Patients perception of intraoral scanning: a comparison between traditional and digital dental impression

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to assess the discomfort perceived by the patient during the intraoral scan procedure using the iTero Scanner. A sample of 33 patients was selected on the basis of parameters that identify a complete dentition. All treated patients underwent a traditional polyvinylsiloxane impression with double procedure and an intraoral scan in the same session. Subsequently they were given a questionnaire concerning the discomfort perceived by both procedures. Once the completed questionnaires were obtained, preliminary statistical tests were carried out to check if the distribution of scores assigned by patients to the two procedures differed significantly from a Gaussian distribution. Furthermore, the discomfort/preference indexes for the two procedures were compared using the Wilcoxon test for paired data. Finally, the Spearman correlation test was used. From the results of the preliminary normality tests, it was decided to use nonparametric type tests that gives the intraoral scan procedure more favorable scores relative to a minor discomfort. The use of intraoral scanning and more specifically of the iTero 2.9 scanner (despite a not small wand), represents an option largely preferred by patients in terms of reduction of discomfort and classic discomfort related to relief systems traditional imprint.