
Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.

Influence of implant scanbody material and operator on scanning fluency and polygonal mesh numbers of digital impression: an in vitro study
Vol 33, Issue 6S2, 2019
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of implant scanbody (ISB) material and operator on scanning fluency and polygonal mesh numbers of a confocal microscopy intraoral scanning (IOS). An edentulous maxillary master model with 6 implant analogues was assembled. Thereafter 3 ISBs featured with same geometry but different materials (polyetheretherketone (PK), titanium (T) and PK with a titanium base (PKT)) were produce and scanned according to a randomized sequence by three different operators. The confocal microscopy IOS resulted in 45 STL test files that were processed to a dedicate software to obtain the request data. The overall analysis of fluency (imm/sec) showed the following results: mean 11.997 imm/sec, SD 2.355. The multivariate analysis showed statistical significance of material (p< .0001) and operator (p< .0001) influence. The univariate analysis referred to polygonal mesh numbers expressed the following results: mean 30327.8, SD 2432.5. The multivariate analysis stressed how there is a related effect to materials (p< .0001) and operator (p=0.0205). PKT represented the material with the best results for both. Analyzing the overall distribution histogram for scanning fluency, the IOS device seems to work with higher frequency at level of 13 imm/sec. The distribution of the measurements in the reference histograms showed an effect related to both variables referring to scanning fluency as well as to polygonal mesh numbers. Operator can be considered as a random effect; regarding the materials, the difference between PKT and PK can be related to the different base material. The dissimilar optical properties of T justify the different behavior.
Keywords
References
Supporting Agencies
Copyright (c) 2019 L. Arcuri, F. Lio, A. Papa, A. Nardi, A. Barlattani Jr
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Medical Genetics, University of Torino Medical School, Italy

Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Italy