Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.
Gamification as a means to improve teaching/learning process
Vol 1, Issue 2, 2023
VIEWS - 5325 (Abstract)
Download PDF
Abstract
Teacher training, particularly in-service training, is among the factors that can influence the success or failure of the teaching and learning process. Among the necessary skills that teachers must have and transmit to their students are life skills, i.e., a set of social, cognitive, and personal skills that can be learned, developed, and made transversal in every area of one’s life and in every learning context. Through ‘Learning through Play’, it is possible to develop social and cognitive skills, mature emotionally, and gain the self-confidence needed to engage in new experiences and face everyday challenges. From this perspective, gamification can be a useful means and added value for teachers to train, engage, and motivate students.
Keywords
References
1. Cronin L, Maher A, Greenfield R. A qualitative investigation of teachers’ perspectives on life skills development in physical education. In: Proceedings of British Psychological Society—Division of Sport & Exercise Psychology Conference; November 2021; Liverpool, UK.
2. Cera R. Pedagogy of Play and Learning. Reflections on the Educational Dimension of the Game (Italian). Franco Angeli; 2009.
3. Nasheeda A, Binti Abdullah H, Krauss SE, Ahmed NB. A narrative systematic review of life skills education: Effectiveness, research gaps and priorities. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth 2019; 24(3): 362–379. doi: 10.1080/02673843.2018.1479278
4. Marmocchi P, Dall’Aglio C, Zannini M. Educate Life Skills. How to Promote Psycho-social and Affective Skills According to the World Health Organization (Italian). Erickson; 2004.
5. Fitzpatrick K. Physical education: A reflection on subject status, the critical, and the wellbeing agenda. Sport, Education and Society 2022; 28(8): 1–14. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2022.2077718
6. Bozkurt A, Durak G. A systematic review of gamification research: In pursuit of homo Ludens. International Journal of Game-Based Learning 2018; 8(3): 1–19. doi: 10.4018/IJGBL.2018070102
7. Danish SJ, Fazio RJ, Nellen VC, Owens SS. Teaching life skills through sport: Community-based programs to enhance adolescent development. In: Van Raalte JL, Brewer BW (editors). Exploring Sport and Exercise Psychology. American Psychological Association; 1996. pp. 269–288.
8. Alvesson M. The Triumph of Emptiness: Consumption, Higher Education, and Work Organization. OUP Oxford; 2013.
9. World Health Organization. Bollettino “Skills for Life”. WHO; 1992.
10. World Health Organization. Division of Mental Health and Prevention of Substance Abuse. Life Skills Education in Schools. Programme on Mental Health; 1993.
11. Malaguti E. Rethinking Inclusive Practices and Helping Relationships from the Perspective of Resilience (Italian). Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica; 2010.
12. Rubio CM. Effective teachers—Professional and personal skills. ENSAYOS. Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete 2009; 24: 35–46.
13. Ciraci AM, Isidori MV. Inclusive teachers: An empirical investigation into the specialist training of support teachers (Italian). Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies 2017; 16: 207–234. doi: 10.7358/ecps-2017-016-cira
14. Biasi V, Caggiano V, Ciraci AM. Soft Skills of teachers: Towards a new field of research and training in Italian secondary schools (Italian). Formazione & Insegnamento. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Dell’educazione e Della Formazione 2019; 17(3): 92–103. doi: 10.7346/-feiXVII-03-19_07
15. Gobbo F. Language games children play: Language invention in a Montessori primary school. In: Brunn SD, Kehrein R (editors). Handbook of the Changing World Language Map. Springer; 2020. pp. 3475–3488.
16. Ianes D, Cramerotti S. Pupils with BES—Special Educational Needs (Italian). Centro Studi Erikson; 2013.
17. Wilson OWA, Whatman C, Walters S, et al. The value of sport: Wellbeing benefits of sport participation during adolescence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022; 19(14): 8579. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148579
18. Ianes D. The Special Normality. Integration and Inclusion Strategies for Disabilities and Special Educational Needs (Italian). Centro Studi Erikson; 2006.
19. Lillard AS. Playful learning and Montessori education. The Namta Journal 2013; 38(2): 137–174.
20. Kendellen K, Camiré M. Applying in life the skills learned in sport: A grounded theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2019; 40: 23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.09.002
21. Val Martín PD, Sebastiani Obrador EM, Blázquez Sánchez D. What is quality and how is it measured in Physical Education? A literature review. Scientific Journal of School Sport, Physical Education and Psychomotricity 2021; 7(2): 300–320. doi: 10.17979/sportis.2021.7.2.7181
22. Mora F. Neuroeducation (Spanish). Alianza Editorial; 2013.
23. Arufe Giráldez V, Navarro-Patón R. Creation of a gamified learning environment inspired by the paper house (Spanish). In: Morente Oria H, González Fernández FT, Sánchez Fernández AS (editors). Metodologías Activas en la Práctica de la Educación Física. Ediciones Morata; 2020. pp. 65–83.
24. Chiva-Bartoll O, Fernández-Rio J. Advocating for Service-Learning as a pedagogical model in Physical Education: Towards an activist and transformative approach. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 2022; 27(5): 545–558. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2021.1911981
25. Hastie PA, Casey A. Fidelity in models-based practice research in sport pedagogy: A guide for future investigations. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 2014; 33(3): 422–431. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.2013-0141
26. Lindgren R, Barker D. Implementing the Movement-oriented Practising Model (MPM) in physical education: Empirical findings focusing on student learning. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 2019; 24(5): 534–547. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2019.1635106
27. Manzano D, Valero-Valenzuela A. The personal and social responsibility model (TPSR) in the different subjects of primary education and its impact on responsibility, autonomy, motivation, self-concept and social climate. Journal of Sport and Health Research 2019; 11: 273–288.
28. Fernandez-Rio J, de las Heras E, González T, et al. Gamification and physical education. Viability and preliminary views from students and teachers. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 2020; 25(5): 509–524. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2020.1743253
29. Lamoneda Prieto J, González-Víllora S, Fernández-Río FJ. Hybridizing cooperative learning, adventure education and gamification through the orientation career (Spanish). Retos 2020; 38: 754–760. doi: 10.47197/retos.v38i38.77276
30. Sailer M, Homner L. The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review 2020; 32: 77–112. doi: 10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w
31. Griffin LL. Teaching Games for Understanding: Theory, Research and Practice. Human Kinetics; 2005.
32. Sardi L, Idri A, Fernandez-Aleman JL. A systematic review of gamification in e-Health. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2017; 71: 31–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.05.011
33. Ioannou A. A model of gameful design for learning using interactive tabletops: Enactment and evaluation in the socio-emotional education classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development 2019; 67: 277–302. doi: 10.1007/s11423-018-9610-1
34. Sani Y, Wardany OF, Herlina H, Vernanda G. The implementation of embodied learning: A literature review. Edukasi 2021; 15(1): 8–18. doi: 10.15294/edukasi.v15i1.30008
35. Trinidad M, Ruiz M, Calderon A. A bibliometric analysis of gamification research. IEEE Access 2021; 9: 46505–46544. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3063986
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Fabio Scamardella, Emma Saraiello, Francesco Tafuri
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Prof. Kittisak Jermsittiparsert
University of City Island, Cyprus
Processing Speed
-
-
-
- ＜5 days from submission to initial review decision;
- 62% acceptance rate
-
-
