Donor human milk versus mothers own milk in preterm VLBWIs: a case control study

F Giuliani, G Prandi, A Coscia, F Cresi, P Di Nicola, M Raia, G Sabatino, L Occhi, E Bertino

Article ID: 6861
Vol 26, Issue 3S1, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/jbrha6861
Received: 9 October 2012; Accepted: 9 October 2012; Available online: 9 October 2012; Issue release: 9 October 2012

Abstract

As for term infants, over the past decades there has been increasing evidence of the benefits of human milk in the feeding of Very Low Birth Weight Infants (VLBWI), influencing not only short-term health outcomes but also long-term neurodevelopmental, metabolic outcomes, and growth. Mothers own milk is the first choice for all neonates including preterm infants, when it is unavailable or in short supply, pasteurized donor breast milk offers a safe alternative and is considered the next best choice. The main aim of this case-control retrospective analysis was to evaluate short term advantages of mothers own milk as a sole diet compared to donor milk as a sole diet, in terms of growth, antiinfectious properties, feeding tolerance, NEC and ROP prevention in a population of VLBWI born in a tertiary center. We did not find significant differences in clinical outcome from mothers own milk compared with pasteurized donor milk. Only a slight and statistically not significant difference in growth could be observed, in favour of maternal milk. We conclude that the maximum effort should always be put in supporting and promoting breastfeeding and donor milk used not only as an alternative to mothers milk but also as a breastfeeding promotion and support strategy.


Keywords

donor milk;very low birth weight infant;mothers milk


References

Supporting Agencies



Copyright (c) 2012 F Giuliani, G Prandi, A Coscia, F Cresi, P Di Nicola, M Raia, G Sabatino, L Occhi, E Bertino




This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).