Hydrogen-Rich Water for the Treatment of Experimental Peri-Implantitis

Yiwei Zhao, Ziliang Zhou, Simin Li, Gerhard Schmalz, Lu He, Chenchen Sun, Yanyan Yang, Rui Zhao, Junmei Wang, Shiyao Liu, Yu Zhang, Jie Xiong

Article ID: 7719
Vol 37, Issue 12, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23812/j.biol.regul.homeost.agents.20233712.663
Received: 8 January 2024; Accepted: 8 January 2024; Available online: 8 January 2024; Issue release: 8 January 2024

Abstract

Background: Due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, hydrogen-rich water has been used to reduce inflammatory responses in many inflammatory diseases. However, its efficacy in treating peri-implantitis remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of hydrogen-rich water in reducing inflammatory responses in experimental peri-implantitis. Methods: A ligature-induced experimental peri-implantitis model was established using three Beagle dogs (n = 24 implants). The implants were divided into two groups: a hydrogen-rich water-treated group (n = 12 implants), and a non-treated control group (n = 12 implants). The clinical indices, including the gingival index (GI), modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI), and probing depth (PD), were examined. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was used to assess the inflammatory cell infiltrate in the peri-implant tissue. Additionally, three host-derived pro-inflammatory cytokines, interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) were assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Furthermore, microbial community profiles were analyzed using high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technology. Results: In terms of the GI, the differences between the control and treated groups at 0, 2, and 4 weeks were not statistically significant (all p > 0.05). However, the GI value in the treated group at 6 weeks was significantly lower than that in the control group (p = 0.005). As for the PD, the differences between the control and treated groups at 0, 2, 4, and 6 weeks were not statistically significant (all p > 0.05). Regarding the mSBI, the difference between the control and treated groups at 0 week was not statistically significant (all p > 0.05), while the mSBI value in the treated group at 2, 4, and 6 weeks was significantly lower than that in the control group (p = 0.008, p = 0.005, p = 0.001). Compared to the non-treated group, the hydrogen-rich water-treated group showed a significantly lower number of inflammatory cells, lower pro-inflammatory cytokines, IL-1, IL-6, and MMP-8 levels (p < 0.05). Additionally, there was a significantly decreased relative abundance of pathogenic bacterial species including Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Fusibacter, and Fretibacterium (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The use of hydrogen-rich water for treating peri-implantitis showed promise and effectiveness within the scope of this study.


Keywords

peri-implantitis;hydrogen-rich water;Beagle dog;high-throughput sequencing;bioinformatics


References

Supporting Agencies



Copyright (c) 2023 Yiwei Zhao, Ziliang Zhou, Simin Li, Gerhard Schmalz, Lu He, Chenchen Sun, Yanyan Yang, Rui Zhao, Junmei Wang, Shiyao Liu, Yu Zhang, Jie Xiong




This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).