Planned versus instinctive behaviour: The connection between personality and food waste

Stefan Mann

Article ID: 2404
Vol 2, Issue 2, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ssd.v2i2.2404
VIEWS - 144 (Abstract)

Download PDF

Abstract

Personality may influence food waste through planned as well as instinctive behaviour. Considerable attention has been devoted to planned behaviour because instincts are difficult to measure using attitudes, behaviours, and intentions. Our study intends to include the instinctive side of behaviour. We used a survey of 339 Swiss households regarding the amount of food waste generated to explore the pathways of how personality influences food waste behaviour. A regression analysis showed that agreeableness and conscientiousness are negative predictors of the amount of food waste. However, the different behaviour of conscientious consumers can be explained by an intermediate variable, whereas the different behaviour of agreeable people can’t. This lack of link can be due either to missing suitable intermediate variables or to the role of instinctive behaviour.

Keywords

personality; food waste; Switzerland; instincts; behaviour; survey


References

1. Muller A, Schader C, El-Hage Scialabba N, et al. Strategies for feeding the world more sustainably with organic agriculture. Nature Communications. 2017, 8(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01410-w

2. Boulet M, Hoek AC, Raven R. Towards a multi-level framework of household food waste and consumer behaviour: Untangling spaghetti soup. Appetite. 2021, 156: 104856. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104856

3. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991, 50(2): 179-211. doi: 101016/0749-59789190020-T

4. Riverso R, Amato M, La Barbera F. The effect of food waste habit on future intention to reduce household food waste. Quality-Access to Success. 2017, 18(S2): 369-375.

5. Graham-Rowe E, Jessop DC, Sparks P. Predicting household food waste reduction using an extended theory of planned behaviour. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2015, 101: 194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.020

6. Tahira B, Saif N, Haroon M, et al. Relationship between big five personality model and abusive supervision. Abasyn Journal of Social Sciences. 2019, 12(2). doi: 10.34091/ajss.12.2.05

7. Dominguez-Lara S, Prada-Chapoñan R, Moreta-Herrera R. Gender differences in the influence of personality on academic procrastination in Peruvian university students (Spanish). Acta Colombiana de Psicología. 2019, 22(2): 125-136. doi: 10.14718/acp.2019.22.2.7

8. Roos JM, Sprei F, Holmberg U. Traits and Transports: The Effects of Personality on the Choice of Urban Transport Modes. Applied Sciences. 2022, 12(3): 1467. doi: 10.3390/app12031467

9. Hakulinen C, Jokela M. Personality as determinant of smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and diet preferences. In: Johansen C (editor). Personality and Disease: Scientific Proof Vs. Wishful Thinking. Elsevier Inc; 2018. pp. 33-48. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-805300-3.00003-7

10. Elwert F. Graphical causal models. In: Morgan SL (editor). Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research. Springer; 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6094-3_13

11. Cooper CA, Golden L, Socha A. The Big Five personality factors and mass politics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2013, 43(1): 68-82.

12. Cooper ML, Agocha VB, Sheldon MS. A Motivational Perspective on Risky Behaviors: The Role of Personality and Affect Regulatory Processes. Journal of Personality. 2000, 68(6): 1059-1088. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00126

13. Andersen JA. Leadership, personality and effectiveness. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 2006, 35(6): 1078-1091. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.066

14. Van der Schiff KA. Personality-Based Surveillance Model for Facebook Apps. Rhodes University Press; 2019.

15. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991, 50(2): 179-211.

16. Bosnjak M, Ajzen I, Schmidt P. The theory of planned behavior: Selected recent advances and applications. Europe’s Journal of Psychology. 2020, 16(3): 352-356. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v16i3.3107

17. Hardison D. From Instinct to Identity. Routledge; 2009.

18. De Raad B, Doddema-Winsemius M. Instincts and personality. Personality and Individual Differences. 1999, 27(2): 293-305.

19. Piechurska-Kuciel E. Personality: Definitions, approaches, and theories. In: Piechurska-Kuciel E (editor). The Big Five in SLA. Springer; 2020.

20. Sun R, Wilson N. Roles of implicit processes: instinct, intuition, and personality. Mind & Society. 2013, 13(1): 109-134. doi: 10.1007/s11299-013-0134-4

21. Burt C. Is the doctrine of instincts dead? A symposium. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1942, 12(1): 1-9. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1943.tb02714.x

22. Winston R. Human Instinct. Random House; 2011.

23. Faye J. The Biological and Social Dimensions of Human Knowledge. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2023. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-39137-8

24. Pirson M. A Humanistic Perspective for Management Theory: Protecting Dignity and Promoting Well-Being. Journal of Business Ethics. 2017, 159(1): 39-57. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3755-4

25. Abdelradi F. Food waste behaviour at the household level: A conceptual framework. Waste Management. 2018, 71: 485-493. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.10.001

26. Altintzoglou T, Honkanen P, Whitaker RD. Influence of the involvement in food waste reduction on attitudes towards sustainable products containing seafood by-products. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021, 285: 125487. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125487

27. Kutlu MB. A Trait-Based Consumer Segmentation for Food Waste Reduction Campaigns. Social Marketing Quarterly. 2022, 28(2): 130-146. doi: 10.1177/15245004221097752

28. Jamaludin H, Mohamed B, Noorashid NA. Food waste motivational factors: The theory of planned behavior and the role of Big-Five personality traits on Malaysians Generation Z. Global Business and Management Research. 2020, 12(4): 73-89.

29. Roccas S, Sagiv L, Schwartz SH, et al. The Big Five Personality Factors and Personal Values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2002, 28(6): 789-801. doi: 10.1177/0146167202289008

30. Lissitsa S, Kol O. Four generational cohorts and hedonic m-shopping: association between personality traits and purchase intention. Electronic Commerce Research. 2019, 21(2): 545-570. doi: 10.1007/s10660-019-09381-4

31. Zhao H, Seibert SE, Lumpkin GT. The relationship of personality to entrepreneurial intentions and performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management. 2009, 36(2). doi: 101177/0149206309335187

32. Galily D. An Evolutionary Approach to the Research of Speculative Historiosophy and Its Possible Influences on the Research of the Social Sciences and Humanities. Open Journal for Anthropological Studies. 2022, 6(1): 11-14. doi: 10.32591/coas.ojas.0601.02011g

33. Armansyah RF. Herd instinct biases, emotional bias, and information processing biases in investment decisions. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan. 2022, 24(2): 105-117. doi: 10.9744/jmk.24.2.105-117

34. Ball KH. So Powerful a Form: Rethinking Girl’s Sexuality. Emory University Press; 2014.

35. Pocuca N. The Legacy of Carl Gustav Jung: Popular Distortions and Suppressions of Analytical Psychology [PhD thesis]. Filozofski fakultet u Zagrebu; 2019.

36. Rammstedt B, Kemper CJ, Klein MC, et al. A short scale to measure the five dimensions of personality: Big-five-inventory-10 BFI-10 (German). Available online: https://nbn-resolvingorg/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-312133 (accessed on 2 June 2023).

37. Elhoushy S, Jang S (Shawn). Religiosity and food waste reduction intentions: A conceptual model. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2020, 45(2): 287-302. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12624

38. Elshaer I, Sobaih AEE, Alyahya M, et al. The Impact of Religiosity and Food Consumption Culture on Food Waste Intention in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability. 2021, 13(11): 6473. doi: 10.3390/su13116473

39. Lin B, Guan C. Determinants of household food waste reduction intention in China: The role of perceived government control. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021, 299: 113577. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113577

40. Qian L, Li F, Cao B, et al. Determinants of food waste generation in Chinese university canteens: Evidence from 9192 university students. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2021, 167: 105410. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105410

41. Hebrok M, Boks C. Household food waste: Drivers and potential intervention points for design – An extensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017, 151: 380-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.069

42. Janssens K, Lambrechts W, van Osch A, Semeijn J. How Consumer Behavior in Daily Food Provisioning Affects Food Waste at Household Level in the Netherlands. Foods. 2019, 8(10): 428. doi: 10.3390/foods8100428

43. Baker D, Fear J, Denniss R. What a waste: an analysis of household expenditure on food. The Australia Institute; 2009.

44. Mattar L, Abiad MG, Chalak A, et al. Attitudes and behaviors shaping household food waste generation: Lessons from Lebanon. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018, 198: 1219-1223. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.085

45. Ilakovac B, Voca N, Pezo L, et al. Quantification and determination of household food waste and its relation to sociodemographic characteristics in Croatia. Waste Management. 2020, 102: 231-240. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.042

46. Di Talia E, Simeone M, Scarpato D. Consumer behaviour types in household food waste. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019, 214: 166-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.216

47. Bilska B, Tomaszewska M, Kołożyn-Krajewska D. Analysis of the Behaviors of Polish Consumers in Relation to Food Waste. Sustainability. 2019, 12(1): 304. doi: 10.3390/su12010304

48. Herzberg R, Schmidt TG, Schneider F. Characteristics and Determinants of Domestic Food Waste: A Representative Diary Study across Germany. Sustainability. 2020, 12(11): 4702. doi: 10.3390/su12114702

49. dos Santos JIAS, da Silveira DS, da Costa MF, et al. Consumer behaviour in relation to food waste: a systematic literature review. British Food Journal. 2022, 124(12): 4420-4439. doi: 10.1108/bfj-09-2021-1075

50. Borg K, Boulet M, Karunasena G, et al. Segmenting households based on food waste behaviours and waste audit outcomes: Introducing Over Providers, Under Planners and Considerate Planners. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022, 351: 131589. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131589

51. Ghinea C, Ghiuta OA. Household food waste generation: young consumers behaviour, habits and attitudes. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2018, 16(5): 2185-2200. doi: 10.1007/s13762-018-1853-1

52. Cronje N, van der Merwe I, Müller IM. Household food waste: A case study in Kimberley, South Africa. Journal of Consumer Sciences. 2018, 46: 1-9.

53. Stancu V, Haugaard P, Lähteenmäki L. Determinants of consumer food waste behaviour: Two routes to food waste. Appetite. 2016, 96: 7-17. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.08.025

54. Ananda J, Karunasena GG, Mitsis A, et al. Analysing behavioural and socio-demographic factors and practices influencing Australian household food waste. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021, 306: 127280. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127280

55. Doron N. A clear plate means a clear conscience. In: Doron N (editor). Revaluing food, Fabian Society; 2012.

56. Robinson E, Hardman CA. Empty plates and larger waists: a cross-sectional study of factors associated with plate clearing habits and body weight. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2015, 70(6): 750-752. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.218

57. Fink A. How to Conduct Surveys—A Step by Step Guide. Thousand Oaks SAGE; 2015.

58. Graziano WG, Tobin RM. Agreeableness in MR Leary, RH Hoyle: Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior. The Guilford Press; 2009.

59. Dambeck JH. Lectures on aesthetics (German). In: Joseph A (editor). Enders; 1822.

60. McCormick TC. A point of view on instincts in social psychology. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1931, 26(1): 102-105. doi: 10.1037/h0074848

61. Graziano WG, Habashi MM, Sheese BE, et al. Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person × situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007, 93(4): 583-599. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.583

62. Wang JM, Hartl AC, Laursen B, et al. The high costs of low agreeableness: Low agreeableness exacerbates interpersonal consequences of rejection sensitivity in U.S. and Chinese adolescents. Journal of Research in Personality. 2017, 67: 36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.02.005

63. Tackett JL, Hernandez MM, Eisenberg N. Agreeableness. In: Adams DP, Shiner RL, Tackett JL (editor). Handbook of Personality Development. The Guilford Press; 2019.

64. Roberts BW, Lejuez C, Krueger RF, et al. What is conscientiousness and how can it be assessed? Developmental Psychology. 2014, 50(5): 1315-1330. doi: 10.1037/a0031109

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Stefan Mann

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).