, Shepard A, et al. Fragile states, conflict and chronic poverty Policy Brief, 24. Chronic Poverty Research Centre; 2010. Available online: http://www.chronicpoverty.org/uploads/publication_files/PB percent2024. Pdf (accessed on 29 November 2012).
57. Baddeley M. Civil War and Human Development: Impacts of Finance and Financial Infrastructure. Available online: https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/api/core/bitstreams/deb83d77-e4a6-461a-bd47-d6c8eed977fe/content (accessed on 1 April 2024).
58. Bannerji, H. Patriarchy in the Era of Neoliberalism: The Case of India. Social Scientist. 2016; 4(3/4): 3-27.
59. McGillivray M, Noorbakhsh F. Aid, Conflict and Human Development. World Institute for Development Economics Research, United Nations University; 2004.
60. International Rescue Committee. New sanctions risk plunging the people of Mali further into humanitarian crisis, warn 13 NGOs. Available online: https://www.rescue.org/press-release/new-sanctions-risk-plunging-people-mali-further-humanitarian-crisis-warn-13-ngos (accessed on 15 December 2023).
61. Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development. How Fragile Contexts Affect the Well-Being and Potential of Women and Girls, OECD Development Co-operation Directorate. OECD Publishing; 2022.
62. Forichon K. Considering Human Capital in a Multidimensional Analysis of Fragility. OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers 80. OECD Publishing; 2020.
63. Loudon S, Goemans C, Koester D. Gender Equality and Fragility. OECD Development Co-operation Working Paper s, No. 98. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2021.
64. Lwamba E, Shisler S, Ridlehoover W, et al. Strengthening women’s empowerment and gender equality in fragile contexts towards peaceful and inclusive societies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2022; 18(1): e1214. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1214
65. Final evaluation report of the Global Programme: Women, Peace and Security, assistance to women/girls affected by conflict and women’s participation in the peace-building process in Mali (French). Available online: https://docplayer.fr/207168019-Violences-basees-sur-le-genre-en-afrique-de-l-ouest-cas-du-senegal-du-mali-du-burkina-faso-et-du-niger.html (accessed on 18 December 2023).
66. USAID. Ending extreme poverty in fragile contexts—Getting to Zero: A USAID discussion series, January 28. Available online: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_ docs/pnaec864.pdf (accessed on 26 December 2023).
67. Annual statistical report of cases of gender-based violence reported in 2018, February 2019, Sous cluster VBG au Mali, UNFPA. Available online: https://reliefweb.int/report/central-african-republic/rapport-annuel-des-statistiques-de-vbg-janvier-d-cembre-2018-gbvims (accessed on 28 November 2023).
68. Trust Africa. Exploratory study on the prevention and elimination of gender-based violence in Mali: Bamako, Mopti and Koulikoro. Available online: https://media.africaportal.org/documents/etude_exploratoire_sur_la_prvention_et_llimination_zone_de_bamako_mopti_et_koulikoro.pdf (accessed on 20 October 2020).
69. Africa.unwomen. Le-mali-dit-stop-aux-violence-basees-sur-legenre-vbg. Africa.unwomen, 12 April 2018. Available online: https://africa.unwomen.org/en/news-and-events/stories/2018/04/le-mali-dit-stop-aux-violence-basees-sur-legenre-vbg (accessed on 1 August 2020).
70. Institut National de la Statistique (INSTAT) and ICF. 2018 Mali Demographic and Health Survey Key Findings. Rockville, Maryland, USA. INSTAT and ICF; 2019
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Dudziro Nhengu
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Prof. Kittisak Jermsittiparsert
University of City Island, Cyprus
Processing Speed
-
-
-
- ＜5 days from submission to initial review decision;
- 62% acceptance rate
-
-
