Technology to support sustainable education in physical education

Francesco Tafuri, Emma Saraiello, Mattia Caterina Maietta

Article ID: 2194
Vol 1, Issue 1, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ssd.v1i1.2194
VIEWS - 5196 (Abstract)

Download PDF

Abstract

Sustainable Development is an action programme of the European Agenda 2030 to protect people, planet and prosperity, this programme was signed by the governments of the member countries of the United Nations Organization in September 2015. All European countries recognize the importance of Education and Physical Education and how, as a consequence, schools can implement the goals of sustainable development using the various tools of increasingly digital and technological education. The paper proposes an examination of the literature and some of the technological tools known to date aimed at the didactic support of physical education aimed at the promotion of sustainable development. In addition, the work is enriched with an analysis of the current situation with an interview, administered through the Google Forms tool, addressed to Physical Education teachers working throughout Italy.


Keywords

sustainable development; physical education; e-learning


References

1. United Nations. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (accessed on 8 June 2023).

2. Elfert M. Lifelong learning in Sustainable Development Goal 4: What does it mean for UNESCO’s rights-based approach to adult learning and education? International Review of Education 2019; 65(4): 537–556. doi: 10.1007/s11159-019-09788-z

3. Colglazier W. Sustainable development agenda: 2030. Science 2015; 349(6252): 1048–1050. doi: 10.1126/science.aad2333

4. Azoulay A, Kapferer JN. Do brand personality scales really measure brand personality? Journal of Brand Management 2003; 11(2): 143–155. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540162

5. McLuhan M. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Signet Book; 1964.

6. Bochicchio F. Education and values (Italian). In: Mandacanu V, Scheau I, Opris D (editors). Eucatia din Perspectiva Valorilor. Cluj Napoca: Eikon; 2012.

7. Piromallo Gambardella A. La scuola al bivio tra cultura istituzionale e cultura veicolata dai media. Construction and appropriation of knowledge in new technological scenarios (Italian). CUEN; 1999. Available online: https://www.miur.gov.it/-/la-scuola-del-futuro (accessed on 26 July 2023).

8. Rivoltella PC. Constructivism and Pragmatics of Online Communication, Sociality, and Internet Education (Italian). Erickson; 2003.

9. Todini B. Parallelism between Socratic teaching and e-learning (Italian). Studi sulla Formazione 2015; 8(1): 187–202. doi: 10.13128/Studi_Formaz-17339

10. MIUR. Law 107/2015 “Reform of the National Education and Training System and delegation for the reorganization of current legislative provisions”. MIUR; 2015.

11. MIUR. Decree 851/2017 “Criteria and parameters for direct allocation to educational institutions, as well as for the determination of national measures relating to the school education mission, from the Fund for the operation of educational institutions”. MIUR, 2017

12. Rondonotti M, Triacca S. Designing the digital curriculum with situated learning episodes: A proposal for the secondary school (Italian). In: Apprendere con le tecnologie tra presenza e distanza. Editrice Morcelliana; 2022. pp. 117–120.

13. Sánchez UM, Mazzer M, Pagliara SM, De Anna L. Support Teacher Training on ICT. Analysis of Multimedia Products from the Specialization Course for Support Activities (Italian). Pensa MultiMedia Editore; 2017.

14. Commissione Europea. Europe 2020: The European Strategy for Growth (Italian). Unione Europea; 2015.

15. Commissione Europea. Key Competencies for Lifelong Learning (Italian). Ufficio delle pubblicazioni ufficiali delle Comunità europee; 2007.

16. Fullan M. The New Meanings of Change in Education (Spanish). Octaedro; 2002.

17. Hargreaves A. The emotional politics of teaching and teacher development: With applications of educational leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education 1998; 1(4): 315–336. doi: 10.1080/1360312980010401

18. Bourdieu P. Choses dites. Minuit, 1987.

19. Gros B. How technology cannot be integrated into the school unless... change the school (Italian). Jornada Espiral 2004; 4: 202009–202010.

20. Pedró F. Technology and school: What works and why. Basic document (Spanish). Grupo Santillana; 2011.

21. Bonaiuti G, Calvani G, Ranieri, M. Fundamentals of Didactics: Theory and Practice of Training Devices (Italian). Carocci; 2016.

22. Kitagawa F, Oba J. Managing differentiation of higher education system in Japan: Connecting excellence and diversity. Higher Education 2010; 59(4): 507–524. doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9262-5

23. OECD. PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing; 2019.

24. Gui M. The educational use of ICT. In: Cavalli A, Argentini G (editors). Gli Insegnanti Italiani: Come Cambia il Modo di Fare Scuola. Terza Indagine Dell'istituto IARD Sulle Condizioni di Vita e di Lavoro nella Scuola Italiana. Il Mulino; 2010.

25. Manca S, Sarti L. Virtual learning communities and new technologies (Italian). Italian Journal of Educational Technology 2002; 10(1): 11.

26. OECD. OECD Skills Strategy-Report Summary: Italy (Italian). OECD Publishing; 2017.

27. Bruner JS. Act of Meaning. Harvard University Press; 1990.

28. Jonassen DH, Howland JL, Marra RM, Crismond DP. Meaningful Learning with Technology. Merrill/Prentice Hall; 2007.

29. Jonassen DH, Land SL. Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.

30. Jonassen DH, Peck KL, Wilson BG. Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective. Merrill/Prentice Hall; 1999.

31. Maragliano R, Vertecchi B. Educational practice. From program to programming (Italian). In: Visalbergi A (editor). Pedagogia e Scienze Dell'educazione. Mondadori; 1978.

32. Jonassen DH. Computers in the Classroom: Mindtools for Critical Thinking. Merrill/Prentice Hall; 1994.

33. Scardamalia M, Bereiter C. Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of Learning Sciences 1994; 3(3): 265–283. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3

34. Bransford JD, Vye N, Kinzer C, Risko V. Teaching thinking and content knowledge: Toward an integrated approach. In: Jones BF, Idol L (editors). Dimensions of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher; 1990. pp. 381–414.

35. Wenger E. Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity (Italian). Cortina; 2006.

36. Cacciamani S. Learning by Cooperating. From Cooperative Learning to Research Communities (Italian). Carocci; 2008.

37. Gardner H. Educating for Understanding. Childhood Stereotypes and School Learning (Italian). Feltrinelli; 2002.

38. Morin E. Introduction to Complex Thinking (Italian). Sperling & Kupfer; 1993.

39. Morin E. The Well-Made Head. Teaching Reform and Thinking Reform (Italian). Raffaello Cortina Editore; 2000.

40. Munafò C. Information technology in physical education (Italian). Educare.it 2020; 20(1): 5–10.

41. García Hoz V. Personalized Education (Italian). La scuola; 2005.

42. Mango P, Sgrò F, Pignato S, et al. Performance analysis as a tool to support the teaching didactic. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2010; 9: 194–197. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.135

43. McLuhan M. The Tools of Communication (Italian). Il saggiatore; 1967.

44. Prensky M. Don’t Bother Me Mom—I’m Learning!: How Computer And Video Games Are Preparing Your Kids for Twenty-First Century Success—And How You Can Help! Paragon House Publishers; 2003.

45. MIUR. Decree 5669/2011 “Right to study of pupils and students diagnosed with Specific Learning Disorder”. MIUR; 2011.

46. Prensky DM. Interorganizational Structure and Organizational Participation in a National Policy Domain [PhD thesis]. The University of Chicago; 1987.

47. Rivoltella PC. Connected kids. Italian Preadolescents and New Media (Italian). Save the Children; 2008.

48. UNESCO. Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. UNESCO; 2017.

49. Dewey J. Experience and Education. The McMillan Company; 1938.

50. Dewey J. Child and the Curriculum. University of Chicago Press; 1902.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Francesco Tafuri, Emma Saraiello, Mattia Caterina Maietta

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).